[Puppet Users] Puppetize Live Stream

sion in by 30 July because we won’t be extending the CFP deadline this year. We look forward to seeing your ideas for live stream (and in-person) talks, and seeing more people and topics represented on the virtual stage at Puppetize Live. *Michael Stahnke* *Director of Engineering PE/Platform/SRE*

Re: [Puppet Users] Raspberry Pi Agents

t anywhere we can get rid of it, I'm in favor. > > [1] https://github.com/stahnma/puppet-agent/commit/ > 02faa1ab51f74ddb827ca1c3f5da5c3ab9c17a20 (assuming, this is your repo?) > > Regards, > Stefan > > - Original Message - > > From: "Michael Stahn

[Puppet Users] Raspberry Pi Agents

In my spare time, I build out puppet-agents for Raspberry pis, because I like pain and ARM boards. I finally got Debian Stretch Working for armhf. Debian 9 http://unsupported.s3.amazonaws.com/puppet-agent_5. 4.0.412.g8f7446e2-1stretch_armhf.deb Debian 8

[Puppet Users] I'd like to see you at PuppetConf 2016

as the sessions. Join us a day early for the contributor summit for open forums if that works for you. I want to invite you to come, but time is running out for the cheaper tickets. Today is the last day for the 20% off price. Michael Stahnke Director of Engineering -- You received this message

[Puppet Users] Pulling down Puppet Agent 1.6.0 (puppet 4.6.0)

A critical bug was reported (PUP-6608) that is affecting a significant number of users in the Puppet 4.6.0 (puppet-agent 1.6.0) release, we are pulling 4.6.0, and will be shipping 4.6.1 later this afternoon Mike Stahnke Release Engineering -- You received this message because you are

Re: [Puppet Users] Official Packages for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

It's up on nightlies, we've been building against the RCs. http://nightlies.puppetlabs.com/puppet-agent-latest/repos/apt/xenial/pool/PC1/p/puppet-agent/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [Puppet Users] AIX Agent with NIM

Hey thanks for that feedback. If we could have that in a Jira ticket, it'd be more likely to get attention, as we could get it to the right folk to look at. I know I am always interested in feedback on our AIX work, because all customers/users do not use it the same way. File a ticket in the PUP

[Puppet Users] Puppet Agent Open Sourced

tlabs.com/browse/PA/ [4] https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/CPR/ Michael Stahnke Release Engineering -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an ema

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet-common from Puppetlabs APT repository broken on Ubuntu wily

We also don't have wily packages up, so if the first bug was fixed, I don't think it would work. It's a work in progress. You can follow https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/CPR-213 for more information. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Markus Birth wrote: > I can't install

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Puppet agent 3.8.x on AIX 7.x

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Ryan Anderson wrote: > I've gotten puppet open source 3.7.x working on AIX, I haven't updated to > 3.8, but I'm sure that would be trivial. The steps are basically: > - Install the ruby 2.0.0 AIX rpm from perzl.org, plus its dependencies

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet agent 3.8.x on AIX 7.x

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Jean-Francois Gratton wrote: > Hi, > > I've looked around to find an answer, all I could find seemed to be badly > outdated. > > I'm looking to either sources or binaries to get a Puppet 3.8.x agent > working on AIX 7.x . > Welcome to the fun

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet agent 1.2.5 ?

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > Same player shot again : > > https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP/fixforversion/14801/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:release-report-tabpanel > > Version

Re: [Puppet Users] puppet agent 1.2.5 ?

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > > Le 12 oct. 2015 à 18:01, Michael Stahnke <stah...@puppetlabs.com> a > écrit : > > > With transparency comes the ability to see things that are not perfect. > We ha

Re: [Puppet Users] Security: Potential exposure of CA key under puppetserver

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Will a CVE be issued for this? > Yes > > Thanks, > > Trevor > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Eric Sorenson < > eric.soren...@puppetlabs.com> wrote: > >> We've identified and are fixing a

Re: [Puppet Users] Status of activemq

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Kenton Brede wrote: > I'm wondering the same thing here. > > Sorry, missed this thread the first time. > Kent > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ellison Marks wrote: > >> So, I'm going through the dance of upgrading to

Re: [Puppet Users] Mcollective plugin packages in the PC1 repository

Short answer, yes there are plans, but we haven't scheduled the work yet. We know it's painful right now, and I'm sorry for that. I'll see we can get that slotted in soon. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: how were your puppet 3-4 upgrades?

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Ellison Marks gty...@gmail.com wrote: We ran into a couple issues, all on centos6. Several package conflicts. Had to remove the puppetlabs-release package to get the puppetlabs

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: how were your puppet 3-4 upgrades?

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Ellison Marks gty...@gmail.com wrote: We ran into a couple issues, all on centos6. Several package conflicts. Had to remove the puppetlabs-release package to get the puppetlabs-release-pc1 package to install. New puppetserver package didn't obsolete the old

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Lucid leaving apt.puppetlabs.com

We had been talking about this internally for a bit as well. Basically, we have a couple things we'd like to do. 1. In the Puppet Collections Paradigm, we are no longer removing items. 2. In the old production repos, we will still be removing items (to eventually phase those repos out) 3. As far

Re: [Puppet Users] Running the Puppet 4 master from the AIO package (especially passenger/rack)

as the immediate issue at this time. I had it working with passenger-5.0.7 last time I tested, so I don't think it's passenger. On 07/18/2015 12:32 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote: For the AIO, you can certainly get passenger working. (Although we'd love to hear why PuppetServer isn't working or what

Re: [Puppet Users] Running the Puppet 4 master from the AIO package (especially passenger/rack)

For the AIO, you can certainly get passenger working. (Although we'd love to hear why PuppetServer isn't working or what you want). Config files on a gist: https://gist.github.com/stahnma/cf89dfa79b053f138eb1 This should get you most of the way there. You might have to sub out passenger

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Announce: Puppet Agent 1.2, Facter 3, Puppet 4.2, Hiera 3

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Urist dur...@ucar.edu wrote: Are there up-to-date instructions for how to install from the apt repos for jessie? Install http://apt.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs-release-pc1-jessie.deb and then use apt-get to install puppet-agent. That should be about it.

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Announce: Puppet Agent 1.2, Facter 3, Puppet 4.2, Hiera 3

I also neglected to mention in the original announcement that we now have package repositories for Debian Jessie and Mac OS X Mavericks (10.9) and Yosemite (10.10) and these OSes will be part of the regular release pipelines going forward. For those looking for Mac packages, they are at

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Problems with puppet agent on EL7 systems

What does your catalog look like? Could you try basically something empty (no node classification, no custom facts/plugins) and see if it works? We certainly have lots of people running Puppet on EL7. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users

Re: [Puppet Users] Fedora 21 Repos ETA

And the Fedora 20 packages for Puppet and Facter at least, work just fine. That's what I've been using at home. On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Melissa Stone meli...@puppetlabs.com wrote: Hi Dallas, We are getting everything prepared to start shipping Fedora 21 packages. You'll see that

Re: [Puppet Users] SSL POODLE Vulnerability

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Mike Seda mike.s...@lillegroup.com wrote: Puppet Developers, Based on the SSL POODLE vulnerability ( https://www.openssl.org/~bodo/ssl-poodle.pdf ), will you be patching WEBrick to deny SSLv3 like you did with SSLv2 (

Re: [Puppet Users] Yum Related Versioning Issue

Sometimes yum (and things calling it) do better when using package-name.arch like openldap-libs.i386 vs openldap-libs.x86_64 if that makes sense. I think that's what's happening. On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Dan White y...@comcast.net wrote: Did you try yum update --verbose package as

[Puppet Users] Outage on yum/apt/downloads for 1 hour at 03:00 UTC

Our primary distribution server will be down for scheduled maintenance at 03:00 UTC for approximately 1 hour. This system hosts yum.puppetlabs.com, apt.puppetlabs.com, and downloads.puppetlabs.com. Those services will be unavailable during this outage window. If you have questions, please let me

Re: [Puppet Users] Enterprise Puppet 3 with AIX WPAR support

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Larry Sybrandt lsybra...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All Just wondering where to manage an AIX server with multiple WPARS. At the host level or at each guest level? It seems like one way would be easier than another. I just can't figure out which one that is.

Re: [Puppet Users] Packages on fedora19

Fedora 19 is now up on yum.puppetlabs.com. As a word of caution, this is the first distro to adopt Ruby 2.0, so there could be some bugs in a few spots. Please file if you run into them. http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet-community-pkg-repo/issues/new stahnma -- You received

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Yum.puppetlabs.com: Fedora 19

Fedora 19 is now up on yum.puppetlabs.com. As a word of caution, this is the first distro to adopt Ruby 2.0, so there could be some bugs in a few spots. Please file if you run into them. http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet-community-pkg-repo/issues/new stahnma -- You received

[Puppet Users] End of Life Plan for Puppet 2.7.x

://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/upgrading.html Web: http://ask.puppetlabs.com IRC: #puppet Mailing list: puppet-users@googlegroups.com Thanks, Michael Stahnke Engineering -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [Puppet Users] Packages on fedora19

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Pete Brown rendhal...@gmail.com wrote: I was just wondering the same thing. My dev environment runs in Fedora 18 and I almost upgraded yesterday but thought some testing was in order first. I am likely to do what I did last time and try installing the versions

Re: [Puppet Users] ruby issue

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Greg Chavez greg.cha...@gmail.com wrote: Which is just fine if your company has the Optional subscription. Mine doesn't. So I'm screwed unless I write a script to manually pull updates from Fedora or CentOS into a custom mrepo repository. Bit of a pain, that

Re: [Puppet Users] Dashboard fails to import report from Fedora 17 node

Fedora stock ships Puppet 2.7.18 and Ruby 1.9.3, which are not compatible. I suggest adding yum.puppetlabs.com and upgrading to Puppet 3. Either that or downgrade Ruby to 1.8.7. This is a known issue with Puppet 2.7 and Ruby 1.9.3. On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Peter Bukowinski

[Puppet Users] Puppet 2.6.x is now EOL

The time has come for us to say good-bye to Puppet 2.6.x. Puppet 2.6.x is now end of Life, as originally announced Jan 17, 2013. Puppet 2.6.0 first launched July 20, 2010. Since that time, we've had two major versions of Puppet, 2.7.x and the semantically versioned Puppet 3 series. Puppet 2.7.x

Re: [Puppet Users] Recent RoR Vulns and puppet 3x on RHEL 6?

Unless you've elected to use legacy storeconfigs (with activerecord), you are correct, your system should not be vulnerable. stahnma On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Kodiak Firesmith kfiresm...@gmail.com wrote: Hello fellow Puppet users! I'm trying to perform due diligence to make sure that

Re: [Puppet Users] Version 2.6 Future Updates?

Thanks for the query. I don't know that we did make an official announcement regarding Puppet 2.6.x. I will be doing that shortly (as in today). Mike On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Michael Hrivnak mhriv...@hrivnak.orgwrote: I am trying to determine how much longer, if at all, version 2.6

[Puppet Users] Support/patch EOL for Puppet 2.6.x

The time has come for us to say good-bye to Puppet 2.6.x. Puppet 2.6.x will be end of life on April 30, 2013. Puppet 2.6.0 first launched July 20, 2010. Since that time, we've had two major version of Puppet, 2.7.x and the new semantically versioned Puppet 3 series. Puppet 2.7.x is largely on

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Catalog compile times 40s - Puppet 2.7.18

Puppet 3 has lots of performance improvements. In many cases it's faster than 2.6.x was. Some of those fixes were back-ported to 2.7.20, but not all of them could be. For best performance, try out something in the Puppet 3 series. On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:30 AM, shurik a.grus...@gmail.com

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet with dedicated ruby install

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Alexander Philipp alex.phili...@gmail.com wrote: Are there any good guides out there to using Puppet agents with a dedicated, separate ruby install? Our apps are all Ruby based and require different versions than Puppet. Installing the agent from a package

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.0 Puppet labs repo package problem on rhel5

Thanks Jeff for pointing out that the EPEL maintainer and the puppet labs maintainer should have been coordinating on rubygem-json. (It's the same guyme. I'm an idiot). Mike On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Brian Jolly br...@brianjolly.com wrote: That worked for me. Thanks!!! On

Re: [Puppet Users] 1.8.7 = 1.9.3 migration, compilation times raised twice!?

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:34 AM, asq asqu...@gmail.com wrote: i've made a migration on our puppetmasters yesterday, hoping it will run faster and/or make less load on machines with newer ruby. but actual result is just opposite, our compilation times went up a lot, ie: Nov 27 14:30:12 punch

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 3.0 Puppet labs repo package problem on rhel5

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Alaric paxindust...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm having a weird issue and was wondering if anyone else had run into it. I recently upgraded from puppet 2.7 - 3.0.1 After cleaning up some gems on my puppet master everything seemed to be working ok. I had

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet client won't autostart

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Bret Wortman b...@thewortmans.org wrote: It is kind of funny that we're talking about using puppet's tricks for working around bad start scripts for puppet's own software On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 9:58:57 AM UTC-5, jcbollinger wrote: On Tuesday,

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: tcl dependency in RHEL6 installing facter, puppet

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:37 AM, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote: On Monday, November 5, 2012 2:10:58 PM UTC-6, msuho wrote: Hi- I am running RedHat Enterprise version 6. Linux luke 2.6.32-131.17.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Sep 29 10:24:25 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Re: [Puppet Users] compiling ruby on HP-UX / PA-RISC

On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Alex Harvey alexharv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Not sure if anyone out there would be using HP-UX on PA-RISC but just in case we've run into a real brick wall on this one. We are apparently encountering exactly the same issue as this person did -

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Puppet 2.7 v 3.0 in the PuppetLabs yum repo

I'm trying to close the loop on this thread. We recognize that some users were negatively impacted by having Puppet 3.0.0 in the same repositories as the previously released versions. While we attempted to communicate our intentions to release that way by design, not everybody saw those

Re: [Puppet Users] OperatingSystem fact for Oracle Linux?

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Ramin K ramin-l...@badapple.net wrote: On 10/26/2012 2:19 AM, Gavin Williams wrote: Morning all Not sure on the best place to raise this, so thought I'd start here... I'm starting to work with Puppet and Oracle Linux 6.1. Unfortunately I'm finding a lot of

Re: [Puppet Users] FreeBSD 3.0 Port

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Worker Bee beeworke...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Everyone; So, the FreeBSD Port is now available. However, I am a bit confused about hiera. The Makefile does not list rubygem-puppet-hiera as a requirement for the agent. This IS required in the redhat spec files

Re: [Puppet Users] Custom Ruby

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Jakov Sosic jso...@srce.hr wrote: On 10/17/2012 01:02 AM, Craig White wrote: The puppet server should probably be running on something newer than CentOS 5.x (a vm perhaps?) Can you run 3.0 server with 2.7 clients? Yes. -- Jakov Sosic www.srce.unizg.hr

Re: [Puppet Users] Seeing an error that is totally confusing the heck out of me

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Peter Berghold salty.cowd...@gmail.com wrote: Got the following: err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: Could not autoload package: Could not autoload /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/windows.rb: no such

Re: [Puppet Users] domain resolution in facter

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Klaus Ethgen klaus+use...@ethgen.de wrote: Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com schrieb: [Bug in domain.rb] I think that is a bug in facter but I do not know how to open a bug report on the website, there is only a way to display open issues. You can open

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet 2.7 v 3.0 in the PuppetLabs yum repo

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Jeff McCune j...@puppetlabs.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Robert Rothenberg rob...@gmail.com wrote: I am using CentOS 6 with the PuppetLabs yum repo from http://yum.puppetlabs.com I noticed that today version 3 is available on the repo, so of

Re: [Puppet Users] install vmware tools through puppet

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Jakov Sosic jso...@srce.hr wrote: On 09/19/2012 11:55 PM, Hai Tao wrote: There seems to be a few vmware tools installation modules. Has someone used these modules to install VMware tools? Searching http://forge.puppetlabs.com ... NAME

Re: [Puppet Users] collect facter output of puppet client remotely from the puppetmaster

There's also http://rubygems.org/gems/web-facter. not sure if that would help. I haven't played with web-facter, but thought it looked somewhat interesting. Mike On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Bill Fraser fra...@pythian.com wrote: On 12-09-20 10:36 PM, Hiu wrote: hi all, I would like to

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Installing puppet and using ruby from RVM.

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Stephen Price ste...@gmail.com wrote: John's right. Yum and RVM will manage Rubies separately. Is there a specific reason you want Puppet to use 1.9.2 instead of CentOS 6's version from yum repos (1.8.7)? I run CentOS on close to 100 hosts, all with 1.8.7 as

Re: [Puppet Users] RHEL Kickstart and Puppet certificates

I used to just institute policy that hostnames could not be re-used. It had a few benefits beyond puppet, like application people not hard-coding hostnames and using cnames as the maker intended. Mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users

[Puppet Users] PuppetConf 2012 -- Last day for early bird pricing

It's the time of year again where we gather the Puppet faithful from around the world and hold PuppetConf. What started last year in Portland is moving to San Francisco this year, with a bigger venue, more tracks and amazing speakers. PuppetConf 2012 takes place in San Francisco, from September

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: yum puppet install fails

Ruby is in the base repos (or optional channel in RHEL 6), so there isn't a need for us to provide it. It is provided by the distro vendor. On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:26 AM, unixman unix...@videotron.ca wrote: I mean yum install puppet of course Chris -- You received this message because

Re: [Puppet Users] unable to install on Ubuntu 12.04

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:21 PM, alike ch...@propeld.com wrote: This is my first time to install puppet and it's quite frustrating to me. If anyone can help me out that would be great. My current installation failed with the below error: ** /opt/puppet/bin/erb -T -

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet updated yum packages without logging?

Did something else pull that package in as a dependency? On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Matthew Barr mb...@snap-interactive.com wrote: We just saw an interesting scenario: Puppet 2.7.18 updated packages on a RHEL 6.2 box to a newer version without logging that fact. We've already fixed

Re: [Puppet Users] fedoar 17 and puppet dashboard

This has to do with Ruby 1.9.3 being the default (and only) ruby in Fedora 17. Puppe 2.7 in Fedora 17 has a couple of outstanding bugs in the 2.7.x series with Ruby 1.9.3. Reporting is one of them. It can't easily be fixed without modifying behavior. When Puppet 3.0 arrives, this is fixed with

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet updated yum packages without logging?

I can't reproduce this. I used sudo because it was out-of-date on my system. [0] root@centos6-64 /tmp rpm -q sudo sudo-1.7.4p5-9.el6_2.x86_64 [0] root@centos6-64 /tmp yum list available | grep sudo sudo.x86_641.7.4p5-12.el6_3 updates [0]

Re: [Puppet Users] activeMQ client on the puppet server?

You only need activeMQ in one spot to do mcollective stuff. So, the Puppet Server is an acceptable place to do that. If you're not yet using mcollective, then you don't need ActiveMQ at all. Mike On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Hai Tao ehai...@gmail.com wrote: on the puppet server ( i

Re: [Puppet Users] GSoC 2012 - State of Ruby DSL for Puppet

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Mateusz Lenik mt.le...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, My name is Mateusz and I'm one of the GSoC 2012 students. My proposal was to expand features of Ruby DSL for Puppet. The idea is to make Ruby DSL as similar as possible to Puppet language, so it can be learned

[Puppet Users] State of Puppet 3.0 and our commitment to quality

As many of you have doubtless noticed, Puppet 3 and Facter 2 have been sitting in RC (Release Candidate process) for a long time. That's about to change, but they won't be getting released as they currently stand. Puppet 3 and Facter 2 have been pulled out of the RC process after we recognized

[Puppet Users] Chicago Puppet Camp -- would you like to speak?

We've had a few cancellations for our Puppet Camp Chicago (July 23, 2 weeks from today). If you'd like to speak about Puppet,what you're doing with it, DevOps, etc we may have a spot for you. You can game fame, fortune or at least a little notoriety. If you'd like to speak, just reply to me

Re: [Puppet Users] can puppet-dashboard be installed on CentOS 5.4?

Puppet Dashboard *can* be installed on EL 5 based systems if you've updated Ruby to a 1.8.7 version. By default, EL5 comes with 1.8.5 versions of ruby which have known issues with Dashboard. If you search the archives of this list, there are a few posts about getting 1.8.7 onto EL5 specifically

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Extending Puppet using Rubygems

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:19 AM, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote: On Saturday, June 23, 2012 7:38:20 PM UTC-5, Kelsey Hightower wrote: There is a pending pull request that adds the ability for Puppet to load Faces, parser functions, and report processors installed via Rubygems.

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet and Ruby 1.9

I've used 2.7.13 and higher with Ruby 1.9.3. The only real problem I remember having was around reports. I wasn't doing anything super complicated though. Mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email

Re: [Puppet Users] Java dependency error in puppet installation

If you really want to use Oracle java, see this: http://docs.puppetlabs.com/pe/2.5/install_basic.html#vendor-packages On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Scott s...@torand.net wrote: Jeeva kissan475 at gmail.com writes: Hi,  I was trying to instal puppet-enterprise-2.5.1-el-5-x86_64 in

Re: [Puppet Users] Thoughts on job listings?

I let this sit for a week or so to see what response would be. In general: If you are a puppet user/community member and want to post a job at your company, that is ok. Please add JOB to the subject line. If you are a recruiter or hiring for a 3rd party, it is not ok. You can use traditional

[Puppet Users] Thoughts on job listings?

How do folks feel about getting Puppet job listings on this list? I've rejected a few that we quite spammy, but when the subject matter really is a system admin with puppet experience, the decision becomes a bit different. I'm looking for general feelings. A simple +1 or -1 would be great.

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Announcing Razor

I have Ruby 1.9 (the build from Fedora 17) available for EL6 variants. It's not super-tested, but I've used it for some tests/experiments. http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/ruby/ Mike On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com wrote: Nan, Using the

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Announcing Razor

! Trevor On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote: I have Ruby 1.9 (the build from Fedora 17) available for EL6 variants.  It's not super-tested, but I've used it for some tests/experiments. http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/ruby/ Mike On Thu, May 24

Re: [Puppet Users] Installing up to date puppet on Ubuntu

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:07 AM, felix crucialfe...@gmail.com wrote: ah ! thanks before: puppet:   Installed: (none)   Candidate: 0.25.4-2ubuntu6.7   Version table:      0.25.4-2ubuntu6.7 0         500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages         500

[Puppet Users] Announce: PuppetDB 0.9.0 (first release) is available

://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppetdb/issues Michael Stahnke Community Manager Puppet Labs -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Mailing list etiquette

community guidelines or formal policy around this.  I'd like to keep this as simple as possible. Thanks for understanding, Michael Stahnke Community Manager -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Java dependency error in puppet installation

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:34 AM, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote: On May 16, 5:23 am, Jeeva kissan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,  I was trying to instal puppet-enterprise-2.5.1-el-5-x86_64 in centos6 machine. But got below error. ## Installing packages from files... error: Failed

[Puppet Users] Mailing list etiquette

with other lists We don't have clear community guidelines or formal policy around this. I'd like to keep this as simple as possible. Thanks for understanding, Michael Stahnke Community Manager -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group

Re: [Puppet Users] Mailing list etiquette

. This was just a chore that needed to go out. Our list has grown quite a bit, so a gentle reminder is a good thing. On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:44:59AM -0700, Michael Stahnke wrote: I wanted to quickly make a reminder on mailing list etiquette: * Don't top post (quote inline) * Use plain

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Why latest stable Debian Squeeze package is 2.6.2-5+squeeze4 please ?

in advance. Best regards, Christophe On 8 avr, 00:42, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Christophe L cl.subscript...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you all for your answers ! As a suggestion for the documentation, that would be nice to have

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Creating a system module path (starting with Telly)

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Bill Proud billpr...@yahoo.com wrote: Sounds good. One problem that I have with the forge is that the extent to which the modules have been tested is not clear to me.  Can I take it that the core modules that ship with puppet will have been through a similar

[Puppet Users] Creating a system module path (starting with Telly)

There was some discussion and concern about moving the Nagios types/providers out of the core area of Puppet for Telly. We made a mistake of talking about a point solution to a problem rather than the vision on where we’d like it to go, and why. We’ve attempted to outline this a bit more so you

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Undo

There also could be mcollective logs on the end-points that would tell you what command were run etc. On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:10 AM, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.org wrote: On Apr 18, 3:17 am, Luke Bigum luke.bi...@lmax.com wrote: If you're really really lucky you can look in

Re: [Puppet Users] how to get ruby-shadow installed before trying to make users,groups

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Paul Hinze paul.t.hi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Steve Roberts strob...@strobe.net wrote: But since the provider has already clipped the attributes they don't get set in the first run. when run a second time the attributes do get set

Re: [Puppet Users] Supported Ruby Versions for Telly

things that MUCH older than what telly is setup to do. Another option would be to run Puppet Enterprise (which includes Ruby 1.8.7), but doesn't support RHEL 3 or 4. I'd probably talk to my boss about what end-of-life really means ;) On Apr 13, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Michael Stahnke wrote: Puppet

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: [Puppet Users] Telly: Nagios types moving into Module

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote: Michael Stahnke wrote: For the next major Puppet version, code-named Telly, we have some changes coming.  This is the first in a series of emails around these changes and may require some input from the community

[Puppet Users] Telly: Nagios types moving into Module

For the next major Puppet version, code-named Telly, we have some changes coming. This is the first in a series of emails around these changes and may require some input from the community. For Telly, the nagios types will be moved into a module. This allows them to be iterated on in isolation

[Puppet Users] Supported Ruby Versions for Telly

Puppet Labs is happy to announce full support for Ruby 1.9.3 will be part of the next major release of Puppet, codenamed Telly. Ruby 1.8.7 and 1.9.3 are considered the primary supported Ruby versions, on all platforms including Unix, Linux, Windows, and MacOS-X. Ruby 1.8.5 is also supported, on

[Puppet Users] FYI: Packages available for Puppet natively

Since we've had a few threads about packages lately, I thought I would share where our Open Sources packages are available from. These areas are kept updated with the latest versions from Puppet Labs. This is in contrast with many distro policies (e.g. Squeeze at 2.6.2, EPEL at 2.6.14, etc).

[Puppet Users] Taking github noise away from puppet-dev list

feed for the puppet projects you have the most interest in. This decision isn't final, but I would like to get opinions on the idea. I welcome feedback until Friday, April 13. Michael Stahnke Community Manager -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet

Re: [Puppet Users] Taking github noise away from puppet-dev list

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Jeff McCune j...@puppetlabs.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote: We have a goal to foster development discussion from the community. Because of that, I am proposing we move the github notifications to a new

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Why latest stable Debian Squeeze package is 2.6.2-5+squeeze4 please ?

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Christophe L cl.subscript...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you all for your answers ! As a suggestion for the documentation, that would be nice to have information about the http://apt.puppetlabs.com/ apt repository on the puppet installation page. That is currently

Re: [Puppet Users] Getting started

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Andreas Haerter list+puppet-us...@mail-node.com wrote: Hi, On 05.04.2012 22:42, Brown, Rodrick wrote: I really hate poor documentation. I’m following along in PDF documentation I downloaded from the official site and I’m stuck after I installed rack

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

this differently. This is also by no means designed to close this discussion, so please weigh in if you have opinions. Michael Stahnke Community Manager On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Mister IT Guru misteritg...@gmx.com wrote: Good Evening Guys, Let me start by saying that I really admire how far

[Puppet Users] Dashboard 1.2.7 available

This is a maintenance release candidate of Puppet Dashboard. It includes contributions from Carl Caum, Josh Lifton, and Matt Robinson. This release is available for download at: http://downloads.puppetlabs.com/dashboard/ We have included Debian and RPM packages as well as a tarball. See the

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Facts loading 4-5x

I am fairly certain that 2.7.12 fixes these issues. On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Krzysztof Wilczynski krzysztof.wilczyn...@linux.com wrote: Hi, It is a known issue in older version. A quick search yields: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3741

[Puppet Users] Puppet Enterprise 2.5 is here

] If you have any questions, let me know, Michael Stahnke Community Manager [1] http://puppetlabs.com/blog/announcing-puppet-enterprise-2-5/ [2] http://docs.puppetlabs.com/windows/index.html [3] http://bit.ly/GNN8CU [4] http://bit.ly/GGVYGj [5] https://twitter.com/#!/puppetlabs [6] http://puppetlabs.com

  1   2   3   >