On 14/04/2010 17:03, Roger Bishop Jones wrote:
On Wednesday 14 Apr 2010 16:07, Rob Arthan wrote:
Can you test texpdf on wrk066 from maths_egs? makeindex
produces some garbled entries resulting in LaTeX erros
when I try running it by hand.
No, doesn't work.
! Extra }, or forgotte
On Wednesday 14 Apr 2010 16:07, Rob Arthan wrote:
> Can you test texpdf on wrk066 from maths_egs? makeindex
> produces some garbled entries resulting in LaTeX erros
> when I try running it by hand.
No, doesn't work.
! Extra }, or forgotten $.
...\mathgroup \symAMSb \relax R\egroup
I ran docdvi on one of my files and it does generate PDF but
it does not get the index right.
So I'm putting this to Rob as an issue to be addressed
somehow.
I have a hack which makes hyperlinked indexes work, and the
question for Rob is whether this is something which he would
care to adopt
Roger,
On 14/04/2010 15:12, Roger Bishop Jones wrote:
On Wednesday 14 Apr 2010 13:23, Phil Clayton wrote:
You can actually get docdvi and texdvi to generate PDF
files straight up if you add
\RequirePackage[pdftex,...]{hyperref}
in the preamble (where ... represents other options).
Roger Bishop Jones wrote:
On Wednesday 14 Apr 2010 13:23, Phil Clayton wrote:
You can actually get docdvi and texdvi to generate PDF
files straight up if you add
\RequirePackage[pdftex,...]{hyperref}
in the preamble (where ... represents other options).
See attached example. This is gene
On Wednesday 14 Apr 2010 13:23, Phil Clayton wrote:
> You can actually get docdvi and texdvi to generate PDF
> files straight up if you add
>\RequirePackage[pdftex,...]{hyperref}
> in the preamble (where ... represents other options).
> See attached example. This is generally useful anyway
Roger,
[Subject changed for the mailing list.]
Roger Bishop Jones wrote:
However I actually have a small problem which I don't know
how to solve without a patch.
All of my stuff depends upon the use of docpdf and texpdf for
documentation.
I could put "./docpdf" in the makefile to invoke the f
