This is easy.
How does Postfix decide the nexthop for a given domain? What controls
do you have?
I suppose a transport map in the ways of
.domain-a.se :
.domain-b.se :
* smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10035
In addition to your recepie should work? (Domain-a and domain-b being the
normal domains?)
A bit of a goof there...
domain-a.se :
domain-b.se :
* smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10035
Från: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
f#246;r Jan Johansson [j...@mupp.net]
Skickat: den 22 mars 2011 08:22
Till: postfix-users@postfix.org
Am 22.03.2011 04:34, schrieb brian:
I'm occasionally seeing file attachments being logged, like so:
postfix/smtpd[14027]: read from B8F5EDA8 [B8F5F9BD] (1420 bytes = -1
(0x))
postfix/smtpd[14027]: read from B8F5EDA8 [B8F5F9BD] (1420 bytes = 1420
(0x58C))
disable the debug mode!
Hi all,
sorry to bother you, but I'm smashing my head on a problem from some
time and even I've read previous posts and other Postfix documentation,
there's still something I don't catch.
Currently if from my postfix installation, behind a static IP, I try to
send email to yahoo I often get the
Am 22.03.2011 09:05, schrieb Kenneth Holter:
Hi all.
I'm new to the list, and quite new to postfix.
I'm running postfix 2.3 on one of my RHEL 5 servers, and have set up
postfix to forward all emails to our Microsoft Exchange
infrastructure.
On the server running postfix, I have an
Am 22.03.2011 05:38, schrieb Simon:
Hi There,
We are using postfix on debian lenny. Everything is mysql backed and
we are using amavisd-new (spamassassin with daily updates from
saupdates.openprotect.com and updates.spamassassin.org clam-av),
postfix-policy greylisting and
Thanks for the quick reply.
Your solution seems to be a very good one, but unfortunately that
default_destination_rate_delay parameter is not available in the
postfix version I'm running (2.3). I'm using the postfix
implementation shipped with RHEL 5, which is not the most current one.
- Kenneth
On 3/22/2011 8:33 AM, Kenneth Holter wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply.
Your solution seems to be a very good one, but unfortunately that
default_destination_rate_delay parameter is not available in the
postfix version I'm running (2.3). I'm using the postfix
implementation shipped with RHEL
On 22/03/2011 9.29, Angelo Amoruso wrote:
sorry to bother you, but I'm smashing my head on a problem from some
time and even I've read previous posts and other Postfix documentation,
there's still something I don't catch.
Currently if from my postfix installation, behind a static IP, I try to
On 22/03/2011 09:29, Angelo Amoruso wrote:
Hi all,
I've seen that messages above 2-3 MB total size get such treatment,
while smaller ones get through without problems.
So, until I investigate the problem with Yahoo, I'd like to limit
message sizes which could be (attempted) delivered, so my
Angelo Amoruso:
today I've just played with postfwd (http://postfwd.org/) and I was able
to achieve the desired result, ie having a way to reject with a failure
code mails directed on a specified domain (in my case yahoo.it and
yahoo.com) when total size is above a predefined limit.
Anyway,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:34:43PM -0400, brian wrote:
I'm occasionally seeing file attachments being logged, like so:
postfix/smtpd[14027]: read from B8F5EDA8 [B8F5F9BD] (1420 bytes = -1
(0x))
postfix/smtpd[14027]: read from B8F5EDA8 [B8F5F9BD] (1420 bytes = 1420
(0x58C))
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 07:27:27AM +, Jan Johansson wrote:
A bit of a goof there...
domain-a.se :
domain-b.se :
* smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10035
The * entry is not required, that's what default_transport is for. If
you want non-default nexthops for the relay_domains, just use the default
The * entry is not required, that's what default_transport is for. If
you want non-default nexthops for the relay_domains, just use the default
setting of relay_transport = relay without an explicit nexthop.
So in other words I should say Thanks for the rewrite-recepie, that one I
would not have
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:03:12PM +, Jan Johansson wrote:
The * entry is not required, that's what default_transport is for. If
you want non-default nexthops for the relay_domains, just use the default
setting of relay_transport = relay without an explicit nexthop.
So in other words I
Everything I suggested is standard transport behaviour.
Well, granted. Maybe i should have said The rest is trivial. Your suggestion
about the pcre/pot 10035 was definitely over _my_ Postfix horizon.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:29:18PM +, Jan Johansson wrote:
Everything I suggested is standard transport behaviour.
Well, granted. Maybe i should have said The rest is trivial. Your
suggestion about the pcre/pot 10035 was definitely over _my_ Postfix
horizon.
The REDIRECT feature is
Hello,
i got following error in my log:
postfix/local[8755]: fatal: main.cf configuration error: mailbox_size_limit
is smaller than message_size_limit
postfix/master[8737]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/local pid 8755 exit
status 1
postfix/master[8737]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/local:
Hajo Locke:
Hello,
i got following error in my log:
postfix/local[8755]: fatal: main.cf configuration error: mailbox_size_limit
is smaller than message_size_limit
So don't do that.
but values are:
mailbox_size_limit = 409600
Prior to Postfix 2.9 this value is stored in a signed
Hi there,
I had two milters running on postfix: dkim-filter, spamass-milter.
Both of these worked fine.
I have added the clamav-milter to the config, but I noticed that now
the spamass-milter does not 'seem' to do anything.
System set-up:
postfix v 2.8
Debian Squeeze
The dkim-filter
J4K:
Is this configuration correct, and can anyone think of what causes the
spamass-milter to be ignored?
First, confirm that spamass-milter is ignored, by turning on logging
in spamass-milter. Then, complain that Postfix is making mistakes.
Wietse
On 2011-03-16 08:22:10 +0200, Henrik K wrote:
Postfwd ftw.
http://postfwd.org/doc.html
ctrl+f action==size
Thanks. It also has other nice features, such as scoring.
--
Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: http://www.vinc17.net/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:34 AM, J4K ju...@klunky.co.uk wrote:
Hi there,
I had two milters running on postfix: dkim-filter, spamass-milter.
Both of these worked fine.
I have added the clamav-milter to the config, but I noticed that now
the spamass-milter does not 'seem' to do anything.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
grkni...@scent-team.com wrote:
On 3/22/2011 8:33 AM, Kenneth Holter wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply.
Your solution seems to be a very good one, but unfortunately that
default_destination_rate_delay parameter is not available in the
On 3/22/2011 1:18 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
grkni...@scent-team.com wrote:
There are reliable (S)RPM packages available for RHEL 5 that will get
you to the parameters/functionality you need.
The most common is by Simon Mudd
On 03/22/2011 05:39 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
J4K:
Is this configuration correct, and can anyone think of what causes the
spamass-milter to be ignored?
First, confirm that spamass-milter is ignored, by turning on logging
in spamass-milter. Then, complain that Postfix is making mistakes.
Brian Evans - Postfix List:
Yes, the web pages linked directly from the Postfix site are outdated,
but not the link referenced there (in the blog area) and above.
This includes RPMs for x86_64 for RHEL5 as well as SRPMS for Postfix up
to 2.8.1 at this time.
Which link? The blog refers me to
On 3/22/2011 2:41 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Brian Evans - Postfix List:
Yes, the web pages linked directly from the Postfix site are outdated,
but not the link referenced there (in the blog area) and above.
This includes RPMs for x86_64 for RHEL5 as well as SRPMS for Postfix up
to 2.8.1 at
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
grkni...@scent-team.com wrote:
It is rather obscure.
To say the least. :)
The first blog post, which references 2.6, has a
link that also contains info for 2.8.
For the sake of anyone looking through the archives, that link is:
I've been reading through
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html and Googling in
an attempt to figure out how to allow tagging of email accounts for
SPAM fighting purposes (mail to bob+any...@server.com gets delivered
to b...@server.com), but haven't been able to figure it out.
Can
--On Monday, February 28, 2011 11:32 PM -0500 Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:22:52PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
With Debian, if I need mysql support I simply install the extra package
postfix-mysql, which depends on libmysqlclient. (This
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 01:44:37PM -0700, Steve Jenkins wrote:
I've been reading through
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html and Googling in
an attempt to figure out how to allow tagging of email accounts for
SPAM fighting purposes (mail to bob+any...@server.com gets delivered
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
After filing a bug with RedHat about their GPL violation, they got on the
phone with Oracle, and Oracle updated the MySQL FOSS exception list to
include IBM Public License 1.0. So this is no longer a problem for anyone.
Thanks. That is one less thing to worry about.
Steve Jenkins:
I've been reading through
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html and Googling in
an attempt to figure out how to allow tagging of email accounts for
SPAM fighting purposes (mail to bob+any...@server.com gets delivered
to b...@server.com), but haven't been able to
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Subject: [SPAM] - Re: Address Tagging in Postfix? - Bayesian Filter
detected spam
Steve Jenkins:
I've been reading through
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html and
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Steve Jenkins:
I've been reading through
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html and Googling in
an attempt to figure out how to allow tagging of email accounts for
SPAM fighting purposes (mail to
Le 22/03/2011 05:38, Simon a écrit :
Hi There,
We are using postfix on debian lenny. Everything is mysql backed and
we are using amavisd-new (spamassassin with daily updates from
saupdates.openprotect.com and updates.spamassassin.org clam-av),
postfix-policy greylisting and
Le 22/03/2011 22:53, Simon Brereton a écrit :
The number of javascript email input validations that wouldn't allow + as a
valid character (particularly the banks)
Oh, not only banks. sigh.
I once worked for a company to help fight spam, and among the
recommendations I gave was to tag
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:04:28PM -0700, Manjiri wrote:
Have compiled postfix with mysql support, but i am still getting this error:
The Postfix software running on the machine:
Mar 22 16:14:46 vmlinuxrh01 postfix/postfix-script[5435]: starting the
Postfix mail system
Mar 22 16:14:46
Manjiri:
Though, I have 2 postfix built on the same machine. One is w/o mysql support
and the above one is with mysql support.
I know that it is possible to start multiple postfix instances on same
machine, but is it possible to install and build multiple postfix packages
on same machine ?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:08 PM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
if you're not running mailing lists, then yes, '-' is ok. if the domain
has mailing-lists, then '-' is already in use
Interesting. Could the '-' delimiter still work in this case, as long
as the tagged address doesn't match an
Dear
THis just a question.
Is there a way to whitelisting postscreen against sender smtp domains
name ?
best regards
David Touzeau:
Dear
THis just a question.
Is there a way to whitelisting postscreen against sender smtp domains
name ?
Sorry, postscreen will not look up client hostnames. It needs to make
a decision in milliseconds time to avoid slowing down good clients.
Wietse
Wietse Venema:
Manjiri:
Though, I have 2 postfix built on the same machine. One is w/o mysql support
and the above one is with mysql support.
I know that it is possible to start multiple postfix instances on same
machine, but is it possible to install and build multiple postfix packages
Steve Jenkins:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:08 PM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
if you're not running mailing lists, then yes, '-' is ok. if the domain
has mailing-lists, then '-' is already in use
Interesting. Could the '-' delimiter
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:56 AM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
1) nothing in your sample shows that you use postfix.
if using postfix, why is Return-Path in the middle of headers?
2) given the return-path you show, this is not backscatter. maybe you
meant envelope sender forgery?
3)
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Didn't I write that Postfix will attempt the unextended name first,
before trying the name without the text after $recipient_delimiter?
I'm assuming you meant extended name first - otherwise I'm confused! :)
Yes. I
Steve Jenkins:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Didn't I write that Postfix will attempt the unextended name first,
before trying the name without the text after $recipient_delimiter?
I'm assuming you meant extended name first - otherwise I'm
Thanks a lot.
Another quick question:
Even though, I have read this thread:
http://old.nabble.com/Postfix-integration%3A-Oracle-or-LDAP--to29532158.html#a29532158
Is there any way to connect to Oracle database from postfix ?
thanks again !
--
View this message in context:
49 matches
Mail list logo
