Re: Multiimage branch (was: next step)

2003-08-14 Thread Adam McDaniel
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:12:43PM +0200, Michael Nordstrom wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2003, Adam McDaniel wrote: Any chance we can include the multiimage branch within HEAD at this point as well? :) Well, the only way for that to happen is if you actually include it in the main trunk before

Re: Multiimage branch (was: next step)

2003-08-14 Thread Alexander R. Pruss
I am just looking for some font smoothing. I don't expect to do sub-pixel positioning of the characters. We'll have to see if it looks any good. -- Dr. Alexander R. Pruss Department of Philosophy Georgetown University Washington, DC 20057-1133 U.S.A. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] online papers and

Multiimage branch (was: next step)

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Nordstrom
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003, Adam McDaniel wrote: Any chance we can include the multiimage branch within HEAD at this point as well? :) Well, the only way for that to happen is if you actually include it in the main trunk before we make a 1.5 release... /Mike

Re: Multiimage branch (was: next step)

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Nordstrom
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: What kind of timeline are we looking at? This weekend... I'd like a week for anti-aliasing support, myself. :-) Then I don't think it will be include in 1.5 (but there will still be 1.5.1, 1.5.2, etc. ) /Mike

Re: Multiimage branch (was: next step)

2003-08-05 Thread Alexander R. Pruss
05, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: Multiimage branch (was: next step) On Tue, Jul 29, 2003, Adam McDaniel wrote: Any chance we can include the multiimage branch within HEAD at this point as well? :) Well, the only way for that to happen is if you actually include it in the main trunk before we make

Re: Multiimage branch (was: next step)

2003-08-05 Thread Alan Hoyle
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 at 15:40, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: What kind of timeline are we looking at? I'd like a week for anti-aliasing support, myself. :-) Are you talking sub-pixel, (color LCD) anti-aliasing? I suspect that would be pretty hard with configurable screen orientation -alan --

Re: next step

2003-08-03 Thread Michael Nordstrom
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003, Michael Nordstrom wrote: Give me a chance to include the changes from 1.4 first; it will take at least another couple of days. Now I have included the bug fixes from 1.4 in the unstable branch. I've also changed the scroll-to-bottom feature back to a compile time option.

Re: next step

2003-08-03 Thread Alexander R. Pruss
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Michael Nordstrom wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2003, Michael Nordstrom wrote: Give me a chance to include the changes from 1.4 first; it will take at least another couple of days. Now I have included the bug fixes from 1.4 in the unstable branch. I've also changed the

Re: next step

2003-08-03 Thread Michael Nordstrom
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: Would you mind THREE compile-time options: --scroll-to-bottom=always --scroll-to-bottom=never --scroll-to-bottom=runtime-configurable ? Yes, since I don't see any reason to make this a runtime option. How often do you really change this

Re: next step

2003-08-03 Thread Alexander R. Pruss
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Michael Nordstrom wrote: On Sun, Aug 03, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: Would you mind THREE compile-time options: --scroll-to-bottom=always --scroll-to-bottom=never --scroll-to-bottom=runtime-configurable ? Yes, since I don't see any reason to make this a

Re: next step

2003-08-03 Thread Michael Nordstrom
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: Of course if we are willing to distribute both sets of binaries, that's fine with me, but I think that with the multiple language versions, the light, full and hi-res versions, etc., it will be a mess. As I have said before we don't have to

Re: next step

2003-08-03 Thread Adam McDaniel
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 10:46:26AM -0400, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: I like giving power to the end-user, and letting end-users make as many decisions as possible. (One of my pet peeves is developers who could have added a simple user-configurable option to do something that a user might want

Re: next step

2003-07-30 Thread Chris Hawks
of days. Considering the amount of downloads we might want to wait a week or two before we release a first 1.5 version, though ;-) And let the servers cool down! 8^) --re: Re: next step Chris Christopher R. Hawks Software Engineer Syscon Plantstar a Division

Re: next step

2003-07-30 Thread David A. Desrosiers
Considering the amount of downloads we might want to wait a week or two before we release a first 1.5 version, though ;-) I think we're doing good now that the majority of BIG downloads are out of the way (fingers crossed). I've started pushing the files back on the announce sites

Re: next step

2003-07-30 Thread David A. Desrosiers
And let the servers cool down! 8^) (Nervously blowing on the disk drives) No, we're fine, everything's fine.. I'm with Mike on this, I had no idea 1.4 was this popular, and officially, we haven't even made a public release/announcement yet. The only thing I can figure

Re: next step

2003-07-30 Thread Alexander R. Pruss
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Michael Nordstrom wrote: Give me a chance to include the changes from 1.4 first; it will take at least another couple of days. And I'd like to add rotation support to image.c, which may take two more days. Alex -- Dr. Alexander R. Pruss || e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: next step

2003-07-29 Thread Alexander R. Pruss
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Michael Nordstrom wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: Now that 1.4 is released, when is HEAD moving to alpha testing? As soon as I have merged the changes from the 1.4 branch with the main trunk. And I take it we will do a feature freeze at that

Re: next step

2003-07-29 Thread Adam McDaniel
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:13:35AM -0400, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Michael Nordstrom wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: Now that 1.4 is released, when is HEAD moving to alpha testing? As soon as I have merged the changes from the 1.4 branch with

Re: next step

2003-07-29 Thread Michael Nordstrom
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: And I take it we will do a feature freeze at that point? Nope. The main trunk is the unstable branch, so the development continues for a while longer (it will still be released as 1.5, but the odd number indicates an unstable release.) At some

Re: next step

2003-07-29 Thread Chris Hawks
? As soon as I have merged the changes from the 1.4 branch with the main trunk. And I take it we will do a feature freeze at that point? Any chance we can include the multiimage branch within HEAD at this point as well? :) Yeah!(?) --re: Re: next step Chris

next step

2003-07-28 Thread Alexander R. Pruss
Now that 1.4 is released, when is HEAD moving to alpha testing? Alex -- Dr. Alexander R. Pruss Department of Philosophy Georgetown University Washington, DC 20057-1133 U.S.A. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] online papers and home page: www.georgetown.edu/faculty/ap85

Re: next step

2003-07-28 Thread Michael Nordstrom
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: Now that 1.4 is released, when is HEAD moving to alpha testing? As soon as I have merged the changes from the 1.4 branch with the main trunk. /Mike ___ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]