Re: [pve-devel] Integration of FreeNAS iSCSI target initiator in Proxmox Enterprise repo

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:34 AM Andreas Steinel wrote: > Hopefully, we'll see the storage plugin framework happening in the future, > so that only additive changes are required in order to support new plugins. > This would hugely improve third-party-support and solve the problem of >

Re: [pve-devel] Integration of FreeNAS iSCSI target initiator in Proxmox Enterprise repo

of integrating yet another Storage-Plugin. [1] https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Documentation [2] https://deepdoc.at/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=virtualisierung:proxmox_kvm_und_lxc:proxmox_debian_als_zfs-over-iscsi_server_verwenden -- With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Stein

[pve-devel] [PATCH to pve-docs] Also mentioning FC-based storage in pve

Signed-off-by: Andreas Steinel --- pvesm.adoc | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/pvesm.adoc b/pvesm.adoc index 5340c3d..b76ce87 100644 --- a/pvesm.adoc +++ b/pvesm.adoc @@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ data to different nodes. ^1^: On file based storages, snapshots

Re: [pve-devel] LDAP integration with G Suite?

ith kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Steinel M.Sc. Visual Computing M.Sc. Informatik ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

[pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server v2 0/3] Fix #2041 and #413

for sharing files. Based on the Windows version, there are two possible sound implementations used like it is described on the SPICE page on the wiki. Signed-off-by: Andreas Steinel Andreas Steinel (3): Fix #2041: add spice webdav / folder sharing fix #413: add SPICE audio device Adding new

[pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server v2 3/3] Adding new config option 'spicedesktop'

--- PVE/QemuServer.pm | 32 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm index 173ae82..657cfad 100644 --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm @@ -607,6 +607,12 @@ EODESCR default => "1

[pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server v2 1/3] Fix #2041: add spice webdav / folder sharing

Adding the device and serial port for the service spice-webdavd on Linux and Windows. Signed-off-by: Andreas Steinel --- PVE/QemuServer.pm | 5 + PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm | 1 + 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm index 1ccdccf..225f0c0

[pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server v2 2/3] fix #413: add SPICE audio device

If you enable SPICE, the audio device will be automatically added. Intel HD for newer Windows and AC97 otherwise. --- PVE/QemuServer.pm | 9 + PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm | 1 + 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm index 225f0c0..173ae82

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container 1/1] Fix #2041: add spice webdav / folder sharing

Hi Dominik, On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2:54 PM Dominik Csapak wrote: > On 12/28/18 6:59 PM, Andreas Steinel wrote: > > Adding the device and serial port for the service spice-webdavd on Linux > and > > Windows. > > > > hi, thanks for the patch, a few points thoug

[pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 1/1] Fix #2041: add spice webdav / folder sharing

://www.spice-space.org/spice-user-manual.html Andreas Steinel (1): Fix #2041: add spice webdav / folder sharing PVE/QemuServer.pm | 5 + PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm | 1 + 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) -- 2.11.0 ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel

[pve-devel] [PATCH container 1/1] Fix #2041: add spice webdav / folder sharing

Adding the device and serial port for the service spice-webdavd on Linux and Windows. Signed-off-by: Andreas Steinel --- PVE/QemuServer.pm | 5 + PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm | 1 + 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm index 1ccdccf..225f0c0

Re: [pve-devel] Using rEFInd with Proxmox VE

m on the forums with grub2 was that the Debian version was just too old. -- With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Steinel M.Sc. Visual Computing M.Sc. Informatik ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/

Re: [pve-devel] [RFC/PATCH installer 0/4] don't create swap on ZFS as default

ompressed memory-backed, but still swap. Unfortunately, zram-config is still not in Debian, but the Ubuntu package works fine. It's just some systemd config files. -- With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Steinel M.Sc. Visual Computing M.Sc. I

Re: [pve-devel] [RFC/PATCH installer 0/4] don't create swap on ZFS as default

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:53 PM Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Looks good to me, I'll let it still ripe a bit on the mailing list though, > for other possible commenters :-) Great! -- With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Steinel M.Sc. Visual Computing M.Sc. Info

[pve-devel] Using rEFInd with Proxmox VE

mechanism, so I had to come up with a way to boot my PVE ZFS, which worked, but is obviously not a rock solid solution. https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Booting_a_ZFS_root_file_system_via_UEFI -- With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Steinel M.Sc. Visual Computing M.Sc. Informatik

Re: [pve-devel] RFE: pventer

gt; pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com > https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel -- With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Steinel M.Sc. Visual Computing M.Sc. Informatik ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Re: [pve-devel] Review/feedback request: "pveclient"

> pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com > https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel -- With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Steinel M.Sc. Visual Computing M.Sc. Informatik ___

Re: [pve-devel] API - GET /nodes/{node}/storage

iar with extjs and I thought this api (the big JSON thing) is generated somehow from the code itself as a kind of documentation or reference. I'm willing to fix things if I found not so well documented things. Can you point me to the file(s) and package(s) in question to change? -- With kind regar

Re: [pve-devel] API - GET /nodes/{node}/storage

018 at 06:03:58PM +0200, Andreas Steinel wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I tried to access the storage API and looked through [1] to find, that the >> >> GET /nodes/{node}/storage >> >> returns an array of string according to [2] the excerpt is: >> >>

Re: [pve-devel] Gitlab-ci

_________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com > https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel -- With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Steinel M.Sc. Visual Computing M.Sc. Informatik ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

[pve-devel] API - GET /nodes/{node}/storage

bit more complex: root@pve-5-apitest:~# pvesh get /nodes/pve-5-apitest/storage 200 OK [ { "active" : 1, "avail" : 23488102400, "content" : "rootdir,images", "enabled" : 1, "shared" : 0, "storage" : &q

Re: [pve-devel] ZFS encryption

h > there are already quite a few people over in #zfsonlinux that use it > quite heavily. and that is great. We need those people. -- With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Steinel M.Sc. Visual Computing M.Sc. Informatik ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Re: [pve-devel] ZFS encryption

Hi Fabian, On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbich...@proxmox.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 08:45:59PM +0200, Andreas Steinel wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> are you (Proxmox staff) actively testing encrypted ZFS or are you >> wai

[pve-devel] ZFS encryption

Hi everyone, are you (Proxmox staff) actively testing encrypted ZFS or are you waiting for the upstream "activation"? -- With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Steinel M.Sc. Visual Computing M.Sc. Informatik ___ pve-devel ma

Re: [pve-devel] OAuth2 Authentication

Hi Dietmar, On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > I though OAuth2 is not even a authentication protocol, so how do you > want to implement authentication on top of OAuth2? OpenID connect? Both should work (at least with GitLab). I just tried - for another

[pve-devel] OAuth2 Authentication

Hi, Is OAuth2 on the list of features you want to have in PVE and if so, is someone working on it? We're migration step-by-step every service in our infrastructure towards OAuth2 and it would be great to authenticate against OAuth2 too. Best, Lnxbil / Andreas Steinel

Re: [pve-devel] Json reply format

-docs/api-viewer/apidoc.js With kind regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Andreas Steinel M.Sc. Visual Computing M.Sc. Informatik ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Re: [pve-devel] ZFS alternatives

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 9:08 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > As I can see, old data still keep the old parity, with MD all data are > rewritten thus making use of all disks for performance reason Yes, data has to be "resynched" manually via send/receive - same

Re: [pve-devel] ZFS alternatives

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > In example, you can add/remove single disks > You can change from any raid level to any raid level on the fly with no > downtime or loss of redundancy > You can grow /shrink a volume Good points,

Re: [pve-devel] ZFS alternatives

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 7:11 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > MD is way more flexible than zfs Please elaborate. ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com

Re: [pve-devel] ZFS alternatives

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:04 PM, Gilberto Nunes wrote: >>> proven to work for decades now and small footprint > > Yes! EXT4 for are very stable, but leak something advanced tools such as > compression, dedup and RAID... Well AFAIK, the ext4 doesn't has this >

Re: [pve-devel] git repo with PVE/API2/LXC.pm

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: > Which git repository has the file PVE/API2/LXC.pm ? > Check via dpkg: root@proxmox ~ > dpkg -S PVE/API2/LXC.pm pve-container: /usr/share/perl5/PVE/API2/LXC.pm so

Re: [pve-devel] Maximum Bind-Mounts

After a discussion on the forums [1], @fabian suggested to reopen this one. What is the current way to import a whole ZFS tree into a container? My solution was to have more bind mount devices and manually add each one of the, stupid, but easy to implement. [1]

Re: [pve-devel] istgt in Debian Stretch

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > Why not using some server with Ubuntu 16.04 which is LTS 'till 2021?? > This Ubuntu bring iSCSI Enterprise Target (iscsitarget-dkms). > I have implemented this with some customers (iscsitarget + zfs), and work >

Re: [pve-devel] istgt in Debian Stretch

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > > Proxmox only accept COMSTAR, ISTGT and IET for ZFS over iSCSI backend. > That's right? > According to the source code, yes ___ pve-devel mailing list

[pve-devel] istgt in Debian Stretch

Hi everyone, Inspired by a discussion on the forums, I tried to use istgt in Debian Stretch (iscsitarget is not present anymore) so it could work with the ZFS-over-iSCSI implementation. I'm unfamiliar with istgt in general but got it to work with tweaking the example configuration and also

Re: [pve-devel] API Return Values

Hi Adam, Will you open source your GO library? Best, Andreas ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] Allow tmpfs for vzdump temporary files

For simple container/systems is is probably OK, but I cannot backup a multiple TB system on tmpfs. Also, the backup is normally limited by CPU power or network throughput, not storage speed (at least for my machines). On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Martin Lablans

Re: [pve-devel] New feature, archive for old VMs

Hi Rickard, Not a bad idea. I "simulate" this by moving them to a specific VMID range and a specifiy pool or unpack it into my ZFS backup space. If I need to use it again, just repack the backup and restore on a PVE box. Best, Andreas On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Rickard Eriksson

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-storage 0/5] v5 fix regression and indentation

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Michael Rasmussen <m...@datanom.net> wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jun 2017 13:33:38 +0200 > Andreas Steinel <a.stei...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> You said that you do not have the required hardware, however, you do >> not need ad

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-storage 0/5] v5 fix regression and indentation

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Michael Rasmussen <m...@datanom.net> wrote: > On Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:15:25 +0200 > Andreas Steinel <a.stei...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Mi Michael, >> >> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Michael Rasmussen <m...@datanom.n

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-storage 0/5] v5 fix regression and indentation

Mi Michael, On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > MPIO is not tested since I don't have the required hardware to do so. Is there more than adding another IP to the FreeNAS machine? I've done that on a Debian-based target and it automatically logged into

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-storage 4/4] Add support for creating LXC snapshot backup

Hi mir, On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Michael Rasmussen <m...@datanom.net> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 18:54:29 +0200 > Andreas Steinel <a.stei...@gmail.com> wrote: >> And I can't see how ZFS-over-NFS would be any different than >> ZFS-over-iSCSI? Am I see this s

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-storage 4/4] Add support for creating LXC snapshot backup

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > I still dont see a usecase for this? And I can't see how ZFS-over-NFS would be any different than ZFS-over-iSCSI? Am I see this so wrong? What are the usecases for ZFS-over-iSCSI exactly?

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-storage 4/4] Add support for creating LXC snapshot backup

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > Hi Andreas, > Even better, I can sent you the deb packages? That would also work, I then can create a diff to see what you changed and try to incorporate my idea with ZFS-over-NFS.

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-storage 4/4] Add support for creating LXC snapshot backup

Hi mir, have you a public git with all the changes? I'd like to try but I don't want to extract all the patches from this list, try to figure out which ones are already taken care of and manually apply them. Best, LnxBil On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Michael Rasmussen

Re: [pve-devel] FreeNAS storage plugin

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > For containers via nfs you can just use the current nfs in freenas. Yeah, but that is not the point. I want snapshot capability inside Proxmox VE for NFS, the same as ZFS-over-iSCSI provides for iSCSI. I talked about

Re: [pve-devel] FreeNAS storage plugin

Hi mir, I'd really love to have ZFS-over-NFS for containers. I'd like to assist if you like and if you can explain how you setup your test environment. Best, Andreas Steinel (LnxBil) On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Michael Rasmussen <m...@datanom.net> wrote: > Yes, I intend to

Re: [pve-devel] Cloud-init

Also a good idea would be docker-machine support for Proxmox VE. I started a driver for that (docker vocabulary) but I'm no Go programmer, so I lost interest after a few hours of painful slow trial and error cycles. On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Gilberto Nunes

[pve-devel] Hack to circumvent the "apt-get upgrade" problem

Hi, on the forums, there are often problems regarding inproper upgrade of Proxmox VE. Maybe this can be handled better by a small hack. Unfortunately, I did not found any apt hook to fire in such a situation and I don't think it's manageable to handle this in the apt-get source package, so a

Re: [pve-devel] Pve Load Balance...

uld to automatic migrated to other node with less load... Something like > that... > Sorry if I messed up the concepts... > Perhaps you can enlight me. > > Regards > > 2017-03-01 18:25 GMT-03:00 Andreas Steinel <a.stei...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi Gilberto, >> >

Re: [pve-devel] Pve Load Balance...

Hi Gilberto, What do you want to load balance? PVE is a IaaS architecture and normally you would implement balancing on a SaaS architecture, so one layer higher (towards the application). Best, Andreas On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > Hello

Re: [pve-devel] PVE User list...

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > > No matter what you think this is the truth. > https://wiki.list.org/DOC/I%20use%20Gmail-Googlemail%2C% > 20but%20I%20can%27t%20tell%20if%20any%20of%20my%20messages%20have%20been% > 20posted%20to%20the%20list I can

Re: [pve-devel] Has somewhere checked the templates?

Hi Detlef, I really cannot understand why you do not create your own templates automatically and blame Proxmox for that. I create my own dab templates with my own mirrors and generate a whole bunch of them weekly with my settings, keys and so on for internal and external use, such that you can

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH installer] fix #1239: enhance swap on ZFS setup

Good! I presume you did not implement the variable page block size due to the "controlled kernel" you provide which always has default 4K pages on x64? On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Fabian Grünbichler < f.gruenbich...@proxmox.com> wrote: > set properties according to upstream documentation >

Re: [pve-devel] transparent huge pages support / disk passthrough corruption

- Mail original - > De: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbich...@proxmox.com> > À: "pve-devel" <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com> > Cc: "aderumier" <aderum...@odiso.com>, "Andreas Steinel" < > a.stei...@gmail.com> >

Re: [pve-devel] Question: open virtual appliance

Only some experience: I was not able easily interchange simple OVA generated from VMware with OVA generated from VirtualBox without manual intervention. If you build something that works, that should be fine. I also tried to import OVA exported from VMware into Xen and it also did not work, not

Re: [pve-devel] Container Repositories

Hi Marco, I faced a similar problem and we ended up using different storages for different groups of people like this: ZFS base and Proxmox VE with different groups, e.g. group1 rpool/group1/data (for KVM and LXC) rpool/group1/local as filesystem for templates rpool/general/local as filesystem

[pve-devel] Automatic crashkernel generation

my servers (not only Proxmox VE) and find it very useful, because it's a "when" it crashes, not an "if". For most customers, it's very important to at least report a crash back to support and it's always nice to have a crashdump ready for that. What do you guys think? Best re

Re: [pve-devel] training week : students features requests

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > > - implement a gui/tool to manage multiple clusters > That would be awesome! ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com

[pve-devel] Firewalled and masqueraded containers

Hi everyone, I do not know if this is a real bug or simply a non-documented behaviour, but If I setup a masqueraded, private bridge (e.g. with https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Network_Model#Masquerading_.28NAT.29_with_iptables) everything works as long as I do not enable firewalling for the

Re: [pve-devel] Finding VMs by hostname, not id

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Michael Rasmussen <m...@datanom.net> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 19:56:04 +0200 Andreas Steinel <a.stei...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Isn't there a chicken and egg problem now? Where is the name defined if I > > install v

Re: [pve-devel] Finding VMs by hostname, not id

VM, but we still need to identify it afterwards if you see it in the GUI. Therefore I add the IP/Hostname to the comment such that I can find it easily. On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Michael Rasmussen <m...@datanom.net> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:59:52 +0200 > Andreas Steine

Re: [pve-devel] Finding VMs by hostname, not id

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Michael Rasmussen <m...@datanom.net> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:09:48 +0200 > Andreas Steinel <a.stei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > How do you guys solve this problem in big environments? Is there a > simpler > >

[pve-devel] Finding VMs by hostname, not id

Hi, I'd like to discuss a feature request about having a "real" hostname on KVM machines or some other mechanism to solve my problem. I have a rather big environment with over a hundred KVM VMs and also different networks including different DNS settings. Currently I "encode" further VM

Re: [pve-devel] pve-manager and disk IO monitoring

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:08 PM, datanom.net <m...@datanom.net> wrote: > On 2016-10-14 11:13, Andreas Steinel wrote: >> >> So, what was your test environment? How big was the difference? >> >> Are you running your ZFS pool on the proxmox node? Yes, ev

Re: [pve-devel] pve-manager and disk IO monitoring

Hi Mir, On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > I use virio-scsi-single exclusively because of the hough performance > gain in comparison to virtio-scsi so I can concur to that. I just benchmarked it in on a full-SSD-ZFS system of mine and got reverse

Re: [pve-devel] LXC volumes on ZFS over iSCSI

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: >>>Having e.g. LXC working over NFS with ZFS on another server. > > Do you want to manage snasphot/clone on the zfs server ? Yes, the purpose is to use a ZFS-based storage on multiple nodes without iscsi. I don't

Re: [pve-devel] Two-Node HA

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > If you search the forum you will find a step guide for using a rpi as third > node. Yes, I know that. ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com

Re: [pve-devel] Two-Node HA

iously - reviewing them and documentation of this all (which I'm doing > atm). > > cheers, > Thomas > > > > On 09/28/2016 03:26 PM, Andreas Steinel wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to ask if there are any plans to use e.g. the shared storage >> as a q

[pve-devel] Two-Node HA

Hi, I'd like to ask if there are any plans to use e.g. the shared storage as a quorum/voting disk like the oracle grid infrastructure uses it to get a two node ha cluster (for almost a decade). This obviously only works for NAS or SAN storage. Best, Andreas

Re: [pve-devel] ZFS-over-NFS

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Dmitry Petuhov wrote: > Why not use qcow2 format over generic NFS? It will give you > shapshot-rollback > features and I don't think that with much worse speed than these features > on ZFS level. > I want to have send/receive also and I

Re: [pve-devel] ZFS-over-NFS

sed in a cluster. I really miss a cluster filesystem with snapshot capability (the one from Proxmox VE) which can be used by "ordinary" users. On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Michael Rasmussen <m...@datanom.net> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:52:58 +0200 > Andreas Ste

[pve-devel] ZFS-over-NFS

Hi there, are there any plans to support ZFS filesystems exported by NFS to be managed by Proxmox? I'd be very great to have ZFS-backed storage similar to ZFS-over-iSCSI but with file storage instead of block storage. Is this even a wanted feature? Best, Andreas

Re: [pve-devel] qemu-ga

It is also used for backups (e.g. filesystem freeze) which is very handy for hook-scripts. One thing I couldn't find is how long the timeout for the agent to respond is. If some hook-scripts take too long, I get timeouts while backing up. Would be great to know the limit and maybe increase it.

Re: [pve-devel] MAC address generation

Hi Wolfgang, sure. #1050 On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumil...@proxmox.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 05:26:48PM +0200, Andreas Steinel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I currently only have one big 3.4 install (>150 VMs), on which I c

Re: [pve-devel] /var/lib/vz as a dataset

I also tried that, yet depending on the order of mounting and starting of some PVE daemons, the files get recreated and then the ZFS could not be mounted again. ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com

Re: [pve-devel] Maximum Bind-Mounts

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > Not sure, but maybe http://bindfs.org/ can help here? > Could be, but fuse is not known for its speed. I'll stick with the normal bind mounts. ___ pve-devel mailing list

Re: [pve-devel] Maximum Bind-Mounts

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > Because ZFS filesystems are cheap and should be used everywhere ... at > > least as I have read. > > But such setup it is really clumsy for container as long > as there is no recursive bind mount. > Unfortunately,

Re: [pve-devel] Maximum Bind-Mounts

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > I have a filesystem called images with child filesystems of each year > going > > back to the 80s. > > And what is the purpose of such setup? Wouldn't it be simpler to merge > those old child file systems into a

Re: [pve-devel] Maximum Bind-Mounts

Hi Dietmar, On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > > > I needed more (bind of ZFS filesystem with a lot of children) so I > > increased the maximum in /usr/share/perl5/PVE/LXC/Config.pm and it worked > > fine. > > Would you mind to explain why you need more

[pve-devel] Maximum Bind-Mounts

Hi, is there a reason for a the maximum of 10 bind mounts for lxc? I needed more (bind of ZFS filesystem with a lot of children) so I increased the maximum in /usr/share/perl5/PVE/LXC/Config.pm and it worked fine. Best, Andreas ___ pve-devel mailing

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH 1/2] add hugepages option

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: > >>Also, allocation 1GB pages may can fail due to fragmentation, while > >>allocation of 2MB pages still work? > > yes. > But this is a little bit more complex to manage. > In my experience, it always works, but

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH 1/2] add hugepages option

Normally hugepages are setup via sysctl.conf. Default size is always 2 MB. No need for kernel commandline editing. Why exactly are you using hugepages? Can KVM handle hugepages? Normally hugepages implies no KSM, isn't that right? On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Dietmar Maurer

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] Force CPU vendor

The host vendor. This is strange if it is presented as pentium, but is indeed AMD. On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote: > Thanks for the patch! > > I am curios - what does qemu use if we do not set that flag? > >

[pve-devel] [PATCH] Force CPU vendor

Signed-off-by: Andreas Steinel <a.stei...@gmail.com> --- PVE/QemuServer.pm | 22 ++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm index 0e3a95e..670cf90 100644 --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm @@ -3076,6 +3076,28

[pve-devel] FYI: occational kernel crash - patch on its way

Hi all, I don't know if this is news or not, but I encountered this problem once a week for a couple of weeks and finally, there is hope. Hopefully the patch will be available soon in the upstream ubuntu kernel. https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4355 Best, Andreas

Re: [pve-devel] Speed up PVE Backup

Hi Stefan, That's really slow. I use a similar setup, but with ZFS and I backup 6 nodes in parallel to the storage and saturate the 1 GBit network connection. I use LZOP on the Proxmox-side as best tradeoff between size and online-compression speed. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Stefan

Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] add ovmf uefi roms support

Nice! On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Alexandre Derumier wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier > --- > PVE/QemuServer.pm | 16 > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm > index

[pve-devel] iPXE Update

Hi, I run into the PXE-Boot-DHCP-Problem which can be solved by a more recent version of the ipxe stack in qemu. ( http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/19306-PXE-booting-VMs-not-working?p=120764#post120764 ) Booting iPXE CD works just fine and I used the git version of today to build the

Re: [pve-devel] Feature request: LDAP non-anonymous bind

Hi all, Due to the lack of non-anonymous bind, i solved it by building a replicating ldap instance only bind to localhost on each proxmox node. This is a pain in the ass and very error prone - especially on schema changes, which have to be propagated to all nodes. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:57

[pve-devel] vma storage format

ant to add the requirement of 4K block aligned storage in backup.txt which would really be another big advantage of the vma backup mechanism. Best regards, Andreas Steinel ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/li

Re: [pve-devel] disabling transparent hugepage by default like kernel 2.6.32 ?

Hi, In my benchmarks, THP increase the memory transaction speed by 5-10% in the KVM guest if THP is activated on the host side, not in the VM side. I know that THP for databases is bad, but we are not using THP in the guest where the database lives. Can someone provide some benchmarks for that

Re: [pve-devel] disabling transparent hugepage by default like kernel 2.6.32 ?

h, good to known. > > How much memory do you use it your vm ? what is the database software ? > > - Mail original - > De: "Andreas Steinel" <a.stei...@gmail.com> > À: "Daniel Hunsaker" <danhunsa...@gmail.com> > Cc: "aderumier"

[pve-devel] Patch for 'qm list' to compute display size according to maximum vm names

0001-Adding-size-dependended-resizing-of-the-list-output.patch Description: Binary data ___ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Re: [pve-devel] Proxmox directly on LVM2 possible?

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote: lvm2 is the default setup for PVE, so this is known to work well. Maybe it's also a wheezy+install problem. I never encountered it using the proxmox installer, always a wheezy-upgrade-issue.

Re: [pve-devel] High Performance SSH

A little bit off-topic, but there is hope: This week, I almost saturated a 1 Gbit network link between two brand new Dell Servers with 3.2 GHz Xeon E5-2667v3 CPUs. I got 105 MB/sec using standard SSH/SCP. So we finally have single-thread-performance that is fast enough for encryption on gigabit.

[pve-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Adding missing build dependencies

From abd7074f79361f300683e92d7ed58d9302302f7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Steinel a.stei...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 14:02:35 + Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Adding missing build dependencies --- debian/control |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [pve-devel] Floppy-Support

It works directly with my unattend xml file (Windows 8.1). That's very nice. Thank you! I'll try server editions next week. On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Andreas Steinel a.stei...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you very much Alexandre. Will try that next week. On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:07 PM

Re: [pve-devel] Floppy-Support

/shutdown then create template in proxmox Then you can clone your template. (I'm doing like this for all my windows vms) - Mail original - De: Andreas Steinel a.stei...@gmail.com À: aderumier aderum...@odiso.com Cc: Martin Maurer mar...@proxmox.com, pve-devel pve-devel

  1   2   >