I attach some pieces of logs for better understanding
/Hi there /
//
/I have a Postfix installation (postfix-2.6.5-1.rhel5) and I relay
a couple of remote ip addresses /
/(static adsl) of remote sites. /
//
/I cannot figure out how a spam originator fired some e-mails
- Original Message
From: Dimitrios Karapiperis dim...@thessaloniki.gr
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 7:57:36 AM
Subject: trusted Ip address spoofed?
Hi there
I have a Postfix installation (postfix-2.6.5-1.rhel5) and I relay a couple
of
Hello to everybody,
I'm configuring a postfix server connected on internet with a slow
dial-up connection.
Basically I want to hold all emails to be sent (I'll send them
manually when I want), plus I want to relay all the emails to
different smtp servers (depends of the email).
The configuration
Hi all,
In my master.cf I have:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=filtres
So, when mailserver recieves a mail, it passes through 'filter' (is a
perl-based script which control the auto-reply, quota and anti-spam).
Nice here.
The problem comes
Jordi Espasa Clofent:
Hi all,
In my master.cf I have:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=filtres
All mail that arrives via smtpd is filtered, even if it is sent
between local users, or users in the same domain.
If some mail is not filtered,
On 02/01/2010 01:14 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jordi Espasa Clofent:
Hi all,
In my master.cf I have:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=filtres
All mail that arrives via smtpd is filtered, even if it is sent
between local users, or users in the
Jordi Espasa Clofent:
On 02/01/2010 01:14 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jordi Espasa Clofent:
Hi all,
In my master.cf I have:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=filtres
All mail that arrives via smtpd is filtered, even if it is sent
On Feb 1, 2010, at 2:17 AM, Dimitrios Karapiperis wrote:
I attach some pieces of logs for better understanding
Feb 1 08:44:18 smtp postfix/smtpd[17200]: connect from
serial.domain.tld[111.222.333.444]
Feb 1 08:44:18 smtp postfix/qmgr[27864]: 88B76180FE: from=mjands...@tentonhammer.com
,
Hello List,
i would like to have a ldap based auto reply feature in a virtual
hosting environment. I had a look at gnarwl, but it was removed from
Debian lenny due to some security issues:
http://www.downloadpipe.com/forums/linux/Bug-457279-remove-gnarwl-lenny-ftopict57832.html
Is there any
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, K bharathan kbhara...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
i'd also have it configured for user soft quota
guidance appreciated
Postfix is not
Le Lundi 1 Février 2010 10:04:20, Carlos Williams a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, K bharathan kbhara...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
i'd also have it
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Le Lundi 1 Février 2010 10:04:20, Carlos Williams a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:52 AM, K bharathan kbhara...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a
If the content filter does not produce auto-replies between users
in the same domain, then that is a bug in the content filter.
Completey clear now.
Thanks for aclaration.
--
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that
brings total obliteration. I will face my
when a temp fail occurs both the too address and the top alias list are
included in the retry. The result is the email gets sent to many ppl.
Every
this else seems to be working. I will get about 40 email (don't know the
actual number but it's more than 20) sent to jeiva(me) because testt
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube directories. I'd
probably see orders of magnitude more if it weren't for
On 01/02/10 17:09, j debert wrote:
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube directories. I'd
probably see orders of
Quoting Kay li...@coffeehabit.net:
On 01/02/10 17:09, j debert wrote:
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube
jeiva a écrit :
when a temp fail occurs both the too address and the top alias list are
included in the retry. The result is the email gets sent to many ppl.
Every
this else seems to be working. I will get about 40 email (don't know the
actual number but it's more than 20) sent to jeiva(me)
Hi Noel.
Thanks for the reply.
The problem is not when I receive emails(because I'll fetch it with a
perl script), but when I've to send email(relay to smtp.gmail.com)
from gmail.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Michele
On 1 Feb 2010, at 17:16, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On
On 2/1/2010 12:55 PM, Michele Carandente wrote:
Hi Noel.
Thanks for the reply.
The problem is not when I receive emails(because I'll fetch it with a
perl script), but when I've to send email(relay to smtp.gmail.com) from
gmail.
Any suggestions?
Please don't top post.
Don't define gmail.com
j debert a écrit :
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube directories. I'd
probably see orders of magnitude
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:39:49 +0100, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
j debert a écrit :
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts
On 02/01/2010 06:49 PM, Kay wrote:
On 01/02/10 17:09, j debert wrote:
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube
Carlos Williams put forth on 2/1/2010 10:04 AM:
I recommend and prefer Roundcube.
http://roundcube.net/
+1
If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead of
POP. JMHO.
I'm an ex Squirrelmail user and switched to Roundcube, mainly for the nicer user
interface.
Kay put forth on 2/1/2010 11:49 AM:
In my job (hosting company) I see boxes exploited via roundcube all the
time. Squirrelmail? Not one so far. Part of the reason is that
squirrelmail comes with RHEL, so it's kept up to date automatically,
while customers install their own roundcube and
K bharathan wrote:
hi all
of course this is a non postfix topic; but i'd like to know from the
experienced which webmail is best for a postfix pop server
i'd also have it configured for user soft quota
guidance appreciated
I would add from my side... Horde IMP. If you need good replacement for
On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
Debian package:
[02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
Package: roundcube
New: yes
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 0.2.2-1~bpo50+1
Eh? 0.3.1 is
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:17:49 -0500, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
Debian package:
[02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
Package: roundcube
New: yes
* fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu:
Eh? 0.3.1 is the current version, so how is 0.2.2 'up to date'?
attention
0.3.1 is the current version , so 0.2.2 is 'up to date'
That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mouss さんは書きました:
you mean things like
GET /roundcube-0.2//bin/msgimport
GET /round//bin/msgimport
Not lately.
Most recently, they're looking for version info:
GET /rc/README
GET /webmail/README
GET /roundcube/README
On 1-Feb-2010, at 13:39, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Carlos Williams put forth on 2/1/2010 10:04 AM:
I recommend and prefer Roundcube.
http://roundcube.net/
+1
If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead
of POP. JMHO.
Yeah, I have to say I don't even
Charles Marcus put forth on 2/1/2010 4:17 PM:
On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
Debian package:
[02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
Package: roundcube
New: yes
State: installed
Automatically
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 2/1/2010 4:31 PM:
That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .)
I wish it was humor... Debian Stable always lags pretty seriously behind the
cutting edge release versions of a lot of packages. Then again, from what I
understand, so do RHEL, CentOS, SLES,
http://roundcube.net/
+1
If you're going to offer webmail, you may as well offer IMAP folders instead
of
POP. JMHO.
I think it depends upon the requirements. For very simple mail and setup, +1
roundcube. I have been using horde for some time for my clients (as they use
more of
Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/29/2010 4:46 PM, Wade Smart wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/28/2010 4:57 PM, Wade Smart wrote:
I have been using postfix for about two + years but something that was
just out of my understanding at the time was setting up relaying.
Right now I just sent from my mail
Wade Smart put forth on 2/1/2010 7:43 PM:
Right now I just sent from my mail client (thunderbird) but I would
like to be able to send back through postfix to keep a record of all
sent mails.
That's what your Sent Items folder is for.
You need to keep in mind that by default Postfix won't log
36 matches
Mail list logo
