Early versions of Thor could sometimes be a little finicky about installing but
that's a thing of the past, imo. I use Thor (and PEMEDitor) in my dev
environment every day. So first question; did you get Thor installed
successfully? If so, you should have gotten a form with a list of all the
It's time for my semi-annual request to the ProFox community to show your
appreciation for this list by contributing to a charitable cause. On Saturday,
May 10 I will be participating in the Tour de Cure, a bicycle ride to help
raise money and awareness for diabetes research. I'll be doing a
Virgil Bierschwale wrote on 2014-04-20:
I have uploaded a zip file to the following location to see if I can
download it to various computers for easier distribution.
http://www.virgilbierschwale.com/
It appears that I can download it to my box here so hopefully that part
will
On 4/21/2014 5:53 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
It's time for my semi-annual request to the ProFox community to show your
appreciation for this list by contributing to a charitable cause. On Saturday,
May 10 I will be participating in the Tour de Cure, a bicycle ride to help
raise money and awareness
Appreciate that.
Virgil
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Tracy Pearson tr...@powerchurch.comwrote:
Virgil Bierschwale wrote on 2014-04-20:
I have uploaded a zip file to the following location to see if I can
download it to various computers for easier distribution.
Rick Schummer has a program called HackCX to make it easier for you to
do this.
http://www.whitelightcomputing.com/prodhackcxpro.htm
Good luck!
--Mike
On 2014-04-18 18:20, Frank Cazabon wrote:
Hack the scx our vcx file and change the references that are causing
problems. Make sure you make
Steer clear of the wizards -- had nothing but trouble with them back
in 1999 and never used them since.
On 2014-04-18 17:43, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
Doing my first vfp program in a long time.
Simple flatform type application with 3 tables.
Got my form working the way I wanted, and when
Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
In other words, when they display the form, I want it to be read only, and
when they hit the edit button, then I want them to be able to edit and make
active the save and cancel button.
I'm lazy, so what I do is put a container on the form, and all the
controls I
I set all the textboxes to Enabled = .F. when I build the form. I have a
button labelled Edit which has something like the following code:
If This.Caption = 'Edit'
This.Caption = 'Save'
ThisForm.SetAll('Enabled', .T., '_textbox')
ThisForm.cmdCancelEdit.Visible = .T.
Else
Because after 22 years someone is a manager for the last 5 years and
then leaves
And just watch all the gizmos, processes, uploads, auto logins etc etc
etc start failing in cascading splendor
--
Matt Jarvis
Eugene, Oregon USA
___
Post
Thanks for all responses
Generator blew up computer about a hour ago so i might be dead in water for
a few days and unable to respond
On Apr 21, 2014 10:34 AM, John Weller j...@johnweller.co.uk wrote:
I set all the textboxes to Enabled = .F. when I build the form. I have a
button labelled
HELP!
I just bet one of you has experienced this problem and can offer all sorts
of words of wisdom and advice.
Had a large program file that was generating program too large errors
when trying to compile. There is a whole slew of separate procedures and
functions in the original procedure
Desmond Lloyd wrote on 2014-04-21:
HELP!
I just bet one of you has experienced this problem and can offer all
sorts
of words of wisdom and advice.
Had a large program file that was generating program too large errors
when trying to compile. There is a whole slew of separate
At the point that it fails, can you put up a messagebox or something that
shows you the value of SET(PROCEDURE) to make sure you haven't got some
code somewhere that's not got the ADDITIVE clause.
Fred
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Desmond Lloyd desmond.ll...@gmail.comwrote:
HELP!
I
There may be code in the application that uses the IN clause already
(DO MyFunc IN Init.prg).
So in addition to searching for the SET PROC string, you may want to
search for the IN name of main prg (where you put in the name of
the prg that you've been reducing).
I think I heard it
Thank you Fred and Tracy,
Will need to troubleshoot what the procedure is set to by running under the
production environment Am thinking that everything in the Test
environment is fine... It is so odd, to me, that it works in the test
environment, but not production
Regards,
Desmond
Yes, it is VFP6. In this case the program is an old fashion @ say @ get
screen...
Regards,
Desmond
On 21 April 2014 14:26, Charlie charli...@verizon.net wrote:
There may be code in the application that uses the IN clause already
(DO MyFunc IN Init.prg).
So in addition to searching
On 4/21/2014 11:56 AM, Desmond Lloyd wrote:
HELP!
I just bet one of you has experienced this problem and can offer all sorts
of words of wisdom and advice.
Had a large program file that was generating program too large errors
when trying to compile. There is a whole slew of separate
For years I would work on projects for my employer during off hours,
usually thinking things through, deciding best how to proceed, what tools
would work best, all those kinds of things a developer would need before
actually writing code.
Now that I'm retired, and doing work for them as a
Desmond:
I often wonder when these things crop up that the foxuser.dbf has 'something'
in it that makes the system give you undocumented/unwanted features.
You said it works in your development system but not in production. So what's
different? Could it be the foxuser table is throwing sand in
Jim:
Congratulations on your retirement! I am also a bicycle fan, but I don't
find it reasonable to bill my clients for time that isn't spent building
their applications. Sure, the value of our product is based on the care and
thought we put into it, and not the number of keystrokes, and it
Excellent advice. This thread reminds me of some movie (The Firm?)
where the lawyers were billing their clients while they took a crap if
they were thinking of their case during that time. lol
--Mike
On 2014-04-21 16:09, Ted Roche wrote:
Jim:
Congratulations on your retirement! I am also
On 2014-04-21 15:31, Desmond Lloyd wrote:
Yes, it is VFP6. In this case the program is an old fashion @ say @
get
screen...
Well, at least you can legally run this on Linux/Wine and not fear M$
because of the loose EULA back then!!! lol
___
Thanks Ted, I appreciate your comments, they make sense, and I can see the
logic.
Jim Harvey
Spring Grove, PA
cell 717-887-2565
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 4:09 PM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject:
Oh my, I hadn't thought about that scenario...
Jim Harvey
Spring Grove, PA
cell 717-887-2565
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 4:19 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re:
On 4/21/2014 1:09 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
Jim:
Congratulations on your retirement! I am also a bicycle fan, but I don't
find it reasonable to bill my clients for time that isn't spent building
their applications. Sure, the value of our product is based on the care and
thought we put into it, and
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com wrote:
Those darn dogs. They get all the attention but never pay their bill. I
follow the same path that Ted does. If I can't bid a job closely, I will
propose an hourly rate and a cap of hours. Let's say 10 hours at $5,000
An interesting consolation. 8-)
On 21 April 2014 15:20, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
On 2014-04-21 15:31, Desmond Lloyd wrote:
Yes, it is VFP6. In this case the program is an old fashion @ say @ get
screen...
Well, at least you can legally run this on
From: jim.harv...@verizon.net
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: newbie consultant biling question
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:45:12 -0400
Now that I'm retired, and doing work for them as a consultant (independent
contractor), billing by the hour, I was wondering how does one charge for
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:56:24 -0500
Subject: VFP6: Procedure File Blues
From: desmond.ll...@gmail.com
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
---
Note that a procedure file was already set at the time, so I made sure
that I issued the additive command at the end of
On 4/21/2014 2:32 PM, Dan Covill wrote:
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:56:24 -0500
Subject: VFP6: Procedure File Blues
From: desmond.ll...@gmail.com
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
---
Note that a procedure file was already set at the time, so I made sure
that I issued
Desmond:
Program too large does not mean what you think it does. It is not the
size of the procedure file, but the size of the largest procedure. Fox is
limited, even after all these years, to a maximum procedure size of 64k.
Take a look at the sizes of your procedures.
Since it occurs in
That's interesting about testing time.
While at the office I'd do some testing. But often allowed users to help me
do the more intensive testing.
Now that I'm physically removed, and on my own, should I spend more time
with that aspect? Truthfully I'd rather not, and I'm pretty sure the way
our
Le 21/04/2014 21:13, Tracy Pearson a écrit :
Since this is VFP 6, I'm not sure what tool is available to you for
searching your code for a SET PROC line.
Hi Desmond,
you can download the textsearch utility from Ed'site
HTH
The Foxil
___
Post
34 matches
Mail list logo
