Re: [PEDA] (No Subject) - FPGA editor

2002-07-30 Thread Jon Elson
Rene Tschaggelar wrote: > I recently had a look into the subject of FPGA and Protel. > I was told the FPGA router is still taken from the manufacturer > (in your case XILINX). > > Meaning you're just using Protel to draw the schematics and > send the netlist to the other tool doing the FPGA. Thes

Re: [PEDA] (No Subject) - FPGA editor

2002-07-30 Thread Rene Tschaggelar
I'm using Altera FPGAs exclusively, since the tools are an effort in itself. I also find the handling of MaxPlus2 rather awful, Quartus2 is a bit better. The functionality they provide is far beyond just a schematic editor. They allow me have graphic modules ( forget the VHDL for now) to make a hi

Re: [PEDA] (No Subject) - FPGA editor

2002-07-30 Thread TheLight
One reason to get the drawing in Protel and then export it to the Xilinx tools is that the schematic editor of Xilinx is not, how shall I put it, particularly convenient. I myself have done some designs in it while the rest of the board was done in Protel. This got me out of my hum on more tha

Re: [PEDA] (No Subject) - FPGA editor

2002-07-30 Thread Rene Tschaggelar
I recently had a look into the subject of FPGA and Protel. I was told the FPGA router is still taken from the manufacturer (in your case XILINX). Meaning you're just using Protel to draw the schematics and send the netlist to the other tool doing the FPGA. These tools from various manufacturers a