Re: [PEDA] Fwd: OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate function. Linux Added.

2002-07-10 Thread Jon Elson

Jason Van Dellen wrote:

  So, you're saying Protel 99SE works well under Win4Lin?

 Yes, but you still need the cab files and a Lisence.

Yes, I knew that.

 I tried VMware a while ago and found it very bulky and slow, is that still the
 case?

It would have to be remarkably bulky to fill up my 20 GB disk.  The rpm file
is just under 10 MB, which is pretty big.  As for the size of all the installed
files, I really don't know.  This does include the documentation.

As for speed, I think it runs as fast as Win2K on the native hardware, although
it is a little hard to tell.  A 1 GHz machine is so fast, unless you time
autoroutes
or something, I don't know how to accurately gauge performance.  I certainly
am NOT complaining, it is plenty fast enough running Protel 99SE for my
needs!

Jon



* Tracking #: CC2FC2022F2624419B7D8086D7171D8C3F7E2A93
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Fwd: OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate function. Linux Added.

2002-07-10 Thread Jason Van Dellen

 As for speed, I think it runs as fast as Win2K on the native hardware,
 although it is a little hard to tell.  A 1 GHz machine is so fast

Yeah, a 1Ghz is much faster then my Dual 300.  I was trying out the VMware 
demo a few years ago and found it slow and the price tag too high.  They've 
probably made a lot of changes since I tried it last though.
When I found win4lin1.0 and tested the demo, I found it much faster and the 
price tag affordable.  The price at that time was only $40US compared to 
$400US for VMware.  (Or at least that's what I remember it to be).  So I went 
with Win4Lin and if you haven't noticed yet, I'm very happy with it.  :)


Jason



* Tracking #: E3B9E1A8ABE67A40ABF8D27AD2360C35D6F39851
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Fwd: OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate function. Linux Added.

2002-07-09 Thread Jon Elson

Jason Van Dellen wrote:

  If I need to run
 Windows Apps(eg Protel), I run Win4Lin.  http://www.netraverse.com/

So, you're saying Protel 99SE works well under Win4Lin?  I've been running
it under Win2K in a VMWare virtual machine, but if I can skip all that,
it may be a lot better than running (and managing)  two whole OSs.

Jon



* Tracking #: 519020D84E31744E9994D9092416F61ABC4095DB
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Fwd: OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate function. Linux Added.

2002-07-09 Thread Jon Elson

Igor Gmitrovic wrote:

 Don,

 for the same reasons I see Protel (ie Altium) starting to lose thier user base. With 
the ATS useless and increase in prices people will start looking elsewhere. How could 
they explain charging us for the ATS and then they claim to stop support for the 
P99SE. What do they want us to pay them for? What bugs have they fixed so far, does 
anyone know? Have they fixed schematic annotation? I wonder if Mr. Protel (excuse' 
moa, Altium) knows what's happening in the field and how much would their management 
care anyway. There were number of other people in this forum with the views similar 
to mine. If they don't change something it looks to me they are going M$ way, down. 
Slowly, but surely.

Well, if they really believed that their user base was going to walk out on them, 
they'd
do something in a hurry.  So many companies ignore obvious signs of customer
dissatisfaction for so long, however, that by the time they finally wake up, it
is WAY too late!

 Anyone heard of a Linux based PCB CAD program?

There have been a couple of starts, SourceForge has one that is a pretty decent
schematic editor, but no PCB function that is worth consideration.  I'm keeping
an eye on it.

Jon



* Tracking #: 567C4A6FBA77B048A29F13D5914363A4B11B6BB0
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Fwd: OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate function. Linux Added.

2002-07-09 Thread Jason Van Dellen

  Anyone heard of a Linux based PCB CAD program?

Cadsoft has Eagle for Linux, I've installed it and looked at it, but that was 
about it.  I haven't made anything with it yet.  But I know my last company I 
was with has switch to it.

http://www.cadsoft.de/index.htm

Jason



* Tracking #: 1D206871BCC94B4BA2E57C283EDA51FF4516D055
*

-- 
~
Jason Van Dellen
Trilogy-Net Inc.
#4; 1935 - 27Ave NE
Calgary, AB
T2E 7E4

www.trilogy-net.com
Phone (403) 219-8868
Fax  (403) 219-8860
Cell (403) 815-1626
~

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Fwd: OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate function. Linux Added.

2002-07-09 Thread Dennis Saputelli

i have no love lost for Uncle Bill, but i wouldn't bet against him
either

i would wager that 2-3 years from now MS is as dominant as ever and that
although Linux will show strong growth it will still be for gearheads
and backroom operations mostly

if Linux becomes a genuine threat he will just give away something that
can't be refused, they've done it before

Dennis Saputelli

Jason Van Dellen wrote:
 
   Anyone heard of a Linux based PCB CAD program?
 
 Cadsoft has Eagle for Linux, I've installed it and looked at it, but that was
 about it.  I haven't made anything with it yet.  But I know my last company I
 was with has switch to it.
 
 http://www.cadsoft.de/index.htm
 
 Jason
 



* Tracking #: 27284A75B7E8E24093E2C29DEADBEA2EE0163CC5
*

-- 
___
www.integratedcontrolsinc.comIntegrated Controls, Inc.
   tel: 415-647-04802851 21st Street  
  fax: 415-647-3003San Francisco, CA 94110

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Fwd: OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate function. Linux Added.

2002-07-09 Thread Jason Van Dellen

 So, you're saying Protel 99SE works well under Win4Lin? 

Yes, but you still need the cab files and a Lisence.  
After you install Win4Lin it asks for the cab files from a CD or Location.  
Then when you install windows under win4lin for the user you want it for - It 
will install from the cab files you supplied and performs the install for 
you.  You can not change the settings or what applications you want 
installed.   It just zips right through without stopping except when you have 
to punch in the Install Code for Windows.

I tried VMware a while ago and found it very bulky and slow, is that still the 
case?

Jason


 Jon


 
 * Tracking #: 519020D84E31744E9994D9092416F61ABC4095DB
 *
 

-- 
~
Jason Van Dellen
Trilogy-Net Inc.
#4; 1935 - 27Ave NE
Calgary, AB
T2E 7E4

www.trilogy-net.com
Phone (403) 219-8868
Fax  (403) 219-8860
Cell (403) 815-1626
~

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Fwd: OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate function. Linux Added.

2002-07-08 Thread Jason Van Dellen

I've been trying to follow this thread and I just have a few things to say.

I've been running Linux on my desktops at work and at home for three years
now.  Linux has come a long way. I started with Red Hat 5.1 and it was fairly
hard to get everything working smoothly, but once it was up, it was very
solid.  Now you can install Mandrake 8.2 in about 5 minutes have it auto
detect your Windows install on another drive or partition, set up the master
boot record (so you can choose what you want to run at boot time, Graphicly),
setup up all your hardware and connect to the internet.

There is nothing in Windows that I can't do in Linux.  I see Microsoft as a
bad habit (eg. smoking), in order to get away from it you need to quit cold
Turkey and force yourself off it.  If I need to create/open/save
Office97/2000/XP documents I can use OpenOffice.org.  If I need to run
Windows Apps(eg Protel), I run Win4Lin.  http://www.netraverse.com/  

There is talk about Linux sales, well you can't determine the amount of users
you have based on sales.  Linux is OpenSource, so users can download and burn
it for free.  There are millions of Linux users and developers.  A website
called The Linux Counter  was created to track Linux users.
http://counter.li.org/ This doesn't show all the users but it does show an
incredible growth.

WalMart.com Is now selling computers with Lindows installed, and soon will
have Mandrake.  So you can see there is great move towards Linux.  With the
new Licensing policies from Microsoft, I see more and more companies and
schools switching to Linux.  They can't afford not to.

I agree with Ivan, for someone that is new to Linux they should check out
Mandrake Linux http://www.mandrakelinux.com/

As you can see I'm Linux advocate and a Protel User.  Like someone said If
 we don't let Protel know, they will never know..

Ok I'm done now.  :)

Jason

On Friday 05 July 2002 13:14, Tony Karavidas wrote:
 Ditto.. (See replies below.)

  -Original Message-
  From: Bagotronix Tech Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 9:40 AM
  To: Protel EDA Forum
  Subject: Re: [PEDA] OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate
  function.
 
 
  See replies below.
 
  Best regards,
  Ivan Baggett
  Bagotronix Inc.
  website:  www.bagotronix.com
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Tony Karavidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 12:16 PM
  Subject: Re: [PEDA] OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate
  function.
 
   Yeah but the funny thing about that is MS is SO BIG, linux
 
  doesn't matter
 
   either. Why would MS take a 50% hit in profits to suppress 5% of lost
 
  sales
 
   to Linux?  (I'm making up those numbers but I bet they are not too far
 
  off)
 
   So they loose a few customers...
 
  They wouldn't for 5%.  But that 5% won't stay 5%, it will get bigger.
  You'll see.

 Sure it might get bigger, but even if it doubles it's still small. Reminds
 me of a cancer report on the news saying your chances of getting cancer
 'xyz' if you live in 'Smalltown, USA' are twice as great. They neglect to
 say that your chances are 1 in 2,000,000,000 as opposed to 1 in
 4,000,000,000. Sure it's twice as likely, but it's so much more likely you
 won't get it anyway.

  Linux certainly does matter to MS in the server area.  Linux/Unix
  and Apache
  web server have almost as much market share (maybe more now) than MS IIS.
 
   Same thing with Altium. If YOU decide not to upgrade because
 
  Altium's s/w
 
   doesn't run Linux, so what?  If we ALL decide not to upgrade, then
   maybe they will think seriously about Linux, but I doubt it.
 
  If we ALL decide not to, there is no maybe about it.  Altium would have
  to change or go out of business.  Of course, we won't all decide not
  to...

 I still don't know for sure. Selling upgrades to existing customer's isn't
 a way to grow a company. I think if we all told them to 'piss off' they'd
 still have a growing user base from new sales that have no knowledge of
 this group. They make way more money from an $8000 new sale as opposed to a
 $2000 upgrade. In the short term (which is where companies seem to focus)
 they could chance to loose 4 of us for each new customer. Of course they
 wouldn't have the repeated ATS money, which would hurt them in the long
 run. I'm sure most of this wouldn't happen anyway. I'm just babbling.

   The reason I don't switch to Linux (I'd like to start messing
 
  around with
  it
 
   soon) is because the apps I want to use don't support it. It's
 
  a catch 22.
 
  True.  At this time, we use Linux only on the LAN server.  If you want to
  start playing with Linux, get Mandrake Linux and set up a
  dual-boot system.
  Most Linux distros have a utility that can non-destructively shrink a
  Windows partition to make room for Linux partitions on the same drive as
  Windows partitions.  Or, buy a 40GB drive for $90 and install Linux on
  it. Make 

Re: [PEDA] Fwd: OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate function. Linux Added.

2002-07-08 Thread Don Ingram

I agree re the move to look at Linux.  Those that entertain themselves with
a daily dose of the http://www.theregister.co.uk will be no doubt starting
to think more along these lines.

My impression of the way it is going ( for what it may or may not be worth
;-) is that Microsoft is very visibly making a direct and somewhat blind
grasp at domination. Along the way it is arrogantly pushing everyone into a
corner and demanding a lot of money for what, appears to be proven on a
daily basis ( by the security reports), to be a rather suspect product. I
think that the only thing that will come of this is that people will get
their back up, as they indeed are, from Individuals and Corporations to the
European Parliament.

The end result is that Linux is getting one heck of a free ride. To date a
number of 'alternative' products are some what 'thin', it is to be hoped
that they can catch up as for all the MS bashing that takes place I still
like Excel, although I could happily lose the Word2000 virus.

As a Company we are now actively looking at ways of removing MS from our
business equation. The harder that bill pushes, the harder that we will look
elsewhere.  Currently things are tolerable, however the emerging trend in
their behaviour which feels like little more than common blackmail has us
thinking that in the future we would be better placed by avoiding them where
possible.  Interesting one of our large Clients is spending money on exactly
this eventuality.

The wildcard is that the threat of loss of market share may push them back
in their box and bring on a friendlier face ( I won't hold my breath )

Cheers

Don



* Tracking #: 133F7F6F53AC854893009551E19C04CA1FDD98E2
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Fwd: OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate function. Linux Added.

2002-07-08 Thread Igor Gmitrovic

Don,

for the same reasons I see Protel (ie Altium) starting to lose thier user base. With 
the ATS useless and increase in prices people will start looking elsewhere. How could 
they explain charging us for the ATS and then they claim to stop support for the 
P99SE. What do they want us to pay them for? What bugs have they fixed so far, does 
anyone know? Have they fixed schematic annotation? I wonder if Mr. Protel (excuse' 
moa, Altium) knows what's happening in the field and how much would their management 
care anyway. There were number of other people in this forum with the views similar to 
mine. If they don't change something it looks to me they are going M$ way, down. 
Slowly, but surely. Anyone heard of a Linux based PCB CAD program?

Igor

-Original Message-
From: Don Ingram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2002 10:03 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Fwd: OS bugs WAS: Problems with schematic annotate
function. Linux Added.


I agree re the move to look at Linux.  Those that entertain themselves with
a daily dose of the http://www.theregister.co.uk will be no doubt starting
to think more along these lines.

My impression of the way it is going ( for what it may or may not be worth
;-) is that Microsoft is very visibly making a direct and somewhat blind
grasp at domination. Along the way it is arrogantly pushing everyone into a
corner and demanding a lot of money for what, appears to be proven on a
daily basis ( by the security reports), to be a rather suspect product. I
think that the only thing that will come of this is that people will get
their back up, as they indeed are, from Individuals and Corporations to the
European Parliament.

The end result is that Linux is getting one heck of a free ride. To date a
number of 'alternative' products are some what 'thin', it is to be hoped
that they can catch up as for all the MS bashing that takes place I still
like Excel, although I could happily lose the Word2000 virus.

As a Company we are now actively looking at ways of removing MS from our
business equation. The harder that bill pushes, the harder that we will look
elsewhere.  Currently things are tolerable, however the emerging trend in
their behaviour which feels like little more than common blackmail has us
thinking that in the future we would be better placed by avoiding them where
possible.  Interesting one of our large Clients is spending money on exactly
this eventuality.

The wildcard is that the threat of loss of market share may push them back
in their box and bring on a friendlier face ( I won't hold my breath )

Cheers

Don



* Tracking #: 133F7F6F53AC854893009551E19C04CA1FDD98E2
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *