Re: [PEDA] Newbie questions

2002-08-21 Thread Rich Thompson

Jim

Hhhm, I did exactly that, made a complete library of our stocked parts
then used the (horribly slow) database link feature to update our part
numbers into the schematic.  The link feature just uses an excel file
(good for copy paste) and export it as dbase4.  I believe Ian Wilson
wrote a better (and faster) version of database linking direct to an
excel sheet but I havent gotten around to trying it.   I then used a
simple vb script with excel (launched from with protel and hidden) to
format the BOM to our internal style with or without prices etc.

Hope that helps!

rich

-Original Message-
From: Jim Weir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 20 August 2002 21:08
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Newbie questions


I have a chance to acquire a legit copy of 99SE in a rather major swap
of test equipment and computer supplies with another company.  It is a
rather minor component of the whole deal, but before I trade for it, I
want to make sure that it will do what I want it to do.  As yet,
perusing the documentation that came with the 30-day trial package
hasn't unearthed what I want to know.

I am currently using (ptui, yecch) Circuitmaker 2K for my board layouts,
which are minimal to say the least.  Analog boards, 2 sided, nothing
spectacular.  However, CM2K is about as unstable a platform as I've ever
used...I actually considered going back to tape and donuts there for a
while.

Anyway, the one thing that CM has going for it is the capability to put
a whole family of parts into the design database library and call them
up into the schematic individually by value.  And, with a little
maneuvering, you can put in your own identifiers (like company part
number) and the identifiers will ride along with the part.  Thus,
calling up a bom gives you not only the part name and description, but
your own internal stockroom part number as well.

Along with that, CM's database is a text file.  When putting in a large
number of series parts (as, for example, the ¼w 5% resistors), all you
have to do is put in the first sequence.  Then by cut'n'paste, you can
build the whole series quite easily.  In addition, once you have the ¼w
family done, the ½w family is really trivial to generate by copy and
then a search/replace on the differences.  If you have a whole bunch of
families in your stockroom (electrolytics, mylars, etc.) building the
libraries for your entire stockroom of a few thousand parts isn't much
more than a week's work.

I can't find that capability in 99SE.  If it can be done, would somebody
please let me know where in the documentation this feature is so that I
can reread something that I didn't get the first few times?

Many thanks fer yer help.


Jim



* Tracking #: B0189544F35D254DA51704F4DCE2790DD7E3D428
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Newbie questions

2002-08-21 Thread rlamoreaux

As I understand it you want to have one library part for each part number 
in your system, and you want the part information in a field.

One way to do this is to add component names to the component for every 
partnumber. So than the library item RESISTOR would also have names equal 
to all your resistor part numbers. Unfortunately this does not allow you 
to match the value to the part number unless you put it in the name. The 
other way is to copy the component, rename it to the part number and add 
the part number information to the library fields. Some people use the 
dBase link to pull the part number information into the part fields after 
the parts are placed on the schematic, but since I use Access not dBase 
and the link is slow I don't use it.

So yes it is do-able with a little work.

Hope this helps,

Robert D. LaMoreaux
MTS Systems Corp. 
Powertrain Technology Division
4622 Runway Blvd.
Ann Arbor, MI 48108
734-822-9696
Fax 734-973-1103
Main Desk 734-973-



* Tracking #: D3908DFF0DA2A348A19E59AF7D1B10137E72C240
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Newbie questions

2002-08-21 Thread Rusty Garfield

At 11:13 AM 8/21/2002 -0400, you wrote:
As I understand it you want to have one library part for each part number
in your system, and you want the part information in a field.

If you have a company part number for every resistor and you want to be 
able to
place a resistor symbol on to your schematic with the value do the following.
Create symbol and give it your company number. Place the company number in one
of eight library fields under description(always use same library fields 
location
ie field 1)and add footprint. Under group for that number give the value. In
schematic all ways select symbol by value. This will match value to part number
and footprint. Never allow anyone to change a resistor by changing the 
value on the
schematic. Always go back to the library for a new resistor. You don't want 
to explain
to your boss how you are going to get that 1 watt resistor in that 0805 
space. Use
one library to resistor size and tolerance. Can't go wrong.
Capacitors are a little tuft but doable. One library with symbol name as value
tol type and voltage. Put company part in same location. Use Reports - Bill 
of Materials
to extract info.

One way to do this is to add component names to the component for every
partnumber. So than the library item RESISTOR would also have names equal
to all your resistor part numbers. Unfortunately this does not allow you
to match the value to the part number unless you put it in the name.

see above

  The
other way is to copy the component, rename it to the part number and add
the part number information to the library fields. Some people use the
dBase link to pull the part number information into the part fields after
the parts are placed on the schematic, but since I use Access not dBase
and the link is slow I don't use it.

So yes it is do-able with a little work.

Hope this helps,

Robert D. LaMoreaux
MTS Systems Corp.
Powertrain Technology Division
4622 Runway Blvd.
Ann Arbor, MI 48108
734-822-9696
Fax 734-973-1103
Main Desk 734-973-



* Tracking #: D3908DFF0DA2A348A19E59AF7D1B10137E72C240
*


Rusty Garfield C. I. D.
Development Technician IV
Sugar Land Product Center
(281) 285-7611 (voice)
(281) 285-7619 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (e-mail)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



[PEDA] Newbie questions

2002-08-20 Thread Jim Weir

I have a chance to acquire a legit copy of 99SE in a rather major swap of
test equipment and computer supplies with another company.  It is a rather
minor component of the whole deal, but before I trade for it, I want to make
sure that it will do what I want it to do.  As yet, perusing the
documentation that came with the 30-day trial package hasn't unearthed what
I want to know.

I am currently using (ptui, yecch) Circuitmaker 2K for my board layouts,
which are minimal to say the least.  Analog boards, 2 sided, nothing
spectacular.  However, CM2K is about as unstable a platform as I've ever
used...I actually considered going back to tape and donuts there for a
while.

Anyway, the one thing that CM has going for it is the capability to put a
whole family of parts into the design database library and call them up into
the schematic individually by value.  And, with a little maneuvering, you
can put in your own identifiers (like company part number) and the
identifiers will ride along with the part.  Thus, calling up a bom gives you
not only the part name and description, but your own internal stockroom part
number as well.

Along with that, CM's database is a text file.  When putting in a large
number of series parts (as, for example, the ¼w 5% resistors), all you
have to do is put in the first sequence.  Then by cut'n'paste, you can build
the whole series quite easily.  In addition, once you have the ¼w family
done, the ½w family is really trivial to generate by copy and then a
search/replace on the differences.  If you have a whole bunch of families in
your stockroom (electrolytics, mylars, etc.) building the libraries for your
entire stockroom of a few thousand parts isn't much more than a week's work.

I can't find that capability in 99SE.  If it can be done, would somebody
please let me know where in the documentation this feature is so that I can
reread something that I didn't get the first few times?

Many thanks fer yer help.


Jim



* Tracking #: B0189544F35D254DA51704F4DCE2790DD7E3D428
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *