Hi Georges
Thanks for uploading my proposed NMU. As reported there I then waited
for comments.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:40:44PM +0200, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> If it is still possible, please do accept the NMU for mootools, which
> makes it buildable in wheezy, then please undo removals for p
On 12-08-01 at 11:53am, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:48 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > So thanks for pointing out node-colors and node-skin-test - I'll
> > correct those. You are quite welcome to help run through the
> > remaining ones too - and also
had been necessary to package wims
and to make it installable on every architecture.
Here is the part of the page
http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau which is related to
this issue:
--8<-----
# 20120720; done 20120801
# build-dep on node-
Your message dated Wed, 01 Aug 2012 19:32:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#682265: fixed in mootools 1.4.5~debian1-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #682265,
regarding mootools: build-depends on node-uglify, not in wheezy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Accepted:
libjs-mootools_1.4.5~debian1-2.1_all.deb
to main/m/mootools/libjs-mootools_1.4.5~debian1-2.1_all.deb
mootools_1.4.5~debian1-2.1.debian.tar.gz
to main/m/mootools/mootools_1.4.5~debian1-2.1.debian.tar.gz
mootools_1.4.5~debian1-2.1.dsc
to main/m/mootools/mootools_1.4.5~debian1-2.1.d
mootools_1.4.5~debian1-2.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mootools_1.4.5~debian1-2.1.dsc
mootools_1.4.5~debian1-2.1.debian.tar.gz
libjs-mootools_1.4.5~debian1-2.1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Hi!
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 11:53 -0300, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:48 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > So thanks for pointing out node-colors and node-skin-test - I'll correct
> > those. You are quite welcome to help run through the remaining ones too
FYI: The status of the mootools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.4.5~debian1-2
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/jcristau>
# 20120720; done 20120801
# build-dep on node-uglify
Hi Jonas,
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:48 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> So thanks for pointing out node-colors and node-skin-test - I'll correct
> those. You are quite welcome to help run through the remaining ones too
> - and also to cross-check via different methods than (build-)depends if
>
Accepted:
libnode-uglify_1.2.6-3_all.deb
to main/u/uglifyjs/libnode-uglify_1.2.6-3_all.deb
node-uglify_1.2.6-3_all.deb
to main/u/uglifyjs/node-uglify_1.2.6-3_all.deb
uglifyjs_1.2.6-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/u/uglifyjs/uglifyjs_1.2.6-3.debian.tar.gz
uglifyjs_1.2.6-3.dsc
to main/u/uglifyjs/u
uglifyjs_1.2.6-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
uglifyjs_1.2.6-3.dsc
uglifyjs_1.2.6-3.debian.tar.gz
node-uglify_1.2.6-3_all.deb
libnode-uglify_1.2.6-3_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
__
On 12-07-31 at 09:06pm, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote:
> Thanks for the great work against nodejs package! =D
>
> I have some questions. Why both node-colors and node-skin-test
> were added to the nodejs Breaks list? These packages do not
> reference /usr/bin/node.
I compiled this initial list based
Hi,
Jonas worked on transitioning the nodejs package, following
tech-ctte decision [1].
* nodejs 0.6.19~dfsg1-3 version has a list of Breaks relations
that is not accurate : please help fixing it.
* some packages do not depend at all on /usr/bin/node, please
notify us (or better, edit directl
13 matches
Mail list logo
