On 01 7 2004 at 3:12 pm -0400, matt haines wrote:
there's nothing sacred about text-only emails. they're fine normally, and
i use emails that way pretty regularly. but haven't you ever wanted to
underline a word? or perhaps make it bold? oh come on, i know you have!
You don't know many of us
matt haines sez:
i'm glad i brought this up! i think.
You're not the first. You won't be the last. :)
the argument that PM might not be right for me if i want to use html is a
bit like saying you're either for us or against us! first off, i'm not
convinced i want to be a member of that 'club'.
i'm glad i brought this up! i think.
the argument that PM might not be right for me if i want to use html is a
bit like saying you're either for us or against us! first off, i'm not
convinced i want to be a member of that 'club'. it's an email client, not
a way of life. it either suits my needs
Jeffrey, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It is a 100% useful response.
It doesn't solve the problem, so it's clearly not useful.
If you want HTML mail, PM is not the
client for you. What can be more clear and concise? I absolutely hate it
when non-newbies start whining about HTML. You've obviously
Le 29/06/04 à 11:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Stephane Terreaux wrote:
I receive from one person messages which source looks like this :
This is probably because the message contains both an HTML and plain text
parts, the text part being empty. PowerMail can't display both parts (or
Wow -- aren't email lists great. Apart from issues they are set up to
discuss, they are good for both whining and more aggressive behaviour,
helping to get the accumulated stress ions from a bad day out of one's
system.
I hope you feel more relaxed now, Jeffrey,
Max G
At Tue, 29 Jun 2004
On Tue, Jun 29, 20048:42 AM, the following words from Wayne Brissette
[EMAIL PROTECTED], emerged from a plethora of SPAM ...
Ben Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 stated:
HTML/XML mail or similar will sooner or later supersede the pure text
messages of today, no matter what
Jeffrey, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If that's how you want your email, you probably need to
use a different program
This is not a useful response. I absolutely hate it when some
people respond to a problem like that. The user can't be
blaimed for the format of mail that is sent to
Ben Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 stated:
HTML/XML mail or similar will sooner or later supersede the pure text
messages of today, no matter what PM users think about it.
Not without one helluva fight, it won't... (and we PM users are not
exclusive with this opinion)
Ben
Mikael Byström [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 stated:
This is not useful with international umlauts.
Mikael:
The only way we have been able (we being my soon to be former employer)
to make this work 100% of the time is by using UTF-8. Of course as
Hiroaki will point out, UTF-8 is
On 29 6 2004 at 7:22 am -0400, Mikael Byström wrote:
HTML/XML mail or similar will sooner or later supersede the pure text
messages of today, no matter what PM users think about it.
Not without one helluva fight, it won't... (and we PM users are not
exclusive with this opinion)
Of course, the
Jeffrey, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If that's how you want your email, you probably need to
use a different program
This is not a useful response. I absolutely hate it when some people
respond to a problem like that. The user can't be blaimed for the format
of mail that is sent to him/her.
If
Le 28/06/04 à 13:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
- if you want to read an html encoded message, you can click onto the
little globe you will find with such messages at the bottom left: it will
present the message in your webbrowser
I receive from one person messages which source looks like this
You can also go to https://www.ctmdev.com/tools/index.html and get a
script that cleans a mail from html, making it possible to answer it with
quoted text.
If you have BBEdit, I'd recommend HTML Cleanup by Wayne Brissette. If
not, try html CleanUP by W. Eric Tyson.
Max G
At Mon, 28 Jun 2004
you have gotten used to html heavy email applications, that is all.
powermail's strength is that it is text based and only delivers minimal
html support:
- you can change in preferences to receive html email as text, then you
can reply (but will also have the ugly tags).
- if you want to read an
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: more html issues
so i've stumbled onto some other issues with PowerMail.
- i can't select any text in an html-only email! and when i
hit reply, it doesn't quote anything. is PM supposed to work
that way? half the emails i get have some sort of formatting,
even
so i've stumbled onto some other issues with PowerMail.
- i can't select any text in an html-only email! and when i hit reply, it
doesn't quote anything. is PM supposed to work that way? half the emails
i get have some sort of formatting, even if it's just a default. i'm a
little flabbergasted
17 matches
Mail list logo
