On Jan 15, 2:28 am, Dan danwd...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
So, what concrete steps can I help with? Some of the things that I'd
like to see are:
- Make the documentation searchable
- Implement developer input within the api documentation website
- Add user-submitted code feature, much like
sites and hobby coding,
and these do not necessarily need that kind of structure in their
projects.
Of course, this list could be argued for a long time, but I think that
the general idea is the same.
-yanick
On Nov 18, 11:05 pm, Jerod Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like TJs list. However
Hi Tom,
The Prototype version hosted by Google seems not to be compressed. I
haven't look deep, but if it loads this URL
http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/prototype/1.6.0.2/prototype.js ,
then it is not compressed.
yanick
On Oct 3, 12:22 am, Tom Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
end; ++i) {
yield i;
}
};
var n = [0 for each (i in range(0,20))]
// [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
info from:http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/New_in_JavaScript_1.7
On Jun 8, 2:44 am, Jay Tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 3, 10:06 am, Yanick [EMAIL PROTECTED
worthy, I
think it could make a pretty addon.)
yanick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
in a specific way that
Ajax.Updater doesn't do, it is, IMHO, that it adds duplicate code to
the core. If I am mistaking, please help me see the light here.
yanick
On Apr 27, 4:51 pm, I. E. Smith-Heisters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw in the archives that someone was looking for an Ajax.Replacer
class
}
In conclusion, and IMHO, you should not rely on such functions in your
Web application. Not until the W3C releases a new JS standard with
native Class implementation.
Hope this clears out things a bit.
-yanick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
.. which brings this thought : why isn't there a sprintf()-like
function in Prototype ?
On Dec 20, 8:49 pm, Tobie Langel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
There is no built-in support for I18N.
However, implementing it in JavaScript is trivial.
For a pointer on how to do this have a look at
I have been working on a Element.toHTML function, and added two
methods to the Element object. And I was looking for any insight about
my code. Please, feel free to comment. Thanks.
start
html
head
/head
body
div id=container
div id=test_div
On 4 oct, 07:07, Sven Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I´m new to the source code, and had big trouble reading it.
Well there's a perfect API reference on the Web to help you learn
the library. Why would you need to sniff the source code?
URL : http://www.prototypejs.org/api
With the
On 28 sep, 09:51, Yanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried some twists and try to call the parent method foo, but I
failed to see how this can be accomplished with $super and the actual
implementation. In the other hand, consider this blog post
:http://www.severnsolutions.co.uk/twblog
On 27 sep, 12:22, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/07, Ryan Gahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, then it does work, my apologies :)
Every implementation breaks if you use it wrong.
Talking about implementations, I understand why the proto team decided
to add $super as first
not the best guy to provide more test with this matter,
but I'm pretty sure some of you already have the proper setup to do
them. So I'm leaving this into your more capable hands.
Thank you.
yanick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
13 matches
Mail list logo
