Extensionshttp://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/proto.html#extensionsare
commonly used to allow other parties to independently add fields to a
message. To avoid tag number collisions, you can assign each company a
separate extension range.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:06 AM, clayton
I'm starting to look at the patch (meant to start end of last week but got
caught up in other stuff)
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote:
Conceptually this sounds great, the big question
I'm not aware of anything in the Java library that provides this
functionality.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Ben Wright compuware...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know if this can be accomplished without resorting to JNI?
On Feb 3, 4:01 pm, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote:
C++'s
Yes, this code was added in 2.4.0.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:06 AM, dear chap dear.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately we have to use the particular compiler in question and
cannot upgrade. Is the
DescriptorBuilder::OptionInterpreter::AggregateOptionFinder new code ?
I dont see this problem
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Marco@worldcorp mmistr...@gmail.comwrote:
snip
Do i need to somehow declare extensions whenever i register my
ProtocolDecoder / ProtocolEncoder?
I don't know what ProtocolDecoder/ProtocolEncoder are, but yes, you need to
provide an ExtensionRegistry to the
This file was deleted as part of the python serialization optimizations that
were released in 2.3.0. A lot of the functionality now exists in decoder.py.
You shouldn't be relying on internal parts of the package though, so it
should only serve as a reference point for you.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at
Conceptually this sounds great, the big question to me is whether this
should be implemented as an option in the compiler or as a separate plugin.
I haven't taken a thorough look at the patch, but I'd guess it adds a decent
amount to the core code generator. I have a preference for the plugin
No, you cannot refer to arbitrary classes. Doing so would be difficult to
support across languages, and significantly complicates features like
reflection.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Marco@worldcorp mmistr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello
i was wondering if protobuffer supports having an
pm, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote:
You didn't provide a code snippet, so it's hard to say, but I would guess
that you need to provide an ExtensionRegistry and pass that to the
parsing
method. (It looks like you are working in Java)
e.g.
ExtensionRegistry extensionRegistry
Added to the wiki, thanks for contributing!
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:46 PM, blake.mizer...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm please to give the Ruby developers here Beefcake.
https://github.com/bmizerany/beefcake/tree/master/lib/beefcake
I would appreciate it if someone would list this on the
You didn't provide a code snippet, so it's hard to say, but I would guess
that you need to provide an ExtensionRegistry and pass that to the parsing
method. (It looks like you are working in Java)
e.g.
ExtensionRegistry extensionRegistry = ExtensionRegistry.newInstance();
It will be rather difficult to correct for the error. The point at which the
parse fails may not be the point of corruption: e.g., the corruption may be
in a byte that is part of a varint, and the continuation bit may be set when
it shouldn't. Similarly you could have a corruption in the length
Can you provide a small, self-contained reproduction of the program?
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Louhike louh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Google Protobuf with python on a project.
My problem is I get an error while my program tries to build an
instance with the function
There are many things that need to be read from imported .proto files to
determine if the .proto is valid, or to produce correct code. e.g.:
- need to differentiate between enum and message imports
- when referencing a qualified type like foo.bar.Baz.Qux, you need to know
what components are
Add -static to your ld command to link the program statically.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:38 AM, triStone liulei1...@gmail.com wrote:
When I use this program in another computer, it reminder me that
error while loading shared libraries: libprotobuf.so.6: cannot open
shared object file: No
You are parsing the serialization as a RefundRequest, not a Request. The 1
that is being returned is the value of the api_call field - on the wire this
looks like the order_id field - both have tag 1 and are varint encoded.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Simeon Mitev
See other thread
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Simeon Mitev simeon.mi...@alegram.comwrote:
Hi all,
I have a strange behavior with java release 2.3.0 and I need your help:
Protos.proto:
...
message Request {
required Api api_call = 1;
extensions 100 to 200;
}
message
As Adam said, -1 has a representation that is not just a single 0xFF. To
decode a varint, you have to read the bytes until the most significant bit
is 0. (See
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/encoding.html#varints)
Note that int32 values are sign-extended for wire compatibility
This compiler is 10 years old, and apparently is not even an official
release: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html. You should upgrade to a newer
version.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Pinakin Mevawala pmevaw...@gmail.comwrote:
Not able to do so. Any help?
[root@localhost protobuf-2.3.0]#
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Linus suram.su...@gmail.com wrote:
I am new to PB and I just ran into this. Is it possible that the PB
compiler does not generate set_... methods for some nested messages?
Here is an example: I don't see set_... methods for ANY of the
parameters in the db
By the way this is documented here:
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/reference/cpp-generated.html#fields
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Linus suram.su...@gmail.com wrote:
I am new to PB and I just ran
You should be using toByteArray(), not getBytes(), to serialize to the
protobuf wire format. You also need to delimit the messages. Otherwise, the
first ParseFromCodedStream call will consume as many bytes as are available
in the byte array.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Fishtank
Yup.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:31 AM, quickRiposte quickripo...@gmail.comwrote:
Is the GPBUF Float the equivalent of the IEEE754 Float (i.e. 4 bytes)?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hate to tell you this, but this looks pretty much identical to the
TextFormat (text_format.{cc,h}) that's already provided by the library (and
the wrapper methods Message::DebugString() and friends). Or are you using
lite mode, which doesn't support this because it's reflection based?
(Generating
Well, that depends on how you set up your map. You could instead make the
key a pointer to the protobuf field, and define your comparator so that it
dereferences the pointer. Of course you need to make sure that the pointer
is actually valid: if you mutate the field you may invalidate the pointer.
Yes, renaming fields is a wire compatible change. You might break things
that use human readable formats like TextFormat, and of course any code that
references the old field name.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Cameron cameron.develo...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm pretty sure I already know the
It should be pretty straightforward to implement an io::ZeroCopyInputStream
that provides the byte stream using these iterators.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:30 PM, idleman evoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am just wondering if it should be possible to parse from a iterator
range? Say
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:26 PM, AdamM adammaga...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to return the entire extension part of the message into
a separate message like:
message Foo {
extensions 100 to 199;
}
message Baz {
extend Foo {
optional int32 bar = 126;
}
}
In C++ Code:
You can't just parse any message type into *DescriptorProto. Those are
protocol buffers which represent the type definition of other protocol
buffers (e.g. your Request msg). You want to use DynamicMessage in order to
operate on generic messages.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:55 AM, maninder batth
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Jun8 ctaski...@gmail.com wrote:
I've Google for a day now and could not find full information on the
following problem.
I want to serialize protobuf messages in C++, send them to a JMS
(using activemq-cpp API) and parse in my Java server. Based on what I
Looks like Kenton didn't get around to this, so I added it to the wiki.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Brian Palmer br...@codekitchen.netwrote:
I think just the github page for the project would be great. Thanks!
http://github.com/mozy/ruby-protocol-buffers
-- Brian
On Oct 26, 2010, at
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.comwrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Himanshu Srivastava
him.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jason,
In code:
////
DescriptorPool descriptor_pool;
for (int i = 0; i
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Raghav raghav.swa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi I am new to learning google protocol buffers. I have following
questions on my mind when I went throught all te content availiable on
website.
1. What should I know for learning google protocol buffers. I mean is
As Kenton said, including plugin.proto would bloat the core library. Only
people implementing proto compilers such as yourself need to use it.
On the C++ side, you would typically just build a statically linked binary
that has all of the plugin generated code linked in. It's not included in
the
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:29 AM, users moofis...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Kenton and Jason for the advice. I have a couple more
questions as I move forward with PB implementations.
In the documentation it states that PBs don't make good first class
citizens in an OO domain model and
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Igor Gatis igorga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote:
Indeed, maps have been brought up repeatedly. I forget the current state
of the discussion, but I think it's generally agreed that it would be a good
In Java, you need to make sure that you provide an ExtensionRegistry when
you parse the message. You will need to create an ExtensionRegistry
instance, add the extensions that you want to access, and then pass it to
mergeFrom/parseFrom. Otherwise, the extensions will just get treated as an
unknown
You typically want to specify imports relative to your project root, and
run protoc from that directory. Then the includes would be generated
as #include
pathCommon/CommonMsgs.pb.h (I'm assuming you have your project's root in
the include path for your compiler)
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:58 AM,
Yes, this behavior is normal. The wire format is not self delimiting, so
there's no way to tell when one message ends and another starts.
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/techniques.html#streaming
As you mentioned, you can use ParseFromBoundedZeroCopyStream to restrict the
number
on public
domain, though.
Thanks and Regards,
Himanshu
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote:
It occurred to me that protoc shouldn't accept your file either. Did
it really compile successfully? What do you actually get in your
FileDescriptorSet
1) I would guess the problem is that the action message type refers to
undefined types eaction_type and ereason. There are probably error messages
farther up indicating that action could not be built. Because action isn't a
valid type, RecordHeader can't refer to it, and thinks that action is an
It occurred to me that protoc shouldn't accept your file either. Did
it really compile successfully? What do you actually get in your
FileDescriptorSet?
On Wednesday, September 22, 2010, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote:
1) I would guess the problem is that the action message type refers
MSVC has different versions of STL: it appears it may change between
compiler versions, and also between debug and release, even for the same
compiler version. You need to make sure that you build your project with the
same C runtime as the probouf lib. Here are some past threads on the issue:
was forbar.StringMap.
The protos were made and compiled first for .Net which seem to work
with the file reference.member
The Java compiler wanted package.member.
thanks for the help.
On Sep 10, 12:30 pm, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote:
Yes, imports are paths, so use import com/foo/bar/some.proto
Different people have different opinions on this. There are cases where
required may work fine, and with care, you can even change a required field
to an optional one. However, required field checking has led to some
significant problems in the past, so many advocate avoiding required
altogether.
Hmm, a lovely ICE in gcc. You might try filing a bug with them or checking
to see if there are known issues with Mingw32's gcc. I don't know of an easy
way to omit python support. A quick hack would be to just modify
python_generator.cc to be empty, which would hopefully get rid of the error.
On
Yes, imports are paths, so use import com/foo/bar/some.proto; The paths
need to be specified relative to the --proto_path, not the location of the
file with the import statement.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:40 AM, users moofis...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried putting the import path in
Can you provide a small reproduction of the problem? A couple common errors:
- custom options need to be specified as option (option_name) = value;
(parentheses around the identifier)
- if you're using the option in a different package than the one in which
its defined, it needs to be qualified
Can you provide a small reproduction of the problem? The generated code
should not be doing any UTF8 validation. Is it possible you have a field
defined elsewhere that has type 'string'?
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Mk kuznetsov.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I get funny problem. In proto file I
I'm confused. You mention using pure Java reflection, yet you also said you
are trying to do some stuff with protobuf reflection. You should not be
using Java reflection at all.
To get the field type, as defined in the .proto file, use
FieldDescriptor.getType()
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:29 AM,
Default values for required fields do mean that: use the default if not
explicitly set. This only affects the in-memory object, though -
IsInitialized() will still fail if a required field is not set. However,
such a proto would be usable by a client that does not do required field
checking by
Oh, indeed enum_types_by_name is what you want - my bad!
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Mike mspie...@gmail.com wrote:
Got it, Thanks!
In your first statement, I believe the method is actually
enum_types_by_name - at least that's what worked for me.
On Aug 26, 12:29 am, Jason Hsueh jas
If you want to serialize them as one message, make your definition do
exactly that:
message CombinedTypes {
optional int32 int32_val = 1;
optional double double_val = 2;
optional float float_val = 3;
}
Note that you can make the code generator produce effectively the same code
you describe
I added this to the ThirdPartyAddOns wiki as well. Thanks for contributing
to the protobuf community!
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Eugene Vigdorchik
eugene.vigdorc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce the birth of scala-protobuf project. You can
find the sources at
This has come up before on the list, for instance
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/browse_thread/thread/6f4812e30a63b88aand
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/browse_thread/thread/368f5b0518775a9d
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Prakash Rao prakashrao1...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Is it
();
codedInputStream.popLimit(s1SizeEntry);
int s2Size = codedInputStream.readRawVarint32();
int s2SizeEntry = codedInputStream.pushLimit(s2Size);
String s2 = codedInputStream.readString();
codedInputStream.popLimit(modifiedBySizeEntry);
Regards,
Prakash
On Aug 11, 9:17 pm, Jason Hsueh jas
Here are some previous threads on the subject:
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/browse_thread/thread/1699791071e92c83
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/browse_thread/thread/30d76b08545a0097
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Peng dupeng...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does protobuf generate
Added to the wiki, thanks!
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Jeff Plaisance jeffplaisa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I have written a compiler plugin that generates type safe scala
wrappers for the java protoc output. It creates wrappers for each
message type that use the scala Option type for
Suppose those strings are all defined as optional fields in the message.
They may not be present in the serialization, so the decoder needs to read a
tag to determine the field number and type before handling the value.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Prakash Rao prakashrao1...@gmail.comwrote:
ParseFromFileDescriptor will read until there is no more input. This is
consistent with behavior when parsing from other types of input streams, as
the message wire format is not self delimiting. For file descriptors, that
means you have to reach EOF. As such, ParseFromFileDescriptor is only
The setters need a (non-const) pointer to the message object. It appears
fractal_handle is a reference since the getter, which takes a const
reference to a message, compiles.
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:42 AM, mark.t.macdon...@googlemail.com
mark.t.macdon...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can you please
Groups are primarily deprecated because it used to be the case that groups
could not be reused in other types. Now groups can be reused, but other
messages must use the length-delimited format, rather than the group format.
In theory, the fact that groups do not require a length prefix makes them
Added to the wiki.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Igor Gatis igorga...@gmail.com wrote:
Here it is:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-j2me/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to
What are you trying to do? Does the Javadoc help?
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/reference/java/com/google/protobuf/ByteString.html
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:07 AM, David david.kum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit ashamed to ask this, but does anyone know how to use
What exactly do you want to know about them? There are various details about
how they adapt zlib to the ZeroCopy*Stream interfaces, but as a client you
shouldn't need to worry about that. You can use them just like any other
ZeroCopyStream.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Julian González
but first I got an error telling
me zlib.h could not be found and I was also wondering if I can use
GzipOutputStream along with CodedOutputStream?
El 29 de julio de 2010 14:59, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com escribió:
What exactly do you want to know about them? There are various details
about
Messages without any required fields are allowed to have an empty
serialization, so the library cannot assume that parsing empty input is an
error. You just need to test cin.eof() separately.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:18 AM, jetcube pmlo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a simple app that received
The C++ implementation does have a singleton registry, which allows it to
magically parse extensions that are linked into the binary. This behavior
can be somewhat confusing though since it relies on what the linker decides
to do with generated code. The Java implementation uses an object oriented
.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Nader Salehi sal...@alumni.usc.eduwrote:
If any dependency needs to be build beforehand, then how is
topological ordering is supported?
On 7/21/2010 17:39 Jason Hsueh writes:
Ordering is important because any dependencies need to be built before
Ordering is important because any dependencies need to be built before they
are used - if you give an arbitrary order there may be errors complaining
about undefined symbols or imports not being found. A depth first ordering
will work, and that's exactly what protoc does when producing
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:47 PM, mark.t.macdon...@googlemail.com
mark.t.macdon...@googlemail.com wrote:
I am new and want to understand the purpose/usage of default values in
the .proto file. E.g:
test
{
optional string a 1 [default =test];
}
When I create a message object and read the
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Galder Zamarreno
market...@zamarreno.comwrote:
Hi,
I want to use protobuf as a generic marshalling mechanism and I'm
having some issues with the unmarshalling part, because I need
knowledge of what needs to be unmarshalled, i.e. in Java, access to
static
See http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/cpptutorial.html under the
section The Protocol Buffer API
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:08 AM, jd unicom...@gmail.com wrote:
Where are the hasXXX methods that are available in C++?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Yes, you can write the plug-in in the language of your choice.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:08 AM, qrilka qri...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to use other languages?
E.g. python?
Kind regards,
Kirill Zaborsky
On 2 июн, 20:25, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote:
Does the test plugin
The library provides a standard text format (TextFormat classes in C++ and
Java, text_format.py for python). If that doesn't work for you, you could
write your own serializers around reflection, much like TextFormat.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Vladimir Danishevsky danishev...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Dheeraj Pandey
dhee...@alumni.utexas.netwrote:
Java doesn't have such a thing. Is this by design? If yes, would love to
understand the rationale of why
clearing-everything-and-reinserting-(N-1)-values is so much better than:
(a) providing an API to do so, and
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Ananth Arockia ananth.aroc...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I am exploring protobuf to use it in my project.
I would like to have a message defined in a .proto file. All the
fields in this message would be optional due to the fact that the
message producer in my
Yes, '\0' may appear in the binary format. output-size() will return the
correct result: C++ string can store null characters without any issue.
However, strlen(output-c_str()) and other calls that assume null-terminated
C strings will not.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:30 PM, mistlike
. Rather convoluted,
but we don't have a better way.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote:
Hm. Can you send the code snippet you are using to try to access your
custom option? You should just be accessing the options proto from
FieldDescriptor::options(), and calling
Hm. Can you send the code snippet you are using to try to access your custom
option? You should just be accessing the options proto from
FieldDescriptor::options(), and calling GetExtension() on that.
Also, UnknownFields doesn't have anything to do with options extensions. Did
you mean
No, protobuf accessors never return null. For message fields, you get the
default instance of the message type.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Jax jax...@gmail.com wrote:
This should be pretty straightforward, but I couldn't find it in any
of the documentation on default values.
A slight
,I can only hold 10,000 pageids
4.so the server app knows it,so app just serialize 10,000 pageids into
memory instead of 1,000,000 pageids.
I hope I clarify it now.. If the protobuf doesn't implement it, do you
have any idea about it?.
On Jun 3, 12:40 am, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote
is based on
protobuf. On the top,my app faces a lot of small stream packets in
protobuf]
Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/dirlt
于 2010/6/4 0:21, Jason Hsueh 写道:
This really needs to be handled in the application since protobuf has no
idea which fields are expendable or can be truncated
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:31 AM, mark.t.macdon...@googlemail.com
mark.t.macdon...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Linux Mint, and trying to get started with protobuf-2.3.0.
My install was as follows (no problems reported that I could see):
./configure --prefix=/usr
make clean
make
Does the test plugin help? There is a test code generator that is used in
the unittest for command_line_interface.cc:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/browse/trunk/src/google/protobuf/compiler/mock_code_generator.cc
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:00 AM, marcmo oliver.muel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:21 AM, bnh baoneng...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using a protobuf as the protocol for a distributed system.But now
I
have some questions about protobuf
a.Whether protobuf provides the inteface for user-defined allocator
because sometimes I find 'malloc' cost too much?
Can you provide more details? What commands are you running, and what are
your errors? In your previous thread it sounded like you were using C++, but
now you mention Java - which language are you trying to use? Also, are you
attempting to use the lite library or the full library? It seems most
If you compile with the macro GOOGLE_PROTOBUF_UTF8_VALIDATION_ENABLED
defined, the C++ code will do UTF8 validation. However, it doesn't prevent
the data from serializing or parsing, it will simply log an error message.
How would you like it to fail?
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:15 PM, JT Olds
There is a default byte size limit of 64MB when parsing protocol buffers -
if a message is larger than that, it will fail to parse. This can be
configured if you really need to parse larger messages, but it is generally
not recommended. Additionally, ByteSize() returns a 32-bit integer, so
there's
I think this is http://b/issue?id=2267627
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Igor Gatis igorga...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed. So I guess I need to start looking for the deadlock in my code. Do
you know any tool to help me out on that?
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Christopher Smith
Err. Got my mailing lists mixed up. I think this is due to
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6501158 The suggested workaround has
been to force initialization of your classes in main, before threads are
spawned.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote:
I think
Check out the docs:
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/techniques.html#union
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Vince vincedup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If I want to serialize many message in the same pipe,
do I need one master message that includes all the others in
optional
Yes, you can. What is your target language? The accessor names are generated
differently - in C++ you would get lower-cased names. Have you looked at the
generated header? You may also want to see
http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/style.html
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Jacques
Clients with the old binary will not be able to read messages containing the
new enum value. This would get treated as an unknown field, meaning that the
type field would not be sent in an older client. Since your field is also
required, it would fail to parse. So, with this example, you would
No, there isn't any way to remove the dependency. The compiler doesn't try
to detect why you defined an import.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Igor Gatis igorga...@gmail.com wrote:
So, let's say I'm developing a plugin which, say, add or removes builder
pattern to java generator (this is
... ).
So, later we have: enum Type { POP = 0, PUSH = 1, TOP = 2, TAIL = 3,
UNKNOWN = 100 } and so on ...
Or it really does not matter?
Is this the recommended approach for this pattern? Or should I be
using extends?
-john
On May 14, 3:15 pm, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote
Added to the list, thanks!
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 7:46 AM, orbang gyorgy.or...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've created a pluggable protobuf RPC impl based on Apache CXF:
http://code.google.com/p/cxf-protobuf/
Could you please list it on the
Your msg is completely empty. There aren't any entries in the repeated field
- FieldSize() should be returning 0. Your loop needs to terminate when i
size, not i = size - accessing the 1st element of an empty repeated field
is going to return an invalid pointer.
FYI bounds checking is done in
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com wrote:
- Is there a way to avoid attributes ?
I mean something like an internal metadata where we can define the
identifier of each member.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. By attributes do you mean field options?
Can you
a fundamental step here =)
Thanks for the help!
-Ryan
On May 4, 12:23 pm, Jason Hsueh jas...@google.com wrote:
Your msg is completely empty. There aren't any entries in the repeated
field
- FieldSize() should be returning 0. Your loop needs to terminate when i
size, not i = size
101 - 200 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
