Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2007-03-14 17:09-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm having trouble on Fedora 6 and development, which use gnat 4.1.1 and
4.1.2. First off, libgnat appears to be /usr/lib/libgnat-4.1.so.
Also, it appears to be picking up my CFLAGS and passing that to the
gnatmake
On 2007-03-14 17:09-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm having trouble on Fedora 6 and development, which use gnat 4.1.1 and
4.1.2. First off, libgnat appears to be /usr/lib/libgnat-4.1.so.
Also, it appears to be picking up my CFLAGS and passing that to the
gnatmake line:
I have just
Hi Alan,
However, that was because I replaced
-plbox(bc, 0.0, 0, bc, 0.0, 0);
+Box_Around_Viewport(TUB(bc), 0.0, 0, TUB(bc), 0.0, 0);
If I use plbox rather than Box_Around_Viewport, then the result has
extraneous tick marks. I don't understand the cause of this problem. The
same
I just realized that I fell a day or so behind on reading my list
mail. On the weekend I figured out CVS more or less--I made the
problem harder by trying to see if the CVS functionality built into
Apple's Xcode would help me out and in this case it does not. I'm
just following Alan's
On 2007-03-07 04:19-0700 Jerry wrote:
[...]so Tuesday
I figured out the Cmake stuff and now have my example (not an
official plplot example but more complicated) working with 5.7.2. So
I believe I'm ready to fix the things that Alan found a few days ago
and then generate some more example
On 2007-03-05 04:10-0700 Jerry wrote:
It sounds like this might be a question for comp.lang.ada if you guys
don't get it cracked soon.
That's a good idea for the future.
However, what we need most now is some comprehensive platform testing. The
current form of experimental CMake support for
Hi,
However, what we need most now is some comprehensive platform testing. The
current form of experimental CMake support for Ada works fine on all Debian
and Ubuntu platforms where it has been tested. It does have filename
extension problems on MinGW, but at most those problems will affect
Hi Alan,
What happens when you run gnatmake testadacompiler.adb where that file
consists of the following simple Ada source?
procedure testAdaCompiler is
begin
null;
end;
For MinGW we obtain:
Z:\DevZonegnatmake testadacompiler.adb
gcc -c testadacompiler.adb
gnatbind -x
Hi Alan,
That's a surprising result. What happens for the equivalent PLplot C core
library build? I assume the extensions for the -o option will be .obj (like
above), that gcc will build those objects without complaint, and in the next
step (doing the special linking with gcc to create the
On 2007-03-03 21:18+0100 Werner Smekal wrote:
Hi Alan,
That's a surprising result. What happens for the equivalent PLplot C core
library build? I assume the extensions for the -o option will be .obj (like
above), that gcc will build those objects without complaint, and in the next
step
On 2007-02-28 19:34-0700 Jerry wrote:
So--I recommend just renaming all the example files to x??a.adb and
letting them run as standalones, and eliminating the x??.adb and
x??.ads naming level completely. That was my intention originally but
I see that I forgot to adopt that naming convention.
On 2007-03-01 09:40-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2007-02-28 19:34-0700 Jerry wrote:
So--I recommend just renaming all the example files to x??a.adb and
letting them run as standalones, and eliminating the x??.adb and
x??.ads naming level completely. That was my intention originally but
I
On Mar 1, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2007-03-01 09:40-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2007-02-28 19:34-0700 Jerry wrote:
So--I recommend just renaming all the example files to x??a.adb and
letting them run as standalones, and eliminating the x??.adb and
x??.ads naming level
On 2007-02-27 16:25-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
ToDo:
(2) Set up ctest so that the ada example will be executed as a result of the
ctest command. This refinement is not essential for testing so long as you
remember to set the EXAMPLES_DIR, SRC_EXAMPLES_DIR, and PLPLOT_LIB
environment
I'll look into the plparseopts situation.
Also, with the examples, the former ada_plplot.adb is just a high-
level driver to run all of the examples as they become available--it
is not necessary if the examples are kept as stand-alone programs.
So--I recommend just renaming all the example
I am pretty satisfied with the CMake build system improvements I have just
checked in to substantially refine how we deal with the Ada interface and
examples. Here is what I have done.
* I have implemented a limited Ada language support for CMake. As a result
of this effort, add_library should
Hi,
I already added gnat to my MinGW tools, so I'll post results for this
toolchain soon.
thanks for the efforts,
Werner
Arjen Markus wrote:
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
I am pretty satisfied with the CMake build system improvements I have just
checked in to substantially refine how we deal with
17 matches
Mail list logo
