[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: Fixed in 0.9.0-2

2016-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 835581 0.9.0-2 Bug #835581 [node-ast-types] node-es6-promise: FTBFS in testing (compile-modules shows usage help) Marked as fixed in versions node-ast-types/0.9.0-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] how to address node-lodash 841698

2016-11-02 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wednesday 02 November 2016 01:09 AM, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Next I'd create branch from there with branch name "debian/sid" and work > on that that branch to avoid interfering with the master branch. > > Any comments ? You can just work on the master branch. We do all the work targeting sid on

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-base_0.11.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:02:09 +0530 Source: node-base Binary: node-base Architecture: source all Version: 0.11.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Sruthi Chandran

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-is-equal-shallow_0.1.3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:37:24 + Source: node-is-equal-shallow Binary: node-is-equal-shallow Architecture: source all Version: 0.1.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Chang

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-require-relative_0.8.7-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:30 +0100 Source: node-require-relative Binary: node-require-relative Architecture: source all Version: 0.8.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Ch

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-indent-string_3.0.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 23:39:57 +0530 Source: node-indent-string Binary: node-indent-string Architecture: source all Version: 3.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-parse-glob_3.0.4+dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:23:21 +0530 Source: node-parse-glob Binary: node-parse-glob Architecture: source all Version: 3.0.4+dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-resolve-dir_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 12:27:21 +0530 Source: node-resolve-dir Binary: node-resolve-dir Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Sru

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-read-pkg_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 11:12:07 +0530 Source: node-read-pkg Binary: node-read-pkg Architecture: source all Version: 2.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Sruthi Ch

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] how to address node-lodash 841698

2016-11-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 02/11/2016 08:45, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Wednesday 02 November 2016 01:09 AM, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> Any comments ? > > You can just work on the master branch. We do all the work targeting sid > on master branch. For this one it seems the master branch has some commits targeting experiment

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-regenerator-runtime_0.9.5-1_amd64.changes

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
node-regenerator-runtime_0.9.5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-regenerator-runtime_0.9.5-1.dsc node-regenerator-runtime_0.9.5.orig.tar.gz node-regenerator-runtime_0.9.5-1.debian.tar.xz node-regenerator-runtime_0.9.5-1_all.deb Greetings,

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-regenerator-runtime_0.9.5-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:node-regenerator-runtime is NEW. source:node-regenerator-runtime is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] how to address node-lodash 841698

2016-11-02 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wednesday 02 November 2016 01:46 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: > For this one it seems the master branch has some commits targeting > experimental (4.3.0+dfsg-1 and 3.9.3+dfsg-1) that have not made it to to > sid yet: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-lodash.git/tree/debian/changelo

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-read-pkg-up_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
node-read-pkg-up_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-read-pkg-up_2.0.0-1.dsc node-read-pkg-up_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz node-read-pkg-up_2.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz node-read-pkg-up_2.0.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on h

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-read-pkg-up_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:node-read-pkg-up is NEW. source:node-read-pkg-up is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are ro

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-redent_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
node-redent_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-redent_2.0.0-1.dsc node-redent_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz node-redent_2.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz node-redent_2.0.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) --

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-redent_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:node-redent is NEW. source:node-redent is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely pr

[Pkg-javascript-devel] How debian manages npm module version conflicts ?

2016-11-02 Thread shanavas
Does debian allow installation of multiple version of same npm module via package manager ?. If not how will debian manage version conflicts like module a requires module c@1 and module b requires c@2 ? The directory structure suggested by nodejs [1] is not followed in debian. [1] https://nod

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] how to address node-lodash 841698

2016-11-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 02/11/2016 10:42, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Wednesday 02 November 2016 01:46 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> For this one it seems the master branch has some commits targeting >> experimental (4.3.0+dfsg-1 and 3.9.3+dfsg-1) that have not made it to to >> sid yet: >> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pk

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] How debian manages npm module version conflicts ?

2016-11-02 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wednesday 02 November 2016 03:50 PM, shana...@disroot.org wrote: > Does debian allow installation of multiple version of same npm module > via package manager ?. > > If not how will debian manage version conflicts like module a requires > module c@1 and module b requires c@2 ? We'll update mod

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1_amd64.changes

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1.dsc node-snapdragon_0.8.1.orig.tar.gz node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1.debian.tar.xz node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host u

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:node-snapdragon is NEW. source:node-snapdragon is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are rout

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-regex-cache_0.4.3-1_amd64.changes

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
node-regex-cache_0.4.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-regex-cache_0.4.3-1.dsc node-regex-cache_0.4.3.orig.tar.gz node-regex-cache_0.4.3-1.debian.tar.xz node-regex-cache_0.4.3-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on h

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-regex-cache_0.4.3-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:node-regex-cache is NEW. source:node-regex-cache is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are ro

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] How debian manages npm module version conflicts ?

2016-11-02 Thread shanavas
Forwarded message --- From: shana...@disroot.org To: "Pirate Praveen" Sent: November 2, 2016 3:51 PM Subject: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] How debian manages npm module version conflicts ? November 2, 2016 2:21 PM, "Pirate Praveen" wrote: > On Wednesday 02 November 2016 03:50 PM, sha

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] how to address node-lodash 841698

2016-11-02 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wednesday 02 November 2016 04:11 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Fine, can you review what I have done so far and if it's OK sponsor it ? > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-lodash.git/log/?h=debian/master-2.4 I have uploaded it even though there are other possible improvements (l

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4_source.changes

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4.dsc node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javasc

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4_source.changes REJECTED

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4.dsc: Invalid size hash for node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz: According to the control file the size hash should be 797714, but node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz has 807593. If you did not include node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz in your upload, a different version

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4_amd64.changes

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4.dsc node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz libjs-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4_all.deb node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on ho

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-lodash_2.4.1+dfsg-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 11:17:34 +0100 Source: node-lodash Binary: node-lodash libjs-lodash Architecture: source all Version: 2.4.1+dfsg-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#841698: marked as done (node-lodash: FTBFS with bash as /bin/sh)

2016-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:33:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#841698: fixed in node-lodash 2.4.1+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #841698, regarding node-lodash: FTBFS with bash as /bin/sh to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#835581: marked as done (node-es6-promise: FTBFS in testing (compile-modules shows usage help))

2016-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Nov 2016 17:28:03 +0100 with message-id and subject line Better than fixed : closed has caused the Debian Bug report #835581, regarding node-es6-promise: FTBFS in testing (compile-modules shows usage help) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-moment 2.15.2+ds-1 MIGRATED to testing

2016-11-02 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the node-moment source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.15.1+ds-1 Current version: 2.15.2+ds-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-for-in 0.1.6-1 MIGRATED to testing

2016-11-02 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the node-for-in source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.1.4-1 Current version: 0.1.6-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rec

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] jquery 3.x uploaded to unstable

2016-11-02 Thread Mathias Behrle
* Antonio Terceiro: " [Pkg-javascript-devel] jquery 3.x uploaded to unstable" (Sat, 22 Oct 2016 20:53:21 -0200): Hi Antonio, > To those who care about jquery: I have just uploaded jquery 3.1.1-1 to > unstable. > > jQuery 3.x is supposed to be mostly backwards compatible with 1.x, > however the

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: forcibly merging 840967 842465

2016-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 840967 842465 Bug #840967 [npm2deb] use npm dist tarballs when repo does not have any tags Bug #842465 [npm2deb] npm2deb: Use npm registry url in watch files Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'important' Merged 840967 842465 > thanks Stop

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] how to address node-lodash 841698

2016-11-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 02/11/2016 14:36, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Wednesday 02 November 2016 04:11 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> Fine, can you review what I have done so far and if it's OK sponsor it ? >> >> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-lodash.git/log/?h=debian/master-2.4 > > I have uploaded it e

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-regex-cache_0.4.3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:15:17 +0530 Source: node-regex-cache Binary: node-regex-cache Architecture: source all Version: 0.4.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Sru

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-read-pkg-up_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:42:44 +0530 Source: node-read-pkg-up Binary: node-read-pkg-up Architecture: source all Version: 2.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Sru

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-11-02 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi, please mention snapdragon-0.8.1/lib/source-maps.js in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-regenerator-runtime_0.9.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-11-02 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention at least package/runtime.js in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-redent_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:01:39 +0530 Source: node-redent Binary: node-redent Architecture: source all Version: 2.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: Sruthi Chandr

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-js-tokens_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
node-js-tokens_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-js-tokens_2.0.0-1.dsc node-js-tokens_2.0.0.orig.tar.gz node-js-tokens_2.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz node-js-tokens_2.0.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-js-tokens_2.0.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:node-js-tokens is NEW. source:node-js-tokens is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routin

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-chalk on debian - possible mistake?

2016-11-02 Thread Lucas Castro
I was looking at node-chalk that's already is in Debian. But it's not all its build dependences in debian. chalk homepage on debian package: https://github.com/chalk/chalk npm2deb returned dependences and build-dependences: npm2deb depends -r chalk Dependencies: NPM

[Pkg-javascript-devel] ie7-js is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-11-02 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
ie7-js 2.1~beta4-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-11-24 It is affected by these RC bugs: 842130: libjs-ie7: Useless in Stretch -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-chalk on debian - possible mistake?

2016-11-02 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2016, നവംബർ 3 8:44:12 AM IST, Lucas Castro wrote: >I was looking at node-chalk that's already is in Debian. > >But it's not all its build dependences in debian. Some of them are optional, used only for code coverage, linting etc. We are mostly interested in running tests and mocha is alrea

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1_amd64.changes

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1.dsc node-snapdragon_0.8.1.orig.tar.gz node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1.debian.tar.xz node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host u

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-snapdragon_0.8.1-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2016-11-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:node-snapdragon is NEW. source:node-snapdragon is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are rout

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed: add support for npm dist tarballs

2016-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 840967 by -1 Bug #840967 [npm2deb] use npm dist tarballs when repo does not have any tags Bug #842465 [npm2deb] npm2deb: Use npm registry url in watch files 840967 was not blocked by any bugs. 840967 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 840967: 8