[Proto-Scripty] Re: The Unofficial Wiki

2010-04-12 Thread Eric
Hi, Instead of moving the wiki content to official prototype's page, couldn't we just rename it as Official Wiki and link it from the prototypejs homepage? This would allows more peoples to find the content while still let them add/edit content if they wish it. The howtos (and some of the tips)

[Proto-Scripty] Re: The Unofficial Wiki

2010-04-09 Thread T.J. Crowder
Hi, I think the site needs an integrated contribution system for Prototype Extensions, better than jQuery's(http://plugins.jquery.com/). One thing at a time. :-) And of course, there's scripteka.com. Some want something easier than learning git, rake, lighthouse, etc.,  in order to

[Proto-Scripty] Re: The Unofficial Wiki

2010-04-08 Thread T.J. Crowder
And my answer: I really like having something owned by the community, but I don't see much point if there's no itch to scratch. People are more likely to find content on the main site than in an unofficial wiki somewhere. As long as contributing to the site is _easy_, well- publicized, and not a

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: The Unofficial Wiki

2010-04-08 Thread Shane McCarron
I agree - a central site that is easy to contribute to seems the best path. On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:29 AM, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote: And my answer: I really like having something owned by the community, but I don't see much point if there's no itch to scratch. People are

[Proto-Scripty] Re: The Unofficial Wiki

2010-04-08 Thread disccomp
T.J. Crowder: Question: Do we need a wiki with user-generated content? We should: just move all of the relevant content to the Prototype website and make sure the process for contributing to the website is well-publicized, easy, and efficient I think the site needs an integrated