> On 10 Jul 2016, at 16:35, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
> On July 9, 2016 at 6:24:56 AM, Domenic Denicola (d...@domenic.me) wrote:
>> From: Travis Leithead [mailto:travis.leith...@microsoft.com]
>>
>>> The purpose of the “Level 1” document is to serve as a stable reference for
> On 02 Dec 2015, at 16:11, Ms2ger wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Art,
>
> On 12/02/2015 02:23 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> Yves and Travis would like to publish a Candidate Recommendation
>> of WebIDL Level 1 and this is a Call for
> On 31 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Ms2ger <ms2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Yves,
>
> On 08/31/2015 03:28 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
>> In fact, I would prefer to have the editors’ copy published as
>>
> On 01 Sep 2015, at 14:27, Ms2ger <ms2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Yves,
>
> On 09/01/2015 11:30 AM, Yves Lafon wrote:
>> On 31 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Ms2ger <ms2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/31/2015 03:28 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
>>>> In fa
> On 07 Aug 2015, at 14:45, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> On 8/4/15 2:21 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Arthur Barstow
>> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> This is heads-up re the intent to publish a Working Draft of "WebIDL
On 10 Apr 2015, at 18:49, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 4/10/15 8:53 AM, Yves Lafon wrote:
* Everything from old v1 expect ArrayClass which is not used, nor
implemented anywhere.
It's implemented in Gecko and used for both DOMRectList and MediaList in
Gecko, fwiw.
I'm
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/1/14, 1:49 PM, Travis Leithead wrote:
I believe so; this will give many specs a baseline WebIDL document to point
to in their references at the very least. Many specs don't rely on the more
advanced feature set being defined in WebIDL Second
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:56:30 +0200
From: Coralie Mercier cora...@w3.org
To: w3c-ac-fo...@w3.org
Cc: cha...@w3.org
Subject: Positive Work Environment Framework now in effect
Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:56:45 +
Resent-From: cha...@w3.org
Dear
The Draft minutes from WebApps' April 11 f2f meeting are at the
following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2014/04/11-webapps-minutes.html
Corrections, comments, etc., are welcome.
Thanks very much to the various scribes and special thanks to Kris for
handing me the missing minutes.
W3C
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 2/27/14 12:10 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 2/27/14 11:41 AM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote:
What do you recommend?
It seems a little heavy-handed to kill it or gut it. What about putting a
big-red warning at the top that it has been merged to
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
Yes, that would be helpful (hence the report), thanks.
Done. Spec now sez:
Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this
specification must implement them
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
Hi,
In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three
conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2].
Could
This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application
Hi,
In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three
conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2].
Could
This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming
interfaces. be clarified using one of the proposed wordings from WebIDL?
(likely 'Conforming IDL
13 matches
Mail list logo