On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 01:07 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Looks pretty good to me, but I'm just learning myself :)
Thanks for having a look.
One thing I like to mention: The upstream sources come with a Makefile
based on a apparently old Makefile template for libdirs. It was pretty
broken
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
What in the above does not make sense?
Mmmh.. actually nothing :)
Never mind, I'll re-introduce the copyright_hints file ASAP.
--
Alessio Treglia ales...@alessiotreglia.com
Debian Ubuntu Developer | Homepage:
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 09:38 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:16:03 (CEST), Roman Haefeli wrote:
Hi all
I checked in my first package. I tried to follow - where possible - very
closely to pd-motex, which has been already uploaded.
I would be glad if someone
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:36:10AM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 01:07 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Looks pretty good to me, but I'm just learning myself :)
Thanks for having a look.
One thing I like to mention: The upstream sources come with a Makefile
based on a
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:38:56AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Packagingwise, I think it is fine, but I'm umcomfortable with the two
patches. First, please use the patch metadata as described in
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/.
Oh, only saw this _after_ sending off same suggestion myself.
[ no need to CC me explicitly, just hit your 'reply to list' instead
'reply to all' button ]
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 10:06:50 (CEST), Roman Haefeli wrote:
The reason why I added the LICENSE file in the first place is because
the Makefile is hardcoded to install it. Probably I shouldn't have
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 10:48 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:38:56AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Packagingwise, I think it is fine, but I'm umcomfortable with the two
patches. First, please use the patch metadata as described in
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote:
Alessio, please revert that patch. It is the only (meaningful)
divergence from debian's csound.
Done and re-synced.
Thanks!
--
Alessio Treglia ales...@alessiotreglia.com
Debian Ubuntu Developer | Homepage:
Package: libavformat52
Version: 4:0.6-2
Severity: important
With mencoder 2:1.0~rc3++final.dfsg1-1 (current testing/unstable) I get
mencoder: relocation error: mencoder: symbol codec_wav_tags, version
LIBAVFORMAT_52 not defined in file libavformat.so.52 with link time reference
Installing
severity important 536885
severity important 588240
forcemerge 588240 592710 592704 591349 579994 595241 536885
stop
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 13:15:47 (CEST), Tom Parker wrote:
Package: libavformat52
Version: 4:0.6-2
Severity: important
With mencoder 2:1.0~rc3++final.dfsg1-1 (current
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 536885 important
Failed to set severity of Bug 536885 to important: Not altering archived bugs;
see unarchive.
unarchive 588240
Bug #588240 {Done: Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com} [mplayer] Crashes
immediately
Unarchived Bug
Am 02.09.2010 14:13, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
This should force the mplayer package to be upgraded when installing
ffmpeg 0.6.
I am all for it. The fact that mplayer uses ffmpeg internals forces us
to tie them together more closely.
[Reminds me of the internal vs. external ffmpeg packages
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 15:23:20 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 02.09.2010 14:13, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
This should force the mplayer package to be upgraded when installing
ffmpeg 0.6.
I am all for it. The fact that mplayer uses ffmpeg internals forces us
to tie them together more
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 588240 libavformat52
Bug #588240 {Done: Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com} [mplayer] Crashes
immediately
Bug reassigned from package 'mplayer' to 'libavformat52'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 588240 important
Bug #588240 {Done: Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com} [libavformat52]
Crashes immediately
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 588240 to the same value.
severity 592710 important
Bug #592710 {Done: Fabian
Package: vlc
Version: 1.1.3-1
Severity: normal
No audio comes out of an audio CD. I get the mesage
Potential ALSA version problem:
VLC failed to initialize your sound output device (if any).
Please update alsa-lib to version 1.0.23-2-g8d80d5f or higher to try to
fix
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 04:35:38PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
unmerge 592457
sererity 592457 serious
reassign 592457 ffmpeg
thanks
Tartler please stop that.
christian
Urgh. It's the maintainers prerogative to set a severity. If you
disagree you need to appeal to the Release Team
Am 02.09.2010 15:34, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
the situation improves, but now, we clearly have this problem. I'm
therefore going to add this.
Please proceed.
It indeed is possible by including an shlibs.local file in the mplayer
package.
True, but this would have to get regularly adjusted
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 04:35:38PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
unmerge 592457
sererity 592457 serious
reassign 592457 ffmpeg
thanks
Tartler please stop that.
christian
Urgh. It's the maintainers prerogative to set a severity. If you
reassign 592457 ftp.debian.org
thanks
Christian,
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:08:53PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 04:35:38PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
unmerge 592457
sererity 592457 serious
reassign 592457 ffmpeg
thanks
Tartler please stop that.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 592457 ftp.debian.org
Bug #592457 [ffmpeg] ffmpeg: forbidden encoders have been enabled
Bug reassigned from package 'ffmpeg' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
592457:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/09/10 05:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
So another approach would be to repackage the
tarball to just include the COPYING file. While we are at it, we could
also use the new Makefile and get rid of the other patch.
Instead of using a quilt
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 17:13:03 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 02/09/10 05:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
So another approach would be to repackage the
tarball to just include the COPYING file. While we are at it, we could
also use the new Makefile and get rid of the other patch.
Instead
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:13 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/09/10 05:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
So another approach would be to repackage the
tarball to just include the COPYING file. While we are at it, we could
also use the new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I find the subject lines very uninformative. I would like to change it
to this format:
$repository/$branch: $commitmsg
where $commitmsg is the first line of the commit message.
What do you think?
- --
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
-BEGIN PGP
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:21:54PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 17:13:03 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 02/09/10 05:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
So another approach would be to repackage the tarball to just
include the COPYING file. While we are at it, we could
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 17:37:12 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
I find the subject lines very uninformative. I would like to change it
to this format:
$repository/$branch: $commitmsg
where $commitmsg is the first line of the commit message.
I like the idea!
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard
On 02/09/10 11:52, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 17:37:12 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
I find the subject lines very uninformative. I would like to change it
to this format:
$repository/$branch: $commitmsg
where $commitmsg is the first line of the commit message.
I
On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:06 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 09:38 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:16:03 (CEST), Roman Haefeli wrote:
Hi all
I checked in my first package. I tried to follow - where possible
- very
closely to pd-motex, which has been
On Sep 2, 2010, at 3:36 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 01:07 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Looks pretty good to me, but I'm just learning myself :)
Thanks for having a look.
One thing I like to mention: The upstream sources come with a Makefile
based on a apparently
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 09:40 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 01/09/10 04:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
this package has been tried four times and every time we see a different
build error:
#1 (on lebrun):segfault in gcc
#2 (on schroeder): segfault in python (i.e. scons, the build
On 02/09/10 14:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 09:40 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 01/09/10 04:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
this package has been tried four times and every time we see a different
build error:
#1 (on lebrun):segfault in gcc
#2 (on schroeder): segfault
csound_5.12.1~dfsg-5_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
csound_5.12.1~dfsg-5_sparc.deb
csound-gui_5.12.1~dfsg-5_sparc.deb
csound-utils_5.12.1~dfsg-5_sparc.deb
libcsound64-5.2_5.12.1~dfsg-5_sparc.deb
libcsnd-java_5.12.1~dfsg-5_sparc.deb
Accepted:
csladspa_5.12.1~dfsg-5_sparc.deb
to main/c/csound/csladspa_5.12.1~dfsg-5_sparc.deb
csound-gui_5.12.1~dfsg-5_sparc.deb
to main/c/csound/csound-gui_5.12.1~dfsg-5_sparc.deb
csound-utils_5.12.1~dfsg-5_sparc.deb
to main/c/csound/csound-utils_5.12.1~dfsg-5_sparc.deb
Hi,
On Thu Sep 02, 2010 at 19:06:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
#4 (on schroeder): sigill in gcc
can you please try to compile it with -O0 on schroeder?
--
Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org | Debian System Administrator
Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Debian
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:58:57PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Sep 2, 2010, at 3:36 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 01:07 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Looks pretty good to me, but I'm just learning myself :)
Thanks for having a look.
One thing I like to
On Sep 2, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:58:57PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
On Sep 2, 2010, at 3:36 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 01:07 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Looks pretty good to me, but I'm just learning
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 06:38:18PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Sep 2, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:58:57PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
I was under the impression that dh would set the strip options in
the $(INSTALL_PROGRAM) for the
38 matches
Mail list logo
