I've read the cpan module docs and have looked at the cookbook example (
http://poe.perl.org/?POE_Cookbook/DBI_Helper_Processes). The following
modules all run non-blocking async dbi calls for poe but I'm not sure which
I should choose. I would love to see a pro/con list for these or get some
Hi,
I like POE-Component-EasyDBI
Actually, I've written a wrapper module
POE-Component-EasyDBI-Multiplex, which I've not yet made public, but
we're using to manage a pool of EasyDBI connections.
POE-Component-EasyDBI-Multiplex uses the same interface as
POE-Component-EasyDBI, but the whole API
I've been starting to implement something similar so I'd love to see this.
-Andrew
Phil Whelan wrote:
Hi,
I like POE-Component-EasyDBI
Actually, I've written a wrapper module
POE-Component-EasyDBI-Multiplex, which I've not yet made public, but
we're using to manage a pool of EasyDBI
Thanks for the suggestions so far!!! I think I will start with EasyDBI
specially since your multi-plex code will be available :)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Andrew Feren acfe...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've been starting to implement something similar so I'd love to see this.
-Andrew
Phil
I'd like to take a look at PoCo-EasyDBI-Multiplex.
Btw, I'm the EasyDBI author, so you can direct any questions about it to the
list.
David Davis
☄ Software Engineer
http://xant.us/
http://xantus.tel/
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:16, Phil Whelan phil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I like
Dear POE,
I'm sick of pulling my hair out because of your 1989 coding practice.
I've begun packing your bags to send you to Moose-landville. My goal
is to totally deprive you of blessed arrays, and closures in new. I
personal yearn for the day when you lack the confusing nonsense that
gives you
On Apr 27, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Evan Carroll wrote:
Dear POE,
I'm sick of pulling my hair out because of your 1989 coding practice.
I've begun packing your bags to send you to Moose-landville. My goal
is to totally deprive you of blessed arrays, and closures in new. I
personal yearn for the day
Ah... somebody send Evan some Syrup of Epicac.
I know from alot of the JaaaVVaa programmers I have to deal with...
Everything is an object to them. Well, not everything is an Object.
I actually like State machines BETTER.? So think of each POE session as a state
machine.? Look at
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:32 PM, David Davis david.da...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to take a look at PoCo-EasyDBI-Multiplex.
Btw, I'm the EasyDBI author, so you can direct any questions about it to the
list.
David Davis
Cool. Here it is.
$ cat
On Apr 27, 2009, at 17:53, Evan Carroll wrote:
[]
You seem to be trying to steal some of POE's cachet in the same breath
you're using to insult its developers and contributors.
According to http://www.ohloh.net/p/poe you're trying to walk off with
about 34,100 lines of code and
None, any, or all of this may be true.
But I got laid this week.
And built three new POE engines. It was really easy because I'm smart.
- billn
On Apr 27, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Evan Carroll wrote:
Dear POE,
I'm sick of pulling my hair out because of your 1989 coding practice.
I've begun
Ok everyone. Evan made a mistake. He was probably making a joke but it
didn't go over well. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt. I hope
he uses POE as the start of making something really great. If not we
still have the POE we know and love.
-Todd
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Bill Nash
Entirely possible he's right. But nothing is perfect, and I would
never say POE is. But even at it's most succinct level, Evan's
diatribe slipped from funny to malicious, and pretty quick. I'm not
exactly the smartest perl programmer on the block, the fucked up shit
I do with POE not
I'm the designer, but I'm just trying to get a good feel for some best
practices with POE before I make my final decision on the direction.
I haven't completed my design because I'm not sure what the best route is
yet. Hence all my poe mail-list questions of late :)
My app will have the
No, it can be fine to combine services---even disparate ones---into
one program, if that's the best solution to your problem. Obviously
the applicability is up to you or your systems designer.
For example, Bot::Pastebot (CPAN) is an IRC client and a pastebin web
server in one program.
I read the combined service example in the POE cookbook (
http://poe.perl.org/?POE_Cookbook/Combined_Services).
It gave me an idea to have multiple services handled from a single kernel
run call. This way, I could handle an ajax request, a separate web_services
request (json-rpc) as well as ikc
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Rocco Caputo rcap...@pobox.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2009, at 17:53, Evan Carroll wrote:
...
You seem to be trying to steal some of POE's cachet in the same breath
you're using to insult its developers and contributors.
...
Your actions are rude, misleading and
I gave Evan the benefit of the doubt when I asked him to post here
despite his multi-year history of abuse in IRC. His project overlaps
the efforts of at least two readers, and I had hoped an announcement
would start some discussion between projects.
I assumed the change of venue might
On 28-Apr-2009 Josh803316 wrote:
Would it be foolish to try and do all 3 of these inside one kernel run?
Could an IKC server handle these types of requests without having to include
the other 2..with wheels and filters? I'm still very much learning the
ins and outs of POE so please
19 matches
Mail list logo
