rvice like https://appear.in/ which
work well enough these days with up to 8 video connections going at once.
—Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nd working with you all.
Welcome! Are there some particular deliverables in the group that you’re
especially interested in? Just curious to hear your thoughts on which align
well with the problems you’re trying to solve in your own development and
the specific user needs/priorities you’r
e months) needed to do
the actual hands-on work of designing it and implementing it and landing it.
Hopefully we may finally now be reaching the point where we have critical
mass of people who need to see it happen sooner rather than later.
—Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org
somewhat just artifacts of earlier years,
in that they’re just copies of specs published elsewhere, Abe while the
Workers spec was officially a separate spec upstream as well, it was folded
back into the HTML spec years ago. And the content of the Web Messaging
spec has been, since it was first defined, part of the HTML spec.
—Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
this point.
—Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
te
> an API on top of <https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/>. Is that still something
> this group wants to do, and if so, who can commit to actually doing the
> work, in particular: editing, implementation, and test suite?
>
> If we no longer have committed resources for doing the above tasks then this
> spec should be removed from the draft charter.
--
Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
g here for v1?
<https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/89>
E. Renaming the API
1. If any strongly incompatible changes are made, we suggest
renaming createShadowRoot. This is to avoid compat problems with content
written for Chrome’s shipping implementation. We are not sure if this will be
required, but named slots may force it if adopted.
- End forwarded message -
--
Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
April.
> >
> >[1]: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/WebComponentsJuly2015Meeting
--
Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/IndexedDB/>
>
> >Would recommend redirecting to the ED of the next version of the spec.
>
> That makes sense to me.
Yup, sorry about thatーI forgot a step when we migrated the repos. But I've
now set up the redirects and things should be working as expected. If not
lemme
ht be planning to have it at MIT
> between Jun 9-12: http://www.w3.org/2014/12/18-html-wg-minutes.html
At this point it's almost certainly not going to be in June at MIT. It's
going to be mid-April or end-April or mid-May, more likely in Europe.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith https://p
it.
In that same spirit, I'd suggest that everybody not avoid considering some
particular option just because they've been told it seems like it's not
possible. Or just because of the wrong assumption that since it's never
been done before, it somehow must not be possible.
-
ons for spec that references such a version of XHR, I think
> the XHR spec should be clear (think "Warning!"), that because of the
> Fetch reference, the XHR spec might never get published beyond CR.
That's not necessary. Nor would it be helpful.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Scott González , 2013-12-19 10:23 -0500:
> Can Bugzilla listen to GitHub events and auto-comment?
There's a github hook that can be used -
https://raw.github.com/github/github-services/master/docs/bugzilla
--
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
it they're implicitly intended just
for use with Workers. So I assume that's the context Jonas intended.
--Mike
P.S. Of course there's room for disagreement about whether synchronous APIs
are even a good idea even for the Workers case -
http://infrequently.org/2013/05/the-case-against-synchronous-worker-apis-2/
--
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Hi Dimitri,
Dimitri Glazkov , 2013-10-05 09:01 -0700:
> If I set resolved=later, the target milestone doesn't seem as useful.
It does it you plan to reopen a bug at some later date and work on it then
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
s using the Whiteboard field is,
we could create a set of Target Milestone values for the WebApps bugzilla
product, and those would be available to all WebApps components. We'd need
to first decide on what the set of values should be.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
cellation by the user
> 3) document unloading
> in my product, i want to show the dialog with information about
> network error, but this dialog should not appear in other cases, as
> that will annoy the user.
> in my another product, i want to do retry in case of network error,
>
be
> more frequent than every 10 minutes?
There is and I will try to get it set up next week, unless Robin beats me to it
first.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
go. I believe we run that because it's the latest release available
for Debian stable (or maybe for Debian anything) and so that's been tested
by Debian and gone through security review and that gets any needed
security patches and all that. So if this component-watching feature is
something that's recent -- added after 3.6.2 -- then that would be why we
don't have it.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
ility is to limit the custom tag names to
some recognized prefix -- e.g., x-fancyButton or whatever.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
custom code that Henri wrote that drops
those data-* attributes -- basically, filters them out -- before the Jing
part of the toolchain even sees them.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
low).
If there are any follow-up questions about either the Java or Python
support, we should take that to public-webapps-testsu...@w3.org or
public-test-in...@w3.org
--Mike
"Michael[tm] Smith" , 2012-02-22 16:14 +0900:
> We now have initial WebSocket server support set up on w3c-
anybody's interested in actually trying that right now, and you have
*_wsh.py handlers you'd like to have installed, we can work on getting
something set up to facilitate it.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+
ainly there shall be active liaise-ing with i18n
folk on this API. If you believe we need to capture that in the charter
then I can work with the chairs to make sure we do that.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/+
t caught up on my public-webapps list mail :) (Been
away working on some other things for over the last week.)
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/+
if it is currently possible for a Web application to do the
same thing; that is, to prevent the browser on the device from
auto-rotating into a different mode.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/+
t;The above is captured in bug 15400.
>
> But apparently hard to fix.
Not hard, but just slipped through the cracks until now due to it not
getting on my radar. But it's fixed in CVS now, and the spec should get
regenerated within the next couple of days.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/+
"Michael[tm] Smith" , 2012-01-11 20:36 +0900:
> Satish S , 2012-01-11 10:04 +:
>
> > The Community Groups [1] page says they are for "anyone to socialize their
> > ideas for the Web at the W3C for possible future standardization".
>
> I do
It's up to you all what you choose to do.
But I would like to help make sure you're making a fully informed decision
based on what the actual benefits and costs of the different options are.
--Mike
> [1] http://www.w3.org/community/about/#cg
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/htmlspeech/XGR-htmlspeech/
--
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/+
WG if/when needed.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/+
vant
specs from there, I think there probably are some that aren't included in
your page yet but probably should be.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike
bpages and add links to them on that "goals"
page.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike
ing an LC?
>
> (Personally I'm fine with it going to REC yesterday, so...)
>
> > Bugzilla shows no open bugs for this spec
I just now raised a new one:
spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation
behavior
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/sh
et me know, but otherwise I think we should remove those
> components.
The reason is that only members of the group can raise issues in the
tracker. So bugzilla is useful if you want to enable public commenters to
raise issues.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike
=WebAppsWG
Eric, if you create a W3C bugzilla account (and give me a heads-up after),
I'll set you as the default assignee for those components.
--Mike
--
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike
th the getting the new
directory and its contents pushed to that repo, please contact me directly
and let me know. You can reach me on #whatwg on irc.freenode.net pretty
much any time I'm actually awake, or also feel free to e-mail me directly.
--
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike
view.html
I've just now set up that redirect. Let me know if you find any
problems with it
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike
gt; [1]
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=WebAppsWG&component=WebSimpleDB
>
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike
c technology term
(ISAM) that most readers aren't going to know about and probably
don't need to actually know anything about in order to use the API.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
the title.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
"Web Local and Session Storage"
might be more precise, but I'm not sure whether most people would
consider that an improvement.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
e Web platform -- and to be implemented
in Web clients/user-agents -- as opposed to being something
intended to be implemented on the server side, or as opposed to
something intended to be implemented for some other purpose than
for delivering and interacting with content on the Web.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
aking over ownership/editorship of that
draft, please let me or Doug Schepers know.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
"Nikunj R. Mehta" , 2009-06-30 14:54 -0700:
> On Jun 30, 2009, at 10:28 AM, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
>
> > "Nikunj R. Mehta" , 2009-06-30 09:12 -0700:
> >> I was inquiring about the term "property enumeration"
> >
> > I think in th
check if the Storage object has a particular property.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
quot; are defined
in the HTML5 draft:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/browsers.html#storage-mutex
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/browsers.html#obtain-the-storage-mutex
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
you believe has not received adequate attention from
the group. If that's not the case, what other specific proposals
are you aware of that we have had problems with?
But if it is the case that the issue really is with one specific
proposal, I really wish we could discuss that one specific
proposal instead of making a process issue out of this.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
s
without having to use server-side scripting (such as PHP, ASP,
or CGI) on IIS and Apache.
- Must not require that the server filters the entity body of
the resource in order to deny cross-origin access to all
resources on the server.
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
SSH2-based, so what we would need from you is an SSH2 public key
(either RSA or DSA, doesn't matter).
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
rry Masinter, and (I think) Jonathan Rees,
and the current version of it is here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jun/att-0085/W3C_and_APIs.htm
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
-minutes.html
http://www.w3.org/2008/07/02-wam-minutes.html
http://www.w3.org/2008/07/03-wam-minutes.html
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
re, it's going to be pretty
much impossible to have any productive discussion at all.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
will
> eventually end up at:
> http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets-digsig
Actually, it's there now. We can update it later as needed.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
Arthur Barstow , 2009-03-12 10:23 -0400:
> The minutes from the March 12 Widgets voice conference are available at the
> following and copied below:
>
> <http://www.w3.org/2009/03/12-wam-minutes.html>
Note: I trimmed the source up a little bit and checked back in.
--Mi
w list is now ready to go:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pkg-uri-scheme/
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
eeds/spec/bitsy.xhtml
> [2] http://oracle.com/technology/tech/feeds
I couldn't find anything at [2] that actually does compare BITSY
to Gears, etc. Perhaps you could post a summary directly to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-10-10 10:38 +0300:
> On Oct 10, 2008, at 01:44, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-updates/
> [...]
> The Editor's Draft link points to the Editor's Draft of another spec.
Fixed
--Mike
--
Michael
Marcos Caceres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-09-19 15:46 +0100:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Michael(tm) Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Boris Zbarsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-09-19 09:35 -0400:
> >> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> >> > ht
DATE *
> *-=aways check the latest editor's draft =- *
> **************
>
> (1337 ASCII art optional :P )
+1!!
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
Boris Zbarsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-09-19 10:44 -0400:
> Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
> > It's intended in part to be a way to keep all our law-abiding
> > citizen readers in the general public informed about what progress
> > if any the group is making on the sp
other
MCs should always follow the editor's draft instead.
I hope that clears things up.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
ppformats/group/RecentChanges
...so we won't be migrating it in whole over to the current
MediaWiki-based Wiki (as we are doing with some of the other older
MoinMoin-based ones).
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
-dP webapi
If you do run into any cvs client problems that you can't figure
out, please let me know right away.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
http://sideshowbarker.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
g we expect Staff contacts to be able to do...) or to
> > > postpone the start until lunchtime, depending on how people feel.
> > >
> > > The agenda for the meeting is pretty basic, covering XHR1 and XHR2
> > with
> > > Access Control, and the issues raised in MS' review of XHR2.
> > >
> > > Hopefully Mike will manage the right W3C mojo soon and announce the
> > > page
> > > with the information.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Chaals
> > >
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
http://sideshowbarker.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
e start until lunchtime, depending on how people feel.
>
> The agenda for the meeting is pretty basic, covering XHR1 and XHR2 with
> Access Control, and the issues raised in MS' review of XHR2.
>
> Hopefully Mike will manage the right W3C mojo soon and announce the page
&g
cular)
That would certainly be really useful, but I don't know whether
it's already being considered or not. I'll ask and find out.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
http://sideshowbarker.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Sam Weinig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-06-17 07:34 -0700:
> On Jun 17, 2008, at 3:45 AM, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
>> Note that all of the Web API WG drafts are in this tree:
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/
>>
>> And the WAF WG drafts (including Acc
bBackplane
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck
>
> webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number
> 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street,
> London, EC2A 4RR)
>
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
http://sideshowbarker.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
events and that the existing
> solutions are exceedingly complicated.
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008May/0111.html
OK, so I guess we ought to decide where we go with this next. Take
it up as an issue for the group? Assign somebody an action?
Something else?
that is not good for you to have a new
> attribute on the tag for 'branding', so that the image is always
> rendered 100x100, nor is it good to have a new tag that
> renders the src as 100x100. You simply use the existing tag and
> modify it to your specific case.
and by holding people accountable for their responsibilities, and I
> don't want to step on their toes. But I do hope that the participants
> in this group will consider this.
>
> Best Regards-
> -Doug Schepers
> W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF
>
> Michael(tm
rt of that, as a PDF attachment), just dropping the comments
on the group and then saying that you have no plans to discuss
them at length during the next two weeks is not going to work.
--Mike
--
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/
http://sideshowbarker.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
72 matches
Mail list logo
