hello,
I have added a private restriction class to main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/distribution_lists.cf,
reject_unauth_destination
# RESTRICTION CLASS
smtpd_restriction_classes = distribution_list_01
distribution_list_01 = check_sender_access
Hi,
I've been running postfix as my MTA for many years. Recently I
upgraded my main server and now I cannot send mail anymore.
The system is running Fedora 13, with postfix 2.7.0
(postfix-2.7.0-1.fc13.i686). My previous version of postfix was 2.5.
I have a LAN with local DNS that is connected
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 at 09:11 CEST,
Dieter Kluenter die...@dkluenter.de wrote:
I have added a private restriction class to main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/distribution_lists.cf,
reject_unauth_destination
# RESTRICTION CLASS
Hi all,
i'm runing a postfix server as gateway on a local network just for routing
between different backends and the DMZ systems. I have to delete some special
lines in the mail body (auto-generated by a backend) for a sms gateway. its
pretty easy doing this global using the body_checks
On Monday 12 July 2010 20:53:46 Phil Howard wrote:
I've added a domain name which has email addresses that are only in
the virtual map. There are no real mailboxes over on Dovecot (via
transport) for this one. Attempts to send mail to
postmas...@newdomain.example.com gets Relay access denied,
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 at 09:58 CEST,
Körner, Uwe uwe.koer...@t-systems.ch wrote:
i'm runing a postfix server as gateway on a local network just for
routing between different backends and the DMZ systems. I have to
delete some special lines in the mail body (auto-generated by a
Hi Magnus,
the messages will be send to the SMS gateway via postfix.
a user is sending a mail (for example) to +41123456...@sms - postfix is doing
a rewriting to +41123456...@examplesmsgateway.ch and delivers the mail.
Cheers
Uwe
Am 13.07.2010 um 10:32 schrieb Magnus Bäck:
On Tuesday, July
Le lundi 12 juillet 2010 19:10:38, Jeroen Geilman a écrit :
On 07/12/2010 04:41 PM, John A. wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to setup a multi-server mail architecture with a mail gateway
and 2 final dest. servers hosting mailboxes, all on the same domain.
I'm using virtual mailboxes wih MySQL
I tried to use transport as following:
transport_maps = local.cf remote.cf
- local.cf contains a sql query which returns virtual if the u...@domain
matches.
- remote.cf contains a sql query which return smtp:[mail.gateway] if the
domain matches.
Did this according to TABLE SEARCH ORDER section
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:42:42 +0200
John A. j...@edatis.com articulated:
I tried to use transport as following:
transport_maps = local.cf remote.cf
- local.cf contains a sql query which returns virtual if the u...@domain
matches.
- remote.cf contains a sql query which return
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 at 10:44 CEST,
Körner, Uwe uwe.koer...@t-systems.ch wrote:
Am 13.07.2010 um 10:32 schrieb Magnus Bäck:
How does messages from the SMS gateway enter your Postfix system? If
they can enter via a different SMTP listener (different IP address
and/or port) you
--
***
Jonathan Amiez
Administrateur système
j...@edatis.com
it-pa...@edatis.com
ad...@edatis.com
***
Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 13:15:36, Jerry a écrit :
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:42:42 +0200
John A. j...@edatis.com articulated:
I tried to use
thank you Noel. so simple :-) and it works. regards, Wojtek
Noel Jones wrote:
On 7/12/2010 8:59 AM, Wojtek Bogusz wrote:
hi, could you please help me to understand is this possible with postfix
configuration:
i have postfix installed on the gateway computer and also on the
internal mail
We provide smtp relay services for a lot of remote mailservers
There are still some inadvertent spam outbreaks , either because the
remote mail server has some weak username/password account. Or because
there is some Micro$$oft windows desktop with a virus spewing spams
We do partial outbound
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 19:02, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Phil Howard:
virtual_alias_domains already defaults to virtual_alias_maps. But
that wasn't working.
If you believe it is broken then you must provide the evidence,
otherwise you are just spreading false rumors.
I'm
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:07, Simon Waters sim...@zynet.net wrote:
On Monday 12 July 2010 20:53:46 Phil Howard wrote:
I've added a domain name which has email addresses that are only in
the virtual map. There are no real mailboxes over on Dovecot (via
transport) for this one. Attempts to send
Hello!
I'm getting some throttling/trivial-rewrite/problem talking to service
errors when enabling LDAP with Postfix.
My virtual map seems to work using postmap:
cybersec:~# postmap -q jon.kristen...@cybersec.se
ldap:/etc/postfix/virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
/var/mail/virtual/cybersec/csjonkri/
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:36:48AM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
Hi,
I've been running postfix as my MTA for many years. Recently I
upgraded my main server and now I cannot send mail anymore.
The system is running Fedora 13, with postfix 2.7.0
(postfix-2.7.0-1.fc13.i686). My previous
Jon Kristensen:
cybersec:~# tail -f /var/log/mail.log
Jul 13 14:28:52 cybersec postfix/master[2422]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/trivial-rewrite pid 2457 killed by signal 6
You need to search your logfiles for lines with the word panic.
Wietse
Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 14:12:22, John A. a écrit :
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:42:42 +0200
John A. j...@edatis.com articulated:
I tried to use transport as following:
transport_maps = local.cf remote.cf
- local.cf contains a sql query which returns virtual if the
u...@domain
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:47:12PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
The question remains: was this a deliberate change in 2.6 or 2.7? I
double checked and verified that postfix 2.5 generates the 'right'
domain names in the MAIL FROM, even without masquerade_domains being
set.
Postfix address
On 7/13/2010 5:42 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jon Kristensen:
cybersec:~# tail -f /var/log/mail.log
Jul 13 14:28:52 cybersec postfix/master[2422]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/trivial-rewrite pid 2457 killed by signal 6
You need to search your logfiles for lines with the word panic.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 05:58:53PM +0200, Jon Kristensen wrote:
On 7/13/2010 5:42 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jon Kristensen:
cybersec:~# tail -f /var/log/mail.log
Jul 13 14:28:52 cybersec postfix/master[2422]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/trivial-rewrite pid 2457 killed by signal 6
You
Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com writes:
Postfix address rewriting did not change between these releases.
That's what I thought, too.
You clearly also changed the application that injects email into
Postfix.
Possibly, though unlikely. This is my favourite test command:
On 7/13/2010 6:07 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
perhaps your LDAP is using GNUTLS (it used to exit() in the library when
entropy was not available
The LDAP library does indeed use GNU TLS:
cybersec:~# ldd /usr/sbin/slapd | grep tls
libgnutls.so.26 = /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.26 (0xb7526000)
Johan Vromans:
double checked and verified that postfix 2.5 generates the 'right'
domain names in the MAIL FROM, even without masquerade_domains being
set.
Again, Postfix does not change the MAIL FROM domain unless you
configure it otherwise.
Wietse
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 06:19:19PM +0200, Jon Kristensen wrote:
On 7/13/2010 6:07 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
perhaps your LDAP is using GNUTLS (it used to exit() in the library when
entropy was not available
The LDAP library does indeed use GNU TLS:
cybersec:~# ldd /usr/sbin/slapd | grep
--On Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:49 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
Test with chroot off, if that fixes it, either GNUTLS or Postfix is
unhappy in the jail, and given lack of panic log entries, I am guessing
GNUTLS, but the evidence is not yet conclusive.
As a
HISTORY, 20061207:
Compatibility with Postfix 2.3: undo the change to bounce
instead of defer after pipe-to-command delivery fails with
a signal. File: global/pipe_command.c.
Part 1: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/154616
Part 2 (tested with Postfix 2.6.6):
---
On 7/13/2010 11:13 AM, Johan Vromans wrote:
Victor Duchovnivictor.ducho...@morganstanley.com writes:
Postfix address rewriting did not change between these releases.
That's what I thought, too.
You clearly also changed the application that injects email into
Postfix.
Possibly, though
Thomas Arnett:
HISTORY, 20061207:
Compatibility with Postfix 2.3: undo the change to bounce
instead of defer after pipe-to-command delivery fails with
a signal. File: global/pipe_command.c.
Part 1: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/154616
Part 2 (tested with
On Jul 13, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
What are the symptoms of the problem?
postfix/pipe[22169]: 5991748: to=u...@example.com, relay=dovecot, delay=1.9,
delays=1.8/0.05/0/0.03, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Command died with signal 7:
/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver)
Johan Vromans put forth on 7/13/2010 2:36 AM:
The problem: although I have configured
mydomain = squirrel.nl
myorigin = squirrel.nl
postfix stil uses the real, local hostname in the SMTP envelope:
What do you want the SMTP host name to be? squirrel.nl ? johan.squirrel.nl ?
(I apologize for my terrible English)
In order to minimize dnsbl queries and, globally, to decrease external
services dependency i started to test some pcre rules
(check_client_access on various stages) in which i'm trying to
'whitelist' properly configured dns hosts and to slow down/rate
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 04:50:11 +0200, Amedeo Rinaldo wrote:
when a client has a reverse hostname but the corresponding fw dns
query doesn't exists .. here a sample..
94.96.8.3 - reverse lookup - 94.96.8.3.dynamic.saudi.net.sa.
94.96.8.3.dynamic.saudi.net.sa. - fw lookup - NXDOMAIN
Hi All,
I'm new to postfix as well as to this mailing list, so I apologize in
advance for any blunder ;)
Need some expert advice on what I'm trying to achieve but encountered
a major roadblock so far.
I need a mail server with a catch-all address but limit the recipient
pattern to
36 matches
Mail list logo