On Monday 20 April 2015 18:41:26 Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thanks for pushing this transition. What do you think, if I
> have a library, which is now built against qt4, should I just
> switch to qt5 or create lib-qt5-dev for the transition period?
The best thing to do is, if possible, prov
Hello,
thanks for pushing this transition. What do you think, if I
have a library, which is now built against qt4, should I just
switch to qt5 or create lib-qt5-dev for the transition period?
The second question is the problem with armel and armhf
qt5-builds. I think it will cause some problems [
On Thursday 16 April 2015 15:59:58 you wrote:
> Hi everyone! I have drafted a Qt4-removal announce in gobby, Teams→KDE→Qt4,
> right at the top.
After some discussing with Dmitry on IRC we decided it would be better to
start announcing Qt4's webkit removal and using that as propaganda for
suggest
On April 16, 2015 7:21:44 PM EDT, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
wrote:
>On Thursday 16 April 2015 18:43:52 Scott Kitterman wrote:
>[snip]
>> If you look at what paultag started regarding python3 migration (see
>dda), I
>> think that's a good model for creating positive motivation to work
On Thursday 16 April 2015 18:43:52 Scott Kitterman wrote:
[snip]
> If you look at what paultag started regarding python3 migration (see dda), I
> think that's a good model for creating positive motivation to work on
> porting thing.
Right, although we don't have the porting team ;)
**Maybe** we s
On April 16, 2015 6:29:17 PM EDT, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
wrote:
>On Thursday 16 April 2015 22:37:52 Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote:
>> On Thursday 16 April 2015 15:58:58 Scott Kitterman wrote:
>[snip]
>> Hi, the porting progress of KDE Applications is currently working
>quite
>> nice
On April 16, 2015 6:29:17 PM EDT, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
wrote:
>On Thursday 16 April 2015 22:37:52 Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote:
>> On Thursday 16 April 2015 15:58:58 Scott Kitterman wrote:
>[snip]
>> Hi, the porting progress of KDE Applications is currently working
>quite
>> nice
On Thursday 16 April 2015 22:37:52 Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote:
> On Thursday 16 April 2015 15:58:58 Scott Kitterman wrote:
[snip]
> Hi, the porting progress of KDE Applications is currently working quite
> nicely IMO. An overview on what currently is already ported is e.g. here:
>
> http://dev
On Thursday 16 April 2015 15:58:58 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I would also like some input from the KDE maintainers, specially (but not
> > limited to) maxy on how KDE's porting efforts are being developed (for
> > example, do you think we will have a usable KDE with Qt5 experience by the
> > end o
On Thursday, April 16, 2015 03:59:58 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Hi everyone! I have drafted a Qt4-removal announce in gobby, Teams→KDE→Qt4,
> right at the top.
>
> As many of you might know there are different feelings about this removal.
> On one hand we will not be having a
Hi everyone! I have drafted a Qt4-removal announce in gobby, Teams→KDE→Qt4,
right at the top.
As many of you might know there are different feelings about this removal. On
one hand we will not be having anything else but security-related bugs fixed
in Qt4 from the next point release which shoul
11 matches
Mail list logo
