* Mike Power mpo...@alumni.calpoly.edu:
So I am confused, is Chrstian's packages the same as the base postfix
package?
Obviously not.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203
Wietse Venema wrote:
Hi list,
I saw this in my logs:
Apr 29 14:58:08 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: connect from
xxx.yyy.zzz[xxx.yyy.zzz.xxx]
Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: valid_hostname: empty
hostname
Apr 29 14:58:09 mx postfix/smtpd[4880]: warning: malformed domain name
in
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:39:10AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
This looks like a Null MX record:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-delany-nullmx-00
If the domain owner declares that this domain never sends or recieves
email, then shouldn't postfix reject the above
has anybody out there ever sent a message to them successfull?
they are blcoking all our servers independent from the network-range
including messages to postmaster and FAIK it is rfc-ignorant answer
with 451 the whole time for all messages until maximal_queue_lifetime
is reached
May 1 22:12:19
On 05/02/2011 03:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
has anybody out there ever sent a message to them successfull?
they are blcoking all our servers independent from the network-range
including messages to postmaster and FAIK it is rfc-ignorant answer
with 451 the whole time for all messages until
Am 02.05.2011 12:37, schrieb Mihira Fernando:
On 05/02/2011 03:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
has anybody out there ever sent a message to them successfull?
they are blcoking all our servers independent from the network-range
including messages to postmaster and FAIK it is rfc-ignorant answer
On 05/02/2011 04:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.05.2011 12:37, schrieb Mihira Fernando:
On 05/02/2011 03:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
has anybody out there ever sent a message to them successfull?
they are blcoking all our servers independent from the network-range
including messages to
This isn't a Postfix issue, just an FYI for those running updated
versions of Postfix on CentOS.
I recently updated one of my CentOS 5.5 systems (which was running
Postfix 2.8.2 compiled from source) to CentOS 5.6. The Postfix package
appeared nowhere on the upgrade list, and my /etc/yum.conf has
Earlier, I wrote:
I'm starting to ponder the idea of setting up a separate service in
my master.cf file -- similar to the standard smtp service, but with
a few parameters overridden -- and define that separate service as
my smtp_fallback_relay, and have the separate service use my *real*
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 09:46:51PM -0700, Rich Wales wrote:
[Short version of my question: Is there any way to enable sender-
dependent authentication *only* when mail is being sent out via my
smtp_fallback_relay host, and *not* when I am sending mail directly
to a destination MX? I do not
There is a lot of did not work without concrete detail: actual
configuration, actual error responses. See my response in a recent
thread: . . .
With all possible respect, Wietse, I believe I already provided ample
concrete detail in my original message from last night. If you would
prefer
I thought I had this one fixed a while back but apparently not. I want to
reject emails like this that are sent from one person but claim to be
another. Ideas? Notice the first line and the last line:
From rs...@bnpi.com Sun May 1 16:37:58 2011
Return-Path: rs...@bnpi.com
X-Original-To:
On 2011-05-02 R F wrote:
I thought I had this one fixed a while back but apparently not. I want
to reject emails like this that are sent from one person but claim to
be another. Ideas? Notice the first line and the last line:
[...]
Thanks for any ideas.
Quoting from the headers of your own
On 5/2/2011 1:21 PM, R F wrote:
I thought I had this one fixed a while back but apparently
not. I want to reject emails like this that are sent from one
person but claim to be another. Ideas? Notice the first line
and the last line:
From rs...@bnpi.com mailto:rs...@bnpi.com Sun May 1
16:37:58
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:08:40PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
So to find which master is which instance you need to look in the master.pid
files or in /proc, ... If you do look in /proc, each child process has
MAIL_CONFIG in its environment...
I see, and I don't want to sound
* Victor Duchovni postfix-users@postfix.org:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:08:40PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
So to find which master is which instance you need to look in the
master.pid
files or in /proc, ... If you do look in /proc, each child process has
MAIL_CONFIG in its
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:38:08PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Victor Duchovni postfix-users@postfix.org:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:08:40PM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
So to find which master is which instance you need to look in the
master.pid
files or in /proc,
* Victor Duchovni postfix-users@postfix.org:
Is this useful?
Definitely! I ran it on a machine that has four instances of whom two
weren't
running and it failed on the first one not running. Could it be the script
does not handle such situations?
You of all people should be able
You have to use a fallback relay setting that sends the mail to a second
Postfix instance on your machine, and have that instance send all mail
to the relay, with sender-dependent authentication. This would be a full
Postfix instance, not just another master.cf entry:
Thanks, Victor.
A
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:00:52PM -0700, Rich Wales wrote:
You have to use a fallback relay setting that sends the mail to a second
Postfix instance on your machine, and have that instance send all mail
to the relay, with sender-dependent authentication. This would be a full
Postfix
The mail must be handled by a second separately configured smtp(8)
delivery agent, and therefore, must be placed in a separate queue,
which requires a separate instance. If the message were handed off
to the same queue-manager it would loop.
Ah. And, not surprisingly, when I tried to solve
On 02/05/11 17:21, Steve Jenkins wrote:
This isn't a Postfix issue, just an FYI for those running updated
versions of Postfix on CentOS.
I recently updated one of my CentOS 5.5 systems (which was running
Postfix 2.8.2 compiled from source) to CentOS 5.6. The Postfix package
appeared nowhere on
I am trying to configure a very selective list on who can send to a
certain local accounts ( could be many and currently contains maybe 30 ).
Currently, this is covered by:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
There was a (Red Hat/CentOS) security update to Postfix issued almost 3
months after the upstream release of 5.6:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0422.html
However, because CentOS were slow with the release of 5.6,
The above is the envelope sender. You can configure postfix to reject your
own domain in the envelope sender from outside mail. See numerous posts on
this in the archives.
This will reject legit mail, but probably not a great amount. Pick your pain
threshold.
That is probably
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:33:31PM -0700, Rich Wales wrote:
The mail must be handled by a second separately configured smtp(8)
delivery agent, and therefore, must be placed in a separate queue,
which requires a separate instance. If the message were handed off
to the same queue-manager
FYI, there exists no standard function to set the process title.
BSD has setproctitle() in the system library which as the manpage
says, is implicitly non-standard.
Other systems don't have an equivalent in their system library, as
far as I know. I prefer not to maintain Postfix's own version.
On a new postfix/dovecot configuration, email is generally working OK. That
said, I'm seeing Client host rejected: Access denied messages in the logs for
two of the client company principals when they are connecting remotely. I'm
pretty certain their mail clients are set up correctly to
Yes, and this is no less efficient, and in fact the configuration
is IMHO simpler, and mailq(1) output is more meaningful, ...
Thanks again.
As it turned out, I was able to find a way to authenticate to my web
hosting service's outbound SMTP server using a single username/password
combo -- and
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 18:09:48 -0700, Des Dougan wrote:
On a new postfix/dovecot configuration, email is generally working OK.
That said, I'm seeing Client host rejected: Access denied messages
in the logs for two of the client company principals when they are
connecting remotely.
Show an
On May 2011, at 6:58 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 18:09:48 -0700, Des Dougan wrote:
On a new postfix/dovecot configuration, email is generally working OK.
That said, I'm seeing Client host rejected: Access denied messages
in the logs for two of the client company principals
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 19:16:42 -0700, Des Dougan wrote:
On May 2011, at 6:58 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 18:09:48 -0700, Des Dougan wrote:
On a new postfix/dovecot configuration, email is generally working OK.
That said, I'm seeing Client host rejected: Access denied
On May 2011, at 7:26 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 19:16:42 -0700, Des Dougan wrote:
On May 2011, at 6:58 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 18:09:48 -0700, Des Dougan wrote:
On a new postfix/dovecot configuration, email is generally working OK.
That said,
On May 2011, at 7:26 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 19:16:42 -0700, Des Dougan wrote:
On May 2011, at 6:58 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 18:09:48 -0700, Des Dougan wrote:
On a new postfix/dovecot configuration, email is generally working OK.
That said,
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 19:37:50 -0700, Des Dougan wrote:
Do you have POSTFIX logs that show successful authentication?
Like this?:
May 2 17:30:53 enterprise postfix/smtpd[2142]: connect from
S01065475d08916e7.AA..net[DD.DD.DDD.DDD]
No, that is just a connection. Successful
On May 2011, at 7:42 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 19:37:50 -0700, Des Dougan wrote:
Do you have POSTFIX logs that show successful authentication?
Like this?:
May 2 17:30:53 enterprise postfix/smtpd[2142]: connect from
On 5/2/2011 7:10 PM, R F wrote:
The above is the envelope sender. You can configure postfix to reject your own
domain in the envelope sender from outside mail. See numerous posts on this in
the archives.
This will reject legit mail, but probably not a great amount. Pick your pain
37 matches
Mail list logo
