On Jul 26, 2017, at 8:36 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have read the DSN README, and I'm searching if there's a better
alternative than disabling DSNs at all.
On 26.07.17 10:59, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
My advice is to disable DSN at the edge of each administrative
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:08 Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> > On Jul 26, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> > Now my question: is there any future benefit to having tls certs for a
> host name of "smtp.domain.tld" for each "domain.tld" when
> On Jul 26, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>
> Now my question: is there any future benefit to having tls certs for a host
> name of "smtp.domain.tld" for each "domain.tld" when all domains will have
> the same mail server?
No, for inbound mail a single MX
> Any 5xx code is supposed to say that
That's clear now that's how it's supposed to work.
> Whether the recipient of the remote site's resulting bounce message is paying
> attention is another
matter.
That's the actual problem here I think.
> You're now down to something like Kevin
> On Jul 26, 2017, at 6:01 AM, Z3us Linux wrote:
>
> I'm running Postfix with MailScanner as a spamfilter for multiple
> domains/customers.
> Is it possible to create a TLS configuration to force encryption for a set of
> domains with one 1 SSL certificate for the FQDN
Hi Viktor,
thank you for your detailed explanations.
Greetings, Frank
I have been soliciting help from this list for some time now in the process
of planning my new single-server, multi-domain web and mail server, with
domains 'domain1.tld1' through 'domainN.tldN'.
I have been experimenting with Lets Encrypt clients with mixed success,
and, as of this morning,
robg...@nospammail.net wrote:
I have a milter set up to REJECT on some body content.
It works like it should and REJECTS with the message
Jul 25 14:41:13 mariner postfix/handoff/smtpd[56542]: proxy-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE: 554
5.7.1 id=12969-07 - Rejected by next-hop MTA on relaying,
On 26/7/2017 2:09 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
/etc/postfix/protected_destinations:
privlist1@example.comallowed_list1
privlist1@example.comallowed_list1
privlist1@example.comallowed_list1
Hmm, sorry, this part was meant to be:
/etc/postfix/protected_destinations:
Hello,
I maintain multiple postfix servers with LMTP content filter set up.
last week we started receiving much spam that requests NOTIFY=SUCCESS
which results in many queued DSNs.
I got the idea of avoid notifications when they reach particular spam score.
My problem is, that on (at least)
Firstly here is the relevant config:
main.cf:
smtp_send_xforward_command=yes
content_filter = amavisfeed:[127.0.0.1]:10024
master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
smtp-amavis unix - - - - 2
Hello,
Since Postfix is now (since v2.11) providing more extensive sasl access
restrictions, we are considering using the following model to protect
particular addresses so that only specific users can send mail to them:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
...
allowed_list1=
I'm running Postfix with MailScanner as a spamfilter for multiple
domains/customers.
Is it possible to create a TLS configuration to force encryption for a set
of domains with one 1 SSL certificate for the FQDN of the mailserver?
The MX-records of the hosted domains are pointing to my mailserver
13 matches
Mail list logo