Re: Quick update on WebIDL "Level 1"

2016-07-11 Thread Yves Lafon
> On 10 Jul 2016, at 16:35, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > On July 9, 2016 at 6:24:56 AM, Domenic Denicola (d...@domenic.me) wrote: >> From: Travis Leithead [mailto:travis.leith...@microsoft.com] >> >>> The purpose of the “Level 1” document is to serve as a stable reference for

Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Web IDL Level 1; deadline December 9

2015-12-02 Thread Yves Lafon
> On 02 Dec 2015, at 16:11, Ms2ger wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Art, > > On 12/02/2015 02:23 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Yves and Travis would like to publish a Candidate Recommendation >> of WebIDL Level 1 and this is a Call for

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

2015-09-01 Thread Yves Lafon
> On 31 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Ms2ger <ms2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Yves, > > On 08/31/2015 03:28 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: >> In fact, I would prefer to have the editors’ copy published as >>

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

2015-09-01 Thread Yves Lafon
> On 01 Sep 2015, at 14:27, Ms2ger <ms2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Yves, > > On 09/01/2015 11:30 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: >> On 31 Aug 2015, at 20:12, Ms2ger <ms2...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 08/31/2015 03:28 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: >>>> In fa

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

2015-08-31 Thread Yves Lafon
> On 07 Aug 2015, at 14:45, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > On 8/4/15 2:21 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Arthur Barstow >> wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> This is heads-up re the intent to publish a Working Draft of "WebIDL

Re: WebIDL Plans

2015-04-14 Thread Yves Lafon
On 10 Apr 2015, at 18:49, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: On 4/10/15 8:53 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: * Everything from old v1 expect ArrayClass which is not used, nor implemented anywhere. It's implemented in Gecko and used for both DOMRectList and MediaList in Gecko, fwiw. I'm

Re: Help with WebIDL v1?

2014-12-03 Thread Yves Lafon
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 12/1/14, 1:49 PM, Travis Leithead wrote: I believe so; this will give many specs a baseline WebIDL document to point to in their references at the very least. Many specs don't rely on the more advanced feature set being defined in WebIDL Second

[admin] Positive Work Environment Framework now in effect

2014-10-24 Thread Yves Lafon
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:56:30 +0200 From: Coralie Mercier cora...@w3.org To: w3c-ac-fo...@w3.org Cc: cha...@w3.org Subject: Positive Work Environment Framework now in effect Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:56:45 + Resent-From: cha...@w3.org Dear

[April2014Meeting] Draft minutes for April 11

2014-04-11 Thread Yves Lafon
The Draft minutes from WebApps' April 11 f2f meeting are at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2014/04/11-webapps-minutes.html Corrections, comments, etc., are welcome. Thanks very much to the various scribes and special thanks to Kris for handing me the missing minutes. W3C

Re: [admin] Should WebApps' HTML Templates spec be published as a WG Note?

2014-03-11 Thread Yves Lafon
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 2/27/14 12:10 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: On 2/27/14 11:41 AM, ext Rafael Weinstein wrote: What do you recommend? It seems a little heavy-handed to kill it or gut it. What about putting a big-red warning at the top that it has been merged to

Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL

2013-07-31 Thread Yves Lafon
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote: On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: Yes, that would be helpful (hence the report), thanks. Done. Spec now sez: Implementations that use ECMAScript to implement the APIs defined in this specification must implement them

Re: [widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL

2013-07-30 Thread Yves Lafon
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Marcos Caceres wrote: On Monday, July 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Yves Lafon wrote: Hi, In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2]. Could This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application

[widgetsapi] reference to WebIDL

2013-07-29 Thread Yves Lafon
Hi, In the PR [1], the text referencing WebIDL is not using one of the three conformance clauses defined in WebIDL [2]. Could This specification uses [WebIDL] to specify application programming interfaces. be clarified using one of the proposed wordings from WebIDL? (likely 'Conforming IDL