>
> (Steve Hendrix Wrote):
> > by the financial types. Looks like I'm stuck with P99SEsp6,
> warts and all,
> > until that next entrepeneur gets going. Hmmm, my degree is
> in computer
> > science (I started out doing mostly programming), and I've
> now got a lot
> of
> > experience designing
At 08:49 AM 5/15/2002 -0700, Brad Velander wrote:
>[...]"Another impact on revenue figures for this half is the re-scheduling
>of our next major product release. Protel DXP, which is now expected
>to go into external beta testing in May and released for sale in July
>2002."
>
>So I guess anybody c
.> Many bugs do not rear their ugly little heads until
> the program has been exposed to a wide range of user-generated conditions;
> as we have noticed, there are bugs that took us two years to find
>
yea and if you think our issues are real problems join a PADS/Inoveda forum,
They are has
TED]>
To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel DXP beta testing
> Abd ul-Rahman,
> here is a quotation from an Altium publically released report
> courtesy of the Australian Stock Exchange. Ar
m: Abd ulRahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:57 AM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel DXP beta testing
>
> I signed the NDA, but it does allow signers to reveal already public
> information, public as of the time of signing
At 08:02 AM 5/15/2002 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I received it yesterday. However, I haven't yet decided whether to sign or
>not. Perhaps the biggest sticking point is that the license specifically
>forbids me to use the beta to do real work - above and beyond the usual
>disclaimers of liabi
At 04:59 PM 5/15/2002 +1000, Thomas wrote:
>I received an invite to apply for Protel DXP beta testing today.
>As I have not signed it yet, I don't suppose its breaking the NDA to let you
>know this.
It's my understanding that Beta testing was only being offered to those who
had already signed up
, but they didn't get that way on the
Software Assurance plan they are now trying to foist on us!
Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> [Snip] Within a short time,
> though, will come another entrepeneur who recognizes the void which Protel
> has left, and fills it with tools which advance the state of the art, at a
> price which fits the vast numbers of small shops which have been overlooked
> by t
I received it yesterday. However, I haven't yet decided whether to sign or
not. Perhaps the biggest sticking point is that the license specifically
forbids me to use the beta to do real work - above and beyond the usual
disclaimers of liability for any of the results. Now I have to ask, what's
I received an invite to apply for Protel DXP beta testing today.
As I have not signed it yet, I don't suppose its breaking the NDA to let you
know this.
Tom.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
*
11 matches
Mail list logo
