http://www.zeroc.com/vsplugin.html
From: Kenton Varda [mailto:ken...@google.com]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 12:18 PM
To: George Georgiev
Cc: Protocol Buffers
Subject: Re: protoc feature question
Is there precedent for other tools like protoc providing
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Well, the build-if-newer is handled by either Make or VisualStudio, not
by the compiler in either case.
Right, the link is to a build system plugin. I'm all for build system
plugins for protocol buffers but those
Buffers
Subject: Re: protoc feature question
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Monty Taylor
mord...@inaugust.commailto:mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Well, the build-if-newer is handled by either Make or VisualStudio, not
by the compiler in either case.
Right, the link is to a build system plugin. I'm
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:25 PM, George Georgiev georgi.georg...@citrix.com
wrote:
How exactly this will handle the problem with the different output files?
It won't -- like I said, it's not what you were asking for.
We're still saying that your issue is the responsibility of the build
Varda; Monty Taylor; Protocol Buffers
Subject: Re: protoc feature question
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:22 PM, George Georgiev georgi.georg...@citrix.com
wrote:
I think that protoc already has a compromise with pure compiler
functionality - namely placing the java class in the package subfolder
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:22 PM, George Georgiev georgi.georg...@citrix.com
wrote:
I think that protoc already has a compromise with pure compiler
functionality - namely placing the java class in the package subfolder.
Since you have so strong fillings not to make another compromise you
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:16 PM, George Georgiev
georgi.georg...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to tell to protoc to recompile the files only if the output
files are missing or are older than the input file?
Isn't this what makefiles are for ?
-h
: Thursday, September 10, 2009 4:21 PM
To: George Georgiev
Cc: Protocol Buffers
Subject: Re: protoc feature question
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:16 PM, George Georgiev georgi.georg...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to tell to protoc to recompile the files only if the
output files
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Henner Zeller h.zel...@acm.org wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:26 PM, George Georgiev
georgi.georg...@citrix.com wrote:
Sure, but it is really hard for me to prepare something general since the
java output files are located in a different folders based
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Henner Zeller h.zel...@acm.org wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:26 PM, George Georgiev
georgi.georg...@citrix.com wrote:
Sure, but it is really hard for me to prepare something
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:59 PM, George Georgiev georgi.georg...@citrix.com
wrote:
So you suggest if I change the java package in a proto file, I to update
the makefile too?
That seems reasonable to me. If you changed the package of any of your
other Java files it would mean moving source
Henner Zeller wrote:
And if you do it from an ant-buildfile (often used
in java projects) then it would be as well hard as ant has not really
a notion of file-dependencies (yeah, ant sucks as build-tool).
Perhaps you are looking for uptodate or dependset
-O
, 2009 5:45 PM
To: George Georgiev; Protocol Buffers
Subject: Re: protoc feature question
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:59 PM, George Georgiev
georgi.georg...@citrix.commailto:georgi.georg...@citrix.com wrote:
So you suggest if I change the java package in a proto file, I to update the
makefile too
13 matches
Mail list logo
