No, it is in webapps (all the widgets work is there) - try:
public-webapps@w3.org
Cheers!
David.
-Original Message-
From: Ricardo Varela [mailto:pho...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 July 2010 09:02
To: David Rogers
Subject: Re: question about number of occurrences of author and content
Dear all,
Please note that the OMTP BONDI 1.11 errata release specifications are
available at: http://bondi.omtp.org/1.11/ . These contain minor changes
and editorial updates to the previously released 1.1 version:
http://bondi.omtp.org/1.1/ .
Thanks,
David.
David Rogers
OMTP
The question of where you are represented and your ability to
participate cuts both ways - the same is true for us. I think if the
browser vendors want their products really to be seen as compatible
with
the Web application space (as compared to just dynamic Web pages),
they
will support the
Hi Robin,
It might be worth hanging on for Arun's response to my email this
morning before we get to a resolution on this.
Also on the proposed naming, the term 'Trusted' has a very specific
meaning and it could create ambiguities - i.e. we would not be defining
a Trusted File System Access.
Hi Arun,
-Original Message-
From: Arun Ranganathan [mailto:a...@mozilla.com]
Sent: 16 June 2010 19:48
On 6/16/10 2:16 AM, David Rogers wrote:
The question of where you are represented and your ability to
participate cuts both ways - the same is true for us. I think
Hi Robin,
I'm not sure how far forward we are with this but looking at the
security considerations, it would be useful to have the examples for
implementers to understand where we're coming from with the concerns.
For your info, this was the original proposal I discussed with Marcin:
Security
A small comment. It's probably best to use the OED for English dictionary words
rather than a google search:
http://www.askoxford.com/results/?view=dictfreesearch=immersivebranch=13842570textsearchtype=exact
David.
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
feedback during the
Candidate Release phase. OMTP is now working on BONDI 1.5, please
contact me if you would like any more information.
Thanks,
David.
[1] http://bondi.omtp.org/1.1/
[2] http://bondi.omtp.org/1.1/BONDI%201.1%20Release%20Notes.txt
David Rogers
OMTP Director
Apologies in advance for this week and next.
Thanks,
David.
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Barstow
Sent: 10 February 2010 13:30
To: public-webapps
Subject: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010
Marcos, Art,
Please could you point us in the direction of the documentation from W3C on
progressing to PR? Is there some kind of formal gate to progression?
Thanks,
David.
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of
Thanks Art,
Marcos, although I don't disagree on the quality point, I just want to check
how this fits in with the formal process. Where did 100,000 users come from?
Apologies for being new to this part of the process but it talks about:
Proposed Recommendation (PR)
A Proposed
Thanks for that Art, I agree with you, that would also be the OMTP view.
Cheers,
David.
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
Sent: 03 February 2010 15:55
To: Marcos Caceres; David Rogers
Cc: public-webapps
Subject: Re: [widgets] PC: comments submitted
; David Rogers; Marcin Hanclik; Dominique
Hazael-Massieux; Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; public-webapps
WG
Subject: Re: DAP and security (was: Rename File API to FileReader
API?)
On Nov 18, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
This is a good point, and an argument for policy rather
My comments:
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: 18 November 2009 20:15
To: David Rogers
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak; Marcin Hanclik; Dominique Hazael-Massieux; Robin
Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; public-webapps WG
Subject: Re: DAP and security
My comments:
-Original Message-
From: public-device-apis-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-device-apis-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Adam Barth
Sent: 19 November 2009 07:42
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak; Dominique Hazael-Massieux; Robin Berjon;
public-device-a...@w3.org;
My comments:
-Original Message-
From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux [mailto:d...@w3.org]
Sent: 19 November 2009 09:52
To: rob...@ocallahan.org
Cc: Marcin Hanclik; Jonas Sicking; David Rogers; Maciej Stachowiak; Robin
Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; public-webapps WG
Subject: Re: DAP
My comments:
From: rocalla...@gmail.com [mailto:rocalla...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert
O'Callahan
Sent: 19 November 2009 10:10
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Cc: Marcin Hanclik; Jonas Sicking; David Rogers; Maciej Stachowiak; Robin
Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; public-webapps WG
My comments:
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: 19 November 2009 10:11
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: David Rogers; Maciej Stachowiak; Dominique Hazael-Massieux; Robin
Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; public-webapps WG
Subject: Re: DAP and security
From: rocalla...@gmail.com [mailto:rocalla...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert
O'Callahan
Sent: 19 November 2009 10:58
To: David Rogers
Cc: Dominique Hazael-Massieux; Marcin Hanclik; Jonas Sicking; Maciej
Stachowiak; Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; public-webapps WG
Subject: Re: DAP
Hi Maciej,
From my side I'd like to understand what your thoughts and proposals for file
writing security / policy would entail - would you defer the decision
responsibility to the user via a prompt?
Thanks,
David.
-Original Message-
From: public-device-apis-requ...@w3.org
As mentioned in the widgets meeting yesterday, comments welcomed:
From: public-device-apis-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-device-apis-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Rogers
Sent: 02 November 2009 17:30
To: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG
Subject: OMTP BONDI 1.1 Candidate Release now available
and key)
Thanks,
David.
David Rogers
OMTP Director of External Relations
Hi,
As discussed on the webapps call, in addition to Fredrick's proposal I
think we need to understand the relationship between DAP / Widgets /
WebApps / HTML5 more clearly. There are overlaps and architectural
disparities which we should highlight and come up with a plan for
dealing with. Would
: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
Sent: 29 October 2009 16:04
To: David Rogers
Cc: Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston); public-Webapps@w3.org WG;
Charles McCathieNevile; W3C Device APIs and Policy WG; Robin Berjon;
Nick Allott
Subject: Re: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps
jointly own this and it should be presentable to the
outside world at any stage.
Cheers,
David.
-Original Message-
From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:cha...@opera.com]
Sent: 29 October 2009 16:53
To: David Rogers; Arthur Barstow
Cc: Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston); public-Webapps
conflict
with widgets / potential to put requirements there for the item below
and others?
Thanks,
David.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-ui/#keepchromevisible-goodpractice
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Rogers
Sent: 22
Thanks Art,
OMTP are happy to proceed.
Thanks,
David.
-Original Message-
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Barstow
Sent: 22 October 2009 22:40
To: public-webapps
Subject: [widgets] CfC to publish LCWD#3 of the Packaging and
not sure that anyone has started work on any widget security
guidelines?
Thanks,
David.
David Rogers
OMTP Director of External Relations
Art and all,
AB: any other comments on this?
... given we don't consensus on this, we will not be able to publish
a new LC until after the TPAC meeting
... any last comments?
... given this is still an open issue, we will not discuss LC
publication today
Given that Marcin
Hi there,
Have you checked out the DAP working group? http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/
Cheers,
David.
David Rogers
Director of External Relations, OMTP
From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of ~:'' ???
Sent: 03 August 2009
Apologies, I should have also forwarded this onto the WebApps group for
your information.
Thanks,
David.
From: public-device-apis-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-device-apis-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Rogers
Sent: 15 September 2009 18:44
To: public-device-apis
Subject: BONDI
.
Thanks,
David.
David Rogers
OMTP Director of External Relations
The information contained in this e-mail and in any files transmitted
with it is confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are
not the intended recipient(s) any distribution, copying or use of the
information
Thanks Marcos, my comments below, marked [DAVID]:
-Original Message-
From: marcosscace...@gmail.com [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Marcos Caceres
Sent: 16 July 2009 12:53
To: David Rogers
Cc: Arthur Barstow; Web Applications Working Group WG
Subject: Re: [widgets] PC
widgets face-to-face meeting soon.
Thanks,
David.
David Rogers
OMTP Director of External Relations
Marcos,
Surely the logic should support algorithm evolution in that way. If it is a
SHOULD it doesn't mean that engines need to support all algorithms - that would
be a SHALL? If we say nothing at all, you run the risk of dropping off a
security cliff if you need to migrate in the future. A
explicitly say that using the wildcard character in any
position other than the first character in a domain specifier is
invalid. I.e. it's not intended to be a general glob expression as in
a.*.com
Thanks,
David.
David Rogers
OMTP Director of External Relations
Hi Josh,
Many thanks for your input, again I'll ensure your comments are
considered.
Thanks,
David.
-Original Message-
From: timeless.b...@gmail.com [mailto:timeless.b...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of timeless
Sent: 23 March 2009 14:17
To: David Rogers
Cc: WebApps WG
Subject: Re: FW
Hi Art,
I'll ensure that this input is considered. Many thanks for your
feedback.
David.
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com]
Sent: 23 March 2009 01:02
To: David Rogers
Cc: public-webapps
Subject: [widgets] Comments on the 9-Feb-2009 BONDI v1.0 Release
/TR/2008/WD-widgets-20081222/
On Feb 26, 2009, at 3:46 AM, ext David Rogers wrote:
Dear all,
As discussed in the Widgets F2F in Paris, please find the links to
the OMTP BONDI Candidate Release 1.0 documentation as follows. This
is open for public comment at the moment
://bondi.omtp.org/apis/
David Rogers
OMTP Director of External Relations
issues that need to be addressed
5. OMTP BONDI Example Policies v1.0 (Zip file)
BONDI example polices to demonstrate the flexible nature of the BONDI
security model
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to get in contact.
[1] http://www.omtp.org/Bondi/
David Rogers
all when these are
online and available to download.
If you have any comments or questions, please feel free to contact me.
Thanks,
David.
David Rogers
OMTP Director of External Relations
September 2008 14:30
To: David Rogers; Nick Allott; Priestley, Mark, VF-Group; Paddy Byers
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (1 of 2)
Hi All,
I've now integrated the OMTP requirements into the Req spec. OMTP
crew, I'm made lots
Hi Thomas,
Mark Priestley of Vodafone will respond to you on OMTP's behalf in relation to
the comments below. Speak to you all on the call later on today.
Thanks,
David.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 August 2008 01:30
To: David Rogers
44 matches
Mail list logo
