To Abdul-Rahman, Dwight & Ian, & All,
Well guys I have finally seen the light.
Actually it was Dwight's post that finally clued me in last night, and
a chat with Abdul-Rahman. I guess it was past CAD systems
that provided me a major mental block.
There is no bug and I do understand now how the foo
Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Bob Wolfe's Update Issue (Ex: Component partition)
> AHHH! Bob - I think I see what you're doing different! Please confirm...
>
> You are changing the footprint in the PCB, NOT i
At 07:47 AM 2/5/2002 +1100, Ian Wilson wrote:
>I am happy to do this but international long distance phone costs would
>apply (I'm in Oz) - maybe there is another user nearby that could do this?
Of course, I'm just a short way down the road, I forget how far, maybe an
hour's drive from Mr. Wolf
AHHH! Bob - I think I see what you're doing different! Please confirm...
You are changing the footprint in the PCB, NOT in the SCH. Then the next
time you run synchronize from SCH to PCB, it tries to put it back. If you
change the PCB, you must either back-annotate, or manually change the SCH t
Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:47 PM
Subject: [PEDA] Bob Wolfe's Update Issue (Ex: Component partition)
> On 11:40 AM 4/02/2002 -0500, Bob Wolfe said:
> >Dwight,
> >Mr. Lomax pointed out and unless there is something wrong
> >with
On 11:40 AM 4/02/2002 -0500, Bob Wolfe said:
>Dwight,
>Mr. Lomax pointed out and unless there is something wrong
>with my intsallation, it does respect a footprint in each symbol however
>ONLY the first and not any alternates that may be listed.
>If you have a symbol with more than one footprint l
