On 05/08/2011 02:53 PM, Gustavo Kuerten wrote:
Armin,
My example is not equivalent to the actual test.
But here is the snippet from test_pypackrat.py
def test_leftrecursion(self):
class parser(PackratParser):
b: b 'a' | 'b';
Hi Ram,
On 05/03/2011 01:25 PM, cool-RR wrote:
In my project I made an `abstract_static_method` class:
https://github.com/cool-RR/GarlicSim/blob/master/garlicsim/garlicsim/general_misc/abc_tools.py#L7
Hi all,
anybody has an idea what the state of PyPy's standard library is? I
assume it's at the state of CPython 2.7, right?
Then there is the branch merge-stdlib, which seems to merge in the
2.7.1 changes. Why are all the modified directories deleted there?
Carl Friedrich
On 04/20/2011 12:51 AM, Ian Overgard wrote:
Thanks, that definitely helped. I forgot you could run arbitrary python
before the entry point.
I've got it parsing now, but the one issue I'm still running into is
that the syntax tree that comes back has a lot of junk nodes. The
ToAST.transform
On 04/11/2011 02:45 PM, p...@pocketnix.org wrote:
Hi again
i have been compiling a bunch of different pypy instances with different
levels of optimizations and features and found that if i run pypy-c
from the current directory and dont specify a new output filename it
will attempt to and
On 04/05/2011 03:54 PM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Andrew Brownbrow...@gmail.com wrote:
I corrected a typo and changed the wording in 2 places. They're not any huge
deals, but if you want to edit the post, see my changes here:
On 04/06/2011 04:03 PM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Hmm, looks like the line numbers for the JIT trace output are
mis-aligned, although it may just be my browser (Chrome beta). Looks
fine in Firefox. Oh well.
Can you re-load? I tried to fix it.
Carl Friedrich
On 04/04/2011 10:28 PM, Andrew Brown wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Antonio Cuni anto.c...@gmail.com
mailto:anto.c...@gmail.com wrote:
sure, I think that for this example, using fd is fine.
Btw, in case you want to do more with pypy, having a look to rlib
might be a
On 04/04/2011 04:12 PM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Submitted for everyone's approval, I've written a draft of a pypy
tutorial going over everything I learned in writing this example
interpreter.
https://bitbucket.org/brownan/pypy-tutorial/src
See the main document at tutorial.rst
On 04/04/2011 05:43 PM, Andrew Brown wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Carl Friedrich Bolz cfb...@gmx.de
mailto:cfb...@gmx.de wrote:
Looks very nice! Would you be up to making a guest post out of this on
the PyPy blog?
Sure! What needs to be done to turn it into a blog post
On 03/09/2011 11:30 PM, Timothy Baldridge wrote:
I know rlib has a regex module, but it seems to be limited to only
recognizing characters and not returning groups. Is there a full
featured regex parser somewhere that is supported by rpython?
Are you just interested in the parser or also in a
Hi Holger,
On 03/01/2011 07:42 PM, holger krekel wrote:
I just turned
http://codespeak.net/svn/pypy/extradoc
as well as the internal pypy-z repository READ-ONLY.
Thanks to Ronny's conversion work we now have these repositories at
bitbucket.org:
On 02/26/2011 01:03 PM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Laura,
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Laura Creightonl...@openend.se wrote:
I don't care about the old versions of binary files.
That was the only thing we talked about -- as far as I understood, it
was never suggested that we should stop
On 02/25/2011 10:36 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote:
this night i started taking a look at the extra repos that need to be
migrated.
many of them contain reconstructible, but large pdf files, that i'd like
to kill off for saving space.
this shouldn't be a problem as long as the svn that many
On 02/17/2011 03:23 PM, holger krekel wrote:
i'd like to continue consolidation of PyPy repositories (and more generally
pypy services but that in a separate mail).
Thanks to Ronny Pfannschmidt, sponsorship from merlinux (my company), and work
from Armin, Anto and others the main PyPy
Hi all,
I think we should consider sending a paper to ICOOOLPS this year again,
see call for papers below.
Carl Friedrich
--
Call For Papers for the sixth annual workshop on Implementation,
Compilation, Optimization of Object-Oriented Languages, Programs and
Systems (ICOOOLPS) to be held
On 02/15/2011 11:54 AM, Laura Creighton wrote:
In a message of Tue, 15 Feb 2011 02:57:21 CST, Stephen Simmons writes:
Hi...
I have just started following the PyPy mailing list and am interested in
getting involved in some small way.
Are there any European sprints planned in the
On 02/15/2011 12:51 PM, Laura Creighton wrote:
In a message of Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:36:43 +0100, Antonio Cuni writes:
snip
Anyway, back to the original topic: what would python offer more than jav
a for
android?
ciao,
Anto
As some of you saw in Leysin, I own one of these.
On Saturday, February 5, 2011, Christian Tismer tis...@stackless.com
wrote:
Ah, we do get a warning, that is good, did not know.
Anyway, the concept of RPython is pretty old, since we needed
something that is treatable. And RPython is a good compromise
for most things.
Meanwhile, a lot of
On 01/17/2011 12:30 PM, Konrad Delong wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently finishing up my master thesis. In it, I'd like to
mention PyPy, but I think I need references to a couple of statements
in order... well... not to lie :)
So here it is:
1. PyPy is based on an approach first used in
On 01/11/2011 04:48 PM, Nathanael D. Jones wrote:
As far as the discussion regarding PyPy's capabilities with
multiple-sandboxing, reloading, and continuation serialization go, I
think that is a relevant discussion for this forum.
I'm still very interested in understanding (a) what PyPy can
On 12/27/2010 07:00 AM, Dima Tisnek wrote:
(dan) random binary trees: O(log2(n)) is 7.2 for builtins, though the
constant factor for locks, etc, might make it worthwhile
(paolo) non blocking hash maps: memory barriers can be quite costly too
different options will have to be implemented and
Hi David,
On 12/14/2010 01:57 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
The attached patch is an attempt at extending the C code generator so
that it annotates the generated .c code with file/line information for
the corresponding Python sources.
Method:
I followed the instructions in
Hi Miquel,
On 12/13/2010 09:20 AM, Miquel Torres wrote:
So the remaining descriptions are
ai
slowspitfire (what is the exact difference between the three spitfire
benches?)
The difference is the way the final string is built, using cstringio, or
other means. I guess Maciek knows the
Hi Alex,
On 11/29/2010 09:02 PM, Alex A. Naanou wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 21:46, Carl Friedrich Bolzcfb...@gmx.de wrote:
[snip]
a) lots of attributes, which we expect to be rare
b) access them with setattr, which is a lot slower than a fixed attribute
c) access a different
On 11/29/2010 02:04 PM, wlavrij...@lbl.gov wrote:
Hi,
with the Reflex branch, and the fast path enabled, I sometimes run into
pbs with doubles in libffi. Sometimes the results are wrong, sometimes
there's a crash, and sometimes there's:
self =C object ffi_cif (opaque) at 0xbfb8848
Hi Wim,
On 11/29/2010 02:17 PM, wlavrij...@lbl.gov wrote:
Could you check in a test that shows the behaviour so that I can
reproduce that? It is definitely possible that there is a bug in one of
the layers that has nothing to do with cppyy.
simply run:
$ cd pypy/module/cppyy/test
$
Hi Alex,
On 11/29/2010 03:04 PM, Alex A. Naanou wrote:
With the release of version 1.4, I decided to test these usecases out
and benchmark them on PyPy and 15 minutes later I got results that
were surprising to say the least...
Expectations:
1) the normal/native namespace should have been a
Hi Wim, hi all,
On 11/25/2010 01:32 AM, wlavrij...@lbl.gov wrote:
so I'm revising my numbers after finding out that I was using a debug
version
of ROOT/Reflex ...
PyROOT: 48.6
PyCintex: 50.2
pypy-c: 5.5
C++: 0.05
I did some benchmarks with the new fast path that I just added, it gives
On 11/24/2010 01:13 AM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
I've created a branch at http://codespeak.net/svn/pypy/branch/gdbm and
made the proposed changes in it.
I took the liberty of creating an attic directory to put dbm.py in.
Any reason not to just delete dbm.py? This attic stuff is annoying, and
if
On 11/23/2010 09:48 PM, wlavrij...@lbl.gov wrote:
I've been banging my head on the error below. I've removed the references
to lltype.direct_ptradd in my code that I'm aware of, but that didn't do
the trick.
I told the JIT not to look into TypeConverter._get_fieldptr, see
revision 79444.
On 11/01/2010 06:02 PM, Christian Tismer wrote:
On 10/1/10 11:31 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi all!
Düsseldorf PyPy sprint October 25th-31st 2010
=
...
Hi Armin,
this became a trap for me.
The PyPy sprints were always listed in the sprint
Hi Amaury,
On 09/15/2010 01:11 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
2010/9/15 Saravanan Shanmughamsa...@yahoo.com:
I don't expect this python compiler to be for full python but just a
Restricted
statically typed subset of python as defined by Shedskin.
Yes. JIT annotation may not serve the
Hi Andy,
On 09/13/2010 06:18 PM, Andy wrote:
OK let me make sure I got it right:
PyPy-JIT does not work with pypy-stackless. I'm mostly interested in
greenlet, not stackless python. Is pypy-stackless required for
greenlet support?
Looks like you're saying PyPy-JIT doesn't support greenlet
Registration for S3 - A Workshop on Self-Sustaining Systems is now open.
http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/hirschfeld/s3/s3-10/
We hope you will join us on September 27-28 in Tokyo.
Invited speakers:
• Takashi Ikegami: Sustainable Autonomy and Designing Mind Time
(The University of
--- Program committee ---
Carl Friedrich Bolz, University of Duesseldorf, Germany
Johan Brichau, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Shigeru Chiba, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
Brian Demsky, University of California, Irvine, USA
Marcus Denker, INRIA Lille, France
Richard P. Gabriel, IBM
On 07/27/2010 03:42 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Hello.
According to current buildbot status, both osx and win machines are
offline. No clue how to get them back. Anyway, our OS X machine is
unable to translate pypy, so it's not exactly the best buildbot ever.
Can anyone contribute any
Hi Brett,
On 07/24/2010 11:06 AM, Hart's Antler wrote:
http://pastebin.com/UhnEurqb
Nice. Did you also see this?:
http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2009/11/using-cpython-extension-modules-with.html
I guess it could be used for GTK as well.
BTW, I guess if we ever wanted real GTK support, without
Hi Paolo,
On 07/02/2010 02:08 PM, Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
Unsupported claim is for example that fast interpreters are 10x
slower than C.
That's the only unsupported claim, but it comes from The Structure
and Performance of Efficient Interpreters. I studied that as a
student on VM, you are
Hi all,
I think this conference could be interesting to us:
http://www.cgo.org/cgo2011/call_papers.html
From the call for papers:
* Techniques for efficient execution of dynamically typed languages
Deadline is 15 of September.
Cheers,
Carl Friedric
Hi all,
just wanted to point this Master thesis using PyPy out:
http://www.diku.dk/english/Calendar/masters_defence_soeren/
Didn't know about this, but interesting anyway.
Cheers,
Carl Friedrich
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
On 06/28/2010 05:51 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Carl Friedrich Bolzcfb...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi all,
just wanted to point this Master thesis using PyPy out:
http://www.diku.dk/english/Calendar/masters_defence_soeren/
Didn't know about this, but interesting
(Viewpoints Research Institute, USA)
kim.r...@vpri.org
--- Program committee ---
Carl Friedrich Bolz, University of Duesseldorf, Germany
Johan Brichau, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Shigeru Chiba, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
Brian Demsky, University of California, Irvine, USA
Hi Miquel,
On 04/20/2010 07:14 PM, Miquel Torres wrote:
Changes you may notice are geared towards easing the identification of
the cause of performance changes:
- Std deviation was added to the DB, overview table and timeline
tooltips. This way we can rule out fluctuations in the measuring as
On 04/12/2010 04:20 PM, René Dudfield wrote:
cool. Just a little note... On ARM they are faster with the combo of
jager+tracing http://arewefastyet.com/?machine=3
I read the graphs differently: Both on ARM and on the default machine
the orange line (tracing) is a bit below the purple line
Hi all,
Just wanted to point out the website Mozilla is using to track their
JIT's progress (it's quite a bit less polished then what we have, but
still):
http://arewefastyet.com/
As a reference jaeger refers to the new per-method JIT compiler
Mozilla is writing, that is supposed to run
Hi Armin,
On 03/23/2010 10:43 PM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Can we decide if the following branches have been merged, are useful
enough to be merged, need more work, maybe one day, are very outdated,
or turned out just to be a plain bad idea? The numbers are the rev
number of the last change.
Hi Waldemar,
2010/3/13 Waldemar Kornewald wkornew...@freenet.de:
Hi,
maybe I'm doing something totally wrong, but the attached trivial
benchmark runs several times slower than on CPython. I've tested it
with the Windows binary from your website. Your other benchmarks run
fast, BTW. Is there
Hi Armin,
On 03/03/2010 10:14 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:15:19PM +0100, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
kept and move them elsewhere? We plan to shut Cobra down on the 19th of
February, if somebody cannot make it till then, please send me a mail.
Cobra is still around
On 02/25/2010 11:39 PM, Jacob Hallén wrote:
Thursday 25 February 2010 you wrote:
Hi Carl,
error bars are certainly doable and supported by the plot lib. The
only problem is that my backend model doesn't include such a field, so
at the moment the data (which is certainly included in the json
On 02/26/2010 10:59 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Carl Friedrich Bolz, 25.02.2010 18:38:
On 02/25/2010 04:10 PM, Miquel Torres wrote:
As some of you already know, there is a new performance site online:
speed.pypy.org.
[...]
I'm quite impressed, this is very cool work and a good improvement over
On 02/26/2010 12:30 PM, Miquel Torres wrote:
The paper is right, and the unladen swallow runner does the right thing.
What I meant was: use the statistically right method (like we are
doing now!), but don't show deviation bars if the deviation is
acceptable. Check after the run whether the
On 02/26/2010 01:30 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Carl Friedrich Bolz, 26.02.2010 11:25:
http://buytaert.net/files/oopsla07-georges.pdf
It's sad that the paper doesn't try to understand *why* others use
different ways to benchmark.
I guess those others should write their own papers (or blog posts
Hi all,
we need to do some server restructuring at the university and in the
process need to use Cobra for other things (we will get some other
machine back after the reshuffling). Sorry about the disturbance. Could
people please check their home directories for things that need to be
kept
” of their contributions.
Submission page is https://www.easychair.org/login.cgi?conf=dyla10
Organizers
- Alexandre Bergel, Univ of Chile,
- Carl Friedrich Bolz, Heinrich-Heine-Univ, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Simon Denier, INRIA Lille, France
- Michael Haupt, HPI Potsdam, Germany
- Adrian Kuhn, Univ of Bern
Hi Jean-Paul,
On 01/10/2010 05:55 PM, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
I just checked in an implementation of os.openpty:
https://codespeak.net/viewvc/?view=revrevision=70477
It's not all that exciting (unless you were missing it before), but it's
my first PyPy commit in a while so I
On 12/11/2009 12:41 PM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Hakan,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:12:41AM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
OK I didn't know. It seems to me that it could be useful more
generally... But if you're not interested I'll keep this stuff
elsewhere somehow...
Indeed, the current situation
Hi all,
this has been discussed a few times in the past, but I actually started
on this today. The idea is to no longer have the various non-Python
implementations in the pypy/trunk/pypy/lang part of svn, as a first step
of having a less monolithic PyPy source tree. Instead I made a new
On 11/11/2009 06:07 PM, Fiedzia wrote:
Out of curiosity i tried to use pypy to run diesel
(http://dieselweb.org/lib/).
For some reason pypy in trunk doesn't add OutputType property in cStringIO
(perhaps it needs some installation or postprocessing because this property
is mentioned in
Hi Samuele,
Samuele Pedroni wrote:
Given that py.lib 1.0 final is out, I think it makes sense to switch
pypy active branches starting from trunk to use an external pointing to
that.
I've thought about this as well, makes sense to me! I guess at a later
point we can also think about using
Hi all,
just wanted to remind that we are asked to submit the Europython slides
in advance, I think the date was March 22nd (?). Unfortunately I am
quite ill, so won't be able to help much with this (I need to get better
to actually make it to the conference at all).
Cheers,
Carl Friedrich
Hi Laura,
Laura Creighton wrote:
In a message of Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:07:13 +0200, Carl Friedrich Bolz writes:
just wanted to remind that we are asked to submit the Europython slides
in advance, I think the date was March 22nd (?). Unfortunately I am
quite ill, so won't be able to help much
Laura Creighton wrote:
Who wants to be on it? This question is not limited to PyPyers --
I suspect that Frank Wierzbicki would like to be on this.
I would like to be on the panel.
Cheers,
Carl Friedrich
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
As usual with such products, we don't know if they implemented 100%
python or 99%.
Can they run existing apps?
Basically, the whitepaper as it is, is not a scientific experiment
because one is
unable to reproduce results. I would simply ignore it until someone
alan yung wrote:
Thanks and sorry about the link.
The right link is http://paste.pocoo.org/show/119296/ this.
What I'm trying to do there is this:
In the freeze() function, I want to stop executing the current python
function, and copy the (python) frame stack, and unroll the python
==
Birmingham (UK) EuroPython PyPy Sprints 28-29 June/ 3-4 July 2009
==
The PyPy team is sprinting at EuroPython again. This year there are
`sprint days`_ before (28-29
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
A while ago, fijal and I were discussing how annoying it is to have to
update stablecompiler every time one touches the AST of PyPy's
compiler. He suggested that it had served its purpose and can now be
deleted. That makes sense to me. Opinions?
I agree, although
Niko Matsakis wrote:
On Apr 20, 2009, at 8:36 PM, Jacob Hallén wrote:
I think this formulation is a bit confusing. It is not our speed
that is 0.8-2x CPython, it is our performance relative to CPython
that is between 0.8 and 2, with 0.8 meaning that we are faster than
CPython on those
Jacob Hallén wrote:
söndagen den 19 april 2009 skrev Samuele Pedroni:
- Through a large number of tweaks, performance has been improved by
10%-50% since the 1.0 release. The Python interpreter is now between
0.8-2x (and in some corner case 3-4x) of the speed of CPython. A large
Hi Donny,
Donny Viszneki wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Carl Friedrich Bolz cfb...@gmx.de wrote:
today we removed the LLVM and the JS backends from the trunk. Both were
not really maintained anymore, there usefulness was limited and there
tests were mostly skipped. The people
Hi,
inhahe wrote:
Hi, I overheard on the irc channel about 'mentoring', where someone who
knows pypy acts as a mentor to bring someone else into deep knowledge of
it, i'm assuming so they can work on pypy.
I guess what you read was about the Summer-of-Code mentors.
i'm not asking for a
Hi all,
today we removed the LLVM and the JS backends from the trunk. Both were
not really maintained anymore, there usefulness was limited and there
tests were mostly skipped. The people at the sprint decided that it
would be best to remove them from the repository so that they are not
part
Hi Niko,
Niko Matsakis wrote:
Due to the enormous time demands on my PhD, I've been out of touch
lately! I follow from the blog though :) and it seems like you guys
have been doing great work.
When do you plan to finish the PhD?
I am hoping to attend the sprint in Leysin. I would be
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:41, Ben Mellor cum...@netspace.net.au wrote:
Does anyone know why
lambda x, y: x % y
is being converted to a flow graph as:
v2 = int_mod(x_0, y_0)
v1 = int_add(v2, [int_mul([int_and([cast_bool_to_int([int_le([int_xor(x_0,
Hi all,
in case we ever get more serious about our JS interpreter, there seems
to be a pure-Python port of the JavaScript parser of the
Narcissus-project here:
http://code.google.com/p/pynarcissus/
Automatic semicolon insertion included.
Cheers,
Carl Friedrich
Hi Paolo,
Happy new year!
I am getting back to one of the points that Anto has made which you
dismissed. I still think that it is the central one to explain why we
don't think that threaded interpretation is the panacea that you think
it is.
Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 14:23,
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
after the completion of our student project, I have enough experience
to say something more.
We wrote in C an interpreter for a Python subset and we could make it
much faster than the Python interpreter (50%-60% faster). That was due
to the usage of indirect
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Or in pypy/lib ...
you can implement it using ctypes, should be super simple :-)
why using ctypes? I don't think cpython's _csv is using any library.
It's just done in C to be faster. So a pure-python implementaiton is fine.
Cheers,
Carl Friedrich
Hi!
Bartosz SKOWRON wrote:
Fijal asked me to write about possibility of making a sprint in Wroclaw.
There is a possibility to set a sprint at Wroclaw University of
Technology campus for free. But we have a chance to reserve a class
only during winter break. This period is between 30.01 -
Hi Daniel,
sorry for the late response.
Daniel Furrer wrote:
As part of an advanced compiler design course at our university (ETH
Zurich), we have to implement an optimization (or various thereof).
I've spoken with a couple of people who are, like me, very fascinated by
Python.
So I would
Hi David,
David Wilson wrote:
I just read about this on the PyPy status blog and find myself
wondering about the strategies you considered before settling on the
Reflex approach.
I've had an extension to ctypes in mind for quite some time that
involves simply leaving the debugging segments
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on 2.5 compatibility branch right now. Due to incompatible
changes, I suggest that we say we don't provide --pyversion option any
more and simply compile 2.5 compatible interpreter. I
Hi and welcome!
Calen Pennington wrote:
I've been intrigued by pypy for a while =, but haven't really been
able to find a good place to start contributing on my own, so I was
wondering if anyone had suggestions. As far as what I'm interested in,
I'd really like to see pypy be more accessible
Vetoshkin Nikita wrote:
Playing with py.execnet failes too. Full traceback attached.
It seems you are running py.execnet on py.py. Why? py.execnet is rather
independent on PyPy and works fine on CPython.
Cheers,
Carl Friedrich
___
Vetoshkin Nikita wrote:
Thanks!
I thought it should work on top of PyPy doesn't it?
It probably should, but on py.py it is bound to be slow and I am not
sure it works that on the remote site a py.py is started correctly.
Anyway, if you work on py.execnet for helping the translation process
then
Bruno Gola wrote:
Sorry, the right traceback: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/82667/
Anyway, mwhudson pointed that it's maybe a bug in checkFlag() (that
wasn't called until now). It returns 1 or None. Trying to translate
again.
checkFlag was rather silly, it should just return a boolean, but it
Hi Bruno (ccing pypy-dev)!
Bruno Gola wrote:
After having some problems I finished PEP 328 and I'm starting to work
on stdlib now.
However, there is one test that's still failing and I can't fix it :(.
It's in interpreter/test/test_nestedscope.py (lambda_in_genexpr), any
hints?
No clue
holger krekel wrote:
would be good to rename the --faassen option sometime soon
Martijn asked us multiple times already for it. What about
--cheetah or --falcon? other suggestions?
I don't really like --falcon, falcons can only be that fast when flying
downwards (crashing?). How about
Hi Armin,
Armin Rigo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:31:36AM -0300, Bruno Gola wrote:
I'm writing code to support the new 2.5 generator stuff (PEP 342) and
while working on that I found a code that verifies the magic number
(in pyframe.py). The default magic in PyPy is the Python2.4 one,
Hi all,
just wanted to note that the braintone logs seem to work at the moment,
so you can read the as a stopgap measure here:
http://merlinux.de/braintone/chat.freenode.net/pypy/last/50/
The format is not so nice, so I would actually really like pybot back :-).
Cheers,
Carl Friedrich
Hi all,
seems that the video recordings of S3 are available:
http://www.swa.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/s3/program/
The talk slides of the talk I gave there can be found here:
http://codespeak.net/svn/pypy/extradoc/talk/s3-2008/talk.pdf
The paper that we submitted can be found here:
Maciek Fijalkowski wrote:
what about making flow objspace understand xxx and XXX as global
variables that always raise XxxError() instead of exploding? would
simplify translation greatly.
weell. That sounds like an extreme hack to me. Maybe we should do
something else, like 'assert 0,
Gary Robinson wrote:
I saw the suggestion A good project would be to give the 386 backend
a good refactoring, simplifying it, then add support for missing
features like floating-point arithmetic. on the list of PyPy
independent project suggestions.
I'm wondering two things:
1) Is it
Leonardo Santagada wrote:
On 17/03/2008, at 13:23, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
What do you all think of these ideas? Are there other ideas around? I
know that Jakub posted something a while ago (haven't looked in detail
yet, though). In my opinion we should try to avoid yet another
incomplete
Hi all,
there was some discussion about possible Summer of Code topics on the
#pypy channel today. We had several project ideas:
- work on the JIT assembler backends. There are several possible
projects here, like writing a much simpler i386 backend and adding
float support to that; or
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
- Anto proposed to make the javascript backendopt more useful by
^ should be backend,
___
pypy-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
Stephan Diehl wrote:
Hi all,
just found this (at reddit, what a time waster :-) ):
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2008/03/03/Python-at-Sun
At the end, he's saying:
Quick Python trivia question: Near as I can tell, Guido works half-time on
Python over at Google. Is there anyone in
Jacob Hallén wrote:
onsdagen den 20 februari 2008 skrev Chris Lamb:
Laura Creighton wrote:
Interested Lurkers, as it were. Are there any of you out there? Does
this sound like something any of you are interested in?
It sounds very interesting, but it seems that projects must be contributed
Samuele Pedroni wrote:
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
I am not sure it is practical to put parts of PyPy under this agreement.
Which parts would that be? All of it (which would be hard, since we need
to find all contributors and have them sign it)? Only the new bits which
are rather useless
Jacob Hallén wrote:
onsdagen den 20 februari 2008 skrev Carl Friedrich Bolz:
Samuele Pedroni wrote:
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
I am not sure it is practical to put parts of PyPy under this agreement.
Which parts would that be? All of it (which would be hard, since we need
to find all
1 - 100 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
