>>More likely, they're suffering from islands of resist detaching and
floating
around, causing 5 thou gaps wherever they land. I've certainly been asked to
avoid similar features (although normally it's tracks leaving pads and
looping
round the side of the pad, <<
Good point.
I once had trouble
> I just had a board vendor reject my gerbers due to the track spacing
> within a polygon pour. I have been using 15 mil tracks on a 20 mil
> grid and this yields 5 mil track spacing, which violates the 8 mil
> track spacing minimum this board vendor has.
>
> Since all these tracks are shorted to
29/08/2002 22:18:44, "Dennis Saputelli"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>they probably just went ISO or something
:o)
More likely, they're suffering from islands of resist detaching and floating
around, causing 5 thou gaps wherever they land. I've certainly been asked to
avoid similar features (a
they probably just went ISO or something
:)
no seriously though i could see this as at least a potential cosmetic
issue for the fab
(not being able to hold the dimensions)
that could be enough to trigger a reject from the customer ...
why use these dimensions anyway?
you don't want a solid due t
7 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: [PEDA] Polygon Track Spacing
>
>
> I just had a board vendor reject my gerbers due to the track
> spacing within a polygon pour. I have been using 15 mil
> tracks on a 20 mil grid and this yields 5 mil track spacing,
> which violate
I just had a board vendor reject my gerbers due to the track spacing within
a polygon pour. I have been using 15 mil tracks on a 20 mil grid and this
yields 5 mil track spacing, which violates the 8 mil track spacing minimum
this board vendor has.
Since all these tracks are shorted together anywa
