I am using exchange and want to migrate to postfix, The issue is users
should be authenticated from Active Directory and other thing is i have got
1000 users from which 150 users will remain on exchange and the rest
mailboxes will be created on postfix (Linux Box). the 750 users are actually
not
On 9/4/2010 12:53 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Seannnombran...@tsukinokage.net:
That is what I was figuring. Trying two different locations with the
CA file I was using broke, when according to the list's information
and my own reading it should work, turned out to require me to
validate
Considering that spam accounts for the bulk of all client connections to
an MX these days, it might be beneficial if we had log data showing
total time per session, not just for queued mail, so an OP can see how
long it's taking to reject at the smtpd stage, as well as time elapsed
when rejecting
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:11 +0530, Ashwin Muni wrote:
I am using exchange and want to migrate to postfix, The issue is
users should be authenticated from Active Directory and other thing is
i have got 1000 users from which 150 users will remain on exchange and
the rest mailboxes will be
Thanks Ram
But all my 1000 users are in AD and only few of them need to have mailboxes
on exchange, how shall i bifurcate 250 users in exchange and rest 750 users
in postfix.
Again the idea of fetching valid users is great from AD will script it.
Ashwin
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Ram
Hi,
i have recently set up the current postfix version 2.8 from the trunk,
so far everything works fine.
First some feedback to Wietse about postscreen in production
environment:
I have configured postscreen and its doing a great job in production
environment,
combined with grey listing
On 09/02/2010 03:26 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote:
Hi there,
If Postfix server gets a mail message with multiple TO: address (i.e.,
multiple recipients), does Postfix send one message to each address?
These decisions are not made when postfix receives mail.
The message in the incoming queue includes
fdo...@network-steps.com:
postfix keeps complaining
close database /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or directory
That is a Berkeley DB mis-feature.
Newer Postfix snapshots ignore that error.
Wietse
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 03:02:00AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
If we're using delays=a/b/c/d for troubleshooting that's fine. But if
we're expecting to be tuning a server for performance based on log
metric data we need time data for our rejected messages as well.
The purpose of the a/b/c/d
* fdo...@network-steps.com fdo...@network-steps.com:
close database /var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or directory
I'm also seeing this, but only very sporadically:
Aug 20 08:49:23 mail-ausfall postfix/postscreen[15615]: close database
/var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
That is a Berkeley DB mis-feature.
Newer Postfix snapshots ignore that error.
I'm still seeing it with postfix-2.8-20100830:
Sep 1 05:14:38 mail postfix/postscreen[17745]: close database
/var/lib/postfix/ps_cache.db: No such file or directory
Sep 1
Ralf Hildebrandt:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
That is a Berkeley DB mis-feature.
Newer Postfix snapshots ignore that error.
I'm still seeing it with postfix-2.8-20100830:
Sep 1 05:14:38 mail postfix/postscreen[17745]: close
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 03:28:28PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
That is a Berkeley DB mis-feature.
Newer Postfix snapshots ignore that error.
I'm still seeing it with postfix-2.8-20100830:
Sep 1 05:14:38 mail postfix/postscreen[17745]: close
As expected. Notice that this message is informational, not a warning
or an error:
/*
* With some Berkeley DB implementations, close fails with a bogus ENOENT
* error, while it reports no errors with put+sync, no errors with
* del+sync, and no errors with the sync
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 04:45:08PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
if (DICT_DB_CLOSE(dict_db-db) 0)
msg_info(close database %s: %m, dict_db-dict.name);
Not reporting the anomaly at all may mask real problems in the future.
Hm, so isn't that a bug in BerkeleyDB then - and
Victor Duchovni put forth on 9/4/2010 7:33 AM:
What do you mean by filters?
Spam filters in the form of table lookups and dnsbl queries. I'm
currently processing
12,581 CIDRs
1,568 regular expressions (PCRE)
5 dnsbl lookups
per each inbound connection (assuming no hits). Obviously
Ashwin Muni ashwin.m...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:aanlktimqqpcmm6f89ioamsjtavtmsn3p+gxs0db0i...@mail.gmail.com...
I am using exchange and want to migrate to postfix, The issue is users
should be authenticated from Active Directory and other thing is i have got
1000 users from which
On 2010-09-04 at 19:19:34 -0500, Jamrock wrote:
1. Mail Entering Postfix machien using Port 25
2. Authentication from AD if user exists and mailbox location
3 Results from AD
4. If user on Mailbox on exchange then deliver to echange
5. Else Deliver to postfix
That's almost
On 2010-09-04 at 21:35:44 -0700, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
We use an Ubuntu box along with the likewise-open package to join the Ubuntu
machine to the domain.
Bad form to reply to my own message--but I forgot to include:
We do spamassassin filtering on the Linux box too which has benefits
for
19 matches
Mail list logo
