IOhannes m zmölnig:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 23:45:41 +0100
> =?UTF-8?Q?IOhannes_m_zm=c3=b6lnig_=28Debian/GNU=29?=
> wrote:
>> On 12/12/2016 10:06 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>> please fix the loader, so it respects the 'path' argument.
>>
>>
>> afaict, this is fixed in
yes, I'll happily review your fix.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Tags: pending
This is already fixed in the upstream svn, so the fix will be included when
0.27 is released.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Tags: pending
This is already fixed in the upstream svn, so the fix will be included in the
next release.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:55 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
I just uploaded a new version of openni, which should fix the open issues
preventing the openni-sensor-* packages from hitting testing. Thanks to
Jochen
' etc.
testing-migration: Migration: Not in testing for 186 days
Package: openni-sensor-pointclouds
Binary: libopenni-sensor-pointclouds-dev, libopenni-sensor-pointclouds0
Uploaders: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, Hans-Christoph Steiner
h
Hey Jochen,
FYI, this bug is preventing openni-sensor-pointclouds from being accepted from
unstable into Debian/testing.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734768
Fixing it should just be a matter of moving modules.xml from /etc to /var and
adding it to the postrm script.
.hc
Thanks for the patch! This would be a great thing to forward upstream, have
you tried that? I think they would accept it. I'm also OK with including it
as part of the Debian package regardless.
.hc
On 01/03/2014 04:44 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
Source: openni
Version: 1.5.4.0-6
Severity:
When I add the patch as the final patch in the package, it fails to build. It
looks like the patch is formatted for applying upstream. If you make your
patch a patch to the packaging, and I'll include it in the package.
dpkg-source: info: patches are not applied, applying them now
dpkg-source:
On 12/19/2013 09:15 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:50 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
hi fellow packagers,
now that i have become DM, i thought it probably time to do the last
step and become DD as well.
There is a lintian error on this package:
E: pd-cyclone source: missing-build-dependency dpkg-dev (= 1.16.1~)
Since I don't really maintain CDBS packages and IOhannes is stepping up on the
maintenance, I'm removing myself from Uploaders on this one.
I'll grant you upload on it, please handle
On 11/25/2013 06:52 AM, Hauke Wintjen wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org hat am 23. November 2013 um 18:43
geschrieben:
On 11/22/2013 05:55 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
Hi,
* Hauke Wintjen hwint...@rimpl-consulting.de [2013-11-21 09:30]:
Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org
On 11/25/2013 01:49 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-11-25 11:08]:
Uploaded! Let's hope ftp-masters likes it :)
Great, thanks :).
Could you remove the patches which shouldn't be there? I wouldn't know which
ones to keep and which to remove
On 11/24/2013 06:38 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
Hi Hans-Christoph,
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-11-23 13:28]:
* the descriptions in debian/control still mention avin2. Could you add
something about what makes this 'pointclouds' fork different than the
official
one
On 11/22/2013 05:55 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
Hi,
* Hauke Wintjen hwint...@rimpl-consulting.de [2013-11-21 09:30]:
Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org hat am 20. November 2013 um 20:13
geschrieben:
Also, what tool are you building it with? I couldn't get it to build with
either dpkg
On 11/09/2013 12:36 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-11-04 14:20]:
tarball to build the package from. Here's your git repo:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/openni-sensor-pointclouds.git;a=summary
I've just pushed an adapted
On 11/21/2013 04:41 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at [2013-11-21 10:37]:
it's always best to follow upstream as closely as possible (as long as
they make sane assumptions :-)), esp. in picky areas like SONAMEing.
if your package has not been in debian yet
binary packages.
These packages are also compiling / working on Raspbian(!).
See https://github.com/hcw70/OpenNI2
Regards
Hauke
Am Mittwoch, den 20.11.2013, 11:26 -0500 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
They've built up a new machine and have much of it restored, but its still
On 11/04/2013 02:32 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-11-04 14:20]:
Looks good. Next step is tagging a release there, so there is an upstream
tarball to build the package from.
I've just pushed Stable-5.1.0.41-pointclouds-1, can you import
On 10/30/2013 02:30 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-10-30 12:11]:
Patches in a Debian package are not meant for adding new functionality. They
are meant to get the code building/working/installing on Debian, and for
fixing security bugs. So
On 10/29/2013 10:46 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-10-29 10:10]:
My question is more the opposite: when do people use the plain version
without
any of the avin2 patches? I think we should call the current package
'openni-sensor-avin2-sensorkinect
On 10/28/2013 03:24 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
(just recent my previous reply, to all, sorry for the spam)
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-10-28 15:20]:
Is openni-sensor-primesense useful on its own? That seems like a lot of
patches to include in the package. Are people using
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org
Description:
libopenni-dev - headers for OpenNI 'Natural Interaction' frameworks
libopenni-java - Java framework
On Oct 28, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-10-28 13:26]:
At long last, we finally did it! openni is officially part of Debian (and
soon it'll be automatically included in Ubuntu).
Awesome!
primesense-nite-nonfree just got accepted
recently.
.hc
On Oct 2, 2013, at 3:10 AM, Ziv Hendel wrote:
Excellent!
Thank you for all your work,
Zivo.
-Original Message-
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner [mailto:h...@eds.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 4:21 AM
To: Ziv Hendel
Cc: Jochen Sprickerhof; Nobuhiro Iwamatsu; Debian
wrote:
Hi Hans!
I was finally able to find the original doc file :)
Here it is...
Is there anything else that's missing?
Zivo.
-Original Message-
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner [mailto:h...@eds.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 3:57 AM
To: Ziv Hendel
Subject: Re
-
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner [mailto:h...@eds.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 4:45 PM
To: Ziv Hendel
Cc: Jochen Sprickerhof; Nobuhiro Iwamatsu; Debian Multimedia Maintainers
Subject: Re: OpenNI_UserGuide.pdf in original Microsoft Word format?
Excellent! The Debian gatekeepers
On 06/18/2013 09:56 PM, Thomas Moulard wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org wrote:
On 05/20/2013 03:18 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
I just updated primesense-nite-nonfree to the latest version and updated the
packaging. I'm out of time on this sprint
Hey Hauke,
I'm emailing you as part of the team working on the OpenNI packages for
Debian. I'm glad to see you're work on openni2!
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707056
In case you haven't seen it, the most up-to-date version of the 'openni'
package is here:
On 07/27/2013 09:00 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Hi,
* files under External are licensed under different terms than those listed in
copyright file.
* libopenni0 recommends libopenni-sensor-primesense0, which is not available
in the archive
These are all fixed.
*
Hey,
I have a small request: would it be possible to include the original Microsoft
Word document that OpenNI/Documentation/OpenNI_UserGuide.pdf is generated
from? It would be useful for people used to that format rather than PDFs, and
also the original format is a better source for converting
On 06/18/2013 09:56 PM, Thomas Moulard wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org wrote:
On 05/20/2013 03:18 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
I just updated primesense-nite-nonfree to the latest version and updated the
packaging. I'm out of time on this sprint
On 05/21/2013 09:13 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-05-20 16:06]:
How about openni-sensor-avin2-sensorkinect? Is that still relevant?
No, it's all integrated into openni-sensor-primesense, so it's working
with the original Primesense and the Kinect
On 05/20/2013 03:18 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-05-20 14:44]:
Ok, I uploaded openni-sensor-primesense and osceleton to Debian just now.
Awesome, thanks!
What about primesense-nite-nonfree? Is there an updated version of that? Is
that still
On 05/20/2013 12:51 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-05-20 12:49]:
I just built openni-sensor-primesense and I got this lintian warning:
W: libopenni-sensor-primesense1: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libXnCore1
libXnDDK1 libXnDeviceFile1
On 05/20/2013 03:18 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2013-05-20 14:44]:
Ok, I uploaded openni-sensor-primesense and osceleton to Debian just now.
Awesome, thanks!
What about primesense-nite-nonfree? Is there an updated version of that? Is
that still
On 04/06/2013 03:32 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Hi,
Recently, Russ' blog post was echoed on http://planet.debian.org:
http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/journal/2013-04/001.html
In that post, he describes how to combine both the import tarball
and the have upstream history available in the
On Jul 2, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2012-06-29 11:58]:
Hey,
Hi Hans-Christoph,
This is great news! I'm also CCing the others who have contributed to the
current packages. I have little time to work on the OpenNI stuff
On 07/02/2012 10:43 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jul 2, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2012-06-29 11:58]:
Hey,
Hi Hans-Christoph,
This is great news! I'm also CCing the others who have contributed to the
current packages. I
Hey all,
I'm now officially a DD with upload privileges! I just tried them out,
uploading two simple packages that I had sitting around ready to go.
Thanks all for your help getting me there.
I have a little bit of time to do some uploads if there is anything
urgent that needs to make it into
On May 3, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:26:27PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I've drafted a message that I'd like to send to Christian publicly
Cc:-ing this list. It is attached to this mail for review by the
pkg-multimedia team. (Yes, I know this
On Apr 28, 2012, at 3:25 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
On Apr 26, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
wrote:
ffmpeg provides many
On Apr 26, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
ffmpeg provides many things that
libav does not. For example, I have written an audio redaction plugin for
ffmpeg. Such a plugin is not possible in libav
On Apr 27, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 26.04.2012 18:18, schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
When I read statements like Uploading ffmpeg would be a bad idea, it
seems to me that the Debian-multimedia team has taken sides on the
ffmpeg-libav fork dispute. That is not a position
Ok, I've just had to dive deep into this stuff again, but sadly this time on
Mac OS X. The good news is that almost all of this experience will be easy to
apply to the Debian packages. Indeed, I was packaging for Fink which uses a
lot of Debian tools and even .deb packages. Here are the
Woo hoo! Back on the road to becoming a DD, thanks Felipe!
.hc
On Jan 15, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I have just advocated you.
Cheers
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 16:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
A month later and resounding silence, either everyone
to do next.
.hc
On Dec 9, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey all,
Now that I've been a DM for at over 6 months, I'm thinking I'm ready to take
the final step and become a full DD. Then not only will I no longer need to
bother y'all with my upload requests, but then I can
Thanks for the bug report and patch, I'm also upstream on this, so I can get it
in there. One question: I noticed that epsilon is 1e-9 as a float. We're in
the process of porting all Pd libraries to support a 64-bit t_float and
t_sample. The 'vbap' library is not there yet, but we hope to
On Jan 10, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Reinhard Tartler siretart at gmail.com writes:
I'm not really convinced by 'avtools' and 'avutils', as both seem
pretty generic to me. 'libav' was chosen to follow the name change of
the project 'ffmpeg'-'libav'.
To clarify:
There
AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I am trying to get pd-hid into Debian/testing and also Ubuntu by getting
it in before the Ubuntu Debian Import deadline. This update of
pd-mapping (0.2-2) is the last step, but I don't yet had upload
priviledges for it. Its all ready for upload, hopefully
I am trying to get pd-hid into Debian/testing and also Ubuntu by getting
it in before the Ubuntu Debian Import deadline. This update of
pd-mapping (0.2-2) is the last step, but I don't yet had upload
priviledges for it. Its all ready for upload, hopefully someone can
upload it in the next day
I was just looking into the OpenNI/PrimeSense updates. There are new source
releases, and they've changed the URL and the binary layout of the NITE
middleware. Has anyone got this stuff working or made any recent updates on
this? It would be great if we could get the packages working again
Hey all,
Now that I've been a DM for at over 6 months, I'm thinking I'm ready to take
the final step and become a full DD. Then not only will I no longer need to
bother y'all with my upload requests, but then I can also handle the upload
requests of others! Here are the 34 packages I am one
On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:00 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:53, Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com wrote:
If time allows,
Finally some time... :/
could you also have a look at pd-pdstring? It's been
waiting for some time and I have ironed out all issues that were
Daniel,
Looks like Eleanor found the answer. So the thing to do is change the
download URL in the script in that package.
.hc
On Oct 20, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Eleanor Blackmore wrote:
Looks like the real problem is that the download site has been
changed, so
wget is retrieving a html
If you can post a fix to this, I'll include it in the git repo and
post some updated packages on launchpad.
.hc
On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Daniel Squires wrote:
Oops, Eleanor is my wife,I replied using her old email profile,
sorry about
that.
I got it installing ok, now trying to
That .deb is generated by the installing of openni-module-primesense-
nite-nonfree, it downloads the non-free binaries and makes a deb out
of it. I'm on a 32-bit system, it works for me. But I think the
author of that package is on 64-bit.
I cc'ed the pkg-multimedia team to see if
On Oct 10, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at
wrote:
I was just checking in on my packages, it seems that pd-hid is
caught in
unstable for 75 days, but I can't figure out what the issue is. The
error message
FYI, here's the answer from debian-release:
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 22:01 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 16:43 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I was just checking in on my packages, it seems that pd-hid is caught in
unstable for 75 days, but I can't figure out what
On Oct 8, 2011, at 1:15 AM, Simon Wise wrote:
On 08/10/11 12:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Oct 7, 2011, at 11:48 PM, Simon Wise wrote:
On 07/10/11 23:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I was just checking in on my packages, it seems that pd-hid is
caught in
unstable for 75 days
I was just checking in on my packages, it seems that pd-hid is caught in
unstable for 75 days, but I can't figure out what the issue is. The
error message is Adding pd-hid makes 1 non-depending packages
uninstallable on kfreebsd-amd64: pd-hid
On Oct 4, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 13:06 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Oct 3, 2011, at 3:54 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@pd-dev: in the course of making packages for debian, we discovered
another
I find that Launchpad is a good place to test new packages. I think
you have a launchpad account already, so it should be easy. I always
upload my packages to my launchpad before submitting them for upload
to Debian. So far, I haven't remembered how to use cowbuilder or
pbuilder... an
This is fixed upstream already in most of these, and will be soon in
the rest. Its less than half of the pd-* packages that are effected,
according to buildd. The list of affected packages is:
pd-bsaylor pd-cxc pd-cyclone pd-ekext pd-ext13 pd-ggee pd-hcs pd-
markex pd-maxlib pd-mjlib
One important upstream detail is that the lib is called 'osc', the
folder in SVN is called 'osc', the package is called 'pd-osc',
therefore the OSC-meta.pd needs to be osc-meta.pd to match the library
and package name. That change is already in the upstream SVN.
Also, it'd be good to
On Jul 29, 2011, at 9:25 AM, Romain Beauxis wrote:
2011/7/29 Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org:
Accepted:
lame-doc_3.98.4+repack2-1_all.deb
to main/l/lame/lame-doc_3.98.4+repack2-1_all.deb
(...)
Guys,
I am impressed, really impressed...
Thanks you all!
Romain
Yay!
On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:38 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 16:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner
h...@at.or.at wrote:
There is one more package with the same fatal error: m_pd.h: No
such file
or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev) bug that needs uploading:
pd-pmpd
On Jul 20, 2011, at 11:07 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 23:50, Hans-Christoph Steiner
h...@at.or.at wrote:
On Jun 14, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:01 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 14:43, Hans-Christoph
With the primesense-nite-nonfree, it downloads the binary and
generates the openni-module-primesense-nite-nonfree_1.3.1.5-1_i386.deb
package but it doesn't install it afterwards. It seems to me that it
should install it automatically, since that's the only purpose of
installing
On Jun 19, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 09:05:46 (CEST), Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
According to the git-buildpackage documentation [1] the upstream-
branch
can either be imported or a branch you can pull from. So generating
tarballs from a git and then
On Jun 1, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Cosimo Alfarano wrote:
On 31/05/11 03:49, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ah, cool, so we have an uploader :) I'm just a DM. I'm not sure
about
Cosimo.
I'm a DD.
BTW, update to the pkgs status:
I tried yesterday the three repos, they worked.
I just pushed
On Jun 19, 2011, at 3:05 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2011-06-19 00:07]:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:07 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof
joc...@sprickerhof.de wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2011-06-07 18:47]:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 6:44 PM, Jochen
I was just looking at the udev stuff in primesense-kinect-sensor. It
seems to me that we should probably ignore their 55-primesense-usb.rules
file and do it the proper Debian way. Nobuhiro, I see you are a
maintainer on bluez, which installs udev rules. Do you think you could
set up the proper
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:07 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof
joc...@sprickerhof.de wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2011-06-07 18:47]:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 6:44 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org [2011-06-06 13:05]:
I have not been in contact
On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:01 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 14:43, Hans-Christoph Steiner
h...@at.or.at wrote:
On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner
h...@at.or.at
wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:30
On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:06, Hans-Christoph Steiner
h...@at.or.at wrote:
On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:40 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner
h...@at.or.at
wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:18
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 13:30 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:06, Hans-Christoph Steiner
h...@at.or.at wrote:
On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:40 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:05, Hans
Here are my lowest priority uploads, but I hope to get them uploaded
in time to be included in Ubuntu/oneiric. An easier fix to all these
RC bugs would be to get someone to upload the 'puredata' package from
collab-maint/puredata.git. IOhannes and I have been asking the
maintainers to
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:30 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:45, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:41 -0300, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 21:55, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org
wrote
, Jun 7, 2011 at 17:30, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
And a gentle ping on these packages... but for me puredata-import is a
higher prioity for uploading.
Thanks in advance!
.hc
On May 25, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
After the 'hold
pd-moonlib was uploaded before, but was rejected by the ftpmasters
because the LGPL-covered files were not documented distinct from the
over-arching GPL of the project. That's fixed, as well as other recent
issues that have come up, and pd-moonlib is ready for upload!
Source: pd-bassemu
Version: 0.3-2
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on
Source: pd-beatpipe
Version: 0.1-2
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
Tags: wheezy sid pending help
I am the packager and lead maintainer on this package. I have fixed
this bug and pushed the fixes to the git.debian.org repo listed in the
Vcs-* lines. The package is ready for upload, but I am a DM without
upload permissions on this package.
I have been looking
1 - 100 of 280 matches
Mail list logo