Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.2

2024-04-20 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
This release fixes missing endbr / bti.Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/objfw/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p -r1.8 Makefile --- Makefile 15 Apr 2024 22:22:05 - 1.8 +++ Makefile 20 Apr 2024 21:48:06

Re: Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-15 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
+# .objc_sel_* symbols are for string de-duplication and can be ignored. +SHARED_LIBS += objfw 0.1 +SHARED_LIBS += objfwrt 0.1 SHARED_LIBS += objfwtls 0.0 CATEGORIES = devel @@ -12,7 +13,7 @@ HOMEPAGE = https://objfw.nil.im/ MAINTAINER = Jonathan Schleifer -# GPLv2 or GPLv3 or QPL +# LGPLv3

Re: Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-15 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 15.04.24 um 13:24 schrieb Jonathan Schleifer: Am 15.04.24 um 13:10 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: Heh, I remember I asked pretty much the same question when handling a previous update.  Could you please write down a comment above SHARED_LIBS that explains roughly which changes don't

Re: Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-15 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 15.04.24 um 13:10 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: Heh, I remember I asked pretty much the same question when handling a previous update. Could you please write down a comment above SHARED_LIBS that explains roughly which changes don't require a bump? That way you'll save precious

Re: Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 14.04.24 um 22:32 schrieb Theo Buehler: or are these .objc_* symbols somehow special? Those are all .objc_sel_name*. Those are symbols that just contain the selector name as a string. That's a selector being *used*, not exported. They're pretty similar to local symbols, however, they're

Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.1.1

2024-04-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
= https://objfw.nil.im/ MAINTAINER = Jonathan Schleifer -# GPLv2 or GPLv3 or QPL +# LGPLv3 PERMIT_PACKAGE = Yes # uses pledge() Index: distinfo === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/objfw/distinfo,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p

Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.0.11

2024-03-10 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Index: devel/objfw/Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/objfw/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -p -r1.7 Makefile --- devel/objfw/Makefile 25 Feb 2024 01:13:41 - 1.7 +++ devel/objfw/Makefile 10 Mar 2024 10:50:09 -

Re: devel/objfw: add BTCFI landing pads for amd64 and arm64

2024-02-24 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 24.02.24 um 23:22 schrieb Mark Kettenis: This is how the hardware behaves; see the documentation for PSTATE.BTYPE in Part D of the ARM Architecture Reference Manual (document DDI0487). The difference is that this will allow an attacker to exploit a "BR" type branch (jump) to jump to the

Re: devel/objfw: add BTCFI landing pads for amd64 and arm64

2024-02-24 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Fixed upstream: https://objfw.nil.im/info/262baf76e7e66bc4 https://objfw.nil.im/info/d73a388ecaf73b2a New release: https://objfw.nil.im/downloads/objfw-1.0.10.tar.gz https://objfw.nil.im/downloads/objfw-1.0.10.tar.gz.sig Am 24.02.24 um 22:17 schrieb Mark Kettenis: Ah, right. What happens in

Re: devel/objfw: add BTCFI landing pads for amd64 and arm64

2024-02-24 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 24.02.24 um 21:30 schrieb Mark Kettenis: Unless we explicitly mark them as not, yes, they will use IBT (but not Shadow Stack). Ah cool! No. Tail call elimination will use a *direct* branch, which doesn't need a landing pad at all. Not necessarily - I've seen tail call elimination on

Re: devel/objfw: add BTCFI landing pads for amd64 and arm64

2024-02-24 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 24.02.24 um 20:01 schrieb Theo Buehler: This adds missing landing pads for amd64 and arm64. Not sure if for upstream a dance using _CET_ENDBR would be preferable. For the port I kept it simple. ld: warning: objc_msg_lookup: missing endbr64 ld: warning: objc_msg_lookup_stret: missing

Update from maintainer: devel/objfw 1.0.8

2024-01-21 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Patch attached. Please also import to 7.4, as this contains quite the list of bugfixes compared to the previous 1.0.3. -- JonathanIndex: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/objfw/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p

Re: [UPDATE] devel/objfw to 1.0.4

2023-10-18 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Ping?

Re: [UPDATE] devel/objfw to 1.0.4

2023-10-09 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Also, I'd like to ask for this to be backported to 7.4, as it fixes a nasty bug where failing to open a file causes fd 0 to be closed. -- Jonathan

[UPDATE] devel/objfw to 1.0.4

2023-10-08 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Update devel/objfw to 1.0.4 -- JonathanIndex: devel/objfw/Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/objfw/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.5 Makefile --- devel/objfw/Makefile 21 Sep 2023 09:50:01 - 1.5 +++

[PATCH] Update devel/objfw to 1.0.3

2023-09-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Patch attached this time to be 100% sure my MUA doesn't screw it up. -- JonathanIndex: devel/objfw/Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/objfw/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -u -r1.3 Makefile ---

Re: UPDATE: objfw-1.0.2

2023-09-11 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 11.09.23 um 13:01 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: This diff and the previous one were likely mangled by your MUA. There are hints available: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/email-clients.html Or you may just send diffs as attachments (inline is still preferred). Ah,

UPDATE: objfw-1.0.2 (was: Re: UPDATE: objfw-1.0.1)

2023-09-10 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
And here's an update to the just released 1.0.2 instead. This is 1.0.1 with some additional fixes for macOS, so not important for OpenBSD. But when updating anyway, why not update to the latest version :). Index: Makefile === RCS

UPDATE: objfw-1.0.1

2023-09-10 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Fixes an issue with TLS connections and no longer requires a patch to disable the silent rules. Index: devel/objfw/Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/objfw/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -u -r1.2 Makefile ---

Re: New port: devel/objfw

2023-09-07 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 05.09.23 um 12:50 schrieb Stuart Henderson: Except it isn't robust to changes - it can just silently fail to apply, which doesn't happen with a patch. My worry was that a patch still applies and misses to remove an -s, then giving you only partial output, which is worse than no output.

Re: New port: devel/objfw

2023-09-04 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 04.09.23 um 16:30 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: Thanks. I have imported objfw as proposed in your last tarball, except with a simple patch for clarity instead of your ed(1) script. Thank you! My reason for using the ed script over a patch was that it'll be more robust to changes.

Re: New port: devel/objfw

2023-09-03 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 03.09.23 um 19:55 schrieb Stuart Henderson: yep, exactly. reasons: - we find that some upstream projects don't understand shared library versioning, and either increment the version number when not needed, or don't increment when it is needed. Upstream handling reads exactly like OpenBSD

Re: New port: devel/objfw

2023-09-03 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 03.09.23 um 19:49 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: I don't know which of .SILENT or make -s or the escape characters hide the compiler command lines used to build the object files, but let's find a way to disable this behaviour at least in the port. Attached is an updated port that

Re: New port: devel/objfw

2023-09-03 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
This would be small enough if the package still built. Moving SHARED_LIBS to 0.0 I get: Error: /usr/obj/pobj/objfw-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/libobjfw.so.0.0 does not exist Error: /usr/obj/pobj/objfw-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/libobjfwrt.so.0.0 does not exist Error:

Re: New port: devel/objfw

2023-09-03 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 03.09.23 um 12:55 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: On Sun, Sep 03 2023, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Am 31.08.23 um 09:56 schrieb Jonathan Schleifer: Am 31.08.23 um 08:26 schrieb Stuart Henderson: SHARED_LIBS +=  objfw   1.0 SHARED_LIBS +=  objfwrt 1.0 SHARED_LIBS

Re: New port: devel/objfw

2023-09-03 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 31.08.23 um 09:56 schrieb Jonathan Schleifer: Am 31.08.23 um 08:26 schrieb Stuart Henderson: SHARED_LIBS +=  objfw   1.0 SHARED_LIBS +=  objfwrt 1.0 SHARED_LIBS +=  objfwtls    1.0 I can't remember how strict we are with these version starting numbers but iirc we start

Re: New port: devel/objfw

2023-08-31 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 31.08.23 um 08:26 schrieb Stuart Henderson: SHARED_LIBS +=  objfw   1.0 SHARED_LIBS +=  objfwrt 1.0 SHARED_LIBS +=  objfwtls    1.0 I can't remember how strict we are with these version starting numbers but iirc we start with 0.1 (?) I don't really mind if this isn't

New port: devel/objfw

2023-08-30 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Hi! With ObjFW 1.0 being released yesterday, I thought to package it up for OpenBSD. Please find it attached and if it looks good, it would be great if it could be imported. -- Jonathan objfw.tar.gz Description: application/gzip

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

2009-01-16 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 16.01.2009 um 11:40 schrieb Pierre-Emmanuel André: I tested gajim with this patch (http://trac.gajim.org/changeset/10848) and it's better but i still have random deconnexions with my jabber servers (Ichat server and 2 ejabberd )(less deconnexions but there are still here). The only thing

Re: UPDATE: mcs and mowgli

2009-01-13 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Too end this long discussion: Am 12.01.2009 um 23:22 schrieb Matthias Kilian: From my point of view (as a porter), Makefiles hiding details, or Makefiles I have to look at before I can be sure that they don't lie, are just additional work. And hiding details doesn't give anyone anything IMHO.

Re: UPDATE: mcs and mowgli

2009-01-12 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 12.01.2009 um 07:33 schrieb Federico G. Schwindt: I prefer to have the full output rather than only the ANSI'd version of it (which is quite ugly IMHO). Would removing the colours work for you? If not, I recommend removing the printfs completely. But the plain output will be ugly anyway,

Re: UPDATE: mcs and mowgli

2009-01-12 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 12.01.2009 um 16:14 schrieb Federico G. Schwindt: I don't know others, but as developer I would never prefer colorful output over the real one, and I don't find it very useful, neither for me nor for anyone who might need to report issues during building. Well, you see the compiler and

Re: UPDATE: mcs and mowgli

2009-01-12 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 12.01.2009 um 18:23 schrieb Stuart Henderson: imho it is a bit ugly, but if being able to see the compiler command lines requires slightly ugly output, I'd rather have the ugly output. (i'd prefer it even more with a proper option that hides the internal build system logic and the lines like

Re: UPDATE: mcs and mowgli

2009-01-12 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 12.01.2009 um 21:48 schrieb Matthias Kilian: No, it isn't. There may be errors in the Makefile. There may be overrides in the environment and/or command line that may *not* work as desired which you can't check by just looking at the Makefile. Have you actually looked at the Makefile and

Re: UPDATE: mcs and mowgli

2009-01-11 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Hi! I'm the developer of the build system audacious, libmcs and libmowgli use. You shouldn't just comment out .SILENT:, as this is only for debugging. Usually, you should be fine without commenting it :). The other thing I see it that you disable dependency checks, but yet let it

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

2009-01-10 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 10.01.2009 um 01:59 schrieb viq: Any news on that? BTW, there's 0.12.1 out. 0.12.1 only fixes file transfers. I've given up fixing that timeout bug because whatever I do, there's always someone complaining like But then I won't notice within 5 sec that my connection is down!

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

2009-01-10 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 10.01.2009 um 22:33 schrieb Stuart Henderson: On 2009/01/10 15:35, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: I did several patches, one increasing the timeouts to sane values, That sounds like a reasonable thing to put in the port. http://trac.gajim.org/changeset/10848 It was reverted because some

Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership

2008-12-19 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 19.12.2008 um 12:22 schrieb Pierre-Emmanuel André: Thanks for your update Simon. I will not commit this update now: after a full day of testing, i've some regressions with this version. I tested with 3 accounts based on 3 differents servers(ichat server, ejabberd 1.1.2 and ejabberd 2.0.1)

Re: gajim-0.12-alpha1

2008-08-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Simon Kuhnle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @@ -18,5 +10,5 @@ -helpers.exec_command('python history_manager.py ') +helpers.exec_command('%s history_manager.py ' % (sys.executable,)) I committed something similar to that to trunk so you don't need that

Re: gajim-0.12-alpha1

2008-08-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Simon Kuhnle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, nice, thank you :-) No problem. Sometimes, you should just ask upstream instead of adding more patches, especially if it's an alpha. :) The only other patch patches the gajim starter shellscript to use /bin/sh and not /bin/bash, so I don't need bash

Re: gajim-0.12-alpha1

2008-08-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 14.08.2008 um 15:32 schrieb Simon Kuhnle: Which reminds me of the problem: sys.executable returns /usr/local/bin/gajim here, even if I run it from svn (so by running launsh.sh) This is caused by the exec -a, so I also have to commit this: -exec -a gajim ${PYTHON_EXEC} -OO gajim.py $@

Re: update: audacious + plugins 1.5.0

2008-03-31 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Federico G. Schwindt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Index: audio/audacious/patches/patch-m4_buildsys_m4 === RCS file: audio/audacious/patches/patch-m4_buildsys_m4 diff -N

Re: update: audacious + plugins 1.5.0

2008-03-31 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Federico G. Schwindt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This was done for simplicity. The target does not work and it also includes netbsd and solaris, and that's how it was done before. This is not mean to be submitted anyways, but if you really

Re: update: audacious + plugins 1.5.0

2008-03-31 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Federico G. Schwindt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- m4/buildsys.m4.orig Thu Mar 13 22:19:27 2008 +++ m4/buildsys.m4Mon Mar 31 16:01:43 2008 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([BUILDSYS_SHARED_LIB], [ UNINSTALL_LIB='rm

Re: UPDATE: audacious 1.4.5 / audacious-plugins 1.4.4

2008-02-03 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: patch below against in-tree port fixes some of them, but there is still a problem with format conversions. I'll have a patch for that later. also, distributing a system header is a bad idea, IMNSHO. This is a left-over from XMMS which we also had for

Re: UPDATE: audacious 1.4.5 / audacious-plugins 1.4.4

2008-02-02 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Federico G. Schwindt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, same thing here. i was expected it was due to my card or something. iirc, the previous version has oss by default, need to look into it. The sun plugin is unmaintained atm AFAIK, therefore

Re: audio/audacious-plugins fixes

2008-01-19 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
You should also build the OSS plugin. I'm an Audacious developer and fixed the OSS plugin a while ago so that it works perfectly on OpenBSD. Even works much better than the sun audio plugin. -- Jonathan

Re: /usr/ports/infrastructure/build/out-of-date: Undefined subroutine OpenBSD::ProgressMeter::enable

2008-01-07 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Helmut Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /usr/ports/infrastructure/build/out-of-date Collecting installed packages Undefined subroutine OpenBSD::ProgressMeter::enable called at /usr/ports/infrastructure/build/out-of-date line 100. Sounds like you use current ports on

Re: good console jabber client?

2007-11-27 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Sergey Prysiazhnyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any Subj in ports tree? Like centericq, etc? Thank you a lot for advise, mcabber, which isn't in ports IIRC, but should be easy to port. IMO, it's the best console jabber client so far. -- Jonathan

Re: UPDATE: emulators/zsnes 1.42 - 1.51 (was: ZSNES 1.51)

2007-09-25 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm starting to think there is something wrong with auich. I'm also having problems with auich, not only with zsnes. They were that bad that I switched my laptop to NetBSD where it works without any problems. I couldn't even listen to music since all few

Re: UPDATE: emulators/zsnes 1.42 - 1.51 (was: ZSNES 1.51)

2007-09-25 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorry your report was ignored. remember, the best way to not have problem reports ignored is to use sendbug(1). I did use sendbug and I even reported it more than once IIRC. I guess it's just that nobody got an idea what it could be. -- Jonathan

Re: UPDATE: emulators/zsnes 1.42 - 1.51 (was: ZSNES 1.51)

2007-09-25 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: […] I currently don't have OpenBSD on my laptop anymore, but I'll reinstall it, test it and let you know. Thanks for having a look at it. :) -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: ZSNES 1.51 [resent]

2007-09-20 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Mike Swanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed ZSNES hasn't been updated in years Well, not for years, but not in the last time, yes. I personally think that the new versions suck as then don't provide netplay anymore, therefore I didn't update it since I had no interest in the new

Re: ZSNES 1.51

2007-09-20 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Mike Swanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, well there's been a reply on ports@ with the updated version, I've seen it and CC'd him. perhaps you should look at it. Would it be feasible to have zsnes/1.42 and zsnes/1.51 (Java also has multiple versions like this)? For users that want netplay,

Re: UPDATE: shells/zsh

2006-10-21 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Weisgerber) wrote: Which is still a development release. Any good reason we should update now? UTF-8 support. I don't know if it works on OpenBSD, though. AFAIR it requires an UTF-8 locale. -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Update: net/tor (Update to 0.1.1.24 included)

2006-10-09 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Peter Valchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has a maintainer, did you send him a note too? The original post with the update to 0.1.1.23 _IS_ from the maintainer and I just replied to his post to give him an update to 0.1.1.24. So yes, I did through the mailing list. -- Jonathan signature.asc

Re: Fwd: gtk+2 and gtk-engines2 update?

2006-10-05 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't believe there is, OpenBSD needs a maintainer for the Whole Gnome Project 2.16.1 Hm, didn't we have one? Did he quit or what happened? are you interested in porting Gnome 2.16.1? I could do the GTK+2 port + dependencies, but I have no

gtk+2 and gtk-engines2 update?

2006-10-04 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Hi! Just wanted to know: Is there already someone working on an update of gtk+2 to 2.10.6 and gtk-engines2 to 2.8 + the dependencies? -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: UPDATE: net/psi

2006-09-20 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Jonathan Schleifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ports tree is in soft-lock at the moment; it's possible/likely that your patch won't be committed until after the lock. Hang on to it and test ports already in the tree. I know that, but posted it so it can already be tested. AFAIK

Re: UPDATE: net/psi

2006-08-21 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Will Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you contact the current maintainer? Did you send them this patch already? Indirectly, through this list. If he's still interested in maintaining it, he'll read it here. (I don't want to mail to @gmail.com, sorry.) The ports tree is in soft-lock at the

Re: UPDATE: net/psi

2006-08-21 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Karl Ferdinand Ebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've succesfully tested your update on i386, receiving three messages (two errors and one warning) in building psi-0.10. The first error appears at entering in src, the second seems to be a repetition of the first, but more later and more

UPDATE: net/psi

2006-08-19 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Update from the really old 0.9.3 to 0.10. Since it seems that the maintainer isn't interested in this port anymore (0.9.3 is really old), I hereby request to be the new maintainer. The following files have been removed because they're not needed anymore: patches/patch-iris_xmpp-core_jid_cpp

[NEW] databases/ruby-postgres

2006-07-15 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
PostgreSQL bindings for the ruby language. Please test, commit and so on. -- Jonathan ruby-postgres.tgz Description: application/compressed-tar signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: vmware in -current

2006-07-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Alexey E. Suslikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe it is a good idea to try make VMware Server work instead of old (3.x) Workstation? I think that would not be possible. VMware depends on a kernel module. But that module isn't open source AFAIK. Only the part that loads the rest of the binary

Re: vmware in -current (and alternatives)

2006-07-14 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Ian Darwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So meanwhile I use qemu for the odd time when I need to use another OS. qemu has the same problem as VMware: The kernel module. It's really slow without the acceleration module. But maybe the it could be ported to OpenBSD? I know it's not Open Source, but it

[NEW] x11/ruby-gtk2

2006-07-13 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
GTK+2 Bindings for the ruby language. I only tested it with irb, therefore it needs some more testing with real applications. Please test, commit, and so on. Thanks. -- Jonathan ruby-gtk2.tgz Description: Unix tar archive

Re: wmoused sensitivty?

2006-05-06 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way that I can adjust the sensitivty of wmoused? I'm using a USB moused on a Sun X2100, and it's way too fast, I need to slow it down a bit. If you use X11, you could try using xset m. See the manpage for details. -- Jonathan

Re: wmoused sensitivty?

2006-05-06 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Sorry, I sent it to the wrong list. My fault. -- Jonathan

Re: new gaim

2005-12-12 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Aleksander Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here goes new version of gaim port. It's based on today's CVS sources. Have fun. I think we shouldn't use CVS versions for ports when the current stable version works just fine. Besides, the CVS version is very unusable IMO. -- Jonathan

Re: [UPDATE] emulators/zsnes

2005-10-10 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
I removed the do-install target now since zsnes' install target is ok in 1.42. Updated patch is attached, please test and commit. -- Jonathan zsnes.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [UPDATE] emulators/zsnes

2005-10-04 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Aleksander Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PKGNAME with p0 is not needed as you have changed version, right? I just kept the p0 from the old port, changed. If automake is needed to build this port then try to use following: CONFIGURE_STYLE= automake automake isn't needed (no

Re: [UPDATE] emulators/zsnes

2005-10-04 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Thorsten Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your changed do-install target a) does not install the docs any more at all. Because it seems that they don't exist anymore. At least they aren't in the same place anymore, I haven't looked if they just got moved somewhere else. b) is totally

Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2005-09-07 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Marc Matteo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but I'm pretty sure we can get rid of that too :). Why get rid of them? Just drop gnome1, but keep libgnome1. There are some programs that depend on libgnome1 and sometimes there is no alternative program. Or programs that only need it optional. For example,

Re: www/php4/extensions and packaging?

2005-07-20 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
patrick ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, now I turn to the list to see if anyone can shed some light onto my problem. Where am I going wrong? Nowhere. Just cd into /usr/ports/packages/$ARCH/all. The extensions are build as subpackages which you have to add manually using pkg_add. -- Jonathan

Re: Gimp 2

2005-06-17 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Aleksander Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, OK but what does this gnome stuff add to GIMP? What kind of features, etc... Hm, I don't know. I guess it's not much and only a few guys need it. It would be the best if you make a flavor out of it, so everyone could decide if he/she wants

Re: Gimp 2

2005-06-17 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I imagine its things like drag and drop and VFS functions etc. Drag Drop should work without Gnome since it's already possible with only Gtk+ 2. -- Jonathan

Re: Gimp 2

2005-06-15 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
I think there should be a flavor no_gnome. Gimp doesn't really need all that gnome stuff that the port uses. I only want Gimp, not half of Gnome. Would be nice if that flavor could be implemented. -- Jonathan