When using pip install, a temporary folder will be created in /tmp/ so
../src/google/protobuf/... cannot be found in /tmp
so just
ln -s /path/to/src/ /tmp/ (absolute path)
then in ../protobuf-2.x.x/python/
pip install .
在 2010年2月9日星期二 UTC+8下午12:09:38，prot...@googlecode.com写道：
>
>
> Comment
Comment #52 on issue 66 by gregory@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Workaround: use easy_install's --allow-hosts options to force downloading
from PyPI:
easy_install --allow-hosts pypi.python.org protobuf
Worked for me
Comment #51 on issue 66 by a...@northisup.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Can somebody update the file at
http://protobuf.googlecode.com/files/protobuf-2.4.1.zip?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
Comment #50 on issue 66 by rem...@google.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
I'm not sure why easy_install insists on using
http://protobuf.googlecode.com/files/protobuf-2.4.1.zip (which hasn't been
updated) instead of the PyPI vers
Comment #49 on issue 66 by sneakatdatav...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
This is live again as of 10 Jun 2012 with the default setuptools/python2.7
that ship on current osx:
europa:~▻ easy_install protobuf
Searching for
Comment #48 on issue 66 by stevv...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Installation error with protobuf 2.4.1
There is a case when you try to install pydoozerlib via python setup.py
install and run into following error:
[
Comment #47 on issue 66 by jens.ran...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Just curious, is the issue mentioned here:
https://github.com/cloudControl/PyDoozerLib/blob/master/README.md related
to this issue? Or is it a new one?
Comment #46 on issue 66 by stevv...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Confirmed working with pip on Mac OS X 10.7 with virtualenv.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol
Buffers"
Comment #45 on issue 66 by rem...@google.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Issue 311 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol
Buffers" group.
To post to
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: rem...@google.com
Comment #44 on issue 66 by rem...@google.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
I fixed setup.py and uploaded v2.4.1 to PyPI. It should work fine now --
tested with pip and
Comment #43 on issue 66 by stevv...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Three years and no fix to such a simple problem? Sad google.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol
Buffers"
Comment #42 on issue 66 by heathe...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
No updates on this?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol
Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send emai
Comment #41 on issue 66 by m...@bakedbeans.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Is anything being done on this ticket?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol
Buffers" group.
To post to th
Comment #40 on issue 66 by james.pe...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
I'm not sure if this is a perfect solution but it seems to work.
It appears as though the first pass through setup.py finds the file
(descriptor.proto) i
Comment #39 on issue 66 by dan.ostr...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Apparently this issue still exists? Why is there no ownership on this
ticket?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Comment #38 on issue 66 by wins...@netwok.org: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Sorin: your setup script uses setuptools, not distutils, and has at least
one bug: it uses py_modules instead of packages. I’d recommend the
official doc
Comment #37 on issue 66 by timothee.peignier: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
You can't replace file on pypi if you're not the original author, unless
original author give you permission.
Unless you change the package name ...
--
You
Comment #36 on issue 66 by sorin.sb...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
I you do not know how to properly define setup.py and to deploy a package
to PyPI please take a look at https://github.com/ssbarnea/tendo -
release.sh
Comment #35 on issue 66 by wins...@netwok.org: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Are you sure you cannot remove a file hosted on PyPI and reupload it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol
Comment #34 on issue 66 by remoun.metyas: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
I adapted protobuf-2.4.1 to a format that pip and easy_install can parse.
Since I can't upload it to PyPI, I put it in a GitHub repository:
http://github.com/rem/
Comment #33 on issue 66 by techto...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
@jparise: PyPI returns link to home page. It is easy_install "intelligence"
that scans the page and finds "updated" distribution on protobuf home page.
A
Comment #31 on issue 66 by jparise: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
No, that appears to be a separate problem with protobuf-2.4.0a. For some
reason, PyPI is returning the full distribution archive instead of just the
protobuf Python pa
Comment #30 on issue 66 by sto...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Is this the same issue?
sudo easy_install protobuf
Searching for protobuf
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/protobuf/
Reading http://code.google.com/p/prot
Comment #29 on issue 66 by klep...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
I'd also like to see this fixed. I played around and found that with the
following file in the base of the tarball everything (at least with our
buildout)
Comment #28 on issue 66 by jparise: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Timothee Peignier's patch is very helpful. It extended his work with the
attached patch to cover one more remaining issue.
The 'clean' step was always removing generat
Comment #27 on issue 66 by dusan.maliarik: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
I do also suffer from this issue, and it forces me to move out protobuf
from my pip requirements.txt, and store it in my code base :( not nice
--
You received th
Comment #26 on issue 66 by ken...@google.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Thanks, will look into this when doing the next release (which should be
soon).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
Comment #25 on issue 66 by timothee.peignier: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
This is a diff to make protobuf more compatible with easy_install/pip and
recent version of setuptools/distribute. It's remove `ez_setup` dependency
and do
Comment #24 on issue 66 by infralite: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Confirm same issue with techtonik but I want to add more:
1) Initially I was suspecting this was virtualenv's fault but this happens
with and without a virtualenv.
2)
Comment #23 on issue 66 by techtonik: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Running `python -m easy_install protobuf` yields the following error:
Downloading http://protobuf.googlecode.com/files/protobuf-2.3.0.zip
Processing protobuf-2.3.0.zip
er
Comment #22 on issue 66 by qrilka: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
BTW also you can not also install protobug with pip (using "pip install
protobuf")
It's a bit disappointing to see such a good library not working well with
standard
py
Comment #21 on issue 66 by alexei.dvoretskii: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Our python2.6 installation on windows lives in W:\Python\Python26 and I was
able to
install the egg into
W:\Python\Python26\Lib\site-packages\protobuf-2.3.
Comment #20 on issue 66 by spaans: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
you could release a 2.3.1 specifically to fix this issue - I've had to add
a 2.5 and
a 2.6 egg to our svn tree to prevent buildout from fetching the (wrong)
zipfile when
Comment #19 on issue 66 by ken...@google.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
There's not a schedule. I'd imagine/hope it would happen within the next
couple
months, but can't guarantee anything.
I wish there were a way to test this
Comment #18 on issue 66 by danhomerick: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Alright. What's the schedule for the next release? If there is one, that
is. =)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of thi
Updates:
Labels: -Component-Docs
Comment #17 on issue 66 by ken...@google.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
I have no idea how that label got added to my previous comment.
--
You received this message because you are listed i
Updates:
Labels: Component-Docs
Comment #16 on issue 66 by ken...@google.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Unfortunately I don't think PyPi will let me upload another copy unless I
bump the
version number... :/
--
You rec
Comment #15 on issue 66 by danhomerick: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Let me know if that solves the problem.
No luck -- it's still favoring the googlecode download over the PyPi source
dist.
So... we could be a bit more specific in
Comment #14 on issue 66 by ken...@google.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Done. It gave me an error because the bdist was already uploaded but I'm
guessing
that doesn't matter. It looks like the source dist is now listed on
pyp
Comment #13 on issue 66 by danhomerick: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Regarding testing, I would use virtualenv:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/virtualenv
It creates an isolated python environment which has setuptools preinstalled.
--
You
Comment #12 on issue 66 by danhomerick: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Done. Did it work? How do I test it?
Yes, it worked for Python 2.5 (which is the version you're using,
presumably). It
didn't work for other versions of Python, h
Comment #11 on issue 66 by ken...@google.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Could you try the following from protobuf-2.3.0/python:
python setup.py bdist_egg upload
Done. Did it work? How do I test it?
I think it's possible to c
Comment #10 on issue 66 by danhomerick: cannot install using easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
I think what's going on is:
1. easy_install is finding that egg at pypi.python.org is out of date
(v2.0.3) as
compared to the main download page (v2.3.0) and chooses
43 matches
Mail list logo
