[PEDA] Adding extra tracks and vias.

2002-05-23 Thread Embedded Matt

I'm working on a layout with two quad flat packs.  A
substantial number of pins on each chip have no
connection.  Because of the difficulty of
hand-soldering to fine pitch pins, I would like to add
a track and a via to each unused pin for possible use
later.

I'm have two issues:

1. DRC flags these extra tracks and vias as
violations.
2. I get no protection from the design rules that
specify minimum clearances and such.

I think this must be a common problem.  Is there an
easy way to fix this without changing the schematic?

Protel 99 SE sp6.

Thanks,
Matt


__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Adding extra tracks and vias.

2002-05-23 Thread HxEngr




Re: [PEDA] Adding extra tracks and vias.

2002-05-23 Thread Fisher, Jerry

In the sch editor create net list and check include single pin nets. In the
pcb editor load the net list this will allow you to add tracks and vias with
rules applying. 

Jerry Fisher
Assoc. Engineer

Pelco
10 Corporate Dr.
Orangeburg NY 10962
(845) 398-8700
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Embedded Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:10 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Adding extra tracks and vias.


I'm working on a layout with two quad flat packs.  A
substantial number of pins on each chip have no
connection.  Because of the difficulty of
hand-soldering to fine pitch pins, I would like to add
a track and a via to each unused pin for possible use
later.

I'm have two issues:

1. DRC flags these extra tracks and vias as
violations.
2. I get no protection from the design rules that
specify minimum clearances and such.

I think this must be a common problem.  Is there an
easy way to fix this without changing the schematic?

Protel 99 SE sp6.

Thanks,
Matt


__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Adding extra tracks and vias.

2002-05-23 Thread Brad Velander

Matt,
what reason does the DRC flag these extra tracks and vias? What is
the violation?

I believe it would probably be because they are No Net connections. This
is also 'possibly' why they don't follow your spacing DRC rules. For
clearance rules you have to watch the net issues because if you do not have
the board - board general clearance rule and other rules are all net
related, then the 'no net' connections may not be checked for violations.

Sincerely,
Brad Velander.

Lead PCB Designer
Norsat International Inc.
Microwave Products
Tel   (604) 292-9089 (direct line)
Fax  (604) 292-9010
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.norsat.com

Visit us at Booth 2G2-09 at CommunicAsia 2002 in Singapore June 18-21.



 -Original Message-
 From: Embedded Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:10 AM
 To: Protel EDA Forum
 Subject: [PEDA] Adding extra tracks and vias.
 
 
 I'm working on a layout with two quad flat packs.  A
 substantial number of pins on each chip have no
 connection.  Because of the difficulty of
 hand-soldering to fine pitch pins, I would like to add
 a track and a via to each unused pin for possible use
 later.
 
 I'm have two issues:
 
 1. DRC flags these extra tracks and vias as
 violations.
 2. I get no protection from the design rules that
 specify minimum clearances and such.
 
 I think this must be a common problem.  Is there an
 easy way to fix this without changing the schematic?
 
 Protel 99 SE sp6.
 
 Thanks,
 Matt 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Adding extra tracks and vias.

2002-05-23 Thread Abd ulRahman Lomax

Another solution, besides those already given, is to use, in the footprint, 
through pads the size of vias and with the same hole size, given the same 
net as the SM pad. You will have complete DRC protection

Another solution which might be better in some ways is to add a test point 
(single hole) part, one on each unused pin. Once one knows how to copy and 
paste, it would be very quick to add these to the schematic, one click per 
pad or even several pads with a single click.

These will then be incorporated into the net list; an advantage is that 
they can each be given a number which can appear on the legend, making such 
changes easier to document and recognise.

There are also ways to speed up the PCB side of this, but I won't go into 
detail now.

Note that it is an advantage to be able to move the test or wiring points 
if routing requires it... You can move pads included inside a footprint by 
unlocking the footprint in the Edit dialog; but I'd prefer adding separate 
parts; the separate parts can be made into a Union with the flat pack to 
which they adhere, so they will move around together.

At 11:10 AM 5/23/2002 -0700, Embedded Matt wrote:
I'm working on a layout with two quad flat packs.  A
substantial number of pins on each chip have no
connection.  Because of the difficulty of
hand-soldering to fine pitch pins, I would like to add
a track and a via to each unused pin for possible use
later.

I'm have two issues:

1. DRC flags these extra tracks and vias as
violations.
2. I get no protection from the design rules that
specify minimum clearances and such.

I think this must be a common problem.  Is there an
easy way to fix this without changing the schematic?

Protel 99 SE sp6.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Adding extra tracks and vias.

2002-05-23 Thread Rene Tschaggelar

I have a special schematic component : a single pin connector.
On the pcb component side I have two footprints to choose from :
1) a single pad, topside only, rectangular, no hole,
   50x100 mil - great to solder a wire
2) a single pad, multilayer, round 32/62mil
   great for the scope probe to stick in

The schematic component lets me choose between the two mentioned
bcb footprints.

Works great

Rene
-- 
Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com


Embedded Matt wrote:
 
 I'm working on a layout with two quad flat packs.  A
 substantial number of pins on each chip have no
 connection.  Because of the difficulty of
 hand-soldering to fine pitch pins, I would like to add
 a track and a via to each unused pin for possible use
 later.
 
 I'm have two issues:
 
 1. DRC flags these extra tracks and vias as
 violations.
 2. I get no protection from the design rules that
 specify minimum clearances and such.
 
 I think this must be a common problem.  Is there an
 easy way to fix this without changing the schematic?
 * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *