On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:14:25 +0100
Martin Strand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:14:56 +0100, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Horne wrote:
At least a couple of times per year, some large mail provider
makes me jump through their hoops to get my users' mail to them
Martin Strand wrote:
And that's _your_ choice and view.
Dan is right - it's ridiculous for any provider to say sorry, we can't deliver mail to one of
the largest email providers on the planet, and we're not trying to get around the problem.
End users don't care about technical details, they
I run a postfix 2.2.3 server (centOS 5.2) with the whole mySQL virtual
users/domains setup, which works just fine except for a few small
issues, which strangely affect only a few users.
Basically, the server after recieving the mail, does a few checks then
delivers it to the final destination
Hi,
I get this error when I tried to send a mail via postdrop.
vhs3:~# cat signedmail.txt | postdrop
queue_id4BAE870402Fpostdrop: fatal: uid=0: unexpected record type: 68
The signedmail.txt contains the following (edited)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; snip
Return-Path: [EMAIL
Res:
Hi All,
Is there a way to insert line breaks in the banner? On Sendmail we
use \n, which does not work on Postfix.
Postfix smtpd_banner behaves as documented.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_banner
Wietse
On 11/13/2008, Nick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Basically, the server after recieving the mail, does a few checks
then delivers it to the final destination just fine, but for a few
users (for a reason I'm not able to understand) it sends a delivery
report after successful deliveries (obviously
Res:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Is there a way to insert line breaks in the banner? On Sendmail we
use \n, which does not work on Postfix.
Postfix smtpd_banner behaves as documented.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_banner
Already read and an hour'd on
On 11/13/2008, Jacky Chan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I would like to set a specific tranport for mail sending to yahoo, which
slow it down to avoid getting greylisted. I set a dedicated transport in
master.cf like
slow unix - - n - 1 smtp
And set the
Hi all,
I would like to set a specific tranport for mail sending to yahoo, which
slow it down to avoid getting greylisted. I set a dedicated transport in
master.cf like
slow unix - - n - 1 smtp
And set the pre-transport parameters in main.cf like
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rajkumar S:
Hi,
I get this error when I tried to send a mail via postdrop.
vhs3:~# cat signedmail.txt | postdrop
queue_id4BAE870402Fpostdrop: fatal: uid=0: unexpected record type: 68
The postdrop command behaves as
Rajkumar S:
Hi,
I get this error when I tried to send a mail via postdrop.
vhs3:~# cat signedmail.txt | postdrop
queue_id4BAE870402Fpostdrop: fatal: uid=0: unexpected record type: 68
The postdrop command behaves as documented.
http://www.postfix.org/postdrop.1.html
In particular, see
Rajkumar S:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rajkumar S:
Hi,
I get this error when I tried to send a mail via postdrop.
vhs3:~# cat signedmail.txt | postdrop
queue_id4BAE870402Fpostdrop: fatal: uid=0: unexpected record type: 68
The
Occassionally I see a spamcop.net report on backscattered email.
Our MXes forward to three other servers, so we use virtual_alias_maps,
set up with a mapping for every email account, and
we set smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_unlisted_recipient
amongst other restrictions.
I'll report the
Hi to all.
I've go a problem:
i've set up postfix to call a script in master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
filterunix - n n - 20 pipe
flags=Rq user=filter
On 11/13/2008, D G Teed ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'll report the smtpd related details here so those who
want to know how it is set up can see.
postconf -n output is preferred... all of it...
--
Best regards,
Charles
D G Teed wrote:
[snip]
Is there anything more I can be doing?
what is your problem exactly? are you listed on spamcop? if so, what IP
are you talking about? what makes you believe you are listed because of
backscatter? and why do you send backscatter (and what kind of bs)?
Does anyone
nik600 wrote:
Hi to all.
I've go a problem:
i've set up postfix to call a script in master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
filterunix - n n - 20 pipe
flags=Rq user=filter
Jacky Chan wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to set a specific tranport for mail sending to yahoo, which
slow it down to avoid getting greylisted.
why? unless you send a lot of mail, just let it go. and if you send a
lot of mail, you'll ned to get whitelisted.
I set a dedicated transport in
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As documented, postdrop implements a protocol that is internal to
Postfix.
You are therefore not supposed to use it.
Thanks for the clue stick!
raj
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:09:25AM -0800, Jacky Chan wrote:
I would like to set a specific tranport for mail sending to yahoo, which
slow it down to avoid getting greylisted. I set a dedicated transport in
master.cf like
slow unix - - n - 1 smtp
And
master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
9009 inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
filterunix - n n - 20 pipe
flags=Rq
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:05 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D G Teed wrote:
[snip]
Is there anything more I can be doing?
what is your problem exactly? are you listed on spamcop?
We are not listed on spam cop. There have been a couple
of external reports I've seen in the last year.
D G Teed wrote:
We send non-delivery responses. If someone emailed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], it will reject,
saying that user doesn't exist. Our users expect this feature.
If we told them bad addresses will cause email to be lost without
notification, they would not be happy.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Charles Marcus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On 11/13/2008, D G Teed ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'll report the smtpd related details here so those who
want to know how it is set up can see.
postconf -n output is preferred... all of it...
OK - IP, domain,
nik600 wrote:
master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
9009 inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
filterunix - n n - 20 pipe
t??ba([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:00:54AM +0300:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:14:25 +0100
Martin Strand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, they expect you to setup your servers properly with
SPF/DKIM/etc but you probably already know about that.
Martin
But why yahoo do
nik600 wrote:
master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
9009 inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
filterunix - n n - 20 pipe
D G Teed wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:05 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D G Teed wrote:
[snip]
Is there anything more I can be doing?
what is your problem exactly? are you listed on spamcop?
We are not listed on spam cop. There have been a couple
of external reports I've seen
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:14 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D G Teed wrote:
What makes you believe I'm listed? I got a single report
of a complaint. Have you not used the spamcop
web interface before?
never ever. should I?
No, but as you said, some people report the wrong problem
D G Teed wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:14 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone emailed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], it
will reject,
saying that user doesn't exist. Our users expect this feature.
Hi folks --
I've got a problem and I can't seem to find the cause. Basically, if I
address a message with:
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Each recipient gets the same number of copies of the message as there
are recipients... so 3 recipients, they each get 3
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 04:03:17PM -0500, Rob Klingsten wrote:
Hi folks --
I've got a problem and I can't seem to find the cause. Basically, if I
address a message with:
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Each recipient gets the same number of copies of the
Rob Klingsten wrote:
Hi folks --
I've got a problem and I can't seem to find the cause. Basically, if I
address a message with:
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Each recipient gets the same number of copies of the message as there
are recipients... so 3
Hi all,
I was examining my Postfix logs and saw two sequential sessions using the
same queue ID. I was a bit surprised as I had the assumption that queue IDs
were generated randomly, which means they should be practically unique.
Okay, so this could be a wrong assumption... My question is, how
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:36:10PM +0100, Durk Strooisma wrote:
I was examining my Postfix logs and saw two sequential sessions using the
same queue ID. I was a bit surprised as I had the assumption that queue IDs
were generated randomly, which means they should be practically unique.
They
I've got a problem and I can't seem to find the cause. Basically, if I
address a message with:
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Each recipient gets the same number of copies of the message as there
are recipients... so 3 recipients, they each get 3 copies. If it
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 04:53:54PM -0500, Rob Klingsten wrote:
I've got a problem and I can't seem to find the cause. Basically, if I
address a message with:
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Each recipient gets the same number of copies of the message as there
Durk Strooisma:
Hi all,
I was examining my Postfix logs and saw two sequential sessions using the
same queue ID. I was a bit surprised as I had the assumption that queue IDs
were generated randomly, which means they should be practically unique.
Postfix behaves as documented. Please point
I have postfix-2.5.4 and dovecot-1.1.2. I'd like to use:
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noplaintext
It barfs on this with:
fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms
and smtpd doesn't start.
Of course I don't want people sending their passwords in plaintext
over the net. Am I missing something?
Rich Winkel wrote:
I have postfix-2.5.4 and dovecot-1.1.2. I'd like to use:
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noplaintext
It barfs on this with:
fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms
and smtpd doesn't start.
Of course I don't want people sending their passwords in plaintext
over the net. Am I
I have a simple (I'll post postconf -n if it would help)
Postfix box that basically takes in mail and hands it off.
I have one user that would like to send and receive mail
from the outside. I'm ok with receiving mail, but I have
to (I think) set up some authentication so that I don't
become an
N. Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
I have a simple (I'll post postconf -n if it would help)
Postfix box that basically takes in mail and hands it off.
I have one user that would like to send and receive mail
from the outside. I'm ok with receiving mail, but I have
to (I think) set up some authentication
Thanks! That's just what I needed!
Rich
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 05:58:45PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
Most folks use
smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
to require STARTTLS before AUTH since some popular mail
clients only support plaintext methods (plain and/or login),
rather than disabling
N. Yaakov Ziskind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a simple (I'll post postconf -n if it would help)
Postfix box that basically takes in mail and hands it off.
I have one user that would like to send and receive mail
from the outside. I'm ok with receiving mail, but I have
to (I think) set
Victor Duchovni wrote:
If your prorblem is output-rate or destination concurrency, you are using
the wrong tool.
As subject, yeap, I actually want to setup such kind of transport to avoid
getting greylist from yahoo.
As I know, Postfix 2.5 has destination_rate_delay, it can slow down
Yes, so how can I know the user-defined parameter takes effect?
Thank you
mouss-2 wrote:
Jacky Chan wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to set a specific tranport for mail sending to yahoo, which
slow it down to avoid getting greylisted.
why? unless you send a lot of mail, just let it go.
Jacky Chan:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
If your prorblem is output-rate or destination concurrency, you are using
the wrong tool.
As subject, yeap, I actually want to setup such kind of transport to avoid
getting greylist from yahoo.
As I know, Postfix 2.5 has
What is the best OpenLDAP version to use with Postfix at the moment?
I'm mainly wondering whether OpenLDAP 2.4 has any significant problem
issues with Postfix?
As always, thanks for any insights!
Ville
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:34:30 -0600
Ville Walveranta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the best OpenLDAP version to use with Postfix at the moment?
I'm mainly wondering whether OpenLDAP 2.4 has any significant problem
issues with Postfix?
As always, thanks for any insights!
In my Ubuntu
There is very little on the topic on the web and on the Postfix Users
archives. The little I find seems to imply it's very difficult to
extract password information from AD (say, to sync to OpenLDAP).
Since the last thread about this topic in this group is from last
year, I'm asking whether a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ville Walveranta
Sent: Friday, 14 November 2008 3:27 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Authenticating aginst ActiveDirectory?
There is very little on the topic on the web and on the
Postfix Users
Jeffrey Shawn Klotz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having DNS issues when delivering mail on a postfix server.
The server seems to run fine for several hours.
After a while, emails start to stay in the queue with the following error
for all domains:
postqueue -p
*D63998D18BF88122
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:32 PM, MacShane, Tracy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry, why do you need to sync passwords to relay mail to your
Exchange servers? To do relay recipient validation, you just need to do
a simple LDAP lookup to the AD to verify valid email addresses. Since
you only
(copying the list; this went initially out to tôba only)
I'm not aware of any any problems — I'm thinking that there probably
would not be any, but various packages have prerequisites or
support for 2.3 or 2.2. That is not to say, of course, that they
wouldn't work with the latest version, and
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ville Walveranta
Sent: Friday, 14 November 2008 4:29 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Authenticating aginst ActiveDirectory?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:32 PM, MacShane, Tracy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to create a very simple body check for a limited time to get
an indicative idea of how many users may be sending credit card numbers
via email. I have a simple pcre body_check map that is logging a warning
when it encounters a match. Unfortunately, the entire message line that
triggers
This is probably a too complex solution but I mention it anyway. In
late July there was a discussion here about rewriting the subject
line. I'm using an external spam filtering service (Katharion), and if
I choose spams to be delivered (rather than quarantined), they're
tagged with **SPAM** in
D G Teed wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:14 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We send non-delivery responses.
if these are user does not exist or filter thinks this is spam/virus
and the like, then you are a backscatter source.
I don't think we send NDRs as emails originating here.
I think
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
D G Teed wrote:
We user virtual_alias_maps and
smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_unlisted_recipient
is at the beginning of our list of restrictions.
client restrictions are checked on connect.
In the default setup (smtpd_delay_reject=yes), client, helo,
MacShane, Tracy wrote:
I'm trying to create a very simple body check for a limited time to get
an indicative idea of how many users may be sending credit card numbers
via email. I have a simple pcre body_check map that is logging a warning
when it encounters a match. Unfortunately, the entire
60 matches
Mail list logo
