Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Thank you Francesco, again herein my vote for the proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI is +1 Regards Sergio Guillén El 19/12/10 16:39, "Francesco Furfari" escribió: > Dear Sergio, > >This is a reminder because your vote was reported privately to the >members of the GB. > >Indeed you have to write to the public mailing list of the promoters by >replying to the message: >[Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI > > >regards, >Francesco > > > >Il 16/12/2010 21.08, *GUILLEN BARRIONUEVO, SERGIO GUSTAVO ha scritto: >> OK Francesco, very clear explanation and examples. We could start with >>the proposed in the example. >> >> So I my vote for the proposal ZigBee 4 OSGI is >> +1 >> >> Regards >> >> Sergio >> >> De: Francesco >>Furfarimailto:francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.i >>t>> >> Fecha: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:05:39 +0100 >> Para: Sergio Guillen >>Barrionuevomailto:sguil...@itaca.upv.es>> >> CC: Mohammad-Reza >>Tazarimailto:saied.taz...@igd.fraunhofer. >>de>>, Joe Gormanmailto:joe.gor...@sintef.no>>, >>ANTONIO KUNGmailto:antonio.k...@trialog.com>>, >>'Sten Hanke'mailto:sten.ha...@ait.ac.at>>, Thomas >>Karopkamailto:karo...@it-science-center.de> >>>, Francesco Potorti`mailto:poto...@isti.cnr.it>>, >>>Laura Belenguer >>>Querolmailto:laube...@upvnet.upv.es>>, Bruno >>>Jean-Bartmailto:bruno.jean-b...@trialog.com >>>>>, Reiner >>>>>Wichermailto:reiner.wich...@igd.frau >>>>>nhofer.de>>, 'Marius >>>>>Mikalsen'mailto:marius.mikal...@sintef.no>> >> Asunto: Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project >>proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI >> >> Dear Sergio, and All >> >> your question are not boring me. >> In fact we don't have any formal procedure to express a vote. >> I CCed all the Governing Board because it is a useful discussion. >> >> >> So in this case I think that just reporting the positive comment like >>"the project will be very useful for the community", can be considered a >>positive vote. >> >> I talked about the lazy consensus used by the Apache community in a >>previous post. >> I report here for your convenience: >> >> >> Let me also add that sometime the lazy consensus used by Apache >>community works very fine. >> When a new member is invited to join to a software project, at least 3 >> favourable votes should be collect to accept the new member. >> It helps the board by avoiding a boring counting of the people. Of >> course if there is one negative vote it works as a veto. So people start >> to discuss until a consensus is reached, that's veto is cancelled. >> This rule cannot be used for example for modification of a by-laws, but >> it works as facilitate asynchronous communication. >> I would avoid to use one more doodle poll every time we need to take a >> decision that should be fast ... especially now that we are growing. >> >> In Apache there is a distinction among binding votes and non binding >> votes. In this case people of the board have binding votes, but >> non-binding votes are important as well, they represent the community >> involved in the project activities. They are however taken into account, >> and opinion expressed by a of non-binding vote is always commented and >> discussed. >> >> >> So we need to decide how to count the votes ... with a lazy >>mechanism (at least 3) or with the narrow majority (50% +1) or large >>majority 2/3 of the Governing Board. >> I guess that it will not be a problem to reach the unanimity in this >>case. >> But if the vote is call during the the Christmas holidays then it could >>be a problem wait for all members to cast . >> So with the lazy mechanism it is important to fix at least a week to >>give time people to rise a negative vote. >> >> I think that after this voting we can start to write some rules in a >>wiki page or something like this. >> >> Francesco >> >> below some example: >> >> >> Vote mechanism can be very fast in Apache, over the time they started >>to use very fast way to express their vote. >> Effectively in a software community many issue are not really important. >> >> You can cast your vote with: >>+1 meaning ok I agree >>0I don't care, I don't knoe (but usually people don't reply) >>-1 I don't agree, I'm contrar
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Dear Antonio, my comments follwos.. On 20/12/2010 16.50, Antonio kung wrote: Francesco, As member of the board, I vote yes. As technical coordinator of MonAMI, partners of MonAMI (mostly Trialog + U.Zaragoza) would like to propose the following contributions: * providing guidelines to support additional Zigbee development kits. The goal would be that /Zigbee 4 OSGi/ supports as many development kits as possible with as little cost as possible, including the ones used in MonAMI You are very welcome! As you may have noticed in the project proposal we are looking for contributor in the area that you proposed, we have already defined and API which aims at to be portable to many develpoment kit, but due to lack of expierence with other develpoment we definitly need the contribution from the community * working towards an OSGi API that is as Zigbee independent as possible (e.g. /WirelessSensor 4 OSGi/) or if not possible as Zigbee implementation independent as possible Cheers Antonio Kung Ciao, Stefano "Kismet" Lenzi -- Stefano Lenzi Voice: +39 050 315 2887 ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Fax:+39 050 315 2040 via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Mobile: +39 328 489 3270 (entrance 20, 1st floor, room C66) Email: stefano.le...@isti.cnr.it ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Francesco, As member of the board, I vote yes. As technical coordinator of MonAMI, partners of MonAMI (mostly Trialog + U.Zaragoza) would like to propose the following contributions: * providing guidelines to support additional Zigbee development kits. The goal would be that /Zigbee 4 OSGi/ supports as many development kits as possible with as little cost as possible, including the ones used in MonAMI * working towards an OSGi API that is as Zigbee independent as possible (e.g. /WirelessSensor 4 OSGi/) or if not possible as Zigbee implementation independent as possible Cheers Antonio Kung On 16/12/2010 14:58, Francesco Furfari wrote: Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. I ask you to consider it for becoming an AALOA Project and to allocate the needed resources for its software development. As promoter of this proposal and member of the Governing Board I will abstain from voting on this issue. I remember to the promoters that even if they haven't a binding vote, their comments are very welcome. Kind regards, Francesco. ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters -- _ TRIALOG 25 rue du general Foy F-75008 Paris http://www.trialog.com Tel : 33 (0) 1 44 70 61 00 Direct : 33 (0) 1 44 70 61 03 Fax : 33 (0) 1 44 70 05 91 mailto:antonio.k...@trialog.com _ -- Software Engineering Focused on Embedded Systems Technology -- -- Connectivity Solutions for Embedded Systems -- _ The information contained in this transmission, which may be confidential and proprietary, is only for the intended recipients. Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify me immediately by telephone or electronic mail and confirm that you deleted this transmission and the reply from your electronic mail system. _ ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
El jue, 16-12-2010 a las 14:58 +0100, Francesco Furfari escribió: > Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, > > I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal > concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. > > I ask you to consider it for becoming an AALOA Project and to allocate > the needed resources for its software development. > > As promoter of this proposal and member of the Governing Board I will > abstain from voting on this issue. > I remember to the promoters that even if they haven't a binding vote, > their comments are very welcome. Hi, as a promoter I would like to express my support to this initiative. regards, Dario Salvi > > Kind regards, > Francesco. > ___ > Promoters mailing list > Promoters@aaloa.org > http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Dear all, My vote +1 (non-binding). Kind regards. -- César Iglesias WEARTECH El 16/12/10 14:58, Francesco Furfari escribió: Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. I ask you to consider it for becoming an AALOA Project and to allocate the needed resources for its software development. As promoter of this proposal and member of the Governing Board I will abstain from voting on this issue. I remember to the promoters that even if they haven't a binding vote, their comments are very welcome. Kind regards, Francesco. ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Hi Francesco,I will try to clarify my comment on your answer;>in the project proposal we say that ZigBee covers many application>domains very useful for AAL related project, but we don't mean that >ZigBee must be the reference technology for AAL applications.>We are aware that there are many competing solutions, IP6LowPan, >Wireless HART, or UPnP, DPWS When I mention the risk in the survival of the open source project I am referring to external open source competitors. As you are mentioning, it is not a core/reference technology for AAL applications(note that open source is more competitive than traditional commercial development) >I didn't understand your last example. In theory ZigBee networks can>contains 65.000 nodes, enough for the smart environments we are>addressing, but I guess you was thinking to a different use case.>From the inputs I have so far it seems that this number of nodes is difficult to achieve in real deployments; and this is a R&D issue being tackled in other domains. The example was just to illustrate the type of requirements being addressed for this technology in other domains (to clarify the above). ...and it is not only this, also the current strength of some middleware communities. >The scalability issues in my mind are that ones related to the remote>management of thousand of devices; a control center that has to>remotely manage many smart home installations, the remote upgrade of>the software/firmware installed in such environments, and so on ...>but IMO the problems are not on the ZigBee side.I fully agree, this scalability is not in the ZigBee part,Best regards,-Jesus--promoters-boun...@aaloa.org escribió: ->Para: "promoters@aaloa.org" >De: Francesco Furfari >Enviado por: promoters-boun...@aaloa.org>Fecha: 19/12/2010 16:32>Asunto: Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project>proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI>>>Jesus,>>>in the project proposal we say that ZigBee covers many application>domains very useful for AAL related project, but we don't mean that >ZigBee must be the reference technology for AAL applications.>>We are aware that there are many competing solutions, IP6LowPan, >Wireless HART, or UPnP, DPWS >>With respect to the AALOA mission, this project can be considered one>of the many building blocks that may be integrated in a reference>platform for AAL. >>It is an outcome of the PERSONA project, but it is released without>the "peculiarities" of the PERSONA project, so that it is a generic>solution that can be integrated in the AAL/AmI platform you like.>>>I didn't understand your last example. In theory ZigBee networks can>contains 65.000 nodes, enough for the smart environments we are>addressing, but I guess you was thinking to a different use case.>>The scalability issues in my mind are that ones related to the remote>management of thousand of devices; a control center that has to>remotely manage many smart home installations, the remote upgrade of>the software/firmware installed in such environments, and so on ...>but IMO the problems are not on the ZigBee side.>>>Francesco>>>>Il 19/12/2010 0.33, >jesus.berm...@telvent.com> >ha scritto: >>Dear all,>>>My vote is positive ...> >however, it is not clear the strategy for the AAL domain being the>driver for the evolution of Zigbee out from a ZigBee for Health Care>profile (which is a very limited area in the scope of this>technology). This combined with the current activity in this>technology entails a high risk for the survival. > >>>Just to mention an additional implementation being integrated in>device abstraction activities running in OSAmI project; the>(paralell) R&D activities of the team involved in this technology are>moving in the direction of overcoming the current limitations in the>number of nodes in the context of real deployment scenarios (some>already in operation) which are difficult to find in the AAL domain. >> >>>Best regards,> >>>-Jesus->> >>-promoters-boun...@aaloa.org escribió: ->>>Para: >"promoters@aaloa.org"> >>>De: Francesco Furfari >>>Enviado por: >promoters-boun...@aaloa.org>>Fecha: 16/12/2010 14:58>>Asunto: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal:>ZigBee 4 OSGI>> >Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters,>>>I would like to submit to your attention the attached project>proposal>> >concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform.>>> >I ask you to consider it for becoming an AALOA Project and to>allocate>> >the needed resources for its software development.>>> >
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Jesus, in the project proposal we say that ZigBee covers many application domains very useful for AAL related project, but we don't mean that ZigBee must be the reference technology for AAL applications. We are aware that there are many competing solutions, IP6LowPan, Wireless HART, or UPnP, DPWS With respect to the AALOA mission, this project can be considered one of the many building blocks that may be integrated in a reference platform for AAL. It is an outcome of the PERSONA project, but it is released without the "peculiarities" of the PERSONA project, so that it is a generic solution that can be integrated in the AAL/AmI platform you like. I didn't understand your last example. In theory ZigBee networks can contains 65.000 nodes, enough for the smart environments we are addressing, but I guess you was thinking to a different use case. The scalability issues in my mind are that ones related to the remote management of thousand of devices; a control center that has to remotely manage many smart home installations, the remote upgrade of the software/firmware installed in such environments, and so on ... but IMO the problems are not on the ZigBee side. Francesco Il 19/12/2010 0.33, jesus.berm...@telvent.com ha scritto: Dear all, My vote is positive ... however, it is not clear the strategy for the AAL domain being the driver for the evolution of Zigbee out from a ZigBee for Health Care profile (which is a very limited area in the scope of this technology). This combined with the current activity in this technology entails a high risk for the survival. Just to mention an additional implementation being integrated in device abstraction activities running in OSAmI project; the (paralell) R&D activities of the team involved in this technology are moving in the direction of overcoming the current limitations in the number of nodes in the context of real deployment scenarios (some already in operation) which are difficult to find in the AAL domain. Best regards, -Jesus- -promoters-boun...@aaloa.org escribió: - Para: "promoters@aaloa.org" De: Francesco Furfari Enviado por: promoters-boun...@aaloa.org Fecha: 16/12/2010 14:58 Asunto: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. I ask you to consider it for becoming an AALOA Project and to allocate the needed resources for its software development. As promoter of this proposal and member of the Governing Board I will abstain from voting on this issue. I remember to the promoters that even if they haven't a binding vote, their comments are very welcome. Kind regards, Francesco. / (See attached file: ZigBee4OSGi project proposal_v4.pdf)/ ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters [anexo "ZigBee4OSGi project proposal_v4.pdf" eliminado por Jesús Bermejo Muñoz/Telvent/Abengoa] ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Dear all,My vote is positive ... however, it is not clear the strategy for the AAL domain being the driver for the evolution of Zigbee out from a ZigBee for Health Care profile (which is a very limited area in the scope of this technology). This combined with the current activity in this technology entails a high risk for the survival. Just to mention an additional implementation being integrated in device abstraction activities running in OSAmI project; the (paralell) R&D activities of the team involved in this technology are moving in the direction of overcoming the current limitations in the number of nodes in the context of real deployment scenarios (some already in operation) which are difficult to find in the AAL domain. Best regards, -Jesus- -promoters-boun...@aaloa.org escribió: -Para: "promoters@aaloa.org" De: Francesco Furfari Enviado por: promoters-boun...@aaloa.orgFecha: 16/12/2010 14:58Asunto: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. I ask you to consider it for becoming an AALOA Project and to allocate the needed resources for its software development. As promoter of this proposal and member of the Governing Board I will abstain from voting on this issue. I remember to the promoters that even if they haven't a binding vote, their comments are very welcome. Kind regards, Francesco. (See attached file: ZigBee4OSGi project proposal_v4.pdf) ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters [anexo "ZigBee4OSGi project proposal_v4.pdf" eliminado por Jesús Bermejo Muñoz/Telvent/Abengoa] ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Well the right example is : 5 positive binding votes (+1) 25 negative non-binding votes (-1) Francesco Il 18/12/2010 10.39, Francesco Furfari ha scritto: Hi Luca, your vote is very important. The binding vote of the Governing Board may be used for critical situation, for example when there is a problem for resource allocation. However the GB is operating in name of a community, and the opinion of the community is important. In this moment there are 40 people in this mailing list and more than 70 in the supporters mailing list. What do you think would be the effect of having : 5 positive votes (+1) 25 negative votes (-1) Every negative vote must be clearly motivated. And GB must careful evaluate every binding and not-binding vote. I hope we will use this submission to discuss about the rules for voting and how the GB should manage the affairs of AALOA. I will send send another email on this , well under the Christmas vacation there is the risk of a short discussion ... but let's try ... Best, Francesco Il 17/12/2010 17.25, Luca Odetti ha scritto: Correction: it's not my "vote", it's my opinion :-) Ciao Luca Il giorno 16/dic/2010, alle ore 15:00, "Francesco Furfari" ha scritto: > Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, > > I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal > concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. > > I ask you to consider it for becoming an AALOA Project and to allocate > the needed resources for its software development. > > As promoter of this proposal and member of the Governing Board I will > abstain from voting on this issue. > I remember to the promoters that even if they haven't a binding vote, > their comments are very welcome. > > Kind regards, > Francesco. > > ___ > Promoters mailing list > Promoters@aaloa.org > http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Hi Luca, your vote is very important. The binding vote of the Governing Board may be used for critical situation, for example when there is a problem for resource allocation. However the GB is operating in name of a community, and the opinion of the community is important. In this moment there are 40 people in this mailing list and more than 70 in the supporters mailing list. What do you think would be the effect of having : 5 positive votes (+1) 25 negative votes (-1) Every negative vote must be clearly motivated. And GB must careful evaluate every binding and not-binding vote. I hope we will use this submission to discuss about the rules for voting and how the GB should manage the affairs of AALOA. I will send send another email on this , well under the Christmas vacation there is the risk of a short discussion ... but let's try ... Best, Francesco Il 17/12/2010 17.25, Luca Odetti ha scritto: Correction: it's not my "vote", it's my opinion :-) Ciao Luca Il giorno 16/dic/2010, alle ore 15:00, "Francesco Furfari" ha scritto: > Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, > > I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal > concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. > > I ask you to consider it for becoming an AALOA Project and to allocate > the needed resources for its software development. > > As promoter of this proposal and member of the Governing Board I will > abstain from voting on this issue. > I remember to the promoters that even if they haven't a binding vote, > their comments are very welcome. > > Kind regards, > Francesco. > > ___ > Promoters mailing list > Promoters@aaloa.org > http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Correction: it's not my "vote", it's my opinion :-) Ciao Luca Il giorno 16/dic/2010, alle ore 15:00, "Francesco Furfari" ha scritto: > Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, > > I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal > concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. > > I ask you to consider it for becoming an AALOA Project and to allocate > the needed resources for its software development. > > As promoter of this proposal and member of the Governing Board I will > abstain from voting on this issue. > I remember to the promoters that even if they haven't a binding vote, > their comments are very welcome. > > Kind regards, > Francesco. > > ___ > Promoters mailing list > Promoters@aaloa.org > http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Excellent intiiative Francesco My vote is in favour Luca Il giorno 16/dic/2010, alle ore 15:00, "Francesco Furfari" ha scritto: > Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, > > I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal > concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. > > I ask you to consider it for becoming an AALOA Project and to allocate > the needed resources for its software development. > > As promoter of this proposal and member of the Governing Board I will > abstain from voting on this issue. > I remember to the promoters that even if they haven't a binding vote, > their comments are very welcome. > > Kind regards, > Francesco. > > ___ > Promoters mailing list > Promoters@aaloa.org > http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
I vote in favour of this. Joe On 16/12/2010 14:58 , "Francesco Furfari" wrote: Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. I ask you to consider it for becoming an AALOA Project and to allocate the needed resources for its software development. As promoter of this proposal and member of the Governing Board I will abstain from voting on this issue. I remember to the promoters that even if they haven't a binding vote, their comments are very welcome. Kind regards, Francesco. ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Dear all, +1 vote from my side. P.S.: We at AIT are waiting very much for it to work with the project! Regards Von: promoters-boun...@aaloa.org [promoters-boun...@aaloa.org] im Auftrag von Mohammad-Reza Tazari [saied.taz...@igd.fraunhofer.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Dezember 2010 06:39 An: AALOA Promoters Betreff: Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI Francesco Furfari wrote on 16-Dec-10 14:58: > Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, > > I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal > concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. +1 Regards, -- Saied ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Francesco Furfari wrote on 16-Dec-10 14:58: Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. +1 Regards, -- Saied ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
Re: [aaloa promoters] [Vote] Call for Vote on a project proposal: ZigBee 4 OSGI
Dear all, here is my vote for the ZigBee4OSGI project: +1 Comment: ZigBee is an important standard the covers a broad range of devices and domains. The proposed project will ease the integration of heterogeneous sensor networks and allows developers to concentrate on application design instead of infrastructure development. Best regards, Thomas Therefore it is a valuable contribution Am 16.12.2010 14:58, schrieb Francesco Furfari: Dear Governing Board of AALOA, and Promoters, I would like to submit to your attention the attached project proposal concerning the ZigBee networks integration with the OSGi platform. I ask you to consider it for becoming an AALOA Project and to allocate the needed resources for its software development. As promoter of this proposal and member of the Governing Board I will abstain from voting on this issue. I remember to the promoters that even if they haven't a binding vote, their comments are very welcome. Kind regards, Francesco. ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters -- Thomas Karopka Head of ehealth Department chair EFMI LIFOSS WG vice chair IMIA OS WG IT Science Center Rügen gGmbH Circus 14 D-18581 Putbus Telefon: +49(0)38301 8829-0 Fax: +49(0)38301 8829-59 E-mail: i...@it-science-center.de Web: www.it-science-center.de Geschäftsführer : Dipl.- Inf. Ilvio Bruder Handelsregister : Amtsgericht Stralsund HRB 6227 USt-Ident-Nummer: DE 244660253 ___ Promoters mailing list Promoters@aaloa.org http://aaloa.org/mailman/listinfo/promoters
