[Pkg-javascript-devel] libjs-soundmanager2 in Debian [Was: Bug#816664: Useless in Debian]

2016-12-23 Thread David Prévot
Hi Balint,

Le 23/12/2016 à 13:41, Balint Reczey a écrit :

> Please keep the package in Debian for at least Stretch.
>
> Kodi upstream recently switched to a new web interface which uses
> soundmanager2 and to provide the same web interface in Debian I need to
> have it packaged.

Please, consider stepping up for its maintenance (or at least orphan it
on my behalf since my reportbug setup is a mess while I’m traveling).

Regards

David



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#845708: O: libjs-chosen -- select box enhancer for jQuery and Protoype

2016-11-25 Thread David Prévot
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org,
haskell-hoo...@packages.debian.org

I intend to orphan the libjs-chosen package.

The package description is:
 Chosen is a JavaScript plugin that makes long, unwieldy select boxes
 more user-friendly.

Context in #818561, not sure the package is usable anymore (#797166).



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#818561: Useless in Debian

2016-10-31 Thread David Prévot
Hi Axel, haskell-hoogle maintainers,

Le 31/10/2016 à 13:25, Axel Beckert a écrit :
> David Prévot wrote:
>> Package: libjs-chosen
>> Version: 0.9.11-2
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: sid stretch
>>
>> [ Filled as an RC-bug by the maintainer to see the package auto-removed
>>   from testing. ]
>>
>> I packaged libjs-chosen as used by owncloud, but owncloud is going away,
>> see #816376. There is a priori little point to ship libjs-chosen in the
>> next Debian stable release.

> JFTR: The recent hoogle update pulled this in. So it seems no more
> useless but now even has reverse dependencies again. :-)

Thank you Axel for the heads up. I guess someone (maybe from the
hoogle team) will want to take over the maintenance. Feel free to remove
me from Uploaders when you do.

Regards

David



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#842130: Useless in Stretch

2016-10-26 Thread David Prévot
Package: libjs-ie7
Version: 2.1~beta4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
X-Debbugs-CC: s...@packages.debian.org

[ Filed with RC-severity by the maintainer to see it removed from
  testing. ]

libjs-ie7 was packaged as a dependency for spip, but the dependency has
recently been dropped (in version 3.1, now available in Sid and
Stretch). There is little point in keeping libjs-ie7 in Stretch as
nothing uses it anymore.

I intend to ask for removal of this package in a few month. Please do
provide information to this bug report if you disagree with this removal.

Regards

David



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#835704: Bug#835704: It's mostly fixed already!

2016-08-28 Thread David Prévot
Control: reassign -1 node-ast-types
Control: affects -1 node-ast-utils
Control: done -1 0.9.0-2

Hi,

Le 28/08/2016 à 09:08, Julien Puydt a écrit :

> today's upload of node-ast-types 0.9.0-2 fixes this problem in
> node-ast-utils (and all its rdepends).
> 
> I don't know how to say to control@bugs.d.o that a problem in a package
> is fixed by an upload of another.

That should do.

Regards

David



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#814674: Providing map files in node-es6-shim

2016-05-29 Thread David Prévot
Hi,

Le 29/05/2016 à 02:39, Julien Puydt a écrit :

> In fact, I have already prepared a new version, which can be seen here:
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-es6-shim

Thanks! Is it available in some public VCS?

> Does it fix the bug properly?

owncloud(-news) has been removed from the archive in the mean time, so
don’t count on me for some tests, sorry.

Regards

David



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Fwd: How to handle JavaScript npm + gulp web GUI packaging?

2016-05-17 Thread David Prévot
[ CCing you since you seem to have e-mail issues. ]

Hi Thomas,

Le 22/02/2016 03:30, Thomas Goirand a écrit :

> I'm resending this message, hopefully, it will reach the list this time.

It already did the first time.

http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2016-February/012503.html

> I would like to package a web app which contains Javascript stuff, which
> are using npm + gulp 
[…]
> How to make this all in a Debian policy compliant way?

I assume you already found information on the wiki ([Nodjs] may be a
good starting point if you didn’t), As anything else, one needs all the
(build-)dependencies (and all their (build-)dependencies, and…), the
[Tasks] should help figuring out all of that.

[Nodjs]: 
[Tasks]: 

> P.S: I'm not afraid of packaging all individual libjs-* and nodejs-*
> (build-) dependencies, even if there's a big number of them.

From where I stand, that would be much appreciated, looks like gulp is
the new trend and an increasing number of stuff is using it.

Regards

David



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#815482: On bug #815482 (localized libjs-moment)

2016-05-14 Thread David Prévot
Hi Julien,

> Could you have a look and tell me if it's ok?

debian/libjs-moment.install contains now:

locale usr/share/javascript/moment/locale

You probably meant:

locale usr/share/javascript/moment

(Assuming you don’t want the locales in
/usr/share/javascript/moment/locale/locale since they seems looked up in
('./locale/' + name) according to the code.)

owncloud-news has been removed from the archive in the mean time, so I
don’t have a real testbed to check it further, sorry.

Regards

David

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#818558: Useless in Debian

2016-03-19 Thread David Prévot
Package: libjs-jquery-minicolors
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tag: sid stretch

[ Filled as an RC-bug by the maintainer to see the package auto-removed
  from testing. ]

I packaged libjs-jquery-minicolors as used by owncloud, but owncloud is
going away, see #816376. There is a priori little point to ship
libjs-jquery-minicolors in the next Debian stable release.

I intend to follow up with an RM request in a few months if nobody
objects (but feel free to beat me to it).

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#817266: Useless in Debian

2016-03-09 Thread David Prévot
Package: libjs-jcrop
Version: 0.9.13+dfsg-1
Severity: serious

[ Filled as an RC-bug by the maintainer to see the package auto-removed
  from testing, and not let it block the PHP 7.0 transition. ]

I packaged libjs-jcrop as used by owncloud, but owncloud is going away,
see #816376. There is a priori little point to release in the next
Debian stable release

I intend to follow up with an RM request in a few months if nobody
objects (but feel free to beat me to it).

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#815482: Please, provide localized files

2016-02-21 Thread David Prévot
Package: libjs-moment
Version: 2.11.0+ds-1
Control: affects -1 owncloud-news

Hi,

Thanks for packaging libjs-moment, I missed it when I packaged
owncloud-news. As upstream provides localised files (as moment/min/
moment-with-locales.js and moment-with-locales.min.js), would you please
also do so in the package, in order to get rid of the embedded code
copy?

Thanks in advance.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#814674: Please, provide map files

2016-02-21 Thread David Prévot
Hi,

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 05:54:53PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Package: libjs-es6-shim

> As upstream provides map files, would you please also do
> so in the package, so I can get rid of the embedded code copy? It’s easy
> to do it with uglifyjs (you’ll need to build-depend on node-source-map):
> 
> https://sources.debian.net/src/owncloud-news/7.1.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/rules/#L30

Since this link won’t last forever, here is another one:

http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-owncloud/owncloud-news.git/tree/debian/rules?h=debian/7.1.1%2bdfsg-1#n30

as well as a plain text copy:

# Minify JavaScript files
[…]
uglifyjs --source-map \
$(CURDIR)/build/es6-shim.map \
--output \
$(CURDIR)/build/es6-shim.min.js \
$(CURDIR)/js/vendor/es6-shim/es6-shim.js

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#814674: Please, provide map files

2016-02-13 Thread David Prévot
Package: libjs-es6-shim
Version: 0.34.1+ds-1

Hi,

Thanks for packaging libjs-es6-shim, I missed it when I packaged
owncloud-news. As upstream provides map files, would you please also do
so in the package, so I can get rid of the embedded code copy? It’s easy
to do it with uglifyjs (you’ll need to build-depend on node-source-map):

https://sources.debian.net/src/owncloud-news/7.1.1%2Bdfsg-1/debian/rules/#L30

Thanks in advance.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#801412: Please provide a node-bootstrap package

2015-10-23 Thread David Prévot
Hi,

On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 09:53:42PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Package: libjs-bootstrap
> Version: 3.3.5+dfsg-1

> could you provide a node-bootstrap package?

Can you please document why (and how)?

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#785478: jessie-pu: package node-groove/2.2.6-1

2015-05-16 Thread David Prévot
Hi Felipe,

 Node-groove has a bug that is pretty annoying

AFAICT, the fix is not yet in unstable. Can you please upload a fixed
version to Sid (so it can at least be more widely tested)? I believe the
RT won’t consider a fix in stable for an issue that still affects unstable
and testing.

Regards

David


___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#779491: ownCloud video handling (Was: Bug#779491: fixed in mediaelement 2.15.1+dfsg-2)

2015-03-01 Thread David Prévot
Hi Mathieu,

Thanks for your interest in the ownCloud Debian package and for your bug
report.

On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 05:59:57PM +0100, Mathieu ROY wrote:
 So will this new updated package will make sure that existing owncloud 
 servers 
 will stop trying to play video with a non existent file?

The Flash (and Silverlight) shims are now really disabled (so they won’t
be offered as an alternative anymore if proper HTML5 video is not
known to be working).

 I'm not really concerned about the ability or inability of owncloud to play 
 videos. I'm annoyed by the fact it acts as if it would but then silently end 
 up on pop-up with a black screen.

That, unfortunately, may still happen if the browser does not handle
properly video. The only thing fixed by this upload, is it won’t offer
a broken object or embed anymore, trying to download a non existing
file. Upstream documents the current support by formats and vendors:

http://mediaelementjs.com/#devices

It would be nice to not offer a video at all if it is known not to
work, but would be even nicer to be able to build (and ship) those Flash
(and Silverlight) parts (as documented in the package description, the
/usr/share/doc/libjs-mediaelement/README.Debian file, and #760297).

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can you fix node-tap and I will ask for the unblock?

2015-02-16 Thread David Prévot
Hi,

 I have filed a bug for an unblock
 on the package: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778566

Please, double check if that’s needed before doing so next time:

$ apt-cache policy node-serve-static
node-serve-static:
  Installé : (aucun)
  Candidat : 1.6.4-1
 Table de version :
 1.6.4-1 0
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie/main amd64 Packages
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages

grep-excuses can help too.

Regards

David


___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can you fix node-tap and I will ask for the unblock?

2015-02-16 Thread David Prévot
Hi,

 I have filed a bug for an unblock
 on the package: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778566

 Please, double check if that’s needed before doing so next time:

 $ apt-cache policy node-serve-static
 node-serve-static:
   Installé : (aucun)
   Candidat : 1.6.4-1

I should have double check the version, sorry for the noise.
node-serve-static/1.6.4-2 doesn’t seem to have been uploaded, so maybe
there is still something to fix.

Regards

David


___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#773010: Please, update to a current version

2014-12-12 Thread David Prévot
Package: node-less
Version: 1.4.2-1
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 twitter-bootstrap3

Hi,

The version currently in the archive (1.4.2) has been released about a
year and a half ago while upstream updates almost on a monthly basis.

Among missing features, sourcemap support was added on 2013-10-21
(1.5.0), and upstream released 2.1.1 last month.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#693944: /usr/bin/lessc: --help empty, no man page, useless documentation

2014-09-14 Thread David Prévot
Control: retitle -1 node-less: lessc --help empty, no man page, useless 
documentation
Control: found -1 1.4.2-1
Control: tags -1 - patch

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 05:46:58PM -0400, Jason Woofenden wrote:

 I'd love to see some documentation for lessc. I just wasted some
 time setting up a css compressor, before reading some of the source
 code for lessc and discovering that it has commandline options to
 (among other things) compress the output.
 
 lessc doesn't seem to be documented anywhere. Not on the home page,
 no man page, and ``lessc --help`` gives a stacktrace because of a
 missing module.

It now just gives no output at all, which is not an acceptable outcome.
Furthermore, the currently shipped upstream README.md doesn’t provide
any information already available from the package metadata or
copyright, please don’t ship it as is.

There has been many upstream release in the last year, maybe an upgrade
to a more recent version may help WRT this issue.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#760297: The BTS is not a ping-pong table (or it is?)

2014-09-05 Thread David Prévot
Control: severity -1 important

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:49:12AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 severity 760297 grave

Really, again?

 [David wrote - via cont...@bugs.debian.org:]

  # Please, stop overriding the maintainer’s call without reason.
 
 I fully agree.
 
 Maintainer of this package is the Javascript team

That’s fixed now, thanks again to your valuable input.

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-owncloud/mediaelement.git/commit/?id=d1f88116baff56bb4ae1c5ed54529b6905bcef8d

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#760297: Is MediaElement.js fit for testing?

2014-09-04 Thread David Prévot
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:21:52AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System (2014-09-04 23:24:05)

  # Please, stop overriding the maintainer’s call without reason.

 I ask a question

I already pointed at explanations before, and didn’t want to give more
credit to your recurrent flame-baits on this topic. Anyway, for the sake
of third parties you’re willing to pull in the thread or any interested
people, let me try to gather some information bellow.

 you just silently play severity ping-pong here.

I just want you to stop playing, and advise you to get in touch with the
release team if you want them to enforce an RC-bug here.

 That pisses me off.

I find your behaviour off limit.

 I seriously consider no longer wasting my time here.

Please, consider stop wasting other people time and energy.

Now, to the facts:

- MediaElement is currently embedded in at least two packages
  (wordpress and owncloud). As such, preventing the current package to
  enter testing is pointless (it’s already there), and harmful (code
  duplication, security tracking, etc.)
- All functionalities of the package are not yet enabled, and that is
  documented in the package description. As proven (at least via
  owncloud: I’ve not investigated how/if the media playing works in
  wordpress), the current package allows to play video and audio in a
  browser, which make it all but useless.
- Since the initial packaging that has been approved by ftpmasters,
  upstream documented a way to rebuild the Flash parts. They use Flex
  SDK to do so (the present bug as been documented as blocked by the
  relevant RFP one day after you opened it).

What are our perspectives here?

- Manage to build the Flash parts using tools from main, i.e., either:
  + Introduce Flex SDK, in the archive (I’m waiting for an answer from
the latest person who showed some interest into it [1]). I already
started to look into this package, but it’s a big one, with a lot of
Java stack. I’m really not comfortable with all that, and hope
someone more interested than me could take the lead on this one, but
in case nobody does, I’ll try to bite the bullet.
  + Use an alternative build system to the one used upstream, (e.g.,
as3compile from swftools). I already tried that path before without
much success, but back then, the package wasn’t yet accepted in the
archive, which made the effort less attractive. Back then, the build
system wasn’t documented either, so I intend to retry ASAP (i.e.,
when done trying to document the current issue instead of trying to
fix it).
- Manage to build the Silverlight parts: that one seems tricker, since
  there doesn’t seem to be any tool available in Debian (nor Linux-OSes
  at large) to even test them. I already looked into the Mono tools
  available in the archive, but the build system seems even more obscure
  than for Flash, and is not documented upstream. Someone with
  Silverlight or Mono knowledge would certainly be highly welcome, but I
  don’t know where to find such person (making this package available
  may help, that’s also why I preferred to go on and make it public
  instead of letting it rot in a private VCS).

What alternative?

Since you (Jonas) seem to have some specific expectations about how this
package should work, I can think of at least one alternative if you’re
not willing to help into the previously explained perspectives, that may
allow you to use a MediaElement package the way you see fit: simply
repackage it as, e.g., mediaelement-nonfree, without excluding the
build/*.swf and build/*.xap from source, and just copy them into the
binary package you may upload to non-free. Feel free to make it provide,
conflict, and replace libjs-mediaelement if you want to have it
installed in the same place. Feel also free to reuse (or not) part or
all of the existing package, and feel free to use dgit if you can’t
stand having to deal with the upstream VCS as part of the packaging one.
Disclaimer: I’m personally not interested at all by the non-free
alternative, just wanted to point it as a middle-ground workaround until
we’re able to properly fix this bug.

1: https://bugs.debian.org/602499#87

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#760297: Bug#760297: libjs-mediaelement: completely useless without the flash/silverlight parts

2014-09-02 Thread David Prévot
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: rename -1 Please, (build and) ship Flash and Silverlight parts

Hi,

Le 02/09/2014 12:29, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :

 The very purpose of MediaElement.js is to act as a polyfill for browsers
 that does not support html5 audio and video tags, and it does so by
 use of either flash or silverlight code.

As (not enough) documented in the package description and (better) in
the upstream homepage, the purpose is to offer an unified interface in
order to offer the same experience whatever the browser. The Flash or
Silverlight shim are only used if needed to help legacy browsers not
HTML5-compatible to mimic those expectations. The middle-term goal is of
course to offer the the Flash and Silverlight shims, but the upstream
build process was not really open and properly documented at the time
the package was uploaded to Debian.

 ...but this package has both flash and silverlight code stripped,
 rendering the package utterly useless.

No, again, it’s not. As a proof of concept, it’s already used in
ownCloud (as an embedded library for the moment, since
libjs-mediaelement only made it out of NEW today).

Feel free to help getting one or both of these stuff in shape if you
need them, it’s a team maintained package after all. Hopefully upstream
managed to improve the building while the package was waiting in NEW,
and that won’t be as messy as it used to.

Regards

David



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#755372: Please, upgrade to latest version (currently 1.6.0)

2014-07-19 Thread David Prévot
Source: underscore
Version: 1.4.4-2
Severity: normal
Control: block 755260 by -1
Control: affects -1 owncloud

Hi,

The version currently shipped in Debian deserves an update: some third
parties (e.g.: owncloud) use a more recent version, and using the
packaged version lead to bugs (e.g.: #755260). Thanks in advance for
updating this package.

Regards

David

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 
'oldstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-rt-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#754533: Bug#754533: libjs-pdf: please provide a minified version of compatibility.js

2014-07-12 Thread David Prévot
Hi,

 Quoting David Prévot (2014-07-12 19:13:38)
 Le 12/07/2014 03:26, Johannes Schauer a écrit :
 Would you consider also shipping a minified version of compatibility.js
 in the libjs-pdf package?

 Sure.

 awesome - would you want one only for compatibility.js or also for the
 others while we're at it?

I don’t know: on one hand, there is currently no practical need of a
minified version of something else than compatibility.js, but on the
other,  compatibility.js is really not the biggest JavaScript file
distributed in this package (might even be the smaller).

Some third parties uses run-time (with cache) minification, so don’t
really need provided minified files. It would be nice to have upstream
input on the matter actually.

Regards

David

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#754533: Bug#754533: libjs-pdf: please provide a minified version of compatibility.js

2014-07-12 Thread David Prévot
Hi Johannes,

On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 08:41:21PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:

 So this should just be a matter of calling `nodejs make minified` in
 debian/rules and installing the result.

Actually, this target only provides minified pdf.js and pdf.worker.js,
not compatibility.js, so that won’t help fixing this specific issue.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#748223: UDD: DMD - uscan returned an error while fixed in PTS - githubredir?

2014-05-15 Thread David Prévot
Hi,

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:11:19PM +0200, Leo Iannacone wrote:

 there is some problem with watch checks.

 While, according with PTS page, watch check is fine:

  * http://packages.qa.debian.org/pdf.js

No idea if that’s relevant, but I moved away from githubredir.debian.net
and used directly the github pages in the watch file on my last upload,
and UDD seems a lot happier now.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Updating wrong debian watch files

2014-05-14 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi Leo,

Thanks for your QA work!

Le 14/05/2014 03:18, Leo Iannacone a écrit :
 = Already fixed or false positives =
 
 These ones:
 
  * OR have already a suggested debian/watch in sepwatch
  * OR the debian/watch is already fixed in the repository
  * OR at time I checked them, they had a temporary issue with their
 own watch file.
[…]
  * pdf.js

Do you have any idea about this issue? I mean, the watch file is
effective, and the accurate next upstream version is correctly
documented in the PTS and DDPO, but is in error according to UDD.

Thanks in advance for any pointer or follow up with UDD maintainers.

Regards

David


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTc2ALAAoJEAWMHPlE9r08CNgH/R4xdqAj5aIvapypX1v+RhZp
wrAqPYHByc2EVc4O0JLEoQT3zkIT1PjPrZ7Aiwtyd6lf7kUANZ18FT0jrMRm2LG4
W73dJbNYvtoTTkEluCGQNOKeEYx7BKPKAfTBxgW3hWfDdzfbad1wG2UtQEAaFnU6
ukDml3VvXXlvtLOt8Y66bZdtlV6ET1l8rzvLkVc65f0c0B1t8yqRHkH+q21NNjvO
aPfb2GyxKReew+thXmtoiA1a+marvuPlGCLcufcYzrWJfLEkarS+6mzpf0evKfb8
zm7v0I4Lb2tjiPGJ36c+N5tjyp5OADIEuaMTiazy9JjYD7h75rX16y69Z601NLo=
=OvSr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] uscan (and mk-origtargz) behavior (was: JS policy: repackaging upstream tarball when minified js files are present)

2014-05-05 Thread David Prévot
Hi,

 […] if the uscan-based repackaging
 is deterministic (e.g. run it twice on the upstream tarball and get the
 same repacked tarball, byte-for-byte)

The upcoming devscripts version, providing the new mk-origtargz script,
should ensure this behavior (if no --repack is provided, i.e., if the
repacked tarball keep the same compression than upstream).

 I personally don't think it seems necessary

Me neither, but that’s orthogonal to the above.

Regards

David




___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Call for review: should.js packages

2014-04-23 Thread David Prévot
Hi,

 - Regarding your latest commit 719083c do not install should.min.js -
 agreed with debian-js team: this is a long discussion, the short
 version is that you should repackage the upstream tarball to remove
 the included .min.js file

Even if some people sounds attached to repack packages just to be on a
alleged safe-side of their own reading of the DFSG, that statement still
violates the developers reference (“You *should* upload packages with a
pristine source tarball if possible”[0]), and doesn’t add any value to the
package. It sounds weird to enforce such view inside the JavaScript team
while it’s not enforced for other kinds of binaries distributed in the
archive as part of source packages.

0:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#repackagedorigtargz

Regards

David


___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Please review (and eventualy upload) jquery-simpletreemenu

2014-04-03 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi Emilien,

Le 03/04/2014 16:46, Emilien Klein a écrit :

   * you have to mention the copyright on the debian/* files (you 
 […] have to list yourself as copyright holder)

Why do you want to enforce that? FTPmasters allow one to not enforce
being a copyright holder (especially for trivial packaging work).

Regards

David


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTPcrYAAoJEAWMHPlE9r08PkUIAKP1d83syWHZOIuV/NiUgCdt
10FzRwpW/wZkzE8JyMFXZK6or/xa3hQkaLbo/EmH7kVvqEMXg3pAqHoUZdJIwBHa
eQHCys2UAMXsr+vU5opvClgu8Bk057NCjRAQETjTDyvgQcMCuXaRI5RqqI9mpH47
G91knWElw74+ZSdlAdr8ANtl74afb3C7AAYRjjVqmR+CO7uaUdrUgIoO88fE6d9d
5sOE+OyHGM4Uj8vAoAywAmPULWG7Iw99Nv60JU7gsvWg3kr/5YQvsBNljgr6BCuc
Oej4FHCgw2bjqzFb2tDQGyWuKhcpsx5jOPw1faOAWGNmv+QMOeT1dFFPyyOnDA8=
=gtmj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] JavaScript policy?

2014-03-24 Thread David Prévot
Hi François-Régis,

 I may be wrong but perhaps providing minified files in source tarball
 (which are considered as binary files) is DFSG compliant providing we
 have the sources, but debian policy is to exclude them from sources.

Can you please be specific about what (point of) “debian policy” are you
referring to? The Developers’ Reference, on the contrary, advises to keep
useless but DFSG-compliant files: “A repackaged .orig.tar.{gz,bz2,xz} […]
should, except where impossible for legal reasons, preserve the entire
building and portablility infrastructure provided by the upstream author.
For example, it is not a sufficient reason for omitting a file that it is
used only when building on MS-DOS. Similarly, a Makefile provided by
upstream should not be omitted even if the first thing your debian/rules
does is to overwrite it by running a configure script.”

https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#repackagedorigtargz

Regards

David




___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel


[Pkg-javascript-devel] JavaScript policy? (was: Please review jquery-coolfieldset)

2014-03-22 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Le 22/03/2014 05:33, Emilien Klein a écrit :
 On 03/21/2014 11:22 PM, François-Régis wrote:
 Le 21/03/2014 07:45, Emilien Klein a écrit :

 So Marcelo's recommandation goes on the good way to have uniform
 workflow and should be written somwhere (as the recomand to provide
 minify and source version).

 We may have something like :

 * Origin tarball should not include any minify code.

Maybe there is a missing “sourceless” here: it’s perfectly fine for a
source package to embed a convenient binary/prebuilt copy, as long as it
is not used in the binary package, but instead rebuild it from source
and ships the rebuilt version. In order not to make minified JavaScript
any different, the first point should read:

* Origin tarball should not include any sourceless minified code.

 Regarding the removal of the minified files: that is done to comply
 with the DFSG, as minified files are assimilated to compiled objects,
 not source code. As Debian requires the source to be provided, not the
 compiled binaries, the minified files must be removed fromt the
 upstream tarball.

Again, only if the source is not provided. An alternative in case
upstream provides sourceless minified JavaScript in their tarball, would
be to ship the source (e.g., dug up from their source repository, or
from JQuery) inside the debian directory, and rebuild it for (or do
nothing if it isn’t shipped in) the binary package: it can save a repack.

 The general idea is that you would have a get-orig-source target in
 d/rules that downloads the tarball, makes is compliant with DFSG, and
 recreate a new tarball.

Alternatively, the Excluded-Files feature of uscan(1) can do it for you.

Regards

David


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTLXYJAAoJEAWMHPlE9r08VnEIAK6GDhkbJaxrH1T1KZyuDwk4
BGHHtDreMzeDTwR0g5bV+1y8ZWdS2wW1gLmqTAeQ2fxZBwy3H0UyBwlyAqYWFjnn
0Q7aTBqCKC3lQETV3+MaNVHEOjVUFxorNNaPwnvaAke7bt8ZqCJxkssWD9W9YH+r
0h9VK+WG8OYIe5YJ6wThuVMpEJS1EcZf44SJvjgRwjJzebW3k0lT/lbc1AKZUMKu
If5FuCDVudFDBxmgsx3kzZ8U0fqWBRJDM53fqgfyI/6vl/nORDLnYZm6B6e74r77
bPRpKDUJWl7m0Xmd1z18AqeOdli36nyXgMEAY+j7mCsAOiyheaWgf/WN37I77Oc=
=Vq9f
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#733880: ITP: mediaelement -- HTML5 audio or video player with Flash and Silverlight shims

2014-01-01 Thread David Prévot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot taf...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 owncloud wordpress

* Package name: mediaelement
  Version : 2.11.3
  Upstream Author : John Dyer johnd...@gmail.com 
* URL : http://mediaelementjs.com/
* License : Expat
  Programming Lang: JavaScript
  Description : HTML5 audio or video player with Flash and Silverlight 
shims

 Instead of offering an HTML5 player to modern browsers and a totally
 separate Flash player to older browsers, MediaElement.js upgrades them
 with custom Flash and Silverlight plugins that mimic the HTML5
 MediaElement API.


This code is currently embedded in owncloud and wordpress, and this
package aims at getting rid of these copies.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#706696: dojo: Please upgrade to new upstream version

2013-11-20 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi Jason,

Thanks for your reply, I was just currently looking into dojo packaging.

Le 11/11/2013 15:55, Jason Morawski a écrit :

 I also think we should be building dojo using the libclosure-compiler-java
 package.

Sure, it would be a bad idea to use the sourceless embedded Jar to do
so, but the Debian package isn’t yet ready (#705565 and other RC bugs).

 I am unaware of dojo using node-base as the default build system.
 I thought the default was closure-compiler unless it had changed recently.

Seems like node became the default builder in (or before) 1.7.1:
“Javascript environment to use. Defaults to node, if available, java
otherwise.” in util/buildscripts/build.sh

 I would be more than happy to collaborate with you guys in this effort.

Great.

Regards

David

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSgTubAAoJEAWMHPlE9r087L4H+QHOlG0/I1PDsNyutZgwMLAv
SLNFYyrHfs1sx85jzXTfKcLWgRQ9CPwT1mc+LsqB26npMs1nFkvawuakJBsiqToY
q/xaEGmSP8o/zTMnlQe/DdDjTkmsuPd8jJbclH+EJogvvr9gBUu/qeaRf1YIgjom
CRc+9K6vmuuQ0RxzyoZrp6ikdVkKzwWUsjkSTkcj1egkJYsdx2hr/UWXG13O96js
bBjd8zank8vqP6SBNK7d5NW8PUbWHJO6O7QwhO/PxH0sx6cS7dEwTsdtzsp0tV4P
mWh+TrxHLHQyznvdkkpL/DanZJuVS42pJ3tGzO40J/s1H1efiJXSCu1nky/d9pQ=
=Ci2f
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] dojo: Please upgrade to new upstream version

2013-10-25 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi Franck,

Le 25/10/2013 05:26, Frank Habermann a écrit :

 Would
 you agree to maintain this package inside the JavaScript team?

 I think any help is welcome here because Jason is busy

Thanks for your quick answer, I initiated a repository within the team:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/dojo.git

I haven’t pushed the upstream/1.9.1+dfsg tag yet since I’ve a doubt
about the DFSG compliance for util/closureCompiler/compiler.jar (there
are various possible ways to build dojo, the default node-base one
should hopefully be usable now).

 I did not know if Jason has any public repository for that.

We’ll be able to rebase the work in progress on the existing repository
if there is one.

Regards

David

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSatIvAAoJEAWMHPlE9r08/rgH/jPzmt2zTWnCgndyX1lEjpaR
DB8IrezMrEXsXT2igIqelynb0DeWokgcIY2SmZGjkxdE4keyjBhL+Fs3uFfrPEbQ
Mx+l2KSpS7z36Mm41d8reg4jqDfx6E89M8wOEF/IX+6qiFN9j7MyYeB32tU2Q/Wy
hx4HYQSdjDbg/ADAQZr9mVC3NndDTA3N+NRKGiYiCo6xMHsRnBxXZyCoiC84dIim
9XzSLH12eGz2lc1OJPyPpQV5PmJTFuhLuV92eKVGftS32/5nAjVjXiWMGEQ6yWSb
KMfisKsAEiP/+ixeGSazoeyjw+WdOdGiX8aBB3Q1rqv7bcXyr4TG9UzaUunTxVM=
=vUD7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#727529: RFP: libjs-webodf -- add Open Document Format support to web applications

2013-10-23 Thread David Prévot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Control: affects -1 owncloud

* Package name: libjs-webodf
* URL : http://webodf.org/
* License : AGPL-3+
  Programming Lang: JavaScript
  Description : add Open Document Format support to web applications

 WebODF is a JavaScript library that makes it easy to add Open Document
 Format (ODF) support to website and to mobile or desktop applications.
 It uses HTML and CSS to display ODF documents.



I’d like to depend on this package for the upcoming owncloud 6 package.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#727530: RFP: libjs-viewer -- display ODF and PDF into web applications

2013-10-23 Thread David Prévot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Control: affects -1 owncloud
Control: block -1 by 727529

* Package name: libjs-webodf
* URL : http://webodf.org/
* License : AGPL-3+
  Programming Lang: JavaScript
  Description : display ODF and PDF into web applications

 Viewer.js is a JavaScript library that makes it easy to use
 presentations, spreadsheets, PDFs and other documents on web
 applications.



I’d like to depend on this package for the upcoming owncloud 6 package.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] dojo: Please upgrade to new upstream version

2013-10-23 Thread David Prévot
Control: retitle -1 Please upgrade to new upstream version
Control: affects -1 owncloud

On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:47:06PM +0200, Peter Adam wrote:

 there is a new upstream version 1.8.3 of dojotoolkit available

1.9.1 is now available, and the version currently in the archive FTBFSes
(#724124). I’d be happy to help maintaining this package (because the
upcoming owncloud package should depend on it). Would you agree to
maintain this package inside the JavaScript team?

I couldn’t find a repository to handle this package, can you please make
it public if you have one? Would you agree to import the history with
“gbp import-dscs --debsnap” if you haven’t?

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#726279: RFP: libjs-jcrop -- image cropping plugin

2013-10-13 Thread David Prévot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Control: affects -1 owncloud

* Package name: libjs-jcrop
  Version : 0.9.12
  Upstream Author : Kelly Hallman khall...@gmail.com
* URL : ttp://github.com/tapmodo/Jcrop
* License : Expat
  Programming Lang: PHP
  Description : image cropping plugin

Jcrop is a quick and easy way to add image cropping functionality to web
applications. It combines the ease-of-use of a typical jQuery plugin
with a cross-platform DHTML cropping engine that is faithful to familiar
desktop graphics applications.


I’d like to depend on this package for the upcoming owncloud 6 package.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#726171: RFP: libjs-zxcvbn -- realistic password strength estimation

2013-10-12 Thread David Prévot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Control: affects -1 owncloud

* Package name: libjs-zxcvbn
  Version : 1.0
  Upstream Author : Dan Wheeler d...@dropbox.com
* URL : 
https://tech.dropbox.com/2012/04/zxcvbn-realistic-password-strength-estimation/
https://github.com/lowe/zxcvbn#readme
* License : Expat
  Programming Lang: JavaScript
  Description : realistic password strength estimation

zxcvbn tries to give sound password advice through pattern matching and
conservative entropy calculations.


I’d like to depend on this package for the upcoming owncloud 6 package.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] [Pkg-owncloud-maintainers] Bug#718915: owncloud: Share with input does not generate a users list

2013-09-11 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 libjs-jquery-ui
Control: found -2 1.10.1+dfsg-1
Control: notfound -2 1.8.ooops.21+dfsg-2
Control: retitle -2 libjs-jquery-ui doesn’t work well in owncloud

Le 08/09/2013 22:37, David Prévot a écrit :
 Le 06/08/2013 17:43, Jérémie BURTIN a écrit :
 
 On the Files tab, when we click on the share link of a directory or a
 file, a popup shows up with a share with input used to search for other
 owncloud users. This does not generate a users list, even if they're found
 
 Indeed, this is due to libjs-jquery-ui (downgrading it back to the
 Wheezy version, 1.8.ooops.21+dfsg-2, fixes the issue). As a temporary
 workaround, we could ship back the embedded version provided in owncloud
 source (or better figure out what is going wrong here).

Being a bit clueless about how to even debug this situation, I’m hereby
bugging the libjs-jquery-ui maintainers for help. owncloud works fine
with its own libjs-jquery-ui copy (version 1.10.0) and with the
libjs-jquery-ui package from wheezy (version 1.8.ooops.21+dfsg-2), but
not with the version from sid (1.10.1+dfsg-1).

Do you have any idea about what is going wrong here? Do you have any
advice for debugging or fixing the situation?

The embedded working owncloud copy is available online if needed:

https://github.com/owncloud/core/raw/stable5/core/js/jquery-ui-1.10.0.custom.js

Thanks in advance for your help.

Regards

David

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSML9TAAoJEAWMHPlE9r08glkIAKn9Aw2PrBwwimCl7WrhKEcL
FK4TwgcFI1EUUoRv8uGTHxqi+UVBvbucrd1pQa/SOezdw/E0ZtYlMvrUtnITjvHH
WT2akWzX6FL9qc/1PaurOYRdZmc33OkQBoFHIEKWngPDo3lae7ZAq97JekQvcd8a
dZC6hZCxox5tmwTNWuYbOLY2o7yCoaUOeioEJM7JzHhnjW+FKsbIrlUPw2JDMnhD
FQpkcfrlUhXORrBA/yXiMp7JYTbLteQ7eBri3TnO7M3e2cxEpSHeY0lNZBcXirQh
xSZJci/uUL04bowNHsuP1pypz14wwu9KgoZdhf+Rh9b0hwQGOIanKnWEVQRlvws=
=iF4e
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#719068: Bug#719068: libjs-chosen: homepage points to pdf.js

2013-08-08 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Control: tags -1 pending

Hi,

Le 08/08/2013 10:09, Damyan Ivanov a écrit :

 The Homepage field of libjs-chosen points to 
 http://mozilla.github.com/pdf.js/ 
 which is about pdf.js, not chosen.js. Perhaps this is a mistake?

Indeed, it was also pointed by Paul when accepting the package a few
hours ago, and is already fixed in Git.

Cheers

David


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSA1xJAAoJEAWMHPlE9r08Qm8H/iXB5Tgr3HepCaNqtG4eQRSb
rNIW/Tu7y+/qIEi/YKbDFeh+wskNYPHtIunTJJ+ZXHl1PpCAMwNEybgB39GXLBiW
v+IfD/ZkROwNNHmF5MQAO/j4nvNMTEAXJ5Dh3HZv8h79PaC+ZpateWSoWhKcK6t+
SyJYDk/inRJD9OKicF8ewYJENGNYkyfzs8Ypq+y7zRski7VBoYQMSSZ4euCW96S8
Yo0xfZRyXQDaZfoeyomhdQX/HGSPoYU3w2lFf/cNJ+FcOl4/qxch8QAMx5vY1hrH
QQITGcRiJITgL67CPwJEXhAMHtYqgQAtzoWLC28kf27qAqKZzsfLKN6XCbYnyt4=
=EXEX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] fullcalendar also needs grunt

2013-06-25 Thread David Prévot
Control: block 606901 with -1

Hi Marcelo,

On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:31:12PM -0200, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote:
 On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 12:03 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
  
  Is the grunt package really necessary ?
 
 For me it is.
 
 jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile use Grunt as build system.
 Maybe there are other libs that use it too.

fullcalendar is among them. What is the status of this ITP? Is there a
WIP repository available somewhere?

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#714120: ITP: libjs-chosen -- select box enhancer for jQuery and Protoype

2013-06-25 Thread David Prévot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot taf...@debian.org

* Package name: libjs-chosen
  Version : 0.9.11
  Upstream Author : Patrick Filler http://patrickfiller.com
* URL : http://harvesthq.github.io/chosen/
* License : Expat
  Programming Lang: JavaScript
  Description : select box enhancer for jQuery and Protoype

 Chosen is a JavaScript plugin that makes long, unwieldy select boxes
 more user-friendly.


The purpose is to use it as a third party in other packages like
owncloud. As such, I intend to maintain it under the Debian JavaScript
Maintainers umbrella.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#710451: Please also provide a compatibility symlink

2013-05-30 Thread David Prévot
Package: libjs-flot
Version: 0.8.1+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 spip graphite-web trac-bitten

Hi,

Thanks for fixing #704860 and for providing a transitional package.
Would it be possible to also include a (properly handled)* compatibility
symlink from /usr/share/javascript/flot to 
/usr/share/javascript/jquery-flot so that the reverse dependencies and
other home-made stuff could still work until they be updated?

* As dpkg won’t replace a directory by a symlink, please handle this
  replacement carefully (e.g. via a postinst, see
  bugs.debian.org/689154#52).

Regards

David

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 
'oldstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.8-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libjs-flot depends on:
ii  libjs-jquery-flot  0.8.1+dfsg-1

libjs-flot recommends no packages.

libjs-flot suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] documentation about distributing minified versions of files

2013-05-09 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

Le 09/05/2013 15:09, Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit :
 On 05/09/2013 02:11 PM, David Prévot wrote:

 Please note that some projects (including ownCloud, packaged on Debian)
 allow the web administrator to switch (temporarily) in debug mode,
 where, among other things, the non-minified JavaScript are used instead
 of the usual minified ones. […]

 interesting, thanks for this data point.  does this switch work by
 taking advantage of the min.js suffix, or via some other mechanism?

Via the .min.js suffix if I remember correctly (or other specific
suffixes, since not all minified JavaScript in ownCloud use the .min.js
suffix).

 does it work for all js (including libraries), or just for the
 owncloud-native js segments?

All JavaScript if I remember correctly (especially since upstream
embedded convenient copies of external libraries, usually replaced by
symlinks in the Debian package). That reminds me we may have to add back
the non-minified (symlinks to) JavaScript inside the ownCloud package
(for this debug feature), so I’m going to check it again pretty soon and
will be back here with more accurate data if I notice I didn’t remember
correctly.

 […] Should we expect each framework to implement
 it separately?

Please note that, in the ownCloud case, the non-minified JavaScript is
not the only feature of the debug mode, of course (and thus can’t be
addressed in a JavaScript-only generic way, and maybe not even in a
generic way at all).

Regards

David

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=6d3B
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#606901: ITP: fullcalendar -- jQuery plugin providing a full-sized, drag drop calendar

2013-04-15 Thread David Prévot
Control: owner -1 !
Control: retitle -1 ITP: fullcalendar -- jQuery plugin providing a full-sized, 
drag  drop calendar

Hi,

I’m considering to package it since it’s used in owncloud.

Regards

David

P.-S.: Initial ITP

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 08:57:55PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
 Package: wnpp
 Severity: wishlist
 Owner: Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 * Package name: fullcalendar
   Version : 1.4.9
   Upstream Author : Adam Shaw
 * URL : http://arshaw.com/fullcalendar/
 * License : GPL-2/MIT
   Programming Lang: Javascript
   Description : jQuery plugin providing a full-sized, drag  drop calendar
 
  FullCalendar uses AJAX to fetch events on-the-fly for each month and is
  easily configured to use your own feed format (an extension is provided for
  Google Calendar). It is visually customizable and exposes hooks for
  user-triggered events (like clicking or dragging an event).




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#705015: ITP: ie7-js -- help Internet Explorer behave like a standards-compliant browser

2013-04-09 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Le 09/04/2013 07:09, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :

 I suggest adding the following paragraph to long description:

Thanks, staged for -2:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/ie7-js.git;a=commitdiff;h=f99c01a

Regards

David

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=Ghml
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#705015: ITP: ie7-js -- help Internet Explorer behave like a standards-compliant browser

2013-04-08 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi Jonas,

[ moving the discussion to a better place ]

Le 08/04/2013 16:41, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
 Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2013-04-08 21:45:34)

 For general use I believe, however, that html5shiv has proven a better 
 shim.  It is part of Modernizr already packaged for Debian.
 
 It might make sense to mention that in long description of this package.

Thanks for pointing it, do you have a proposal for that? As you may have
noticed, I don’t know anything about html5shiv.

Thanks in advance

David

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=vos9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#704860: Please, consider renaming into libjs-jquery-flot

2013-04-06 Thread David Prévot
Package: libjs-flot
Version: 0.7+dfsg-2
Severity: normal

Hi,

As other libraries for jQuery do, please consider renaming libjs-flot
into libjs-jquery-flot and installing it into
/usr/share/javascript/jquery-flot.

Regards

David

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.8-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libjs-flot depends on:
ii  libjs-excanvas  0.r3-3
ii  libjs-jquery1.7.2+dfsg-1

Versions of packages libjs-flot recommends:
ii  javascript-common  8

libjs-flot suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] [Pkg-owncloud-maintainers] Bug#704502: ITP: pdf.js -- web standards-based platform for parsing and rendering PDFs

2013-04-03 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

Le 01/04/2013 22:47, David Prévot a écrit :

 * Package name: pdf.js

Initial packaging pushed on Git:

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-javascript/pdf.js.git

 The purpose would be to provide it, via a libjs-pdf package, in order to
 be used as a third party in other packages like owncloud.

Unfortunately, ownCloud upstream made two tiny changes to viewer.js,
making pdf.js ownCloud-specific:

https://github.com/owncloud/apps/commit/089a708
https://github.com/owncloud/apps/commit/51e4f92

Any help would be welcome to workaround these changes, I’d very much
prefer to patch owncloud to use the generic libjs-pdf, but I’m not
familiar enough to JavaScript to see this through.

Thanks in advance.

Regards

David

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=iJ4h
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#704502: ITP: pdf.js -- web standards-based platform for parsing and rendering PDFs

2013-04-01 Thread David Prévot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot taf...@debian.org

* Package name: pdf.js
  Version : 0.7.423
  Upstream Author : Andreas Gal g...@mozilla.com
* URL : http://mozilla.github.com/pdf.js/
* License : Apache-2.0
  Programming Lang: JavaScript
  Description : web standards-based platform for parsing and rendering PDFs

pdf.js is an HTML5 technology experiment that explores building a
faithful and efficient Portable Document Format (PDF) renderer without
native code assistance.



The purpose would be to provide it, via a libjs-pdf package, in order to
be used as a third party in other packages like owncloud. As such, I
intend to maintain it under the Debian Javascript umbrella, or, by
default, under the ownCloud one.

Regards

David


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#684828: backbone: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libnode-uglify

2012-08-26 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

Le 26/08/2012 13:28, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
 On 25/08/12 at 19:11 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
 Le 14/08/2012 03:18, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
 Source: backbone
 […]
 Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64

 Actually its an OR dependency:

  libnode-uglify | yui-compressor

 By default, sbuild ignores alternative build-dependencies (a | b)

Thanks for your quick answer, and thanks Jonas who was even quicker,
preparing a t-p-u right now.

 I've tagged a few FTBFS on wheezy as unreproducible (because I didn't
 investigate why it failed ten days ago, or because I couldn't find an
 obvious reason), should I simply have closed them?
 
 Did you Cc me? I have very little time for Debian recently, but try to
 keep up with bugmail where I'm Cced.

No, sorry about that, those were #684833, #684837 and #684860. Cédric
already looked at the last one with the same result than me, and should
investigate again soon.

 Anyway, a good way to make progress is usually to provide a build log,
 and a diff between my log and your log.

Thanks for the tip, I'll try to have a second look at the first two,
following your advice.

Regards

David

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=+M7/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel