Re: opendkim - permission issue?

Maurizio Caloro: > > On 27.06.2022 00:24, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Maurizio Caloro: > > > > setup also opendkim and will appear now the error " > >> *key data is not secure: / is writeable and owned by uid 110 which is > >> not the executing uid (115)* *or the superuser*" > >> it's seem that i

Re: opendkim - permission issue?

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 07:19:59AM +0200, Maurizio Caloro wrote: > On 27.06.2022 00:24, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Maurizio Caloro: > > > > setup also opendkim and will appear now the error " > > > *key data is not secure: / is writeable and owned by uid 110 which > > > is not the executing uid

Re: opendkim - permission issue?

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 12:00:20AM +0200, Maurizio Caloro wrote: > > setup also opendkim and will appear now the error "key data is not secure: / > is writeable and owned by uid 110 which is not the executing uid (115)" > it's seem that i have permission issue? > > # opendkim -V >    

Re: opendkim - permission issue?

On 27.06.22 00:00, Maurizio Caloro wrote: setup also opendkim and will appear now the error "key data is not secure: / is writeable and owned by uid 110 which is not the executing uid (115)" this looks like you have set owner of root directory to non-root user it's seem that i have

Re: opendkim - permission issue?

On 27.06.2022 00:24, Wietse Venema wrote: Maurizio Caloro: setup also opendkim and will appear now the error " *key data is not secure: / is writeable and owned by uid 110 which is not the executing uid (115)* *or the superuser*" it's seem that i have permission issue? Look at the output

Re: opendkim - permission issue?

Maurizio Caloro: > > setup also opendkim and will appear now the error "key data is not > secure: / is writeable and owned by uid 110 which is not the executing > uid (115)" > it's seem that i have permission issue? Look at the output from: ls -ld / Wietse

Re: OpenDKIM but no log of postfix milter running or trying to run

Oh, that's awesome, thanks.  So for the first time I got a log message concerning the milter.  And so this is, indeed, an OpenDKIM issue. Many thanks, I'll go look over there for my problems. Jeff Abrahamson http://p27.eu/jeff/ http://transport-nantes.com/ On 14/10/2020 16:43, IL Ka wrote: >

Re: OpenDKIM but no log of postfix milter running or trying to run

Shutdown OpenDKIM, set "milter_default_action = tempfail", reload postfix and try to send something. If your mail is rejected, then Postfix configuration is ok, and you need to grep maillog (or other logs) for DKIM On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 5:28 PM Jeff Abrahamson wrote: > On 14/10/2020 16:02, IL

Re: OpenDKIM but no log of postfix milter running or trying to run

On 14/10/2020 16:02, IL Ka wrote: > > The config file is active, however.  > > You can check your milter config with > > $  postconf smtpd_milters non_smtpd_milters milter_default_action > > or even > > $ postconf  | grep milter > > You can probably post output it here. > Also, try to increase

Re: OpenDKIM but no log of postfix milter running or trying to run

On 14/10/2020 16:06, Wietse Venema wrote: > Jeff Abrahamson: >> I've set up OpenDKIM.? I've noted the config below, but the basic issue >> is that my mails aren't being DKIM signed and my logs, while showing no >> mail-related errors, also don't show any evidence of milters running or >> trying to

Re: OpenDKIM but no log of postfix milter running or trying to run

Jeff Abrahamson: > I've set up OpenDKIM.? I've noted the config below, but the basic issue > is that my mails aren't being DKIM signed and my logs, while showing no > mail-related errors, also don't show any evidence of milters running or > trying to run.? So I'm suspecting postfix config error

Re: OpenDKIM but no log of postfix milter running or trying to run

> The config file is active, however. You can check your milter config with $ postconf smtpd_milters non_smtpd_milters milter_default_action or even $ postconf | grep milter You can probably post output it here. Also, try to increase logging: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html

Re: OpenDKIM but no log of postfix milter running or trying to run

Thanks.  The suggestion to set milter_default_action to reject is good.  (I also tried unsetting milter_mail_macros.)  Strangely, it doesn't cause a rejection: Oct 14 15:42:53 nantes-1 postfix/smtps/smtpd[5954]: connect from w.z.y.x.rev.sfr.net[x.y.z.w] Oct 14 15:42:53 nantes-1

Re: OpenDKIM but no log of postfix milter running or trying to run

Set "milter_default_action" to "reject", reload postfix, and try to send mail. You should probably get some errors in maillog. Check your syslog config, to make sure opendkim logs are also written. Check your dkim is running (telnet 127.0.0.1 8891). Btw, I have not set "milter_mail_macros"

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

You actually got me on right track. Peeled back the onion abit to how OpenDkim was being started I looked in more depth at start up script used by rc.cof.It was looking for a opendkim.conf in /usr/local/etc/mail not /usr/local/etc/opemdkim Copied opedkim.conf back that and all is good

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

The thing is … that isn an INCOMING not an outgoing email.. Maybe its is failing a DKIM test for incoming I can’t seem to get OpenDKIM to sign my OUTGOING > On Oct 25, 2019, at 1:17 PM, Fazzina, Angelo > wrote: > > > From what I can tell the DNS record

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

On October 25, 2019 9:58:28 PM GMT+02:00, Jason Hirsh wrote: >I am getting entries in my maiillog, but only in regards to OpenDKIM >working to verify INCOMING >These are clearly entries from OpenDKIM. There is nothing >corresponding for actions relative to outgoing mail What happens when you

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

I am getting entries in my maiillog, but only in regards to OpenDKIM working to verify INCOMING These are clearly entries from OpenDKIM. There is nothing corresponding for actions relative to outgoing mail Jason > On Oct 25, 2019, at 3:52 PM, Christian Kivalo > wrote: > > On October 25,

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

On October 25, 2019 6:52:52 PM GMT+02:00, Jason Hirsh wrote: >I have gone over my configuration with a fine tooth comb, but >considering I put them together it is not surprising I can’t spot >anything > > >O have been trying to locate opendkim action in my log file. It >appears that that the

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

I am trying to get rid of the amount of background I was pretty sure that OPenDKIM should be doing the hard lifting.The think that is throwing me for a loop is the absence of any indication of it operating in conjunction with the outgoing mail in the mallow. As show else where it is

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

Jason Hirsh: > I have gone over my configuration with a fine tooth comb, but considering I > put them together it is not surprising I can?t spot anything > > > O have been trying to locate opendkim action in my log file. It appears that > that the mail is being reviewed but now header added

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

Ahh .. Interesting I had not understood that But I am still not signing …. > On Oct 25, 2019, at 2:00 PM, Fazzina, Angelo > wrote: > > From your original email > > Modesv > > > You are verifying and signing so yes that seems to be the

RE: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

ay, October 25, 2019 12:53 PM To: Dominic Raferd ; postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD I have gone over my configuration with a fine tooth comb, but considering I put them together it is not surprising I can’t spot anything O have been

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

I have gone over my configuration with a fine tooth comb, but considering I put them together it is not surprising I can’t spot anything O have been trying to locate opendkim action in my log file. It appears that that the mail is being reviewed but now header added

Re: OpenDKIM , Postfix , SpamAssassin, Amavisd-New, SPF and FreeBSD

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 15:28, Jason Hirsh wrote: > > I am trying to revive my OpenDKIM installation. I had it working but managed > to break it when I updated my ports. It is running but not signing outgoing > messages > > My main.cf configuration relative to OpenDkim is > > smtpd_milters =

Re: OpenDKIM not signing

On Tuesday, April 09, 2019 08:50:52 AM Bill Cole wrote: > On 9 Apr 2019, at 5:36, Ntek, SIA Janis wrote: > > What's your key-size? > > My DNS provider does not support 2048, I found it out the hard way. > > Note that this is usually due to a 255-character limit on a single > string in a TXT

Re: OpenDKIM not signing

On 9 Apr 2019, at 5:36, Ntek, SIA Janis wrote: What's your key-size? My DNS provider does not support 2048, I found it out the hard way. Note that this is usually due to a 255-character limit on a single string in a TXT record. This is because the character-string type in DNS is defined as

Re: OpenDKIM not signing

* SIA Janis Ntek: > Why do use > > inet:localhost:8891 > Instead of a socket? Probably because the above stream socket is, unfortunately, what is to this day used in both opendkim.conf.simple and opendkim.conf.sample in the source code, although a domain socket would be safer in terms of access

RE: OpenDKIM not signing

-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On Behalf Of Laura Smith Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 5:43 AM To: Jim P. Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: OpenDKIM not signing ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 9:40 AM, Jim P. wrote: > On Tue, 2019

Re: OpenDKIM not signing

Apr 9 09:40:14 rx200 mail.info opendkim[4396]: C03DE1014429: foobar.example.com [192.0.2.10] not internal It seems that the domain you want to sign is not in the KeyTable or SigningTable! Note that if you put "refile:" before config file path in /etc/opendkim.conf the syntax changes! If

Re: OpenDKIM not signing

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 9:40 AM, Jim P. wrote: > On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 08:22 +, Laura Smith wrote: > > > OpenDKIM is not signing my mails. > > . > > > KeyTable    /etc/opendkim/KeyTable > > I think this should be: > > KeyTable

Re: OpenDKIM not signing

What's your key-size? My DNS provider does not support 2048, I found it out the hard way. 1024 seems to be the most popular size and google demands at least 1024. Ounce you get the signing working you can regen a 2048 and check if you can feed it in DNS TXT, but for first testing stick to 1024

RE: OpenDKIM not signing

this. And just a question, the DNS is already updated? Greetz, Louis > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: i...@ntek.lv [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] > Namens Ntek, SIA Janis > Verzonden: dinsdag 9 april 2019 11:19 > Aan: postfix-users@postfix.org > Onder

Re: OpenDKIM not signing

Why do use inet:localhost:8891 Instead of a socket? I conf'ed it using this tutorial: https://www.linode.com/docs/email/postfix/configure-spf-and-dkim-in-postfix-on-debian-8/ smtpd_milters = local:opendkim/opendkim.sock non_smtpd_milters = local:opendkim/opendkim.sock The sockets are relative

Re: OpenDKIM not signing

On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 09:41, Jim P. wrote: > On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 08:22 +, Laura Smith wrote: > > OpenDKIM is not signing my mails. > . > > KeyTable/etc/opendkim/KeyTable > > I think this should be: > > KeyTablerefile:/etc/opendkim/KeyTable > > > >

Re: OpenDKIM not signing

On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 08:22 +, Laura Smith wrote: > OpenDKIM is not signing my mails. . > KeyTable    /etc/opendkim/KeyTable I think this should be: KeyTablerefile:/etc/opendkim/KeyTable > InternalHosts   refile:/etc/opendkim/TrustedHosts Try using

Re: openDKIM and postfix

On May 20, 2018, at 7:24 PM, John Levine wrote: > > Has anyone actually seen it happen in the > wild in the past decade? yes, web.de, gmx.net and other domains operated by 1&1 for example. or freemail.de or all the domains hosted by Eleven (today Cyren) For that it /is/ a

Re: openDKIM and postfix

> On May 20, 2018, at 7:59 PM, Viktor Dukhovni > wrote: > > I have a dataset with ~1.4 million MX hosts. Running through those > at a gentle pace (one at a time) after the first ~200 MX hosts I have > 10 that don't announce 8BITMIME. I stopped the scan after 2308

Re: openDKIM and postfix

> On May 20, 2018, at 7:24 PM, John Levine wrote: > > Has anyone actually seen it happen in the > wild in the past decade? I have a dataset with ~1.4 million MX hosts. Running through those at a gentle pace (one at a time) after the first ~200 MX hosts I have 10 that don't

Re: OpenDKIM SOCK path on Debian Jessie

Il 2017-10-16 19:07 A. Schulze ha scritto: [..] postfix and sendmail/milter use different notation to describe the same socket location. http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html#smtp-only-milters vs. http://opendkim.org/opendkim.conf.5.html (search for "Socket" ...) to me your setup looks

Re: OpenDKIM SOCK path on Debian Jessie

Am 16.10.2017 um 18:51 schrieb Davide Marchi: > SOCKET="local:/var/spool/postfix/var/run/opendkim/opendkim.sock" vs. > smtpd_milters = unix:/var/run/opendkim/opendkim.sock > non_smtpd_milters = unix:/var/run/opendkim/opendkim.sock postfix and sendmail/milter use different notation to describe

Re: OpenDKIM on backup MX

You are welcome. In case of DNS you might use cache TTL high and use backup DNS service providers to make it reliable. ‎ Anvar Kuchkartaev  an...@anvartay.com    Original Message   From: Davide Marchi Sent: martes, 10 de octubre de 2017 10:27 p.m. To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re

Re: OpenDKIM on backup MX

Il 2017-10-10 16:36 Anvar Kuchkartaev ha scritto: You can use 2 separate keys on servers with different selectors and use 2 DNS records as public keys (for security reasons it will be better). Recipient of email will query dns record to identify if signature of the email is right or not.‎ It

Re: OpenDKIM on backup MX

You can use 2 separate keys on servers with different selectors and use 2 DNS records as public keys (for security reasons it will be better). Recipient of email will query dns record to identify if signature of the email is right or not.‎ It will generate dns request based on the signature and

Re: OpenDKIM on backup MX

* Davide Marchi : > Hello friends, > On Debian Jessie I would like to enable OpenDKIM on my two Postfix > servers. For signing when sending out mails? > My question is how to behave with the secondary backup server. > Enable it as on the first and then I copy the key from first

Re: OpenDKIM, Milters and Postfix .... config pointer needed

Just for anyone who reads this thread in the future... A **BIG** thank you to the awesome Benny ! A little bit of off-list help lead me to discovering two missing config lines : #master.cf -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING # opendkim.conf MTA

Re: OpenDKIM, Milters and Postfix .... config pointer needed

Tim Smith skrev den 2017-01-25 16:40: P.S. Yes I know OpenDKIM has a “TrustedHosts” config file. But that would not be much good for me as my SMTP client machines can connect from anywhere. And putting 0.0.0.0 in OpenDKIM trusted hosts wouldn’t work either as I have a second postfix instance

RE: OpenDKIM

n <j...@klam.ca>; postfix users <postfix-users@postfix.org> Subject: Re: OpenDKIM On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, John Allen <j...@klam.ca<mailto:j...@klam.ca>> wrote: Is OpenDKIM worth while? I use amavis and it says it signs and verifies DKIM so do need anything else?

Re: OpenDKIM

On 11/7/2015 10:03 AM, yahoogro...@lazygranch.xyz wrote: > ‎Note that Domain Keys is not the same as DKIM. DKIM supercedes Domain Keys. > > http://support2.constantcontact.com/articles/FAQ/2213 > > I'm no guru on this, so correct away if I'm wrong. > > I can pass DKIM, but not Domain Keys. I

Re: OpenDKIM

On 11/7/2015 9:09 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote: > On Saturday, November 7, 2015, John Allen > wrote: > > Interesting! > I tried a couple of DKIM test sites, one says I am signing my > emails, the other says I am not!! > Mailradar say I am not

Re: OpenDKIM

Interesting! I tried a couple of DKIM test sites, one says I am signing my emails, the other says I am not!! Mailradar say I am not signing! DKIMValidator say I am! On 2015-11-06 1:13 PM, John Allen wrote: Is OpenDKIM worth while? I use amavis and it says it signs and verifies DKIM so do need

Re: OpenDKIM

On Saturday, November 7, 2015, John Allen wrote: > Interesting! > I tried a couple of DKIM test sites, one says I am signing my emails, the > other says I am not!! > Mailradar say I am not signing! > DKIMValidator say I am! > My favorite "test site" for SPF, DKIM, DMARC

Re: OpenDKIM

Hi On 2015-11-07 14:30, John Allen wrote: Interesting! I tried a couple of DKIM test sites, one says I am signing my emails, the other says I am not!! Mailradar say I am not signing! DKIMValidator say I am! They are both right. Mailradar checks for DomainKeys (rfc4870) signatures,

Re: OpenDKIM

On 2015-11-07 16:41, Mike wrote: On 11/7/2015 9:09 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote: On Saturday, November 7, 2015, John Allen > wrote: Interesting! I tried a couple of DKIM test sites, one says I am signing my emails, the other says I am not!!

Re: OpenDKIM

, though Constant Contact claims they can.  ‎ ‎ ‎ Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.   Original Message   From: Steve Jenkins Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2015 6:11 AM To: John Allen Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: OpenDKIM On Saturday, November 7, 2015, John Allen <j...@klam

Re: OpenDKIM

Some of my favs: https://en.internet.nl/ (if you're running Postscreen, it will fail the TLS test as it doesn't wait for the STARTTLS offer) http://www.mail-tester.com https://ssl-tools.net https://dane.sys4.de/ (thanks Victor!) http://arp.simson.net/dev/dane_check.cgi/ (defunct :( ) On

Re: OpenDKIM

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:13 AM, John Allen wrote: > Is OpenDKIM worth while? > I use amavis and it says it signs and verifies DKIM so do need anything > else? > Disclaimer: as the OpenDKIM package maintainer for Fedora/EPEL, and a contributor to the upstream project, I'm a bit

RE: OpenDKIM

If Amavis is signing your outbound mail with your (a) private key, and you've published the public key in your DNS so remote servers can verify, then you should be all set. Michael Munger, dCAP, MCPS, MCNPS, MBSS High Powered Help, Inc. Microsoft Certified Professional Microsoft Certified Small

Re: OpenDkim signs incoming emails ???

i...@itrezero.it: Hi all. I've a strange behaviour of my Postfix server: it seems to sign all incoming emails! Postfix does not sign any email. You may have mis-configured opendkim. Wietse

Re: OpenDkim signs incoming emails ???

Apr 16 17:18:46 dante opendkim[17056]: (unknown-jobid): not authenticated Apr 16 17:18:46 dante opendkim[17056]: 9AB782118043: no signature data Apr 16 17:18:46 dante postfix/qmgr[17770]: 9AB782118043: from=pi...@externaldomain.it, size=19094, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 16 17:18:46

Re: opendkim-2.10.1 issue

On Tue, March 31, 2015 16:42, Wietse Venema wrote: James B. Byrne: Mar 31 16:17:58 inet08 postfix-p25/smtpd[20097]: warning: connect to Milter service inet:127.0.0.1:8891: Connection refused This normally means the port is not open (no process listening). Use a suitable command to list all

Re: opendkim-2.10.1 issue

James B. Byrne: Mar 31 16:17:58 inet08 postfix-p25/smtpd[20097]: warning: connect to Milter service inet:127.0.0.1:8891: Connection refused This normally means the port is not open (no process listening). Use a suitable command to list all open sockets: netstat, or lsof, and see what port

Re: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com

Am 05.10.2014 um 17:05 schrieb Inteq Solution - Dep. tehnic: Hello, Having some issues with messages from yahoo.com They seem to fail dkim and dmarc verification. Dmarc from gmail.com (for example) works just fine. Any clue if Yahoo is having some problems? Can’t seem to find

Re: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com

Inteq Solution - Dep. tehnic: Oct 5 17:55:44 ns4 opendkim[3861]: A2CCA44674: s=s2048 d=yahoo.com SSL error:04091068:rsa routines:INT_RSA_VERIFY:bad signature If this were a common problem then there would be many reports, so I presume that you are receiving corrupted email. Do you have a

RE: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com

this problem. -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2014 6:53 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com Inteq Solution - Dep. tehnic: Oct 5 17:55:44

Re: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com

On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:30:20PM +0300, Inteq Solution - Dep. tehnic wrote: No security appliance in front of Postifix. I use SpamAssassin that tags with X-Spam. I have disabled AV scanning. No luck I have disabled dkim-milter. No luck Weird thing is that from other dmarc enabled

Re: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com

Inteq Solution - Dep. tehnic: No security appliance in front of Postifix. I use SpamAssassin that tags with X-Spam. I have disabled AV scanning. No luck I have disabled dkim-milter. No luck Weird thing is that from other dmarc enabled domains, the result is pass and email delivery is OK.

Re: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com

Am 05.10.2014 um 17:52 schrieb Wietse Venema: Inteq Solution - Dep. tehnic: Oct 5 17:55:44 ns4 opendkim[3861]: A2CCA44674: s=s2048 d=yahoo.com SSL error:04091068:rsa routines:INT_RSA_VERIFY:bad signature yes that ssl stuff looks broken somekind, perhaps thats the reason If this were a

Re: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com

Am 05.10.2014 um 18:47 schrieb Wietse Venema: Inteq Solution - Dep. tehnic: No security appliance in front of Postifix. I use SpamAssassin that tags with X-Spam. I have disabled AV scanning. No luck I have disabled dkim-milter. No luck Weird thing is that from other dmarc enabled domains,

Re: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com

On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 05.10.2014 um 17:52 schrieb Wietse Venema: Inteq Solution - Dep. tehnic: Oct 5 17:55:44 ns4 opendkim[3861]: A2CCA44674: s=s2048 d=yahoo.com SSL error:04091068:rsa routines:INT_RSA_VERIFY:bad signature yes that ssl

Re: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com

Am 05.10.2014 um 19:01 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net: Am 05.10.2014 um 18:47 schrieb Wietse Venema: Inteq Solution - Dep. tehnic: No security appliance in front of Postifix. I use SpamAssassin that tags with X-Spam. I have disabled AV scanning. No luck I have disabled dkim-milter. No luck

Re: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com

Am 05.10.2014 um 19:16 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni: On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 05.10.2014 um 17:52 schrieb Wietse Venema: Inteq Solution - Dep. tehnic: Oct 5 17:55:44 ns4 opendkim[3861]: A2CCA44674: s=s2048 d=yahoo.com SSL error:04091068:rsa

RE: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com

...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2014 7:48 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com Inteq Solution - Dep. tehnic: No security appliance in front of Postifix. I use SpamAssassin

Re: opendkim and opendmarc failure for yahoo.com

Am 05.10.2014 um 19:23 schrieb Robert Schetterer: Am 05.10.2014 um 19:01 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net: Am 05.10.2014 um 18:47 schrieb Wietse Venema: Inteq Solution - Dep. tehnic: No security appliance in front of Postifix. I use SpamAssassin that tags with X-Spam. I have disabled AV scanning.