On Friday, March 13, 2009 at 22:09 CET,
M. Rodrigo Monteiro fale...@rodrigomonteiro.net wrote:
I have an Postfix as gateway for other domains (domain1, domain2, domain3).
When domain1 send an e-mail to domain2, it goes to Postfix and then to
domain2, and vice-versa.
When domain2 send an
email builder a écrit :
[snip]
I do not support configurations with multiple myhostname/mydomain
settings (or multiple settings for any domain-like parameter that
determines how Postfix handles email).
That's certainly fair. I can accept that I am stepping outside the use model
with this
On Friday, March 13, 2009 at 18:02 CET,
Marcio Merlone marcio.merl...@a1.ind.br wrote:
Long time since I last deployed a postfix server, and things used to be
much simpler. :) Now I have set a Ubuntu 8.04 server to work as an
anti-spam/anti-virus gateway. Messages will be sent to amavis
tom lee a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:14 PM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
All mails sending from machine A via relaying machine B will arrive in
machine C.
I think I need to set up something in machine B so that there will be no
mails
bounce back to machine A.
if you want
Webmaster Bliss Corporation a écrit :
Greetings,
I am installing a Postfix Server, and I am having trouble setting up a
spam filter with Spamassassin.
I installed Postfix and it is working fine using virtual domains (I
followed these instructions:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Marcio Merlone
marcio.merl...@a1.ind.br wrote:
Hello,
Hi (again?),
Long time since I last deployed a postfix server, and things used to be much
simpler. :) Now I have set a Ubuntu 8.04 server to work as an
anti-spam/anti-virus gateway. Messages will be sent
Wietse:
I do not support configurations with multiple myhostname/mydomain
settings (or multiple settings for any domain-like parameter that
determines how Postfix handles email).
email builder:
That's certainly fair. I can accept that I am stepping outside
the use model with this and that
- Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org schrieb:
C. V. wrote:
Hi,
i've setup my mailsystem a while ago and query MySQL and LDAP vor
address and domain mappings.
Since both of them (database and directory) are more likely to be
down of many reasons (network, connection overload
On 13-Mar-2009, at 14:51, Jorey Bump wrote:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
Yeah, once I get TLS setup. I am running 2.5.6. I did
On 13-Mar-2009, at 14:51, Jorey Bump wrote:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
Yeah, once I get TLS setup. I am running 2.5.6. I did
LuKreme wrote, at 03/14/2009 12:19 PM:
On 13-Mar-2009, at 14:51, Jorey Bump wrote:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
Yeah, once I get
On Saturday, March 14, 2009 at 17:08 CET,
list-u...@backenhoernchen.de wrote:
- mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net schrieb:
there's no backup. you have the choice between:
- accepting temp failures if the backend is down
- using a backedn that doesn't get down (hash, cdb, ...)
ok,
On Mar 14, 2009, at 12:20 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 13-Mar-2009, at 14:51, Jorey Bump wrote:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
Yeah, once I
list-u...@backenhoernchen.de wrote:
Using them as fail-over would really be nice to do and i think shoult work.
postix does not concatenantes these maps because it trys them one by one - in
which order?
is there any documentation on that?
There is no failover for table lookups. You can
KLaM Postmaster wrote:
where can I find the postfix readme files, I have looked all over the
postfix.com site, and while there is lots of documentation (man pages,
how to, faqs, etc) but I cannot find the readme files except as
embedded links.
Is the a directory or something that contains just
LuKreme a écrit :
On 13-Mar-2009, at 14:51, Jorey Bump wrote:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
Yeah, once I get TLS setup. I am
- Magnus Bäck mag...@dsek.lth.se schrieb:
On Saturday, March 14, 2009 at 17:08 CET,
list-u...@backenhoernchen.de wrote:
- mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net schrieb:
Lookup tables are tried in the order specified in the configuration,
but if any of the tables returns a result
Quote from header_checks (5):
DUNNO Pretend that the input line did not match any pat-
tern, and inspect the next input line. This action
can be used to shorten the table search.
For backwards compatibility reasons, Postfix also
Henk van Oers wrote:
Quote from header_checks (5):
DUNNO Pretend that the input line did not match any pat-
tern, and inspect the next input line. This action
can be used to shorten the table search.
For backwards compatibility reasons,
Can you explain how this feature could be enabled?
One of our the services we offer our customers allows them to create as many
domains as they like (on various DNS's), and we have a catchall mailbox that
grabs any emails sent to those domains.
Of course you are correct most of the content on
Henk van Oers wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Henk van Oers wrote:
[]
I was trying to use action OK to jump out of header checks.
That is: not only skip the next patterns, but also the next
input lines.
[]
Isn't it better to use the same semantics as in restrictions?
Joe Postfix:
Does anyone know if postfix supports a feature equivalent to
relay_based_on_MX in sendmail?
Wietse:
Yes.
However such features must not be used because they accept mail
for non-existent recipients, and therefore 1) they fill the Postfix
queue with non-deliverable MAILER-DAEMON
Henk van Oers:
Quote from header_checks (5):
DUNNO Pretend that the input line did not match any pat-
tern, and inspect the next input line. This action
can be used to shorten the table search.
For backwards compatibility
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Henk van Oers wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Henk van Oers wrote:
[]
I was trying to use action OK to jump out of header checks.
That is: not only skip the next patterns, but also the next
input lines.
[]
Isn't it better to
Wietse Venema:
Joe Postfix:
Does anyone know if postfix supports a feature equivalent to
relay_based_on_MX in sendmail?
Wietse:
Yes.
However such features must not be used because they accept mail
for non-existent recipients, and therefore 1) they fill the Postfix
queue with
email builder a écrit :
[snip]
I do not support configurations with multiple myhostname/mydomain
settings (or multiple settings for any domain-like parameter that
determines how Postfix handles email).
That's certainly fair. I can accept that I am stepping outside the use
I do not support configurations with multiple myhostname/mydomain
settings (or multiple settings for any domain-like parameter that
determines how Postfix handles email).
email builder:
That's certainly fair. I can accept that I am stepping outside
the use model with this and that
Noel Jones a écrit :
John G. Heim wrote:
I want to make sure that any messages my system sends out always has a
sender of someb...@math.wisc.edu. I am looking at configuring the
smtpd_sender_restrictions directive.
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
Wietse:
I do not support configurations with multiple myhostname/mydomain
settings (or multiple settings for any domain-like parameter that
determines how Postfix handles email).
email builder:
That's certainly fair. I can accept that I am stepping outside
the use model with this and that
Michael Tokarev wrote, On 3/14/09 4:13 PM:
Henk van Oers wrote:
[...]
I the case of multiple recipients there can be rejects for some,
no tests for some others (OK), a few test for DUNNO recipients
and all the checks for the rest. Right?
Yes. For each recipient independently.
I don't
Wietse:
I do not support configurations with multiple myhostname/mydomain
settings (or multiple settings for any domain-like parameter that
determines how Postfix handles email).
email builder:
That's certainly fair. I can accept that I am stepping outside
the use model with this and
On 14-Mar-2009, at 13:02, mouss wrote:
test the connection manually:
$ telnet yourserv 587
...
EHLO yourclienthostname
...
QUIT
Right, I do know that. Sorry if I wasn't clear, my only point was
that what was actaully logged under submit was not useful and
expressing disappointment that
In reading http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html and all the posts
in the last 15 months with 'smtpd_tls_session_cache_database' in the
subject (all 7 of them!), it is not clear to me how the
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database file is created, or what exactly it
contains. If the file is not
LuKreme:
In reading http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html and all the posts
in the last 15 months with 'smtpd_tls_session_cache_database' in the
subject (all 7 of them!), it is not clear to me how the
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database file is created, or what exactly it
contains. If
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Henk van Oers:
Quote from header_checks (5):
DUNNO Pretend that the input line did not match any pat-
tern, and inspect the next input line. This action
can be used to shorten the table search.
Henk van Oers wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Henk van Oers:
Quote from header_checks (5):
DUNNO Pretend that the input line did not match any pat-
tern, and inspect the next input line. This action
can be used to shorten the table
LuKreme wrote:
On 14-Mar-2009, at 13:02, mouss wrote:
test the connection manually:
$ telnet yourserv 587
...
EHLO yourclienthostname
...
QUIT
Right, I do know that. Sorry if I wasn't clear, my only point was that
what was actaully logged under submit was not useful and expressing
37 matches
Mail list logo
