Re: IRC logging

2008-06-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
the best we've got available to us. It's always possible to fill in any gaps from other's personal IRC logs; it's quite simple for Krijn to insert them if someone sends them to him. For important things like telcons, RRSAgent is always brought into the channel anyway. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera

Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature Selectors API belongs to?

2008-07-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
it at this stage. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API comments: section 2

2008-07-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Moved from public-webapi to public-webapps. Original issue raised here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008Feb/0053.html (forgot to change the address to public-webapps, resending to correct list. Sorry for duplicates) Lachlan Hunt wrote: * It's not clear which IDL

Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature Selectors API belongs to?

2008-07-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
being forwards compatible. Vague hypothetical future scenarios do not serve as useful evidence. If the need ever arises for such feature detection to be incorporated into a future language, we can come back and take another look at the issue in a future version of the specification. -- Lachlan

Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents

2008-07-11 Thread Lachlan Hunt
-public-webapi +public-webapps Boris Zbarsky wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: If I add the following paragraph to the security section, would this adequately address this issue? If, at any time, the implementation detects a situation which would violate security policies, the implementation MAY

[selectors-api] Feature Requests for Version 2

2008-07-14 Thread Lachlan Hunt
%20APIproduct=WebAppsWG -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature Selectors API belongs to?

2008-07-14 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: On Jul 14, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: To avoid forcing implementers to bother implementing such a useless feature, and potentially lying about their support. Basically, this should only be for languages other than ECMAScript that don't have other

Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives

2008-07-16 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Boris Zbarsky wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: Given that IE, Webkit and Opera seem to be in favour of dropping NSResolver, if Mozilla will agree, I'm more than happy to do so OK. We talked it over, and this sounds like the best way going forward for now. I have stripped all requirements from

Re: [selectors-api]

2008-07-16 Thread Lachlan Hunt
risk). As the NSResolver has now been removed from the specification, so has this security requirement. Therefore, I'm closing this issue because it's no longer relevant. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Opera's Proposal for :context Selector

2008-07-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
-www-style +public-webapps Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: Bert Bos wrote: (It seems to me you shouldn't need it at all. The problem seems to be that x.querySelector(:root) doesn't return x. That looks strange to me: you pass a tree and a pattern

Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives

2008-08-13 Thread Lachlan Hunt
current impls should throw something if more than one arg is passed Which exception should be thrown? Is this something I should define in this spec, or is it something for WebIDL or some other spec to deal with? -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives

2008-08-20 Thread Lachlan Hunt
suite with all other functions in the DOM, which means we should not throw for extra arguments. I see no reason to treat this function differently than everything else. OK, agreed. No exceptions for extra arguments. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Why does the default namespace have to be resolved?

2008-10-20 Thread Lachlan Hunt
to resolve it in that situation. Since NSResolver has since been removed from the spec, I'm closing this issue as it is no longer relevant. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Return value of lookupNamespaceURI

2008-10-20 Thread Lachlan Hunt
. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Why null as opposed to empty string (or either one) to resolve default namespace

2008-10-20 Thread Lachlan Hunt
NSResolver has been removed, I'm closing this issue. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents

2008-10-20 Thread Lachlan Hunt
)? Since NSResolver has since been removed from the spec, I'm closing this issue as it is no longer relevant. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API comments: section 2

2008-10-29 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Lachlan Hunt wrote: Boris Zbarsky wrote: * I don't see any indication of what the language bindings for this IDL should look like in languages which do not support function overloading based on number of arguments and do not allow functions with variable numbers of arguments. If it has been

Re: [selectors-api]

2008-10-29 Thread Lachlan Hunt
that it detects is non-conforming? Since NSResolver has since been removed from the spec, I'm closing this issue as it is no longer relevant. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature Selectors API belongs to?

2008-10-29 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Lachlan Hunt wrote: It's been suggested to me that the spec should say something about support for the other methods that use feature strings, including: interface DOMImplementationSource { DOMImplementation getDOMImplementation(in DOMString features); DOMImplementationList

[selectors-api] All Issues Resolved

2008-10-29 Thread Lachlan Hunt
at the F2F last week. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call

2008-10-31 Thread Lachlan Hunt
in the current editor's draft. Though I'd rather not make too many additional changes now as I don't want to hold up publication. Any other issues like this can wait till after this Last Call draft is published and can be fixed before it goes to CR. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call

2008-10-31 Thread Lachlan Hunt
.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/0216.html -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call

2008-11-01 Thread Lachlan Hunt
during this next LC period. * s/an an asterisk/an asterisk/ in section 6.1. Fixed. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Liveness versus NodeList

2008-11-21 Thread Lachlan Hunt
the NodeList instances returned were still static lists. Please let me know whether or not you are satisified with this response. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Typo in Example

2008-11-21 Thread Lachlan Hunt
with this response. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] First element example

2008-11-21 Thread Lachlan Hunt
an additional example with them reversed. You can review the changes in the latest editor's draft. http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/ Please let me know whether or not you are satisfied with this response. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Names of querySelector() and querySelectorAll() methods

2008-11-21 Thread Lachlan Hunt
versions of each of the 4 major browsers, changing the name at this stage is not possible. Please let me know whether or not you are satisfied with this response. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Liveness versus NodeList

2008-11-21 Thread Lachlan Hunt
inefficient if we had to construct the entire node list at NodeList construction time, too. We are not changing the behaviour of all NodeLists, just reusing the same interface for both static and dynamic lists. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: CSS WG comments on Selectors API

2008-11-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
to make on this document. Great, thanks. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping

2008-11-28 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Cameron McCormack wrote: Lachlan Hunt: It seems from the Java bindings section of Web IDL that the way to define modules and how they're mapped to Java packages isn't yet very stable. I’ve added a way to specify the Java package naming method now: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call

2008-12-06 Thread Lachlan Hunt
:scope would be useful in a matchesSelector() function, we can investigate solutions to address the issue. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] matchesSelector() Proposal (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call)

2008-12-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Sean Hogan wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: Sean Hogan wrote: Gregory Reimer (the author of reglib) points out that Element.matchesSelector would be useful for event delegation. See http://blogs.sun.com/greimer/entry/opera_10_will_suport_selector It would also neatly tie in with NodeFilter in DOM

Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

2008-12-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
changed the heading to Informative References. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Typo

2008-12-08 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Doug Schepers wrote: Hi, Lachlan- Lachlan Hunt wrote (on 12/8/08 11:26 AM): Selectors are evaluated against a given element in the context the entire DOM tree in which the element is located. ...in the context of? I'm not sure how to phrase that any more clearly. It means that when

Re: [selectors-api] Use case for passing invalid selector

2008-12-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Simon Pieters wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:26:18 +0100, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: == Section 6. The NodeSelector Interface The caller must pass a valid group of selectors. That's an authoring requirement, explain how that is applicable? It seems perfectly applicable

Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

2008-12-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Erik Dahlström wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:26:18 +0100, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are several features which will be considered for inclusion in the next version of the spec. Why should this one in particular be called out over any other requested feature? Given

Re: [selectors-api] matchesSelector() Proposal

2008-12-12 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Sean Hogan wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5865 Current implementations: http://base2.googlecode.com/svn/doc/base2.html#/doc/!base2.DOM.Element.matchesSelector http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/docs/YAHOO.util.Selector.html http://www.prototypejs.org

Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2009-01-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
the Interoperability Consideration section to more accurately reflect the result of different levels of Selector support and offer advice for dealing with it. http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/#interoperability Please let me know if you are satisfied with this repsonse. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera

Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments

2009-01-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
and :first-letter). So this note may need correction. As Boris explained, this is not relevant. You may review the changes in the latest editor's draft. http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/ Please let me know if you are satisifed with this response. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http

Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

2009-01-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Lachlan Hunt wrote: Erik Dahlström wrote: On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:26:18 +0100, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote: == 8. Examples Please add an example such as this one: ... Then explain how to use the Selectors API to select only the svg 'font' elements and how to select only

Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

2009-01-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
to see. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

2009-01-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
the ones affecting JS libraries the most today, are likely to be addressed. [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WebAppsWGcomponent=Selectors+API -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2009-01-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
address it, I will certainly try and do so. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

2009-01-28 Thread Lachlan Hunt
. It would really help a lot if those who believe being able to resolve namespaces is an important feature, could document clear use cases that cannot be solved easily without, or would be solved more easily with, support for namespaces. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http

Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

2009-01-28 Thread Lachlan Hunt
it will be to evaluate them and find an appropriate solution. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API

2009-01-28 Thread Lachlan Hunt
that are trivial to make up. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments

2009-01-30 Thread Lachlan Hunt
the element itself, and as your example shows, doing so would be pointless and confusing. I've just spotted one more issue: definitions of the querySelector methods Is the plural intended? Yes, there are two definitions. One for querySelector() and another for querySelectorAll(). -- Lachlan

Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2009-01-30 Thread Lachlan Hunt
?) that it intends to benefit. This will then allow me to more easily evaluate and potentially tweak the proposal when it comes. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...

2009-01-31 Thread Lachlan Hunt
that involve normalization. I do not understand that claim because, since Selectors currently doesn't require normalisation, any test cases that relied on normalisation would be invalid tests. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments

2009-02-02 Thread Lachlan Hunt
methods of the NodeSelector interface. Please let me know if you are satisfied with this response. You can review the changes in the latest editor's draft. http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/ -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

2009-02-06 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Resig's tests [1], into the test suite. I started writing one [2], but it's not yet finished. I will be making time to work on it very soon, as it has now become a priority. [1] http://ejohn.org/apps/selectortest/ [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/selectors-api-testsuite/ -- Lachlan

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

2009-02-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
-normative note? The entire example section is already non-normative. excluding all others, requires an additional processing to filter the result. requires additional processing, or an additional step Fixed. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

2009-02-12 Thread Lachlan Hunt
offered [2] (but which I haven't yet received), then we should be able to organise an official test suite relatively quickly. [1] http://ejohn.org/apps/selectortest/#target [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/0347.html -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au

Re: [selectors-api] Stringifying undefined (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec)

2009-02-13 Thread Lachlan Hunt
on whether or not we could or would make the change. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Stringifying undefined

2009-02-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Jonas Sicking wrote: On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote: e.g. function nsresolver(ns) { uri = {xht: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;, svg: http://www.w3.org/2000/svg} return uri[ns]; } For resolving the default namespace, this would return

Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Analysis (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec)

2009-02-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
is the correct behaviour or not. It seems like something WebIDL should define, but I couldn't find anything in the spec on the issue. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

[selectors-api] Test Suite Missing tests for Namespace Selectors

2009-03-12 Thread Lachlan Hunt
-357 -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Missing tests for Namespace Selectors

2009-03-12 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Alexey Proskuryakov wrote: 12.03.2009, в 17:19, Lachlan Hunt написал(а): WebKit has a bug with the |foo selector. http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/28 Opera and Firefox pass This is actually a difference in createElementNS(null, p) vs. createElementNS(, p

[webstorage] Ambiguous Requirement for Key Ordering

2009-06-09 Thread Lachlan Hunt
-storage-key -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

[selectors-api] Transitioning to CR

2009-06-17 Thread Lachlan Hunt
/2009JanMar/0585.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/0586.html I will work in John Resig to get those tests integrated into the test suite soon. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR

2009-06-19 Thread Lachlan Hunt
CR relatively quickly. If we need to wait for at least 2 implementations that both get 100%, that will just delay the spec by 6 to 12 months awaiting the browser vendors' next release cycle. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

[selectors-api] Test Suite Progress

2009-07-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
/public-webapps/2009JanMar/0788.html [4] http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/dom/selectors/001.html -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Progress

2009-07-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Boris Zbarsky wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: I've also begun to add tests for the namespace selector syntax [2] to the second set, but they are currently a work in progress and are not functioning properly. If anyone can figure out what I've done wrong, please let me know. I'm glad to try

[webdatabase] changeVersion should allow all callbacks to be optional

2009-08-28 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Hi, The spec currently requires the first 2 callbacks for the changeVersion method, while the 3rd is optional. The spec should make all of the callbacks optional so authors don't resort to specifying empty functions when they don't actually need to do anything with it. -- Lachlan Hunt

[webdatabase] Transaction Locks

2009-08-31 Thread Lachlan Hunt
/webdatabase/#processing-model -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

[webdatabase] Minor Clarification Needed in Processing Model

2009-09-03 Thread Lachlan Hunt
in the transaction are discarded. Can you clarify this statement so that it's clearer that it's referring to the transaction's error callback, and not a statement error callback in executeSql. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

[selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2

2009-09-23 Thread Lachlan Hunt
and evaluate the problems being solved, and determine if it's really worth addressing in this version. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2

2009-09-23 Thread Lachlan Hunt
target element matches a given selector. So it would be something like: if (evt.target.matchesSelector(.fooinput.bar)) { ... } -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2

2009-09-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
(). It was discussed a couple of days ago in IRC. It's based on the functionality provided and needed by javascript libraries. Garrett Smith wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: div2.matchesSelector(:scope~div, div1); The matching seems backwards. Should be on the matcher, instead of the element? I don't

Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2

2009-09-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Lachlan Hunt wrote: Sean Hogan wrote: I think a couple of those features are pretty low priority: - I don't see the point of collective queries on NodeLists. Are there any references for the proposal? Otherwise I can't think of any useful queries that can't already be achieved with a single

Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2

2009-09-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
it tries to create it. Otherwise, it will be valid. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2

2009-09-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
via querySelector*() or getElementsBy*(), or wherever else. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2

2009-09-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
until we can create arbitrary NodeLists. It would simplify the issues that John described in his last e-mail, but the exact use cases aren't entirely clear which is making finding and determining the most appropriate solution difficult. I'm hoping John can answer this question. -- Lachlan Hunt

Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2

2009-09-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
of elements can be provided somehow and that the implementation can execute the query on each distinct element in that collection. How exactly that is done is just an API design issue. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

[selectors-api] Matches Selector Interface

2009-09-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
easier to define, but otherwise, no normative changes. I also fixed up the IDL for the NodeSelector interface to match the current WebIDL requirements. I made these changes to the level 1 spec too. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

[selectors-api] Scoped Selectors

2009-09-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
used once. I'm not sure which alternative would be best, and I'm kind of hoping there's a 4th alternative I haven't thought of yet that can address the use cases easliy enough. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors

2009-09-25 Thread Lachlan Hunt
for the cases where they're using custom pseudo-classes not supported by the browser) One possible modification I'm considering is introducing a separate factory method for creating implied scope selectors: createScopedSelector(selector); rather than using a boolean parameter. -- Lachlan Hunt

Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors

2009-09-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
or not such a use case is significant. It seems more natural to want to restrict the results to those within the same tree. See the current editors draft for more details. http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/ -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Scoped Selectors

2009-09-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 9/26/09 4:36 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: A scoped selector string is a string that begins with an exclamation point followed by a the remainder of the selector. This assumes that '!' will never be allowed at the beginning of a CSS selector, right? It does

Re: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2

2009-09-28 Thread Lachlan Hunt
a selector like em as being equivalent to :referenceem. I also defined the :reference pseudo class in the spec (formerly known as :scope in previous discussions) to match the contextual reference elements. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Selectors API 2 Status

2009-11-04 Thread Lachlan Hunt
. [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/ [2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WebAppsWGcomponent=Selectors%20API [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/1198.html -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR

2009-11-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
~/2006/webapi/selectors-api/Overview.html?rev=1.101content-type=text/html;%20charset=UTF-8 I'll make all the necessary editorial changes to get it ready for CR when I find out what the publication date will be. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Progress

2009-11-24 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Lachlan Hunt wrote: I have now split the test suite up into 3 files, similar to how I prevoiusly described [1]: 1. Baseline Tests: HTML with CSS Level 2.1 Selectors. 2. Additional Tests: HTML with Selectors Level 3. 3. Additional Tests: XHTML+SVG with Selectors Level 3. http://dev.w3.org/2006

Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace

2009-11-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR

2009-11-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/1221.html -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace

2009-11-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
selector would work fine? -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR

2009-11-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Lachlan Hunt wrote: There must be at least two complete, independent implementations, each of which must pass 100% of the baseline testsuite and should pass additional tests, dependent on the following conditions: ... The current state of implementations is as follows: Minefield: Baseline

Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR

2009-11-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 11/26/09 9:58 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: Actually, correction. Minefield and Opera don't meet the condition if we keep the shipping requirement in the exit criteria. Which imo we should. I don't think we want to be opening up that loophole. The Gecko 1.9.2 branch builds

Re: Selectors CR criteria

2009-11-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
don't actually try to implement the methods themselves. They just implement somewhat compatible functionality and expose it on their own objects (e.g. $(divp); instead of document.querySelector(divp);). -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace

2009-11-30 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Robin Berjon wrote: On Nov 26, 2009, at 15:07 , Lachlan Hunt wrote: Jonathan Watt wrote: Nevertheless, that doesn't mean that Web content shouldn't be able to process XML that uses xml:id using script and present the processed information to the user using content and semantics that *does

Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace

2009-11-30 Thread Lachlan Hunt
help if you could find some other APIs and illustrate with some real world sites that use them, where namespace-supporting APIs are utilised for good reasons on the client side. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD?

2010-01-07 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Mozilla and WebKit have begun their implementation of matchesSelector, which is defined in it. The editor's draft is here. http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/ -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD?

2010-01-10 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Sean Hogan wrote: On 8/01/10 1:19 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: can we publish Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/ FYI, it seems the whole Status of this Document hasn't been updated for Selectors-API2. Yeah, that will get fixed up when I get the spec

Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD?

2010-01-11 Thread Lachlan Hunt
points to, and then follows the normal rules for evaluating querySelector. Given that selector, any descendents of refNode that are also descendents of element (the context node) will be matched, the first of which will be returned. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http

Re: [selectors-api2] Should we keep the queryScopedSelector methods? (was: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD?)

2010-01-11 Thread Lachlan Hunt
to: document.querySelectorAll(:scope+p, elm); Anyway, since the CfC for FPWD has already begun, I'd rather not make any major changes till afterwards. I'd also like to hear from a few other people on this issue. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD?

2010-01-11 Thread Lachlan Hunt
/0317.html -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme

2010-01-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
interoperability by standardising this? Are these icons meant to be used by web content, or meant only for internal use by the browser? -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme

2010-01-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
. It seems much more likely that developers would want to have all icons used to be designed with a common style. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme

2010-01-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
?html;32 or about:icon?ext=htmlsize=32 (though, I think being shorter and avoiding '' is better, so authors don't have to bother escaping it in their HTML) -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

Re: Status of Selectors API Level 1 Candidate

2010-05-05 Thread Lachlan Hunt
/2006/webapi/selectors-api-testsuite/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/1221.html -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/

  1   2   >