Re: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring

2002-06-04 Thread Dennis Saputelli
PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, 5 June 2002 9:45 AM > > To: Protel EDA Forum > > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring > > > > > > right, but keep in mind that the location of the V groove is not as > > accurate as routing so that

Re: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring

2002-06-04 Thread Danny Bishop
e 2002 9:45 AM > To: Protel EDA Forum > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring > > > right, but keep in mind that the location of the V groove is not as > accurate as routing so that may be an issue in some boxes > > (in fact i had a few large bds once

Re: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring

2002-06-04 Thread Dennis Saputelli
right, but keep in mind that the location of the V groove is not as accurate as routing so that may be an issue in some boxes (in fact i had a few large bds once with the V groove going diagonally across the whole thing! must have slipped) anybody know any scientific method of specifying V groov

Re: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring

2002-06-04 Thread Danny Bishop
HI all with regards to below: scoring (or v-grooving) is a cheaper way to manufacture boards as the scoring tool has to remove less material, so it can move a lot faster. The boards will be a lot cheaper with this method. The tradeoff is that you need more clearance from copper and components to

Re: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring

2002-06-04 Thread Jon Elson
Adeel Malik wrote: > Hi All, > Some FABs require that NC Drill data for PCB fabriaction should be > given to them in Excellon Format. In Protel we have 2:3,2:4, 2:5 in Englich > units and 4:2,4:3,4:4 in Metric Units. Can someone comment as to which of > these formats supported by Protel

Re: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring

2002-06-03 Thread Adeel Malik
quot; signify ? Regards, Adeel -Original Message- From: Ian Capps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:24 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring Adeel Your NC file *.txt output is the Excellon file that they request, the

Re: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring

2002-06-03 Thread Ian Capps
- Original Message - From: "Adeel Malik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 6:02 PM Subject: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring > Hi All, > Some FABs require

Re: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring

2002-06-03 Thread Watnoski, Michael

Re: [PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring

2002-06-03 Thread Waldemar Kulajew
Adeel Malik schrieb: > > Hi All, > Some FABs require that NC Drill data for PCB fabriaction should be > given to them in Excellon Format. In Protel we have 2:3,2:4, 2:5 in Englich > units and 4:2,4:3,4:4 in Metric Units. Can someone comment as to which of > these formats supported by Pro

[PEDA] Issues related to Excellon Format and Scoring

2002-06-02 Thread Adeel Malik
Hi All, Some FABs require that NC Drill data for PCB fabriaction should be given to them in Excellon Format. In Protel we have 2:3,2:4, 2:5 in Englich units and 4:2,4:3,4:4 in Metric Units. Can someone comment as to which of these formats supported by Protel correspond to Excellon Format