Re: Specs using Web IDL

. Yes, it seems pretty clear to me that it should be normative. The Process is flexible enough with regards to Rec-track deliverables that it allows us to decide what the best way for this spec to be demonstrably baked. Cameron McCormack wrote (on 6/28/09 7:21 AM): Doug Schepers: As we

Re: Specs using Web IDL

like HTML5? Will there be an updated revision or version 2 of Web IDL? Another possible implementation of Web IDL would be an IDL checker, like a validator. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs Cameron McCormack wrote (on 6/27/09 2:57 AM): I’d like to know what

Berkeley DB (was: Points of order on this WG)

on by changing the license? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Points of order on this WG

ject to being edited and updated individually. Nikunj, would this suit you? Does anyone else have any thoughts? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Points of order on this WG

cases that we agree are important for the web than further specification work. Actually, I think that's an excellent point. Nikunj, maybe that is the next logical step? Could you take charge of that? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Points of order on this WG

ot here to referee. We simply don't have the time or resources. I suppose I would ask the chairs to weigh in on what they think the best way forward is here. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: 'scroll' and 'resize' events

Public/www-dom/2009AprJun/0124.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Agenda:DOM3 Events Telcon

model + diagrams * Event wording [1] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2009&month=6&day=17&hour=21&min=0&sec=0&p1=43&p2=101&p3=234&p4=240 Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Next DOM3 Events Telcon (Time and Day?)

=43&p3=101&p4=234&p5=240&iv=0 [2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2009&month=6&day=17&hour=21&min=0&sec=0&p1=43&p2=101&p3=234&p4=240 [3] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/proposals/d3e-keyflow.svg [

Re: Mutation events replacement

Hi, Jonas- Thanks, looks interesting! I'm interested in feedback on this from the group, and especially interested in prototypes that test performance. Also, I note that this proposal doesn't handle computed values, such as the result of declarative animation in SMIL/SVG or CSS animation. C

[widgets] Open in Browser?

e two are related? I'm thinking that a downloaded and saved file might reuse the widget mechanisms, but with an optional flag that indicates it might be opened directly in an application (like a browser or authoring tool) rather than (or in addition to) a standalone miniapp. Regards- -Dou

Working Vacation

Hi, WebApps and SVG- Just to let you know, I will be away for the next week-and-a-half, for a conference and a short vacation. I will still be checking my email periodically, but I may not respond very quickly. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: addEventListener naming

eople upgrade their browsers to use new technology." ^_^ ) I like your idea of "listenOnce()". Would that also be removed by "unlisten()" in case the author wanted to cancel it, or would it require its own remover? Is it worth thinking about simply adding an optional

Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter

Hi, Nikunj- Nikunj Mehta wrote (on 4/24/09 2:24 AM): On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: Rather than change the charter (which would require everyone who's already rejoined to re-rejoin at the simplest, and might require another AC review at the worst), Nikunj offered th

Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter

Hi, Nikunj- Ian Hickson wrote (on 4/23/09 6:34 PM): On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Doug Schepers wrote: > The draft got published today, so it's too late to change the > high-profile version of the spec. It's not too late at all. This group can publish as frequently as it wan

Re: Web Storage Scope and Charter

Hi, Ian- Ian Hickson wrote (on 4/23/09 4:18 PM): On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Doug Schepers wrote: Jonas and others seem to support broadening the scope, and I've also been reading various posts in the blogosphere that also question whether SQL is the right choice (I see a lot of support for

Web Storage Scope and Charter (was: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10)

ould satisfy him. If this is acceptable to the WG as a whole, I would ask that a message similar to the above be put in a prominent place in the spec. This seems like the soundest way forward. Art, Chaals, care to chime in? Other comments on this matter? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contac

Re: CfC: FPWD of Server-Sent Events, Web Sockets API, Web Storage, and Web Workers; deadline April 10

p://www.w3.org/2009/04/webapps-charter Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Reminder: DOM3 Events Telcon Canceled

Hi, Folks- This is a reminder that we will NOT have a DOM 3 Events telcon today. Stay tuned for next week. Regards- -Doug

Request for Review: Cross-Origin Resource Sharing

html/draft-abarth-origin-00 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2007OctDec/0298.html Best Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Apple Patent Exclusion on Widgets 1.0: Updates

/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Exclusion [5] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/patent-exception-management Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: [widgets] [access] Naming Conflict: Element

Hi, Robert- Robert Sayre wrote (on 2/20/09 12:56 PM): > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: >> >> Thoughts? > > Believe in namespaces or don't. Oh, I believe in namespaces. But when it can be avoided, it's better for authors if: a) there

[widgets] [access] Naming Conflict: Element

might be or something, and for the Access spec, a better name might be . Thoughts? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#the-access-element [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-access/#sec_3.1. [3] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-xhtml-access-20081023/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and

W3C is Not Pay-to-Play (was: Required support for SVG in widgets)

ion, other than the larger companies that are making direct large revenue benefits from it. That seems fair to me. Just correcting the record. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Use Cases for Use Cases (was: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API)

d by the technology, not to exclude options. Meeting use cases and requirements is necessary, but not sufficient. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: SVG as Widget Icon

, in the widget manifest, a width and height to the first one, if it doesn't match those dimensions (let's say it's width="30" height="20"), then it should only show a portion of the icon (if the native icon dimensions are smaller), or it should show space around the

Re: SVG as Widget Icon

Hi, Marcos- Marcos Caceres wrote (on 1/29/09 12:51 PM): > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: > >>>> If you would like me to work up proposed spec text, I could oblige you. >>> >>> That would be great! The relevant sections are:

Re: SVG as Widget Icon

Hi, Marcos- Marcos Caceres wrote (on 1/29/09 7:53 AM): > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: > >> I think that rather than specifying a particular spec or profile, the >> Widgets spec should instead reference a feature set that is appropriate >>

SVG as Widget Icon (was: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009)

lige you. On another topic, I would like to use Widgets with pure SVG content, rather than including HTML... I didn't see a clear way to do this, nor was it explicitly disallowed. I'll review the spec more to see if there are problems in this regard. [1] http://www.schepers.cc/svg/blendups/embedding.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

mixing SVG into text/html. We are also looking at decreasing unnecessary dependence on namespaces (such as potentially allowing @href to be used in the null ns (that is, not prefixed with "xlink:"). Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: [access-control] Rename spec?

ce" is probably more evocative of a range of data types. I'm in favor of changing the name, for the reasons stated, and would support Cross-Origin Resource Sharing. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface

Hi, Cameron- My opinion is that the editor of the Element Traversal spec simply didn't know what he was doing (no offense). I would suggest that a separate file be made with the appropriate Java interface file, with the appropriate license, and that it be linked from an errata (and later a secon

Re: [selectors-api] Typo (was: SVG WG Review of Selectors API)

Hi, Lachlan- Lachlan Hunt wrote (on 12/8/08 11:26 AM): > Selectors are evaluated against a given element in the context the entire DOM tree in which the element is located. >> >> ...in the context of? > > I'm not sure how to phrase that any more clearly. It means that when > evaluati

[selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

e Selectors API to select only the svg 'font' elements and how to select only the svg font elements that have a prefix on the element. == References Please add a normative reference to CSS Namespaces[1]. Clarify if "Other references" means "Informative references" or something else. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-namespace/ Regards- -Doug Schepers, on behalf of the SVG WG

Cancelled: DOM3 Events Telcon

Hi WebApps Fans- I have to cancel this week's telcon, and TPAC is next week. DOM3 Events telcons will resume in November. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Reminder: No DOM3 Events Telcon Today

Hi DOM3 Events Fans- This is a reminder that we will *not* have a DOM 3 Events telcon today. Telcons will resume October 15. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Reminder: SVG 1.2 Tiny Last Call Comments Requested

in a way we're all happy with. The Last Call period ends on 10 October 2008, and we are unlikely to be able to extend it, given our schedule constraints. Please see the forwarded email below for details on commenting. Thanks- -Doug Schepers, on behalf of the SVG WG Doug Schepers wrote (on

Re: [D3E] Include mouse capture functionality

(particularly though with a lot of dragging, drawing, or other mousemove-specific operations) it can help with performance. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs

Re: Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format

ting > much of an example. > > You don't seem to like to have it pointed out when you're wrong. > Instead, you would rather retaliate by calling me names. I guess you > would call this behavior "socially competent behavior." > > Garrett > >> Regards, &

WebIDL in the News

Hi, WebApps Fans- WebIDL is in the news, including a short interview with Cameron, and an endorsement by Hixie! http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/09/WebIDL Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Agenda: DOM3 Events Telcon, 03 September 2008 (Now!!)

t and planned telcons, with a brief summary of issues discussed. [3] [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/DOM3Events#Day_and_Time [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/03_Sept_2008 [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/DOM3Events_Agenda Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Re: ElementTraversal support in Firefox 3.1

iel Glazman pointed out. I'll start drawing up use cases and requirements. Contributions welcome. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Tracker Guidelines

, so I put them in our wiki as a general guideline. [3] If anyone has any comments or questions, please let us know. [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/ [2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Tracker_Guidelines Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact

Re: Fwd: Element Traversal is a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations)

follows section 7.4.3 of the W3C Process Document: http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#cfi Thank you, For Tim Berners-Lee, Director, and Doug Schepers, Rich Web Clients Activity Lead; Ian Jacobs, Head of W3C Communications == Quoting from the

Re: My Action Item

Hi, Carmelo- We aren't using the wiki for uploading files, only for editing wiki pages. Please use the DOM3 Events CVS repository to upload files: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/tests/ If you need help with that, please let me know. Regards- -Doug Carmelo Montanez wrote

Agenda: DOM3 Events Telcon, 06 August 2008 (Today!!)

http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/06_Aug_2008 [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/DOM3Events_Agenda Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Re: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (2 of 2)

be very helpful and greatly appreciated. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF David Rogers wrote (on 8/1/08 7:41 AM): Dear Art, Marcos and all, Please find attached the second set of OMTP BONDI input to the W3C Web Applications WG Widget Requirements last call

Re: [Element Traversal LC] Minor comments

Hi, Sergiu- I forgot to mention, if you are not satisfied by these responses, please respond within two weeks, or sooner if possible. Regards- -Doug Doug Schepers wrote (on 7/30/08 2:56 AM): Hi, Sergiu- Thanks for your detail review Sergiu Dumitriu wrote (on 3/14/08 4:07 PM): Some

Re: [Element Traversal LC] Minor comments

it anyway. B: typo: "Element has -the- all the attributes" Fixed. B: Shouldn't the "In a User Agent..." text be placed outside the "code" div? In its current position it looks bad all bold, and it also causes: B: Repetition: "...has the attributes def

Re: ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal]

EntityReference node, it descends into it without informing the caller, and processes any children as if they had been present at the place where the entity node was found." If this does not satisfy either of you, please respond within two weeks, or sooner if possible. Regards- -Doug

Re: Element Traversal comment

useful. So, no change to the specification will be made at this late stage. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008Mar/0226.html Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: [Element Traversal LC] XML Core (no comment) review

Hi, Paul- Thanks very much for your review. Though it resulted in no comments (and therefore no changes to the spec), feedback of this sort is nevertheless valuable to maintain a consistent platform. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF Grosso, Paul wrote (on 3

Re: ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal]

s soon as possible if this satisfies your comment. [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/ElementTraversal/publish/ElementTraversal.html?rev=1.15 Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Reminder: No DOM3 Events Telcon, 30 July 2008

Hi WebApps Fans- This is a reminder that the 30 July telcon for DOM3 Events has been cancelled, due to a number of absences. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Coordinating XML Events and DOM3 Events

of us to join yours, for coordination, please let us know. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Agenda: DOM3 Events Telcon, 23 July 2008 (Today!!)

/wiki/DOM3Events_Agenda Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events

ay... No, I intend to define that regardless of whether or not we deprecate it. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events

operations. For example setting .innerHTML should likely constitute a compound operation. For DOM Core, every function that mutates the DOM should be considered a compound operation. Maybe a DOM3 Core 2nd edition, or DOM4 Core, could provide these stricter event orders for compound operations. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

[minutes] DOM3 Events Telcon, 16 July 2008

s for keyIdentifierChar, keyIdentifierName, and keyIdentifierUnicode (or an object that contains them and has stringification magic) [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-07-23]. [12]http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Event s.html#events-Events-KeyboardEvents-

Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events

ith previous Recommendations, requiring application-level changes, maybe XML technologies aren’t as reliable as we all thought. Well, there are those who would argue that anyone, but I'm not one of them. :) Your point about compatibility with DOM2 is very well made and taken. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 16 July 2008 (Today!!)

//www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/16_Jul_2008 [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/DOM3Events_Agenda Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events

Hi, Sergey- Thanks for your prompt and informative feedback! Sergey Ilinsky wrote (on 7/15/08 6:39 AM): Doug Schepers wrote: * DOMNodeRemoved and DOMNodeRemovedFromDocument would be fired after the mutation rather than before * DOM operations that perform multiple sub-operations (such as

[D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events

37 -0700 From: Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Doug Schepers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Mutation Events Pain Points Maciej Stachowiak wrote: On Jul 6, 2008, at 9:32 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote

Re: [access-control] Update

t IE team has experienced some turbulence while getting more involved in W3C, but I am encouraged by the productivity that a F2F can bring. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

[minutes] DOM3 Events Telcon, 9 July 2008

Teleconference 09 Jul 2008 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/07/09-webapps-irc Attendees Present Shepazu, smaug, Carmelo Regrets Chair Doug Schepers Scribe Carmelo Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Test Suite * [5

DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 9 July 2008 (Today!!)

ebapps/wiki/9_Jul_2008 [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/DOM3Events_Agenda Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Re: Consensus Call Re: Publishing Web IDL

, explicit response is preferred. Sounds like a good idea to me. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: Consensus Call Re: Publishing Web IDL

regarded as assent, explicit response is preferred. +1 for publishing Sounds like a good idea to me. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]

tion to go door-to-door and manually correct each keyboard (by force if necessary). I am aware that this may take some time (even weeks, perhaps), but I believe that that would be a more logical and pragmatic approach than for DOM3 Events to munge all Latinate characters into the uppercase. We all know that typing in all caps is rude, and forcing all keyboard events to SHOUT would degrade the bounds of polite society. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: F2F Agenda Updated

Hi, Jonas- Jonas Sicking wrote (on 6/25/08 8:48 PM): Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, WebApps WG- The WebApps F2F meeting page has been updated to reflect the current agenda: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/Group/f2f0807.html (member-only) I do notice that some of the times are in what you

Reminder: DOM3 Events Telcon Cancelled, Resumes in 2 Weeks

Hi WebApps Fans- Because of a number of regrets, today's DOM3 Events telcon has been cancelled. We will also not meet next week, due to the F2F. We will resume telcons in 2 weeks, on July 9. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Agenda+ DOM3 Events (was: Agenda and logistics...)

Hi, Folks- At the upcoming F2F, I would also like to spend an hour or two discussing DOM3 Events, if we find the time and have the right people. I don't care what day this happens on. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: Agenda and logistics...

Hi, Folks- Fixed. Sunava, you can put away the heart meds. :) -Doug Charles McCathieNevile wrote (on 6/24/08 12:10 AM): On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:30:39 +0200, Sunava Dutta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The meeting says Tuesday through Thursday 24th - 26 June 2008 in the Overview section. I ju

Element Nodelist - ISSUE-6 (was: ElementTraversal progress?)

use it in the same timeframe as Element Traversal. I hope this resolves your issue satisfactorily. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: RE: RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite

you either outline the opposing arguments in Tracker, or on the wiki: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/XHR That way we can look at the arguments dispassionately, side by side, and decide on the merits. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: Wheel events (ISSUE-9)

map? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

[minutes] DOM3 Events Telcon, 18 June 2008

grets Andrew, Emmons Chair Doug Schepers Scribe Olli Pettay Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Wheel Event * [6]Summary of Action Items _ Date: 18 June 2008 [7]http://dev.w

Re: IRC logging

ple are relying on their comments being logged, this can be an unwelcome surprise. Is there a safeguard against that? Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 18 June 2008 (Today!!)

. We will also maintain a list of all the past and planned telcons, with a brief summary of issues discussed. [3] [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/DOM3Events#Day_and_Time [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/11_Jun_2008 [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/DOM3Events_Agenda Regards-

Issues and Actions (was: XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues)

hings to consider; * Actions are specific tasks that need to be accomplished by a given person within a certain timeframe; they may come from formal issues, or they may simply arise during a discussion; they are meant to be resolved quickly. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

XHR2 Feedback As Tracker Issues (was: [NOT] Microsoft's feedback on XHR2)

editor, and the contributors) think this would be useful? [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products/4 Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: Improving Communication and Expectations

Hi, Anne- Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 6/16/08 6:21 AM): On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:24:12 +0200, Doug Schepers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To be fair, I want to note that during this same timeframe, we have been holding regular telcons for DOM3 Events, and that Travis Leithead (also of Micro

Re: Improving Communication and Expectations

;t read my email. Details inline Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 6/16/08 4:09 AM): On Jun 15, 2008, at 10:24 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: I encourage the chairs of the new WebApps WG to start holding regular telcons in which binding decisions are made, based on evidence presented in email, wi

Improving Communication and Expectations (was: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests])

rival organizations I encourage the chairs of the new WebApps WG to start holding regular telcons in which binding decisions are made, based on evidence presented in email, wikis, tests, other documents, and (yes) verbal discussion. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]

t the chairs to help preserve the peace by enforcing a civil tone and by holding people accountable for their responsibilities, and I don't want to step on their toes. But I do hope that the participants in this group will consider this. Best Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps,

Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]

ade. In this spirit, I'd rather it were not a PDF, but an HTML or plain-text version. Thanks- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

[minutes] DOM3 Events Telcon, 11 June 2008

DOM L3 Events [recorded in [17]http://www.w3.org/2008/06/11-webapps-minutes.html#action01] Created ACTION-2 - Continue discussion on list regarding event handler attributes and should they be specified in DOM L3 Events [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-06-18]. shepazu: No

Re: DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 11 June 2008 (Today!!)

Hi, Folks- Note that we will now be meeting in #webapps, not #webapi. The phone bridge information remains the same. -Doug Doug Schepers wrote (on 6/11/08 12:57 PM): Hi WebApps Fans- This is a reminder that we will have a DOM 3 Events telcon today, 11 June . Please reply to public

DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 11 June 2008 (Today!!)

genda Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI

Mass Subscription, and How to Unsubscribe

so, but I made a judgment call that most of you would rather not miss out on messages of interest. Honestly, it's really very interesting... you should stick around. So, welcome to the WebApps mailing list! Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

<    1   2