Re: How to safely re-inject an archived queue file?

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Curtis: Hi, I'm looking for a safe way to re-inject an archived queue file that was backed up and removed (via postsuper) from the hold queue. (Not just this once, but on a regular basis.) I realize that it would

override the catch-all ?

and is bounced at smtp? Thanks, Curtis

Re: override the catch-all ?

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:23:30PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Mar 10, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Curtis wrote: I've got the catch-all feature explained here working just fine... http://www.postfix.org

Per domain sender_access ?

on the scene (either with Postfix or with policy servers) since the last time this was discussed. Thanks, Curtis

Re: Per domain sender_access ?

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Curtis: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] oops... darn gmail. snip So... my thought is that a policy server is the answer.  However, I can't seem to find a policy server that supports sender

Is it possible to not bounce after smtp?

time. I saw one person suggest disabling the bounce service in /etc/master.cf...which does disable bouncing, but the logs now show the following error: status=deferred (bounce or trace service failure) What is the correct way to disable bounces? Thanks, Curtis

Re: Is it possible to not bounce after smtp?

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Curtis: I'm building a spam filtering appliance using Postfix. We will be making every effort to reject invalid recipient addresses at SMTP time, but since we will not always be made aware when an email box

Re: Is it possible to not bounce after smtp?

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Curtis: What I'd prefer to do here is have the bounces held for customer review so that they can realize that they've got an email address that isn't delivering and fix the problem on their end. Sorry, that does

Re: Is it possible to not bounce after smtp?

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Trey Briggs tbri...@api-digital.com wrote: On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Curtis postfixu...@isparks.com wrote: On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Curtis: I'm building a spam filtering appliance using Postfix.  We

Re: Is it possible to not bounce after smtp?

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Curtis: Companies that provide out-sourced email filtering service often don't have up-to-date recipient lists. Instead they verify addresses in real-time. ?The Postfix implementation of this is described in http

RE: How to safely re-inject an archived queue file?

... I simply created a wrapper for postfix reload that we'll use in place of actually running postfix reload... it creates a lock file that tells the script that drops the files into maildrop to pause and then it waits until the maildrop queue is empty before doing the reload. Thanks, Curtis P.S

RE: How to safely re-inject an archived queue file?

Curtis: We're not manually creating them, these are archived queue files that were pulled from the hold queue, and then later released by being dropped into the maildrop queue (using the technique discussed earlier in this thread). This is safe only when the maildrop queue is stopped

RE: How to safely re-inject an archived queue file?

Wietse: Curtis: This is safe only when the maildrop queue is stopped, that is, 1) No submissions with the Postfix sendmail command while these files are in the maildrop directory, otherwise mail will be lost. I'm still trying to understand why mail would be lost. Since

RE: How to safely re-inject an archived queue file?

the footprint I've already made on this list for an issue that is probably pretty unique to our situation.) Curtis -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list

RE: How to safely re-inject an archived queue file?

. I would love to see that. Curtis Wietse

RE: How to safely re-inject an archived queue file?

right there, except that then it would be a tricky the quarantine system to figure out which messages it has logged into it's database or not. Right now it copies the messages out of the hold queue one by one and then deletes them out of the hold queue with postsuper. Curtis Terry

RE: How to safely re-inject an archived queue file?

to eventually make that happen. In the mean time, it seems like using doing postsuper -r to re-activate old queue files would be a good alternative. Hopefully that resolves the expiration cycle issue that is caused when you inject a queue file directly into the maildrop queue? Curtis

Alternate mail server in transport table?

if it is possible to specify a secondary mail server, to be used only if their primary mail server is down. I don't see a way to do this using the transport table... perhaps there's another way? Anyone have any ideas for me? Thanks, Curtis

[no subject]

: em...@example.com recipient: em...@example.com Would it be safe to say that all local recipients of the message will be found in the recipient: field? (Repeated for each recipient?) Thanks, Curtis

postcat ENVELOPE RECORDS output?

Oops... that was embarrassing... my message was missing a subject. (fixed) -Original Message- From: Curtis [mailto:postfixu...@isparks.com] Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 4:05 PM To: 'postfix-users@postfix.org' Subject: I apologize if this is answered in the documention. but I'm having

RE: postcat ENVELOPE RECORDS output?

-Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 5:04 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: postcat ENVELOPE RECORDS output? Curtis: Oops... that was embarrassing... my message

Re: postcat ENVELOPE RECORDS output?

are not guaranteed to work this way in future versions of Postfix. In fact, they may not even work this way in the current version. I'm using version 2.5.6. Thanks, Curtis

Virtual domains

that it all goes to local unix accounts and that's not what I need. Can anyone point me in the right direction in the docs that explain how to do this or a couple of examples? Thanks in advance, Curtis Maurand

Virtual domains (more)

Can I also assume that I would use relay_domains and relay_transport? Correct?

Re: Virtual domains

as unknown recipients (that's bad.) I'm thinking that I need to do for hosted domains: virtual_mailbox_domains virtual_mailbox_maps virtual_transport and for relayed domains: relay_domains relay_transport postconf -n follows. Thanks, Curtis acolyte postfix # postconf -n access_map_reject_code = 554

Re: Virtual domains

On Tue, 01 Jun 2010, cur...@maurand.com wrote: postconf -n follows. At first glance, I notice you redefine several parameters to their default value. Why? I'll point out just a few of them below. access_map_reject_code = 554 This is default. bounce_queue_lifetime = 0 Are you sure

transport_maps and round robin dns

postfix is reloaded or the local DNS cache for the for mail.customer.domain expires? Thanks, Curtis

Re: transport_maps and round robin dns

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote: On 09/21/2010 12:07 AM, Curtis wrote: In the case where transport_maps is used to designate the next hop destination of a message like this: customer.domain smtp:[mail.customer.domain] ...and the customer uses round

Disable outbound smtp pipelining?

to outbound email... Thanks, Curtis

Re: Disable outbound smtp pipelining?

On 6/6/2012 8:45 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Curtis: smtp_discard_ehlo_keywords = pipelining,silent-discard (Again, this time without the d.) Aside from a little extra bandwidth, would this cause outbound deliveries to go horrendously slower on a busy mail server? The issue is NOT bandwidth

Accept TLS connections only for certain domains?

Is it possible to only accept inbound TLS connections for specified recipient domains only? Thanks, Curtis

smtp threads not spawning?

cause. What I'm most curious about is why would Postfix wait for all existing smtp threads to die before spawning new threads to handle a rapidly growing active queue? We are running Postfix 2.9.1. Thanks, Curtis

Re: smtp threads not spawning?

Wietse: On 5/13/2013 1:28 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Curtis: We are seeing an intermittent issue in our Postfix logs where we see all outbound threads (smtp) stop delivering email or logging anything while the active queue continues to grow. There are many ways this can happen. - One example

Re: smtp threads not spawning?

like the issue I'm seeing is a common one. I'm sure we'll get to the bottom of it, and will report back when we do... Curtis

Re: smtp threads not spawning?

... perhaps in the process of answering his questions I'll stumble into what's causing my issue. Thanks for your efforts... they are appreciated. Curtis Is this clear now? Wietse

What is the upper limit allowed for smtp_line_length_limit?

? Thanks, Curtis

Re: Are sha1 & TLSv1 fully deprecated wrt mail, and time to block them?

October 15 2018 11:19 AM, "Kris Deugau" wrote: > Laura Smith wrote: > >> Honestly, you are most likely wasting your time on that point because all >> that you are likely to >> get back is a page of waffle saying "blah blah blah ... security reasons... >> blah blah blah" >>> I know this because

Re: best practice - integrating spamassassin/clamav in postfix - amavis yes/no?

rred to a new group for management from the author. This happened within the last couple of weeks. I'm on that mailing list, too. They're working on getting the changes into the package repos. Amavis just received a new lease on life. Back to the discussion at hand, --Curtis

Re: server hw sizing

and spam. amavisd-new is written perl. It's a resource hog. Add fuzzy OCR and clamav and resource utilization starts going up. Lot's of regulare expressions in all those rules and policies. --Curtis October 4 2018 11:46 AM, "Viktor Dukhovni" wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:

It is possible for Postfix logging to bypass journald?

n journald/imjournal. Ideas? Thanks, Curtis

Re: best practice for HA cluster

You could use Unison to keep the config folders in sync. Open source. runs on just about everything. February 8 2019 8:59 AM, "De Petter Mattheas" wrote: > Yeas we have F5 loadbalancer. > > But how do we shift the config ? as far as i know there is no central mgmt > for postfix only config

Re: It is possible for Postfix logging to bypass journald?

On 1/9/2019 5:55 PM, Robert L Mathews wrote: On 1/9/19 4:05 PM, Curtis wrote: We recently switched our Postfix mail servers to Ubuntu Server 18, which uses journald for logging. Since we have monitoring systems that parse /var/log/maillog, we enabled rsyslog with imuxsock so we still can parse

Re: Recommended milters for small setup

October 15 2020 3:33 PM, "Patrick Ben Koetter" wrote: > * Ian Evans : > >> The long story short is that due to dealing with family medical issues over >> the past few years, my Combo web/postfix server is still on Ubuntu 14.04. >> >> In a couple of months I will have some time to upgrade.

unknown recipient issue

quite put my finger on it. If you need further details, feel free to ask. thanks in advance, Curtis Maurand

Re: unknown recipient issue

On 6/1/2010 2:22 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:09:23PM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote: I have in the main.cf relay_domains= a couple of domains mysql:/etc/postfix/transport.cf transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/transport.cf Don't use the transport table

Re: Virtual domains

blocked by amavis Thanks for all of your help, Curtis

Too aggressive

, Curtis

Re: Integrating Postfix, SQL, and Mailman with Virtual hosts

I've been doing it with postfix and dbmail for several years. It works very well. I also have it running amavisd-new/spamassassin, clam anti-virus as well as the fuzzyocr plugin for spamassassin. Along with additional rule set and bayes database in MySQL, it works well. On 12/1/2010

Re: Attachments over 10MB Undeliverable

fafaforza wrote: On 10/12/2011 10:59 AM, Joel Roberts wrote: Hi all, new to the group. Have recently setup POSTFIX as an SMTP relay front end to an Exchange 2007 backend. Have encountered the following issue: I'm using POSTFIX as an SMTP fronted relay to an Exchange

Re: SMTP auth for relayhost

? I'm using Postfix 2.7.0 on FreeBSD 7.3 but I can upgrade to latest Postfix version if it's necessary. Thanks Robert Google is your friend. http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/postfix-smtp-authentication-for-mail-servers/ Cheers, Curtis

Postfix as a Smart Host for Exchange 2010 with TLS

Hi all, I've been scouring the internet trying to find someone who's done this before, and am at a loss. I've got Postfix set up as a Smart Host for sending SMTP email from Exchange 2010 (Small Business Server 2011). My problem is that I can't get TLS to work. The error message I get back in

Re: Postfix as a Smart Host for Exchange 2010 with TLS

First off, thanks for the help everyone! Test postfix TLS with openssl to make sure postfix is working correctly. For port 25 (or 587) with STARTTLS # openssl s_client -connect example.com:25 -starttls smtp I'm using 587, and this seemed to functioned just fine from a remote host:

Re:

On 1/27/2012 6:00 AM, nick wrote: Il 27/01/2012 11.47, Nickalf ha scritto: Hi Fellow Postfixers, ( belated H a P p Y N e W Y e A r ) Looking to find out the pros and cons of using MySQL based Postfix over the current basic (text based) setup

Re: DB access details for Postfix

Check out dbmail, http://www.dbmail.org I've been using it for several years.  It works, though nobody's server management tools interface with it. --Curtis Krzysztof Trybowski wrote: Hello all, I've been setting up Postfix recently. I'm using virtual mailboxes and store user data

Re: Should I have postgrey listen on a socket?

I'm running amavisd-new/spamassassin/spamassassin-fuzzyocr/clamav. Would it behoove me to run Postgrey, too? --Curtis On 12/5/2010 11:10 AM, Roger Marquis wrote: Zitat von Grant emailgr...@gmail.com: I just noticed that postgrey is listening on localhost:10030. Would it be better to have

Re: The future of SMTP ?

I would argue that its partially Microsoft's fault for allowing scripts in email or from web pages to have access to anything on your machine outside of the message viewer or the browser.  ActiveX is not your friend in these cases. --Curtis Dennis Carr wrote: On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, Frank

Re: Anyone solely using SMTP Auth for outbound mail?

We use combination of POP/IMAP before SMTP or SMTP auth. --C Bernhard Rohrer wrote: seconded, only that submission is 587 ;) original message- From: Ðlsquo;ак Ðoelig;икаел mikael@yandex.ru To: Postfix users Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:59:05

SPF

This has probably been asked in the past, but is it worth it to go through the contortions to set up SPF? Thanks, Curtis

SASL question

I had a server running on gentoo and it was running OK, but the latest updates in the gentoo tree killed it.  So I spent yesterday afternoon setting up new mail server using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. It took a while, but I have it all working except for smtp authentication (which was working on the

SASL question

I had a server running on gentoo and it was running OK, but the latest updates in the gentoo tree killed it.  So I spent yesterday afternoon setting up new mail server using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. It took a while, but I have it all working except for smtp authentication (which was working on the

Re: SASL question

Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: * Curtis Maurand cur...@maurand.com: I had a server running on gentoo and it was running OK, but the latest updates in the gentoo tree killed it.  So I spent yesterday afternoon setting up new mail server using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. It took a while, but I have

Re: SASL question - SOLVED

On 2/13/2013 7:35 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: Curtis Maurand wrote: Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: However, nothing in my configuration says to open the sasldb file anywhere as the auth machanism is set to imap, but postfix seems intent on opening this file anyway. Cyrus SASL opens sasldb as fallback

Re: custom routing

Carlos L wrote: Hello all, I'm looking for a bit of help on a complicated scenario that I can't seem to get to work. I have mail that comes into a server a server with both a to and 'original to' address What i would like to achieve is that mail going to the to addresses to go

Re: email address (u...@domain.tld) as username?

know how to deal with it, though. There are a couple of web based utilities to manage it. Cheers, Curtis On 9/27/2013 5:32 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:15:43 +0200 DTNX Postmaster postmas...@dtnx.net wrote: Unless those users also need some system level access

mailman issue

I'm not sure if this is on topic or not. I can't tell whether this is mailman issue or a postfix issue. I have set up mailman. I have set up a virtual domain for mailman in the mm_cfg.py via the add_virtualhost() function. I have successfully created the list. I subscribed to the list, got

mailman issue

and that's that. I know that I'm missing a detail somewhere. I had all of this working prior to this, but I had a server meltdown the other day and my configs were blown away with it and for whatever reason, I can't find any backups. :-( Thanks, Curtis

Re: mailman issue

Sahil Tandon wrote: On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 14:55:49 -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote: I'm getting local user unknown errors when I try to send email to the list., but as far as I know, I shouldn't need local aliases with this configuration that anything destined for lists.delrc.org should go

Re: mailman issue

Ron Guerin wrote: In mm_cfg.py I have this to generate the aliases: MTA='Postfix' In main.cf I use the aliases under: alias_maps hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases In in my master.cf for the mailman transport, I have ${user} where you have ${mailbox} , don't know if that's got anything to

hostname rejection

i've been really trying to tighten up spam rejection after getting lots of complaints from users.  I've added a bunch of things to the main.cf for doing rejects, I'm not having any trouble sending email, but one of my clients is and they are authenticating and I have permit_sasl_authenticated

Re: hostname rejection [SOLVED]

On 11/21/2014 12:03 PM, Noel Jones wrote: On 11/21/2014 10:51 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote: i've been really trying to tighten up spam rejection after getting lots of complaints from users. I've added a bunch of things to the main.cf for doing rejects, I'm not having any trouble sending email

outgoing authenticated TLS/SSL problems

running against a remote dbmail imap. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks in advance, Curtis -- Curtis Maurand cur...@maurand.com mailto:cur...@maurand.com 207-252-7748

Re: outgoing authenticated TLS/SSL problems

Interesting. Just fixed that, too. You added the socket to the jail. It would be simpler to disable chroot on port 587, not much point when port 25 is not chrooted. See above. -- Curtis Maurand cur...@maurand.com mailto:cur...@maurand.com 207-252-7748

Re: outgoing authenticated TLS/SSL problems

On 4/20/2015 8:36 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 08:08:08PM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote: Anyone have any ideas? 1. http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail 2. Send logs! Do not set verbose logs produced via debug_peer_list or -v options in master.cf unless

Re: Throttling locally generated email

Hello, I found this link that might be helpful. http://steam.io/2013/04/01/postfix-rate-limiting/ Cheers, Curtis On 11/10/2015 5:42 PM, Donald Bindner wrote: I've been searching for some time, and what I want seems to be fairly obscure, because I haven't found clear examples of it (at least

Re: Throttling locally generated email

And this. http://serverfault.com/questions/290684/postfix-limiting-the-rate-at-which-a-particular-user-can-send-email --Curtis On 11/10/2015 5:42 PM, Donald Bindner wrote: I've been searching for some time, and what I want seems to be fairly obscure, because I haven't found clear examples

Re: selective disable of smtpd opportunistic TLS

In message <20160115051749.gl...@mournblade.imrryr.org> Viktor Dukhovni writes: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:54:13PM -0500, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > > > > > > > smtp_tls_ciphers = high > > > > > > > > > > Usually best to leav

Re: First time setting up Postfix having an issue

In message <003c01d14e5e$053d4990$0fb7dcb0$@consortiex.com> "Jeff Karrels" writes: > > Summary: > > I have installed postfix on a linux machine. Our current mail host is > GoDaddy and we are trying to setup postfix to do mailing to our GoDaddy > accounts. I have the software installed and

selective disable of smtpd opportunistic TLS

;smtpd_tls_security_level = none" on the backup MX. I should get debugging and a failure on the primary and delivery of mail on the secondary so no bounced mail. btw- that wasn't a request to send me a test message. I'll send to my friend and ask for a reply if nothing arrives in the next f

Re: selective disable of smtpd opportunistic TLS

In message <3pgpvv0nvczj...@spike.porcupine.org> Wietse Venema writes: > Curtis Villamizar: > > What I'd like to do is set smtpd_tls_security_level back to "may" and > > then somehow set it to "none" if the EHLO domain is comcast.net (oops >

Re: Postfix with dspam on a backup-MX server

e else responds, then maybe go for it. > +--+--++ > | Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: | > | (Retired)| FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com | > | Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd.org | > +--+--++ Curtis

Re: selective disable of smtpd opportunistic TLS

In message <20160115235712.gn...@mournblade.imrryr.org> Viktor Dukhovni writes: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:47:38PM -0500, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > > > Viktor, > > > > If you are still interested below is a tcpdump. > > > > If not intere

Re: selective disable of smtpd opportunistic TLS

oblem, assuming it is not overly > aggressive settings on your end. > > -- > Viktor. Viktor, If you are still interested below is a tcpdump. If not interested, please just delete. Curtis # tcpdump -n -i em1 -K -l -t -vvv -X 'net 96.114.154.0/24 || net 2001:5

Re: Question on master.cf

In message Paul Goyette writes: > While researching to see if I could find a way to fix my other issue > (how my primary-MX server can differentiate between messages originating > on my backup-MX server and those that are simply relayed from

Re: selective disable of smtpd opportunistic TLS

In message <88031027-d5b8-4f48-947d-294302fac...@dukhovni.org> Viktor Dukhovni writes: > > > On Jan 13, 2016, at 8:52 PM, Curtis Villamizar <cur...@orleans.occnc.com> > > wrote: > > > > The logs revealed something about the nature of the problem. A few o

TLSv1.0 (was Re: selective disable of smtpd opportunistic TLS)

In message <cmu-lmtpd-92837-145279158...@mda32.somerville.occnc.com> Curtis Villamizar writes: > btw - I just added "!TLSv1.0" to get only TLSv1.2. I wasn't sure I > could specify !TLSv1.0 so I just tried it. > > Curtis oops that didn't work. Curtis

Re: selective disable of smtpd opportunistic TLS

> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:53:23PM -0500, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > > > > > smtp_tls_ciphers = high > > > > > > Usually best to leave this at "medium". This is opportunistic > > > TLS, and if high fails, you'll send clearte

Re: selective disable of smtpd opportunistic TLS

In message <20160114175729.gg...@mournblade.imrryr.org> Viktor Dukhovni writes: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:06:43PM -0500, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > > > /usr/local/sbin/postconf -c /etc/postfix -n | grep tls > > > > smtp_tls_cert_file = /etc/postfix/cert.pe

Re: TLSv1.0 (was Re: selective disable of smtpd opportunistic TLS)

In message <20160114200215.gj...@mournblade.imrryr.org> Viktor Dukhovni writes: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 02:07:07PM -0500, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > > > In message <cmu-lmtpd-92837-145279158...@mda32.somerville.occnc.com> > > Curtis Villamizar writes: > >

Re: consequences of Moving to 3.0.3 out of ports

-d postfix-current-3.0.20151003,4 postfix-current-3.0.20151003,4: openssl-1.0.2_5 cyrus-sasl-2.1.26_12 pcre-8.37_4 sqlite3-3.9.2 I don't know why ldd doesn't find the anything with pcre in the name. Curtis

Re: moving configs from /usr/local/etc/postfix to /etc/postfix

In message <49c94ad9-3c94-4c48-9726-0e81e1109...@dukhovni.org> Viktor Dukhovni writes: > > On Jan 31, 2016, at 1:01 AM, Curtis Villamizar <cur...@orleans.occnc.com> > > wrote: > > > > I use tcsh so: > > > > # sh -c 'postconf -

Re: moving configs from /usr/local/etc/postfix to /etc/postfix

In message <211281bd-f686-4a8a-9e37-7d4368568...@kreme.com> LuKreme writes: > On Jan 30, 2016, at 22:42, Curtis Villamizar <cur...@orleans.occnc.com> wrote: > > It would be: > > > > cd /usr/local/etc > > mv postfix postfix.old > > ln -s .

Re: local delivery, alias expansion, and subdomain matches

In message <2a0d3251-10a1-4903-8689-2d190e144...@dukhovni.org> Viktor Dukhovni writes: > > On Jan 30, 2016, at 8:03 PM, Curtis Villamizar <cur...@orleans.occnc.com> > > wrote: > > > > I'm asking a little advice. > > > > On most of my hosts

Re: moving configs from /usr/local/etc/postfix to /etc/postfix

In message <5a7fbd95-2256-4177-a30d-32e36ea73...@dukhovni.org> Viktor Dukhovni writes: > > On Feb 1, 2016, at 3:54 AM, Curtis Villamizar <cur...@orleans.occnc.com> > > wrote: > > > > As I said to Viktor, I mistakenly thought, based on reading (mayb

Re: local delivery, alias expansion, and subdomain matches

In message <20160201080958.9bede332...@english-breakfast.cloud9.net> Curtis Villamizar writes: > > Aliasing root on null-clients is explained in: > > > >http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#split > > OK. This Oops. Was going to write &q

local delivery, alias expansion, and subdomain matches

parent_domain_matches_subdomains on virtual_alias_maps . That would save having to resort to using pcre in this case. Any faults in my thinking on this? Curtis

moving configs from /usr/local/etc/postfix to /etc/postfix

utf8_enable (default: yes)" but "postconf -d | grep smtputf8_enable" yeilds "smtputf8_enable = ${{$compatibility_level} < {1} ? {no} : {yes}}" and "postconf -d | grep compatibility_level\ =" yields "compatibility_level = 0". Curtis

Re: moving configs from /usr/local/etc/postfix to /etc/postfix

In message <ba08647a-9b1d-42e5-b57c-efd945ec0...@kreme.com> "@lbutlr" writes: > > On 30 Jan 2016, at 20:27, Curtis Villamizar <cur...@orleans.occnc.com> wrote: > > Though postfix is compiled with /usr/local prefix (and I prefer the > > executables in /usr/

Re: moving configs from /usr/local/etc/postfix to /etc/postfix

In message <ff1da2c8-ba5d-4c64-9a1a-1e91bfc64...@dukhovni.org> Viktor Dukhovni writes: > > On Jan 31, 2016, at 12:24 AM, Curtis Villamizar <cur...@orleans.occnc.com> > > wrote: > > > >>> /usr/local/sbin/postconf: warning: inet_protocols: disabling

Re: moving configs from /usr/local/etc/postfix to /etc/postfix

In message <16f8c2b2-59cd-41b2-a452-5ec4b4442...@dukhovni.org> Viktor Dukhovni writes: > > On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:27 PM, Curtis Villamizar <cur...@orleans.occnc.com> > > wrote: > > > > This is more of an annoyance than a serious bug since there is a > &

[SOLVED] Re: A bug, maybe?

On 2/20/2016 5:19 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote: On 2/20/2016 1:46 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 01:37:39PM -0500, Curtis Maurand wrote: Nothing is chrooted. resolv.conf is world readable. Wietse's program returns a valid address. It might not match the reverse

  1   2   >