Zitat von Sebastian Wiesinger postfix-us...@ml.karotte.org:
* lst_ho...@kwsoft.de lst_ho...@kwsoft.de [2011-12-08 14:46]:
And I had hoped that perhaps this would be an improvement to postfix.
Sadly it seems it was some kind of blasphemy to question the way
postfix does handle this stuff.
No,
Am 09.12.2011 03:44, schrieb Philip Prindeville:
On 12/8/11 5:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Got it. I misunderstood you before. May I ask why using 465 for
Thunderbird and Squirrelmail would be better than 587 for Thunderbird
and 25 for Squirrelmail talking to localhost?
there is no
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8 and I want to limit number of messages that will be
sent to certain domain as yahoo or hotmail. How can I do that?
Regards
Use the search of this list, repeatedly discussed
On 9 December 2011 13:32, Amira Othman a.oth...@cairosource.com wrote:
Hi all
I am using postfix 2.8 and I want to limit number of messages that will be
sent to certain domain as yahoo or hotmail. How can I do that?
** **
Hello
I actually have one instance running on a host
running as send only with SASL/TLS to let users
relay their emails from external world, it runs
on one IP adress.
The host has two IP addresses on two ethernet
interfaces and I would like to run another postfix
instance on the OTHER IP
Good afternoon List.
Apologies for posting again.
I have a strange issue with my sender_access_maps where the DISCARD
REJECTS work as expected, yet a hold does not
I am seeing this in the logs.
Dec 9 12:57:39 mx1 postfix/smtpd[395]:
On Friday, December 09, 2011 at 10:46:48 UTC, f.bon...@esiee.fr confabulated:
Hello
I actually have one instance running on a host
running as send only with SASL/TLS to let users
relay their emails from external world, it runs
on one IP adress.
The host has two IP addresses on two
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
I don't know the Postfix internals but if it where easy *and* safe to
implement it would have been done already from someone feeling the
need to do so.
A quick search shows that trivial-rewrite server has no fatal
errors - it reports all errors that it can detect to
On 12/9/2011 5:05 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Good afternoon List.
Apologies for posting again.
I have a strange issue with my sender_access_maps where the DISCARD
REJECTS work as expected, yet a hold does not
I am seeing this in the logs.
Dec 9 12:57:39 mx1 postfix/smtpd[395]:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org [2011-12-09 13:47]:
A quick search shows that trivial-rewrite server has no fatal
errors - it reports all errors that it can detect to the client (in
this case smtpd(8)).
However there is one low-level library module (match_ops) that
exits the program
You can use SquirrelMail on 587. It doesn't work right now because
of your smtpd_security_level=encrypt. You could change your
submission restrictions to something like
-o smtpd_security_level=may
-o mynetworks=127.0.0.1
-o smtpd_tls_auth_only=yes
-o
On 2011-12-09 10:07 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
master.cf:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
You should also have:
On 12/9/2011 10:04 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-12-09 10:07 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
master.cf:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
master.cf:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
You should also have:
smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
for the submission service...
Thank you but
master.cf:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
You should also have:
smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
for the submission service...
Normally
On 2011-12-09 11:12 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you but if I do that I won't be able to connect from
Squirrelmail which does not currently support STARTTLS. Squirrelmail
is on the same machine as postfix so TLS isn't necessary there anyway.
Which is why it was repeatedly
Thank you but if I do that I won't be able to connect from
Squirrelmail which does not currently support STARTTLS. Squirrelmail
is on the same machine as postfix so TLS isn't necessary there anyway.
Which is why it was repeatedly suggested to you to continue to use port 465
(smtps) for
On 2011-12-09 11:25 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
It was also repeatedly suggested that I switch to exactly the
arrangement that I've switched to.
No, that was only presented as an option (there is always more than one
way to skin a cat).
Doing it the way you did it makes your
It was also repeatedly suggested that I switch to exactly the
arrangement that I've switched to.
No, that was only presented as an option (there is always more than one way
to skin a cat).
Doing it the way you did it makes your primary submission port *less*
secure, *just* so you can let
On 12/9/2011 10:15 AM, Grant wrote:
master.cf:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
You should also have:
smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
for the
master.cf:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
You should also have:
smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
for the submission service...
Normally
On 12/9/11 8:07 AM, Grant wrote:
I should add that I took Noel's advice and Thunderbird is connecting
remotely to 587 and Squirrelmail is connecting locally to 587 without
encryption or authentication. The above config pertains to that
arrangement.
- Grant
Now whenever you upgrade
On 12/9/11 2:26 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, as long thunderbird offers STARTTLS or SSL and for SSL 465 as
default and as long 465 does not eat anybodys children
It kicked my dog once...
I should add that I took Noel's advice and Thunderbird is connecting
remotely to 587 and Squirrelmail is connecting locally to 587 without
encryption or authentication. The above config pertains to that
arrangement.
- Grant
Now whenever you upgrade Squirrelmail to something current, you
On 2011-12-08 09:53, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Over the last few days I discussed SMTP delivery problems with a czech
site which was using Postfix and a CISCO ASA with smtp protocol
fixup enabled.
smtp fixup is evil and should have died out years ago.
People who still use it have no clue how to
* Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl:
On 2011-12-08 09:53, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Over the last few days I discussed SMTP delivery problems with a czech
site which was using Postfix and a CISCO ASA with smtp protocol
fixup enabled.
smtp fixup is evil and should have died out years ago.
No
On 2011-12-09 19:57, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl:
On 2011-12-08 09:53, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Over the last few days I discussed SMTP delivery problems with a czech
site which was using Postfix and a CISCO ASA with smtp protocol
fixup enabled.
smtp fixup is evil
As far as I know it just limit the commands that you can send to the mail
server, you just have to be sure if you are using ESMTP or SMTP. Here's the
link explaining how it works.
All the customers of our company uses that inspect, the common issue is with
proofpoint. Every other MTA is
Alfonso Alejandro Reyes Jimenez:
As far as I know it just limit the commands that you can send
to the mail server, you just have to be sure if you are using ESMTP
or SMTP. Here's the link explaining how it works.
Well, that is how it is supposed to work.
In reality, the code has a history of
* Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl:
I am in no way implying that you did anything wrong!
I wholeheartedly agree with your last posting :)
It's just that I cringe every time I see this enabled and when I ask
after it the answer is usually a variant on oh it's a security
option offered by a
On 12/9/11 11:39 AM, Grant wrote:
I should add that I took Noel's advice and Thunderbird is connecting
remotely to 587 and Squirrelmail is connecting locally to 587 without
encryption or authentication. The above config pertains to that
arrangement.
- Grant
Now whenever you upgrade
On Friday 09 December 2011 14:23:01 Philip Prindeville wrote:
On 12/9/11 11:39 AM, Grant wrote:
Philip:
Now whenever you upgrade Squirrelmail to something current,
you can pass your free time trying to figure out how to get
it to do STARTTLS. :-)
No need. Squirrelmail connects to 587
On 12/9/11 1:36 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Friday 09 December 2011 14:23:01 Philip Prindeville wrote:
On 12/9/11 11:39 AM, Grant wrote:
Philip:
Now whenever you upgrade Squirrelmail to something current,
you can pass your free time trying to figure out how to get
it to do STARTTLS. :-)
No
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 07:47:08AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
I don't know the Postfix internals but if it where easy *and* safe to
implement it would have been done already from someone feeling the
need to do so.
A quick search shows that trivial-rewrite
Viktor Dukhovni:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 07:47:08AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
I don't know the Postfix internals but if it where easy *and* safe to
implement it would have been done already from someone feeling the
need to do so.
A quick search shows
Wietse Venema:
This week I implemented a memcache client for Postfix in the hope
that it would be useful to share postscreen(8) or verify(8) caches
among multiple MTAs.
The implementation is based on libmemcache. This was not too much
work, given a few examples (libmemcache is
36 matches
Mail list logo
