On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:24 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > ...
>
> > The best way to cater to the developer scenario you mention is to simply
> > look at install_manifest.txt. This file is generated whenever you type
> make
> > install a
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:35 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:24 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > ...
>
> > The best way to cater to the developer scenario you mention is to simply
> > look at install_manifest.txt. This file is generated whenever you type make
> > install
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:24 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> ...
> The best way to cater to the developer scenario you mention is to simply
> look at install_manifest.txt. This file is generated whenever you type make
> install and will provide a much more accurate check on whether the install
> i
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 17:51 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Darryl L. Pierce
> wrote:
>
> I disagree:
>
Are you disagreeing with me or Darryl or both? ;-)
There are two scenarios that we care about:
>
>
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 17:51 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
I disagree:
There are two scenarios that we care about:
1. The install prefix of proton is the same as the install prefix of the
perl/php/etc.
In this case everything just works
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:08:24PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > > Okay, then a developer has to explicitly override the INI directory
> each
> > > time. For the EXT and INCLUDE directories it's easy to do what we're
> > > doing in Pe
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:08:24PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > Okay, then a developer has to explicitly override the INI directory each
> > time. For the EXT and INCLUDE directories it's easy to do what we're
> > doing in Perl now to override the prefix. That feels a little clumsy to
> > me
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 11:12 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Darryl L. Pierce
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > > > > It seems like this new stuff just
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 11:12:02AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Darryl L. Pierce
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > > > > It seems like this new s
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 11:12 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > > > It seems like this new stuff just ignores CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX.
> > >
> > > Yeah, it appears that th
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 11:12:02AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > > > It seems like this new stuff just ignores CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX.
> > >
> > > Yeah, it appears
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > > It seems like this new stuff just ignores CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX.
> >
> > Yeah, it appears that the CMake configuration for Proton doesn't do what
> > Qpid's configurati
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Alan Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 08:55 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Darryl L. Pierce
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:24:25PM -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 17:16 -0500, Darr
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:55:32AM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> The other builds don't manually prepend the install prefix, however they
> still honor it where appropriate by using relative paths. Cmake will
> automatically prepend the install prefix for you if you just use a relative
> path. I
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > It seems like this new stuff just ignores CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX.
>
> Yeah, it appears that the CMake configuration for Proton doesn't do what
> Qpid's configuration did as far as prepending the install prefix to
> directories. No
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 08:55 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:24:25PM -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 17:16 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > > > I've pushed the Perl language bindin
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:24:25PM -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 17:16 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > > I've pushed the Perl language bindings as well as the send/recv
> examples
> > > for using the qpid::prot
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:24:25PM -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 17:16 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > I've pushed the Perl language bindings as well as the send/recv examples
> > for using the qpid::proton::Messenger and qpid::proton::Message classes.
>
> These changes
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 17:16 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> I've pushed the Perl language bindings as well as the send/recv examples
> for using the qpid::proton::Messenger and qpid::proton::Message classes.
These changes break "make install" for a developer build installing in a
non system locat
19 matches
Mail list logo
