-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne av Jaime Vasquez
Paul McNett wrote:
Now *that* sounds like a MS move for sure! The developer says close the
connection and the server, behind the scenes, keeps it open for you.
This technique it's called Connection Pooling and
Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne av Paul McNett
But they become objects at the other end. Mainly structures.
You don't care what happens at the other end, though, do you? You just
need to write your client code to the API, right?
I think the point here is that if
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne av Ed Leafe
True, but we all rely on the tools we use, and to code everything in
assembler is not something you'd want.
Huh? What planet did you just arrive from?
XML is *TEXT*. You use a *TEXT* editor.
What
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] på vegne av Ed Leafe
The 'S' in 'SOAP' was supposed to stand for 'Simple', but Microsoft
and others have made SOAP so complicated that the only way to use it
effectively is to lock into their tools. Once you get used to all that
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eyvind Axelsen
Sent: 09 January 2008 12:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 32bit Compatibility Mode
Unless, of course, eTecnologia are able to finish their .NET compiler for
VFP - then we'll go 64 with ease =)
http://www.etecnologia.net/
No virus found in this outgoing
Unless, of course, eTecnologia are able to finish their .NET compiler for VFP -
then we'll go 64 with ease =)
http://www.etecnologia.net/
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Alan Bourke
Sendt: 9. januar 2008 10:21
Til: profox@leafe.com
Probably not the answer you are looking for, but I'd bet you could save a lot
of time by writing a wrapper for the web service call in VB.NET (or C#), and
exposing this to your foxpro project through COM interop.
Eyvind.
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
The monthly letters at
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vfoxpro/default.aspx seem to have
stopped (the most recent one is from July), has there been a statement
from MS regarding this?
Eyvind.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Ed Leafe
Sendt: 31. juli 2007 02:41
Til: ProFox Mailing List
Emne: [NF] Help Translate Dabo!
Want to contribute to Dabo, but don't feel you understand the inner
workings of the code that well? Do you
Details, please?
Thanks,
Eyvind.
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Bill Anderson
Sendt: 11. juli 2007 22:25
Til: ProFox Email List
Emne: Re: Mailing from Servoy USA for Fox folks
MB Software Solutions wrote:
So this Bob Kirsch is
An xsl is not the schema (while an xsd file is). The xsl is a style sheet, that
as you mention allows for a browser to pretty-print the xml. To use an xsl
style sheet, include a line like the following at the top (after the ?xml
version=...? tag) of the xml file:
?xml-stylesheet type=text/xsl
Rafael Copquin
- Original Message -
From: Eyvind Axelsen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 4:20 AM
Subject: Re: VFP9 - cursortoxml
An xsl is not the schema (while an xsd file is). The xsl is a style sheet,
that as you mention allows for a browser to pretty
help on this subject,
but it shows no examples and deciphering the meaning, at least to a newbie on
XML as me, is a humongous task!!
Rafael
- Original Message -
From: Eyvind Axelsen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: VFP9 - cursortoxml
Virgil,
PMFJI, but it seems to me that you should indeed change the code you use to
produce your XML. I looked at an example from the site you mentioned, and the
xml looks like this:
markers
marker lat=43.65654 lng=-79.90138 html=Some stuff to display in
thelt;brgt;First Info Window
)
oRS.MoveNext()
wend
oRS.close()
oConn.close()
response.write(/markers)
Virgil Bierschwale
http://www.bierschwale.com
http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Eyvind Axelsen
Sent
If you can use the .Net 2.0 framework (either through COM interop or the
etecnologia extender), the System.Net.Mail namespace has got all you need. A
simple example:
SmtpClient smtpClient = new SmtpClient(smtp.someserver.com);
smtpClient.Credentials = new NetworkCredential(username, password);
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Michael Hawksworth
VFP 9 Sedna for the next few years (can't just dump over a million
lines of code)
Personally, I'm very excited to see what will come out of the effort from
eTechnologica.net and
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Stephen the Cook
I read through the functions they are exposing and was under whelmed. If you
could put a .dll into a fox project and consume functions within, then you
have a winner. What you got was
Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Stephen the Cook
Any idea which version of the . ??? Sedna fits in with? Will it be ver 2,
or the to be released probably next year 3?
Version 3 of the .NET FX has been released, actually. Check it out
Are you running VFP9? EXECSCRIPT() should do the trick without a
tempfile.
I don't think that is entirely correct. I believe ExecScript does indeed
create a tempfile (so your users will need write permissions to the temp
directory), but you won't have to handle the creation and compilation of
Damn! That sure looks interesting, let's hope they can live up to their claims
=)
Eyvind.
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Michael Hawksworth
Sendt: 3. januar 2007 09:38
Til: Profox
Emne: .NET Extender for VFP VFP Compiler for .Net
Has
If I could conceive of a better language than Python, I would
indeed
create it. But IMO, Python is as good as it gets!
Say what? Python (like every other language that I have seen) have loads
of flaws and annoyances. I find it hard to believe that you really think
that Python is as good
I didn't say it was perfect, did I?
Well, maybe its just my English, but I believe you did:
Python is as good as it gets!
paired with
If I could conceive of a better language than Python, I would indeed
create it
tells me you think it is perfect. Obviously, if Python did indeed have
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~garys/
This guy has created a tool that translates xBase++ code to executable
IronPython code. Quite cool, and one would think it should be doable for
VFP as well.
Eyvind.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
This sounds like a typical application for a recursive procedure that walks the
child nodes of a given node. If you have a limited amount of items and are
using VFP9, you can use increase the STACKSIZE parameter in your config.fpw
file. It's a shame that the fox is not better suited for
Sent: 09 October 2006 11:11
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Walk the treeview - Soluton
Eyvind Axelsen wrote:
This sounds like a typical application for a recursive procedure that
walks the child nodes of a given node. If you have a limited amount of items
and are using VFP9, you can use increase
Seems so.
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Ailsom F. Heringer
(Osklen)
Sendt: 6. september 2006 17:26
Til: ProFox Email List
Emne: VFP at MSDN
I can´t reach VFP at Msdn. Is it down ?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vfoxpro
--
Aílsom F.
ASP.NET can talk to (read/update) VFP tables through the VFP OLE DB provider.
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Alan Bourke
Sendt: 29. august 2006 13:59
Til: profox@leafe.com
Emne: Advice needed on web interface.
We have a client with an
Calvin Hsia from the FoxPro developer team has some advice:
http://blogs.msdn.com/calvin_hsia/archive/2006/05/16/599108.aspx
This, however, is quite involved. Perhaps you are better off using some other
language if you plan on doing a lot of multithreading.
Eyvind.
-Opprinnelig
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Ed Leafe
As Bruce Eckel stated, strong testing, not strong typing.
The two are not mutually exclusive, and why have only one when you can have
both?
The compiler does not lead to a false feeling of
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Dominic Burford
And there is likely to be more time available for testing due to the quicker
development times that weakly types languages are capable of.
I would say that this is highly dependant on the
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Dominic Burford
Sendt: 28. juni 2006 14:04
Til: ProFox Email List
Emne: RE: Strong parameter checking
I'm curious to find out how. I would have thought a strongly typed language
would have been *more*
Indeed! Especially when you after having used the function/method in
quite a few places need to refactor the damn thing, and change, say,
parameter types...
Is that a problem for you? So sorry. I just go and do a refactor for
it, and I am presented with all the occurrences. VS2005 is really
Has anyone used it? Ed or Paul, perhaps? If so, do you have a gut
feeling or more regarding its stability?
We are considering using it as an embedded scripting language in our
.NET 2.0 app.
Thanks,
Eyvind.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Ed Leafe
It wasn't designed to be a complete re-write of Python,
since Python already runs great on Windows, but rather a wrapping of
the .Net classes.
Actually, I think you are wrong on that (maybe
35 matches
Mail list logo
