i cant see a question .. perhaps i am blind - it is monday afterall !!
- Original Message -
From: Marcus Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 3:12 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Window Scrolling -- sortables.create() and
Thank for the answer
a href=javacript:; onclick=call function here/a
if you want to make xmlhttp request yopu can use Ajax library of prototype
example:
var url=index.php?mod=game;
new Ajax.Request(url,{parameters:params});
What is meaning of call function here can you make a 1
hi
it's possible to make an element that was inserted on the page by
ajax.update draggable ?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to
So, why can't your scripts be in the head? Do you know you can add
scripts to the head dynamically? Like this:
for example, pixelpost photoblog, you want to only load these in the
image_template.html, and have a header.html+footer.html defined, the
scripts will have to go in the body.
I
Hello,
I have the same problem, but I used scriptaculous 1.8.1 and I didn't
have any problem until they released the last version 1.8.2 and Google
updated the library.
I use Google Ajax API Loader (Prototype+Scriptaculous) and Google Maps
API.
Thanks.
On 28 nov, 16:03, mascix [EMAIL
Hi all,
Well to tell u the truth i dont know anything about protype but
eager to use it.
i have written a function
function al()
{
var scrollCovered=document.viewport.getScrollOffsets()['top']
+document.viewport.getHeight();
... sleeping on it during the week end helped ... dont even know how i
missed that:
this works:
{action:saveDraft,artId:12,texts['fr']:du
textefrancais,texts['en']:some
english text}}
my answer was in my question
[SOLVED]
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:10 AM, rr404 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sunil,
Welcome!
There are some recommendations for getting up-to-speed with Prototype
quickly and fairly painlessly in the unofficial Prototype
scripta.culo.us wiki's FAQ: How Can I Learn About Prototype?[1]
[1] http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/faq#learn
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder
On Dec 1, 7:26 am, Harry Porto Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi
it's possible to make an element that was inserted on the page by
ajax.update draggable ?
Yes. Either
- pass 'onComplete' the name of (or a call to) a function in your
original page which will do this, or
- include code in
the problem here is that if i run a second updater, targeted on the
same div as the first one and before the first one is complete...the
result of the second gets on top of the first request. i do not want
to merge the data, only display the latest updater.
so what I'm looking for is a way to
so what I'm looking for is a way to wait or halt the second request
until the first one is finished...
Lots of ways to do that. You could maintain a queue, etc. Prototype
maintains a count of active Ajax requests in Ajax.activeRequestCount
[1], you could query that before launching the
I also have the same problem, but I use Google Ajax API Loader, so I
don't know if the loader puts the javascript files in the head or
somewhere else. How can I solve this problem??
Thank you in advance.
On 1 dic, 09:27, joe.roback [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, why can't your scripts be in
does the ptototype has the such method ?
var setText = function ( element, text ) {
try {
element.innerText = text ;
return this.innerText ;
} catch ( e ) {
try {
element.textContent = text ;
That's very nice. Smoother than the one I've put together.
On Dec 1, 9:49 am, julien Devouassoud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
check this out :
http://www.ndesign-studio.com/blog/design/css-dock-menu/http://www.javascriptfr.com/telecharger.aspx?ID=26334
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Diodeus
Thanks! evalscripts worked!
ColinFine escreveu:
On Dec 1, 7:26am, Harry Porto Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi
it's possible to make an element that was inserted on the page by
ajax.update draggable ?
Yes. Either
- pass 'onComplete' the name of (or a call to) a
Wow, thanks! Had no idea.
Walter
On Dec 1, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Diodeus wrote:
Performant isn't a word.
http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2007/05/10/performant-isn-t-a-word.aspx
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
It was more about solving the problem of how to do it, and getting a
little more practice in OO programming, than being the first to do it.
Regardless, there isn't a scriptaculous version floating around yet.
Based on the links you posted I have discovered room for improvement.
It's turning out
I'd say your DOM traversals might add quite a bit of weight to your
filter. Why select the LI element if you're really looking at its
child A element's innerHTML property ?
Select those nodes and skip the execution of down, should speed things
up quite a bit.
Also if you're using a text input
Try
Event.observe(tre, click, this.RowClick.bindAsEventListener(this));
On Dec 1, 9:15 am, Mauricio Díaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have an iFrame that contains a page with my scripts, and I want to
show a popup dialog in the parent window. I can insert my popup (a div
element
var $aCSS = document.getElementsByTagName('style');
$aCSS.each(function($sEle){
alert('test');
});
I can make this work with $$, and if I use
document.getElementsByTagName('style')[0], I can access each one
individually. So why can't I use each()?
Assuming you really want the $ as part of the variable name, this should be:
var $aCSS = $A(document.getElementsByTagName('style'));
-Original Message-
From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of laurin1
Sent: Monday, December 01,
On 1.12.2008, at 23.14, laurin1 wrote:
var $aCSS = document.getElementsByTagName('style');
$aCSS.each(function($sEle){
alert('test');
});
I can make this work with $$, and if I use
document.getElementsByTagName('style')[0], I can access each one
individually. So why can't I use
I was under the impression that $$ was not very efficient, or do you
mean there is another way that I am overlooking?
On Dec 1, 3:25 pm, Jarkko Laine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1.12.2008, at 23.14, laurin1 wrote:
var $aCSS = document.getElementsByTagName('style');
hi all,
the fowllowing js is causing err on IE:
$('someThing') instanceof Element
error: Function expected
it is fine on any other objects such as:
$('someThing') instanceof Template -- return false
$('someThing') instanceof Hase -- return false
any idea y Element is diff or how i can get
On Dec 1, 7:36 pm, yoshi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
the fowllowing js is causing err on IE:
$('someThing') instanceof Element
error: Function expected
it is fine on any other objects such as:
$('someThing') instanceof Template -- return false
$('someThing') instanceof Hase --
On Dec 1, 7:03 pm, Jerod Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It previously had some performance issues, but now that should not be
noticeable.
Actually, `getElementsByTagName` is still marginally faster than `$$`
in slower engines (e.g. IE).
[...]
--
Jerod Venema
Frozen Mountain
I wonder if anybody has an answer to a slight problem I'm experiencing
with Ajax.Autocomplete?
It's populating the lists perfectly, but the first item on the list is
taking focus. This means that my form which previously got submitted
if I hit the return key now doesn't get submitted. Instead,
On Dec 1, 1:43 pm, Walter Lee Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been working on a problem today and wanted to share the results
here. I have a very tall list of authors on a page, and wanted to make
a simple filter field where you could type in a few characters of the
name and have the list
but it is defined globally? cuz i open up the js debugger console in
IE8 beta, i type 'Element' and the debugger returns {...} so it is
defined? And y is only Element not globally defined and not the
Template or Hash object ? I think prototype define them on global
scope?
what i m trying to do
29 matches
Mail list logo
