(No need to CC me)
On 14/08/10 17:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 14:43 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 13/08/10 14:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> Now that there is a separate thread on cdbs vs dh, perhaps someone could
>>> give me some feedback on my pd-mot
On 14/08/10 11:14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:19:23AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 14/08/10 05:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Backporting a recent d
On 14/08/10 11:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> debhelper maintains a history of very stable interfaces, called compat
>>> levels. I'd really love to see something similar to cdbs. And t
Hi Burkhard (cc public Debian multimedia team mailinglist),
I am a Debian developer and recently got involved in the maintainance of
multimedia project packaging.
During a copyright and licensing audit I noticed an oddity of the
headers for regression tests in your gmerlin-avdecoder project:
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 14:43 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 13/08/10 14:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >
> > Now that there is a separate thread on cdbs vs dh, perhaps someone could
> > give me some feedback on my pd-motex package which happens to use dh.
> > I'm ready to fix whatever needs
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:12:28PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 09:30:32PM +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
and of course the debian/copyright has to be updated; hans?
I started on that yesterday, and am about half-way through that...
I discovered a licensing prob
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 09:30:32PM +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
i have committed that changes necessary to build gmerlin-avdecoer with
the excluded files.
Good.
from a technical side, i see one thing that needs to be done now:
update the "debian/libgmerlin-avdec1.symbols" file!
the orig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/13/2010 02:13 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> I'll do that now.
>
thanks a lot.
i have committed that changes necessary to build gmerlin-avdecoer with
the excluded files.
from a technical side, i see one thing that needs to be done now: update
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:19:23AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 05:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
wouldn't dare d
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> debhelper maintains a history of very stable interfaces, called compat
>> levels. I'd really love to see something similar to cdbs. And this very
>> strict commitment to stable interfaces
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:37:15PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:01:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
packaging related information which I#m not really interested in.
However, de just have this mailinglis
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:13:52PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:15:26 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:20:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:40:08 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
CDBS is more backports-friendly
On 06/08/10 14:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Felipe Sateler (06/08/2010):
>> I also just managed to build it on smetana. Looks like the buildd is
>> borked.
>>
>> What should I do next?
>
> I guess I'm going to give it back again and again, until it builds…
>
> I'm open to any ideas, of course.
On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> debhelper maintains a history of very stable interfaces, called compat
> levels. I'd really love to see something similar to cdbs. And this very
> strict commitment to stable interfaces and semantics help a lot for
> backporting packages.
How does maint
On 14/08/10 05:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
>>> wouldn't dare do...
>>
>> While I don't want to get in the dh/cdbs deba
Hi,
I noticed jack-tools is orphaned, and could really use an update. For example,
jack.play has been transport-aware for more than 3 years, and that didn't make
it into Debian yet.
Perhaps this package could be adopted by someone in the debian-multimedia team?
Kind regards,
Arnout
__
On 14/08/10 04:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:21:02 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:37:36PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
I would like to chime in and say that with the packages I've worked on
(besides my own), I found that both dh and cdbs get whatever I need
done. I however prefer dh.
I suspect that you (like Benjamin) mean modern short-form debhelp
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:15:26 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:20:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>
>> Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing, we didn't have enough
>> of that at debconf 10 ;-)
>
> The best way to keep a thread alive(!) is to feed it ne
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 592913 pending
Bug #592913 [jaaa] jaaa: Defective menu item
Added tag(s) pending.
> severity 592913 minor
Bug #592913 [jaaa] jaaa: Defective menu item
Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
wouldn't dare do...
While I don't want to get in the dh/cdbs debate (I'm fine with either),
this statement is not true. d
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:21:02 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
> BTW
22 matches
Mail list logo
